Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

South Dakota Case Commentaries


    State v. Long: Cross‑Jurisdictional Other‑Act Evidence and Psychological Coercion in Familial Rape and Abuse Prosecutions

State v. Long: Cross‑Jurisdictional Other‑Act Evidence and Psychological Coercion in Familial Rape and Abuse Prosecutions

Date: Dec 13, 2025
State v. Long: Cross‑Jurisdictional Other‑Act Evidence and Psychological Coercion in Familial Rape and Abuse Prosecutions I. Introduction In State v. Long, 2025 S.D. 69, the Supreme Court of South...
State v. Clemensen: Expansive Construction of Elder Theft by Exploitation for POA Misuse and Encumbrance of Trust Property

State v. Clemensen: Expansive Construction of Elder Theft by Exploitation for POA Misuse and Encumbrance of Trust Property

Date: Nov 29, 2025
State v. Clemensen: Expansive Construction of Elder Theft by Exploitation for POA Misuse and Encumbrance of Trust Property Introduction In State v. Clemensen, 2025 S.D. 68, the Supreme Court of South...
King v. King: Pending Business Lawsuits as Marital Property in South Dakota Divorce Law

King v. King: Pending Business Lawsuits as Marital Property in South Dakota Divorce Law

Date: Nov 20, 2025
King v. King: Pending Business Lawsuits as Marital Property in South Dakota Divorce Law I. Introduction In King v. King, 2025 S.D. 67, the Supreme Court of South Dakota addressed a question at the...
No Federal-Style Lodestar Presumption in Condemnation Fee Awards: Commentary on City of Sioux Falls v. Johnson Properties, 2025 S.D. 66

No Federal-Style Lodestar Presumption in Condemnation Fee Awards: Commentary on City of Sioux Falls v. Johnson Properties, 2025 S.D. 66

Date: Nov 20, 2025
No Federal-Style Lodestar Presumption in Condemnation Fee Awards: City of Sioux Falls v. Johnson Properties, 2025 S.D. 66 I. Introduction In City of Sioux Falls v. Johnson Properties, LLC, 2025 S.D....
Fraud Between Spouses Under Rule 60(b)(3): Trumble v. Trumble and the Duty of Full Asset Disclosure in Divorce Settlements

Fraud Between Spouses Under Rule 60(b)(3): Trumble v. Trumble and the Duty of Full Asset Disclosure in Divorce Settlements

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Fraud Between Spouses Under Rule 60(b)(3): Trumble v. Trumble and the Duty of Full Asset Disclosure in Divorce Settlements I. Introduction The South Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in Trumble v....
Baseless Allegations of Judicial Fabrication as Professional Misconduct: Commentary on In re Discipline of Volesky, 2025 S.D. 62

Baseless Allegations of Judicial Fabrication as Professional Misconduct: Commentary on In re Discipline of Volesky, 2025 S.D. 62

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Baseless Allegations of Judicial Fabrication as Professional Misconduct: Commentary on In re Discipline of Volesky, 2025 S.D. 62 I. Introduction The South Dakota Supreme Court’s decision in In the...
Expert Testimony and Technical Construction Disputes in Contract and Tort: Commentary on RTI, LLC v. Pro Engineering, Inc., 2025 S.D. 64

Expert Testimony and Technical Construction Disputes in Contract and Tort: Commentary on RTI, LLC v. Pro Engineering, Inc., 2025 S.D. 64

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Expert Testimony and Technical Construction Disputes in Contract and Tort: Commentary on RTI, LLC v. Pro Engineering, Inc., 2025 S.D. 64 I. Introduction RTI, LLC v. Pro Engineering, Inc., 2025 S.D....
Coyle v. McFarland: Excusable Neglect, Rule 56(f) Continuances, and Public Right‑of‑Way Disputes in South Dakota Trespass Law

Coyle v. McFarland: Excusable Neglect, Rule 56(f) Continuances, and Public Right‑of‑Way Disputes in South Dakota Trespass Law

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Coyle v. McFarland: Excusable Neglect, Rule 56(f) Continuances, and Public Right‑of‑Way Disputes in South Dakota Trespass Law I. Introduction In Coyle v. McFarland, 2025 S.D. 63, the South Dakota...
Inadequate Claim Investigation, the “Fairly Debatable” Defense, and Punitive Exposure in South Dakota First-Party Bad Faith: Commentary on Fiechtner v. American West Insurance Co., 2025 S.D. 60

Inadequate Claim Investigation, the “Fairly Debatable” Defense, and Punitive Exposure in South Dakota First-Party Bad Faith: Commentary on Fiechtner v. American West Insurance Co., 2025 S.D. 60

Date: Nov 6, 2025
Inadequate Claim Investigation, the “Fairly Debatable” Defense, and Punitive Exposure in South Dakota First-Party Bad Faith: Commentary on Fiechtner v. American West Insurance Co., 2025 S.D. 60 I....
Inherent Judicial Authority to Accommodate Vulnerable Adult Witnesses: Commentary on State v. Richter, 2025 S.D. 58

Inherent Judicial Authority to Accommodate Vulnerable Adult Witnesses: Commentary on State v. Richter, 2025 S.D. 58

Date: Nov 6, 2025
Inherent Judicial Authority to Accommodate Vulnerable Adult Witnesses: Commentary on State v. Richter, 2025 S.D. 58 Introduction The Supreme Court of South Dakota’s decision in State v. Richter, 2025...
State v. Longchase: Waiver of Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Rights by Guilty Plea and Constitutional Limits on Recoupment of Indigent Defense Costs

State v. Longchase: Waiver of Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Rights by Guilty Plea and Constitutional Limits on Recoupment of Indigent Defense Costs

Date: Nov 6, 2025
State v. Longchase: Waiver of Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Rights by Guilty Plea and Constitutional Limits on Recoupment of Indigent Defense Costs 1. Introduction In State v. Longchase, 2025 S.D. 61,...
Minimum Contacts and Revocation-on-Divorce: Jurisdictional Limits on Clawing Back Nonprobate Assets from Nonresident Ex‑Spouses

Minimum Contacts and Revocation-on-Divorce: Jurisdictional Limits on Clawing Back Nonprobate Assets from Nonresident Ex‑Spouses

Date: Nov 6, 2025
Minimum Contacts and Revocation-on-Divorce: Jurisdictional Limits on Clawing Back Nonprobate Assets from Nonresident Ex‑Spouses I. Introduction In Estate of Cunningham, 2025 S.D. 59, the South Dakota...
Nonlawyer Guardians Cannot Perfect Appeals in South Dakota: Notices of Appeal Filed on Behalf of Wards Are Ineffective to Invoke Appellate Jurisdiction

Nonlawyer Guardians Cannot Perfect Appeals in South Dakota: Notices of Appeal Filed on Behalf of Wards Are Ineffective to Invoke Appellate Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Nonlawyer Guardians Cannot Perfect Appeals in South Dakota: Notices of Appeal Filed on Behalf of Wards Are Ineffective to Invoke Appellate Jurisdiction Introduction In Danielson v. LifeScape, 2025...
Clarifying “Ability to Pay” in Alimony Contempt: Assets and Borrowing Capacity Must Be Considered; Good‑Faith Career Changes Can Warrant Modification (Peery v. Peery, 2025 S.D. 57)

Clarifying “Ability to Pay” in Alimony Contempt: Assets and Borrowing Capacity Must Be Considered; Good‑Faith Career Changes Can Warrant Modification (Peery v. Peery, 2025 S.D. 57)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Clarifying “Ability to Pay” in Alimony Contempt: Assets and Borrowing Capacity Must Be Considered; Good‑Faith Career Changes Can Warrant Modification Introduction In Peery v. Peery, 2025 S.D. 57, the...
State v. Bordeaux (2025 S.D. 55): Tightened Similarity Requirement for Rule 404(b) Intent/Common-Plan Evidence and Reversal Where “Violent When Drinking” Propensity Theme Dominates

State v. Bordeaux (2025 S.D. 55): Tightened Similarity Requirement for Rule 404(b) Intent/Common-Plan Evidence and Reversal Where “Violent When Drinking” Propensity Theme Dominates

Date: Oct 16, 2025
State v. Bordeaux (2025 S.D. 55): Tightened Similarity Requirement for Rule 404(b) Intent/Common-Plan Evidence and Reversal Where “Violent When Drinking” Propensity Theme Dominates Introduction In...
Jones and the Clear-and-Convincing Public-Interest Test: No Automatic Expungement After Acquittal in South Dakota

Jones and the Clear-and-Convincing Public-Interest Test: No Automatic Expungement After Acquittal in South Dakota

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Jones and the Clear-and-Convincing Public-Interest Test: No Automatic Expungement After Acquittal in South Dakota Introduction In Record Expungement of Jones, 2025 S.D. 54, the Supreme Court of South...
No Appropriation Without Exclusive Control: Shoreline-Connected Canals Do Not Require Water Appropriation Permits under South Dakota Law

No Appropriation Without Exclusive Control: Shoreline-Connected Canals Do Not Require Water Appropriation Permits under South Dakota Law

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No Appropriation Without Exclusive Control: Shoreline-Connected Canals Do Not Require Water Appropriation Permits under South Dakota Law Case: McCook Lake Recreation Area v. Dakota Bay, LLC, 2025...
Actual Value Controls Over Productivity Schedules: No Certified Appraisal Required, and Agencies Must Find Market Value

Actual Value Controls Over Productivity Schedules: No Certified Appraisal Required, and Agencies Must Find Market Value

Date: Sep 19, 2025
Actual Value Controls Over Productivity Schedules: No Certified Appraisal Required, and Agencies Must Find Market Value Introduction In Pallansch v. Roberts County, 2025 S.D. 52, the Supreme Court of...
Parental Primacy Reaffirmed: No Non‑Parent Visitation Without Rebutting the Parental Presumption; ICWA Applies to Third‑Party Custody and the Duty to Inquire Rests with the Court

Parental Primacy Reaffirmed: No Non‑Parent Visitation Without Rebutting the Parental Presumption; ICWA Applies to Third‑Party Custody and the Duty to Inquire Rests with the Court

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Parental Primacy Reaffirmed: No Non‑Parent Visitation Without Rebutting the Parental Presumption; ICWA Applies to Third‑Party Custody and the Duty to Inquire Rests with the Court Introduction In...
State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule

State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule

Date: Aug 21, 2025
State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota | Citation: 2025 S.D. 48 | Date:...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert