Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Equal Treatment Is Non‑Negotiable: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award for asymmetric waiver of contractual notices and rewriting milestone preconditions (SEPCO v. GMR Kamalanga, 2025 INSC 1171)

Equal Treatment Is Non‑Negotiable: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award for asymmetric waiver of contractual notices and rewriting milestone preconditions (SEPCO v. GMR Kamalanga, 2025 INSC 1171)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Equal Treatment Is Non‑Negotiable: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award for asymmetric waiver of contractual notices and rewriting milestone preconditions Case: SEPCO Electric Power Construction...
Reaffirmation of strict evidentiary thresholds in circumstantial murder cases: Section 65-B compliance, limits of Section 27, and caution on delayed “last seen” evidence — State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Singh, 2025 INSC 1166

Reaffirmation of strict evidentiary thresholds in circumstantial murder cases: Section 65-B compliance, limits of Section 27, and caution on delayed “last seen” evidence — State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Singh, 2025 INSC 1166

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Reaffirmation of strict evidentiary thresholds in circumstantial murder cases: Section 65-B compliance, limits of Section 27, and caution on delayed “last seen” evidence — State of Rajasthan v....
No Pan‑India Clubbing of FIRs for Multi‑State Financial Frauds; Only Intra‑State Consolidation Permissible and No Pre‑Emptive Clubbing of Future FIRs — Commentary on Pavan Kumar Odela v. State of Telangana (2025 INSC 1174)

No Pan‑India Clubbing of FIRs for Multi‑State Financial Frauds; Only Intra‑State Consolidation Permissible and No Pre‑Emptive Clubbing of Future FIRs — Commentary on Pavan Kumar Odela v. State of Telangana (2025 INSC 1174)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Pan‑India Clubbing of FIRs for Multi‑State Financial Frauds; Only Intra‑State Consolidation Permissible and No Pre‑Emptive Clubbing of Future FIRs — Commentary on Pavan Kumar Odela v. State of...
Single-Notice Suffices: Supreme Court affirms no second penalty show-cause under the Competition Act and upholds behavioural remedies binding office-bearers

Single-Notice Suffices: Supreme Court affirms no second penalty show-cause under the Competition Act and upholds behavioural remedies binding office-bearers

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Single-Notice Suffices: Supreme Court affirms no second penalty show-cause under the Competition Act and upholds behavioural remedies binding office-bearers Introduction This commentary examines the...
Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific

Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Omnibus Allegations Against In‑Laws Are Insufficient to Sustain 498‑A Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR; Section 377/506 Liability Must Be Accused‑Specific Introduction This commentary examines...
Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181

Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Conduct‑Centric Bail Scrutiny and “Deemed Court Custody” on Appearance: Supreme Court’s Framework in M/s Netsity Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 1181 Introduction This Supreme...
CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC in Kalyani Transco v. BPSL (2025 INSC 1165)

CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC in Kalyani Transco v. BPSL (2025 INSC 1165)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
CoC’s Post‑Approval Continuity and No Ex‑Post EBITDA Claims: Supreme Court’s Blueprint for Finality and Implementation under the IBC Case: KALYANI TRANSCO v. M/S BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD. & Ors....
Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on Undertaking

Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on Undertaking

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Mandatory Pre‑Sale Disclosure and Quantification of Lessor’s Statutory Encumbrances in DRT Auctions: Non‑Compliance Vitiates Sale; Res Judicata Inapplicable Where Earlier Writ Was Withdrawn on...
Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases

Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Reinforcing Cheque Presumptions: 269SS breach no bar to Section 138 NI Act; Supreme Court mandates procedural and compounding reforms for cheque dishonour cases Case: SANJABIJ TARI v. KISHORE S....
Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific Performance

Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific Performance

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Finality as a Precondition for Section 37 Savings: Supreme Court Clarifies That Receiver’s Transfers Based on Set-Aside Orders Are Not Protected; Insolvency Courts Cannot Adjudicate Specific...
Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment

Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Reimbursement of Fixed Charges Is Distinct From Compensation for Diverted Power; Half‑Hourly Computation Valid When Adopted by Parties Despite No Formal PPA Amendment Introduction This commentary...
Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under Section 35

Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under Section 35

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Recording “Reasons to Believe” and Locus in Bar Disciplinary Referrals: Opponent-Litigant Complaints Ordinarily Impermissible; Mere Identification/Attestation by Advocate Is Not Misconduct under...
Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design

Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Narrowing the Video Electronics Exception under Article 304(a): Rajasthan’s Fly-Ash VAT Exemption Struck Down for Want of Reasoned, Non‑Hostile Design Introduction In M/s U.P. Asbestos Limited v....
Party Autonomy Trumps Statutory Post‑Award Interest: No Compound or Additional Interest Where Award Grants Contractual Interest “Till Repayment” under Section 31(7)

Party Autonomy Trumps Statutory Post‑Award Interest: No Compound or Additional Interest Where Award Grants Contractual Interest “Till Repayment” under Section 31(7)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Party Autonomy Trumps Statutory Post‑Award Interest: No Compound or Additional Interest Where Award Grants Contractual Interest “Till Repayment” under Section 31(7) Case: HLV Limited (formerly Hotel...
Lex Specialis Prevails: No Waiver of Public‑Interest Cultivation Conditions under the Organização Agrária; Pending OA Proceedings Saved Despite the 1971 Land Reforms Regulation

Lex Specialis Prevails: No Waiver of Public‑Interest Cultivation Conditions under the Organização Agrária; Pending OA Proceedings Saved Despite the 1971 Land Reforms Regulation

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Lex Specialis Prevails: No Waiver of Public‑Interest Cultivation Conditions under the Organização Agrária; Pending OA Proceedings Saved Despite the 1971 Land Reforms Regulation Introduction This...
Retaliatory FIRs in Civil/Commercial Disputes: Supreme Court Reaffirms Bhajan Lal and Clarifies Post-Charge-Sheet Quashing under Section 482 CrPC (Anukul Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025 INSC 1153)

Retaliatory FIRs in Civil/Commercial Disputes: Supreme Court Reaffirms Bhajan Lal and Clarifies Post-Charge-Sheet Quashing under Section 482 CrPC (Anukul Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025 INSC 1153)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Retaliatory FIRs in Civil/Commercial Disputes: Supreme Court Reaffirms Bhajan Lal and Clarifies Post-Charge-Sheet Quashing under Section 482 CrPC Case: ANUKUL SINGH v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH...
No Second SLP After Unconditional Withdrawal: Supreme Court Reaffirms Upadhyay Principle and Fortifies Finality Under Article 136

No Second SLP After Unconditional Withdrawal: Supreme Court Reaffirms Upadhyay Principle and Fortifies Finality Under Article 136

Date: Sep 24, 2025
7 CPC against appeals from review refusals."> No Second SLP After Unconditional Withdrawal: Supreme Court Reaffirms Upadhyay Principle and Fortifies Finality Under Article 136 Introduction In a...
Inside-the-Station Confessions Are Inadmissible: Supreme Court reins in Section 106 in circumstantial cases and cautions against joint Section 27 recoveries

Inside-the-Station Confessions Are Inadmissible: Supreme Court reins in Section 106 in circumstantial cases and cautions against joint Section 27 recoveries

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Inside-the-Station Confessions Are Inadmissible: Supreme Court reins in Section 106 in circumstantial cases and cautions against joint Section 27 recoveries Case: Nagamma @ Nagarathna & Ors. v. State...
Single-Notice Rule and Extinction of Redemption on Publication: Supreme Court’s Definitive Construction of Amended Section 13(8) SARFAESI

Single-Notice Rule and Extinction of Redemption on Publication: Supreme Court’s Definitive Construction of Amended Section 13(8) SARFAESI

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Single-Notice Rule and Extinction of Redemption on Publication: Supreme Court’s Definitive Construction of Amended Section 13(8) SARFAESI Case: M. Rajendran & Ors. v. M/s KPK Oils and Proteins India...
Player Representation, Promotion–Relegation, and Non‑Delegable “Essential Aspects” of Football Governance: The Supreme Court’s Blueprint for AIFF and its State Units

Player Representation, Promotion–Relegation, and Non‑Delegable “Essential Aspects” of Football Governance: The Supreme Court’s Blueprint for AIFF and its State Units

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Player Representation, Promotion–Relegation, and Non‑Delegable “Essential Aspects” of Football Governance: The Supreme Court’s Blueprint for AIFF and its State Units Case: All India Football...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert