Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

Accident Location Is Not Dispositive: Evidence, Not Assertions, Controls Transfers Under Alabama’s Forum Non Conveniens Statute (§ 6-3-21.1)

Accident Location Is Not Dispositive: Evidence, Not Assertions, Controls Transfers Under Alabama’s Forum Non Conveniens Statute (§ 6-3-21.1)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Accident Location Is Not Dispositive: Evidence, Not Assertions, Controls Transfers Under Alabama’s Forum Non Conveniens Statute (§ 6-3-21.1) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme Court of...
Substantive Immunity Shields Municipalities from Negligence Claims Over Inoperable Interstate Streetlights

Substantive Immunity Shields Municipalities from Negligence Claims Over Inoperable Interstate Streetlights

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Substantive Immunity Shields Municipalities from Negligence Claims Over Inoperable Interstate Streetlights Introduction In Ex parte City of Birmingham (In re: Smith v. City of Birmingham), decided on...
Sampson Limited: Affirmative Defenses Must Be Evidenced at Summary Judgment; Hayden Foreclosure Standard Reaffirmed

Sampson Limited: Affirmative Defenses Must Be Evidenced at Summary Judgment; Hayden Foreclosure Standard Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Sampson Limited: Affirmative Defenses Must Be Evidenced at Summary Judgment; Hayden Foreclosure Standard Reaffirmed Introduction In Russell A. Collins and Stacey D. Collins v. West Alabama Bank &...
Ex parte Tanner: Extending Ford’s “Relate-To” Specific Jurisdiction to Cross‑Border Health Systems; AMLA Venue Applicability to Out‑of‑State Malpractice Unresolved

Ex parte Tanner: Extending Ford’s “Relate-To” Specific Jurisdiction to Cross‑Border Health Systems; AMLA Venue Applicability to Out‑of‑State Malpractice Unresolved

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Ex parte Tanner: Extending Ford’s “Relate-To” Specific Jurisdiction to Cross‑Border Health Systems; AMLA Venue Applicability to Out‑of‑State Malpractice Unresolved Introduction This commentary...
No State Exhaustion Bar to § 1983 Due‑Process Delay Claims; Alabama Supreme Court Remands for Fact‑Finding on Mootness After SCOTUS Reversal

No State Exhaustion Bar to § 1983 Due‑Process Delay Claims; Alabama Supreme Court Remands for Fact‑Finding on Mootness After SCOTUS Reversal

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No State Exhaustion Bar to § 1983 Due‑Process Delay Claims; Alabama Supreme Court Remands for Fact‑Finding on Mootness After SCOTUS Reversal Introduction This commentary analyzes the Alabama Supreme...
No Presumption from Criminal Stand‑Your‑Ground Immunity: Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Rule 56 Burdens in Subsequent Civil Cases

No Presumption from Criminal Stand‑Your‑Ground Immunity: Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Rule 56 Burdens in Subsequent Civil Cases

Date: Sep 9, 2025
No Presumption from Criminal Stand‑Your‑Ground Immunity: Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Rule 56 Burdens in Subsequent Civil Cases Introduction In Arethea Hurbert, an incompetent person, by and...
Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds

Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds Introduction In Ex parte City of...
Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20

Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20 Introduction This commentary examines the Alabama...
Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration

Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration Introduction In Franklin...
Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions Case: Rodney G. Englund, Dyann K. Englund, and Georgetown...
No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law

No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law

Date: Aug 30, 2025
No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law Case: Ex parte Corey Lee Walton, Supreme...
Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed — Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Broussard (Ala. 2025)

Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed — Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Broussard (Ala. 2025)

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Robert Broussard, District...
Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments

Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments Introduction In Carol Rogers, as...
“Truthful-but-Misleading” Communications, Limited Proximate Cause, and Line-and-Scope Constraints: The New Framework from Flickinger v. King (Ala. 2025)

“Truthful-but-Misleading” Communications, Limited Proximate Cause, and Line-and-Scope Constraints: The New Framework from Flickinger v. King (Ala. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Truthful-but-Misleading” Communications, Limited Proximate Cause, and Line-and-Scope Constraints: The Alabama Supreme Court’s New Framework for Tortious Interference in Flickinger v. King (2025)...
Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount

Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount Introduction In iWTNS, Inc.; Leveraged, LLC; and Bradley Lewis...
CBS Holdings, LLC v. Hexagon US Federal, Inc.:  A New Benchmark for Documentary Support and Peebles-Factor Analysis in Alabama Attorney-Fee Awards

CBS Holdings, LLC v. Hexagon US Federal, Inc.: A New Benchmark for Documentary Support and Peebles-Factor Analysis in Alabama Attorney-Fee Awards

Date: Jul 12, 2025
CBS Holdings, LLC v. Hexagon US Federal, Inc.: The Supreme Court of Alabama Demands Transparent, Substantiated Fee Petitions and Explicit Peebles-Factor Findings 1. Introduction CBS Holdings, LLC v....
The “Depicted-Access Facilities” Doctrine: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies When Easement Alterations Require Unanimous Consent

The “Depicted-Access Facilities” Doctrine: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies When Easement Alterations Require Unanimous Consent

Date: Jul 9, 2025
The “Depicted-Access Facilities” Doctrine: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies When Easement Alterations Require Unanimous Consent Introduction 790 Montclair, LLC v. The Station at Crestline Heights, LLC...
“Express Survivorship” & “Alternative Devise” Defeat Alabama’s Antilapse Statute – A Commentary on Johnson v. Mayers (2025)

“Express Survivorship” & “Alternative Devise” Defeat Alabama’s Antilapse Statute – A Commentary on Johnson v. Mayers (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Express Survivorship” & “Alternative Devise” Defeat Alabama’s Antilapse Statute – Comprehensive Commentary on Timothy Brian Johnson & Phillip Barnes v. Judith Mayers, SC-2025-0297 I. Introduction In...
“Accident Location Alone Is Not Enough” – Alabama Supreme Court Strengthens the Dual-Nexus Test for Interest-of-Justice Venue Transfers

“Accident Location Alone Is Not Enough” – Alabama Supreme Court Strengthens the Dual-Nexus Test for Interest-of-Justice Venue Transfers

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Accident Location Alone Is Not Enough” – Alabama Supreme Court Strengthens the Dual-Nexus Test for Interest-of-Justice Venue Transfers 1. Introduction In Ex parte Nathan Nash, the Supreme Court of...
Extending Engquist to Academia: The Alabama Supreme Court Refines Class-of-One Claims and § 14 Immunity in Ex parte Roberts

Extending Engquist to Academia: The Alabama Supreme Court Refines Class-of-One Claims and § 14 Immunity in Ex parte Roberts

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Extending Engquist to Academia: The Alabama Supreme Court Refines Class-of-One Claims and § 14 Immunity in Ex parte Roberts 1. Introduction This commentary unpacks the Supreme Court of Alabama’s...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert