Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Repeated Unwanted Touching Can Be “Severe or Pervasive” Under § 1983 and NYSHRL; Stray Sexist Remarks Do Not Establish Intent; Remedial Response Defeats Monell Deliberate-Indifference Theory

Repeated Unwanted Touching Can Be “Severe or Pervasive” Under § 1983 and NYSHRL; Stray Sexist Remarks Do Not Establish Intent; Remedial Response Defeats Monell Deliberate-Indifference Theory

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Repeated Unwanted Touching Can Be “Severe or Pervasive” Under § 1983 and NYSHRL; Stray Sexist Remarks Do Not Establish Intent; Remedial Response Defeats Monell Deliberate-Indifference Theory Case:...
Reaffirming the “At-Risk” Trigger for Asylum Timeliness and the Evidentiary Demands for Diaspora Activism: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Huang v. Bondi

Reaffirming the “At-Risk” Trigger for Asylum Timeliness and the Evidentiary Demands for Diaspora Activism: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Huang v. Bondi

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Reaffirming the “At-Risk” Trigger for Asylum Timeliness and the Evidentiary Demands for Diaspora Activism: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Huang v. Bondi Introduction In Huang v. Bondi (No....
Aguilar-Morales v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Waivability of NTA Time-and-Place Defects and Demands a Non-Incidental Nexus for Family and Imputed-Political-Opinion Claims

Aguilar-Morales v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Waivability of NTA Time-and-Place Defects and Demands a Non-Incidental Nexus for Family and Imputed-Political-Opinion Claims

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Aguilar-Morales v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Waivability of NTA Time-and-Place Defects and Demands a Non-Incidental Nexus for Family and Imputed-Political-Opinion Claims Court: U.S. Court of...
No Victim-Identity Limit for FDCA § 333(a)(2); FDCA § 334 Is Not a Civil Forfeiture Statute — United States v. Fishman, Giannelli (2d Cir. 2025)

No Victim-Identity Limit for FDCA § 333(a)(2); FDCA § 334 Is Not a Civil Forfeiture Statute — United States v. Fishman, Giannelli (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Victim-Identity Limit for FDCA § 333(a)(2); FDCA § 334 Is Not a Civil Forfeiture Statute United States v. Fishman, Giannelli, Nos. 22-1600-cr (L), 22-2063-cr (C), 23-6819-cv (C) — U.S. Court of...
Uncorroborated Recantations Do Not Justify Coram Nobis: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Without Evidentiary Hearing in Nkansah v. United States

Uncorroborated Recantations Do Not Justify Coram Nobis: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Without Evidentiary Hearing in Nkansah v. United States

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Uncorroborated Recantations Do Not Justify Coram Nobis: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Without Evidentiary Hearing in Nkansah v. United States Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars

Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars Note: The...
Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch

Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch Note: This decision is a Second...
“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen

“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen

Date: Sep 24, 2025
“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen Introduction In Frey v. City of New...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Braswell’s Act‑of‑Production Bar at Trial and Imposes Single‑Recovery Rule for Co‑Conspirator Forfeiture Under § 981

Second Circuit Reaffirms Braswell’s Act‑of‑Production Bar at Trial and Imposes Single‑Recovery Rule for Co‑Conspirator Forfeiture Under § 981

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Braswell’s Act‑of‑Production Bar at Trial and Imposes Single‑Recovery Rule for Co‑Conspirator Forfeiture Under § 981 Introduction United States v. Costanzo is a Second...
United States v. Valdez: Oral Sentencing Controls Over Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Tailored Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld

United States v. Valdez: Oral Sentencing Controls Over Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Tailored Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld

Date: Sep 13, 2025
United States v. Valdez: Oral Sentencing Controls Over Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Tailored Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld Introduction In United States v. Valdez, No. 23-6482 (2d...
No Bright-Line 30-Day Rule and Pre-Enforcement Standing for Training-Arrest Threats: The Second Circuit’s Post-Bruen Roadmap in Giambalvo v. Suffolk County

No Bright-Line 30-Day Rule and Pre-Enforcement Standing for Training-Arrest Threats: The Second Circuit’s Post-Bruen Roadmap in Giambalvo v. Suffolk County

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Bright-Line 30-Day Rule and Pre-Enforcement Standing for Training-Arrest Threats: The Second Circuit’s Post-Bruen Roadmap in Giambalvo v. Suffolk County Introduction In Giambalvo v. Suffolk...
No Summons Before IFP Screening; Plausibility Requires Facts: Second Circuit Affirms § 1915(e) Dismissal in Lewis v. Redline Hockey

No Summons Before IFP Screening; Plausibility Requires Facts: Second Circuit Affirms § 1915(e) Dismissal in Lewis v. Redline Hockey

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Summons Before IFP Screening; Plausibility Requires Facts: Second Circuit Affirms § 1915(e) Dismissal in Lewis v. Redline Hockey Introduction In Lewis v. Redline Hockey, LLC, No. 24-1342-cv (2d...
PLRA Grievances Must Signal Retaliation; Evidence Beyond Disagreement or Injury‑Free Delay Needed to Survive Summary Judgment on Prison Medical Claims

PLRA Grievances Must Signal Retaliation; Evidence Beyond Disagreement or Injury‑Free Delay Needed to Survive Summary Judgment on Prison Medical Claims

Date: Sep 13, 2025
PLRA Grievances Must Signal Retaliation; Evidence Beyond Disagreement or Injury‑Free Delay Needed to Survive Summary Judgment on Prison Medical Claims Editorial note: This is a Second Circuit summary...
Mootness of § 1443 Removal Appeals After State Discontinuance—and Vacatur as the Default Remedy: Commentary on Town of Newburgh v. Newburgh EOM LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

Mootness of § 1443 Removal Appeals After State Discontinuance—and Vacatur as the Default Remedy: Commentary on Town of Newburgh v. Newburgh EOM LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Mootness of § 1443 Removal Appeals After State Discontinuance—and Vacatur as the Default Remedy Case: Town of Newburgh v. Newburgh EOM LLC (d/b/a Crossroads Hotels) Court: United States Court of...
Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings

Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings Note: This is a summary...
Clarifying “Antitrust Injury” vs. Substantive Pleading and Reaffirming Rule‑of‑Reason Requirements for Vertical Restraints: Amigo Shuttle v. Port Authority (2d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying “Antitrust Injury” vs. Substantive Pleading and Reaffirming Rule‑of‑Reason Requirements for Vertical Restraints: Amigo Shuttle v. Port Authority (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Clarifying “Antitrust Injury” vs. Substantive Pleading and Reaffirming Rule‑of‑Reason Requirements for Vertical Restraints: Amigo Shuttle v. Port Authority (2d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard (2d Cir. 2025)

NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard, No. 23-6886 (2d...
Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As” Claims

Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As” Claims

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As”...
Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a)

Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second Circuit’s decision...
For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi)

For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert