Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Contextual Materiality & Discovery Rights in Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit Rejects the “Total-Eclipse” Standard in Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust v. Maiden Holdings Ltd.

Contextual Materiality & Discovery Rights in Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit Rejects the “Total-Eclipse” Standard in Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust v. Maiden Holdings Ltd.

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Contextual Materiality & Discovery Rights in Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit Rejects the “Total-Eclipse” Standard in Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust v. Maiden Holdings Ltd....
United States v. Rose: Refining “Good-Cause” and Reliability Standards for Hearsay in Supervised-Release Revocations

United States v. Rose: Refining “Good-Cause” and Reliability Standards for Hearsay in Supervised-Release Revocations

Date: Aug 25, 2025
United States v. Rose: Refining “Good-Cause” and Reliability Standards for Hearsay in Supervised-Release Revocations 1. Introduction United States v. Carl Rose, No. 24-2274 (3d Cir. Aug. 20 2025),...
Parole Rescission Challenges Must Proceed Under § 2254: Fifth Circuit Extends AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation and Exhaustion Requirements to State Prisoners Questioning Parole Board Action

Parole Rescission Challenges Must Proceed Under § 2254: Fifth Circuit Extends AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation and Exhaustion Requirements to State Prisoners Questioning Parole Board Action

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Parole Rescission Challenges Must Proceed Under § 2254: Fifth Circuit Extends AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation and Exhaustion Requirements to State Prisoners Questioning Parole Board Action Introduction...
No Resignation by Conduct: Sixth Circuit Clarifies That Share Transfers Alone Do Not Remove Directors or Officers under Kentucky Law – Commentary on C-Ville Fabricating, Inc. v. Tarter

No Resignation by Conduct: Sixth Circuit Clarifies That Share Transfers Alone Do Not Remove Directors or Officers under Kentucky Law – Commentary on C-Ville Fabricating, Inc. v. Tarter

Date: Aug 25, 2025
No Resignation by Conduct: Sixth Circuit Clarifies That Share Transfers Alone Do Not Remove Directors or Officers under Kentucky Law Commentary on C-Ville Fabricating, Inc. v. Joshua Tarter, 25 F.4th...
“From Vitamins to Drugs” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies Unauthorized-Medication Exclusion in Equine Mortality Policies

“From Vitamins to Drugs” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies Unauthorized-Medication Exclusion in Equine Mortality Policies

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“From Vitamins to Drugs” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies Unauthorized-Medication Exclusion in Equine Mortality Policies 1. Introduction Cypress Creek Equine, LLC v. North American Specialty Insurance Co.,...
“Sand Tires ≠ Street Tires” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Off-Road ATVs Are Not “Motor Vehicles” for Auto-Policy or Michigan No-Fault Coverage

“Sand Tires ≠ Street Tires” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Off-Road ATVs Are Not “Motor Vehicles” for Auto-Policy or Michigan No-Fault Coverage

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Sand Tires ≠ Street Tires” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Off-Road ATVs Are Not “Motor Vehicles” for Auto-Policy or Michigan No-Fault Coverage Introduction Laurie Leitch’s summer ride on a Polaris...
No Bivens Remedy Against ICE Agents for Immigration-Related Fourth or Fifth Amendment Violations: A Commentary on Enriquez-Perdomo v. Newman

No Bivens Remedy Against ICE Agents for Immigration-Related Fourth or Fifth Amendment Violations: A Commentary on Enriquez-Perdomo v. Newman

Date: Aug 25, 2025
No Bivens Remedy Against ICE Agents for Immigration-Related Fourth or Fifth Amendment Violations: A Commentary on Riccy Mabel Enriquez-Perdomo v. Ricardo A. Newman, 6th Cir. (2025) 1. Introduction In...
“Not Every Toker Is a Trigger-Puller”: The Eleventh Circuit Declares that State-Compliant Medical-Marijuana Users Are Not Automatically Disarmed under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)

“Not Every Toker Is a Trigger-Puller”: The Eleventh Circuit Declares that State-Compliant Medical-Marijuana Users Are Not Automatically Disarmed under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Not Every Toker Is a Trigger-Puller”: The Eleventh Circuit Declares that State-Compliant Medical-Marijuana Users Are Not Automatically Disarmed under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) 1. Introduction Florida...
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the “Schuurman Rule”: 30-Day Appeal Clock Begins on the Amendment Deadline, Not on Later Clerk-Entered Judgment

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the “Schuurman Rule”: 30-Day Appeal Clock Begins on the Amendment Deadline, Not on Later Clerk-Entered Judgment

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the “Schuurman Rule”: 30-Day Appeal Clock Begins on the Amendment Deadline, Not on Later Clerk-Entered Judgment Introduction Richard Burt, a tenured English professor at...
Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms “Spoofing = Fraud” — United States v. Gregg Smith et al. (2025)

Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms “Spoofing = Fraud” — United States v. Gregg Smith et al. (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms “Spoofing = Fraud” United States v. Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak & Christopher Jordan (2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Gregg Smith, Nos. 23-2840, 23-2846 & 23-2849,...
“Spoofing” as a Stand-Alone Scheme to Defraud: A Commentary on United States v. Gregg Smith et al., 7th Cir. 2025

“Spoofing” as a Stand-Alone Scheme to Defraud: A Commentary on United States v. Gregg Smith et al., 7th Cir. 2025

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Spoofing” as a Stand-Alone Scheme to Defraud: United States v. Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak & Christopher Jordan, Seventh Circuit 2025 Introduction United States v. Gregg Smith consolidates three...
“Spoofing Equals Fraud” – The Seventh Circuit’s Definitive Pronouncement in United States v. Smith (2025)

“Spoofing Equals Fraud” – The Seventh Circuit’s Definitive Pronouncement in United States v. Smith (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Spoofing Equals Fraud” – The Seventh Circuit’s Definitive Pronouncement in United States v. Gregg Smith (2025) Introduction In United States v. Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak & Christopher Jordan, Nos....
Fourth Circuit Holds that the First-Amendment “Unfettered-Discretion” Doctrine Does Not Constrain a Governor’s Clemency Power to Restore Voting Rights – A Commentary on George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin (2025)

Fourth Circuit Holds that the First-Amendment “Unfettered-Discretion” Doctrine Does Not Constrain a Governor’s Clemency Power to Restore Voting Rights – A Commentary on George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
First Amendment Licensing Rules Stop at the Executive Door: A Comprehensive Commentary on George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin, 92 F.4th ___ (4th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In George Hawkins v. Glenn...
Shumate v. Lynchburg: Fourth Circuit Clarifies the Non-Applicability of Eleventh-Amendment Immunity to Municipal Officials and Reinforces § 1367 Discretion

Shumate v. Lynchburg: Fourth Circuit Clarifies the Non-Applicability of Eleventh-Amendment Immunity to Municipal Officials and Reinforces § 1367 Discretion

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Shumate v. Lynchburg: Fourth Circuit Clarifies the Non-Applicability of Eleventh-Amendment Immunity to Municipal Officials and Reinforces § 1367 Discretion Introduction Mary Lynn Shumate, a veteran...
Glover v. EQT – The Fourth Circuit’s New Standard on Class Certification for Uniform Royalty-Payment Practices

Glover v. EQT – The Fourth Circuit’s New Standard on Class Certification for Uniform Royalty-Payment Practices

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“One Scheme, One Class” – Glover v. EQT and the Fourth Circuit’s Clarification that a Uniform Royalty-Payment Methodology Can Sustain Class Certification Despite Lease Variations Introduction William...
“Unlawful User” Redefined: Possession-Based Drug Use as a Firearm Disability under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) — Commentary on United States v. Davey (10th Cir. 2025)

“Unlawful User” Redefined: Possession-Based Drug Use as a Firearm Disability under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) — Commentary on United States v. Davey (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Unlawful User” Redefined: Possession-Based Drug Use as a Firearm Disability under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) Commentary on United States v. Davey, 92 F.4th ___ (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction United States...
“Neutral-Factor” COVID-19 Delays and Mandatory Specificity: United States v. Flynn’s Clarification of Waiver Doctrine under the Speedy Trial Act and Rule 12

“Neutral-Factor” COVID-19 Delays and Mandatory Specificity: United States v. Flynn’s Clarification of Waiver Doctrine under the Speedy Trial Act and Rule 12

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Neutral-Factor” COVID-19 Delays and Mandatory Specificity: United States v. Flynn’s Clarification of Waiver Doctrine under the Speedy Trial Act and Rule 12 Introduction United States v. Flynn, No....

        United States v. Ingram: Confirming Broad District-Court Discretion to Impose
        Upward Variances Beyond Criminal-History Category VI When Guidelines Understate
        Recidivism and Danger

United States v. Ingram: Confirming Broad District-Court Discretion to Impose Upward Variances Beyond Criminal-History Category VI When Guidelines Understate Recidivism and Danger

Date: Aug 25, 2025
United States v. Ingram: Confirming Broad District-Court Discretion to Impose Upward Variances Beyond Criminal-History Category VI When Guidelines Understate Recidivism and Danger 1. Introduction The...
Rivera v. New Castle County Police Department: Third Circuit Reinforces “Defendant-Knowledge” Test for Rule 15(c) Relation Back

Rivera v. New Castle County Police Department: Third Circuit Reinforces “Defendant-Knowledge” Test for Rule 15(c) Relation Back

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Rivera v. New Castle County Police Department: Third Circuit Reinforces “Defendant-Knowledge” Test for Rule 15(c) Relation Back Introduction In Michael Rivera v. New Castle County Police Department...

        Third-Circuit Clarifies that Significant Prison Disciplinary History Can Justify an
        Upward Variance at Post-Taylor Resentencing Despite a Lower Amended Guideline Range

Third-Circuit Clarifies that Significant Prison Disciplinary History Can Justify an Upward Variance at Post-Taylor Resentencing Despite a Lower Amended Guideline Range

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Third-Circuit Clarifies that Significant Prison Disciplinary History Can Justify an Upward Variance at Post-Taylor Resentencing Despite a Lower Amended Guideline Range Introduction United States v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert