Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alabama Case Commentaries

Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar

Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Jerry...
Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement

Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement I. Introduction In Dendy v. Ryan, decided on December 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Alabama...
Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation

Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation I. Introduction In Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A., decided on...
“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center (SC‑2024‑0767) and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics (SC‑2024‑0770)

“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center (SC‑2024‑0767) and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics (SC‑2024‑0770)

Date: Dec 15, 2025
“Timely Amendment” Under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Commentary on Ex parte Coosa Valley Medical Center and Ex parte Marble City Family Care & Obstetrics, P.C. I. Introduction This decision...
No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State: Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P.

No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State: Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P.

Date: Dec 15, 2025
No Automatic Vacatur of Domesticated Foreign Judgments Upon Reversal in the Rendering State Commentary on Shumate v. Berry Contracting, L.P., Supreme Court of Alabama (Dec. 12, 2025) I. Introduction...
Substantial Compliance with Public-Works Bid Advertising under Alabama Title 39: Commentary on Pinpoint Locating, Inc. v. Water Works & Gas Board of Red Bay

Substantial Compliance with Public-Works Bid Advertising under Alabama Title 39: Commentary on Pinpoint Locating, Inc. v. Water Works & Gas Board of Red Bay

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Substantial Compliance with Public-Works Bid Advertising under Alabama Title 39 Commentary on Pinpoint Locating, Inc. v. The Water Works and Gas Board of the City of Red Bay, Supreme Court of Alabama...
Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC: Clarifying Alabama’s “Seriously Inconvenient” Standard for Outbound Forum‑Selection Clauses

Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC: Clarifying Alabama’s “Seriously Inconvenient” Standard for Outbound Forum‑Selection Clauses

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC: Clarifying Alabama’s “Seriously Inconvenient” Standard for Outbound Forum‑Selection Clauses I. Introduction In Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC...
Southampton 100, LLC v. Alabama Department of Revenue: Limiting Dismissal Sanctions for Rule 30(b)(6) Discovery Violations and Encouraging Hearings on Contested Dispositive Motions

Southampton 100, LLC v. Alabama Department of Revenue: Limiting Dismissal Sanctions for Rule 30(b)(6) Discovery Violations and Encouraging Hearings on Contested Dispositive Motions

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Southampton 100, LLC v. Alabama Department of Revenue: Limiting Dismissal Sanctions for Rule 30(b)(6) Discovery Violations and Encouraging Hearings on Contested Dispositive Motions I. Introduction...
Roberson v. Daniel: Tightening Rule 54(b) Final-Judgment Certification in Multi‑Party, Bankruptcy‑Affected Litigation

Roberson v. Daniel: Tightening Rule 54(b) Final-Judgment Certification in Multi‑Party, Bankruptcy‑Affected Litigation

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Roberson v. Daniel: Tightening Rule 54(b) Final-Judgment Certification in Multi‑Party, Bankruptcy‑Affected Litigation I. Introduction Roberson v. Daniel, decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama on...
Lay Witness “Indicated” Abuse Findings as Impermissible Ultimate-Issue Testimony: Commentary on Ex parte William Chad Randolph

Lay Witness “Indicated” Abuse Findings as Impermissible Ultimate-Issue Testimony: Commentary on Ex parte William Chad Randolph

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Lay Witness “Indicated” Abuse Findings as Impermissible Ultimate-Issue Testimony: Commentary on Ex parte William Chad Randolph Introduction In Ex parte William Chad Randolph (Ala. Nov. 21, 2025), the...
Timely Amendments under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Ex parte Steven M. Taylor, M.D.

Timely Amendments under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Ex parte Steven M. Taylor, M.D.

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Timely Amendments under the Alabama Medical Liability Act: Integrating Rule 15(a) with § 6‑5‑551 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Ex parte Steven M. Taylor, M.D. (Nov. 7,...
Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Juror Nondisclosure and Clarifying Rule 59.1 Extensions: Commentary on Nissan North America, Inc. & Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Henderson‑Brundidge

Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Juror Nondisclosure and Clarifying Rule 59.1 Extensions: Commentary on Nissan North America, Inc. & Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Henderson‑Brundidge

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Reaffirming Trial Court Discretion in Juror Nondisclosure and Clarifying Rule 59.1 Extensions: Commentary on Nissan North America, Inc., and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Alise Henderson‑Brundidge I....
Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway

Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway Introduction In City of Birmingham v....
Mootness Bars Post‑Remand Declaratory Judgments: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Dismissal When Relief Is Afforded and Damages Are Barred — City of Orange Beach v. Boles (2025)

Mootness Bars Post‑Remand Declaratory Judgments: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Dismissal When Relief Is Afforded and Damages Are Barred — City of Orange Beach v. Boles (2025)

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Mootness Bars Post‑Remand Declaratory Judgments: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Dismissal When Relief Is Afforded and Damages Are Barred — City of Orange Beach v. Boles (2025) Introduction In City of...
Kolessar v. SJP: Alabama Supreme Court Bars Trial Courts from Ordering Receivers to Pay Pre‑Receivership Debts Without Respecting Creditor Priorities; Such Orders Are Appealable Injunctions

Kolessar v. SJP: Alabama Supreme Court Bars Trial Courts from Ordering Receivers to Pay Pre‑Receivership Debts Without Respecting Creditor Priorities; Such Orders Are Appealable Injunctions

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Kolessar v. SJP: Alabama Supreme Court Bars Trial Courts from Ordering Receivers to Pay Pre‑Receivership Debts Without Respecting Creditor Priorities; Such Orders Are Appealable Injunctions...
Imputed Corporate Knowledge and Waiver of Arbitrator-Partiality Challenges under the FAA: Apex Restoration DKI v. Rocca

Imputed Corporate Knowledge and Waiver of Arbitrator-Partiality Challenges under the FAA: Apex Restoration DKI v. Rocca

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Imputed Corporate Knowledge and Waiver of Arbitrator-Partiality Challenges under the FAA Restore with Apex, Inc., d/b/a Apex Restoration DKI v. Zachary Rocca (Supreme Court of Alabama, Oct. 17, 2025)...
“Prove Incapacity at the Moment of Signing”: Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Apparent-Authority Standard for Nursing‑Home Arbitration Agreements

“Prove Incapacity at the Moment of Signing”: Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Apparent-Authority Standard for Nursing‑Home Arbitration Agreements

Date: Oct 18, 2025
“Prove Incapacity at the Moment of Signing”: Alabama Supreme Court Reaffirms Apparent-Authority Standard for Nursing‑Home Arbitration Agreements Introduction In Mobile Nursing and Rehabilitation...
Rent Is Not Purchase Price: Alabama Supreme Court Strictly Construes Lease-Option Credits and Applies Prevention Doctrine in McCain v. Sneed

Rent Is Not Purchase Price: Alabama Supreme Court Strictly Construes Lease-Option Credits and Applies Prevention Doctrine in McCain v. Sneed

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Rent Is Not Purchase Price: Alabama Supreme Court Strictly Construes Lease-Option Credits and Applies Prevention Doctrine in McCain v. Sneed Introduction In LaTonya McCain v. James Sneed and Vernetta...
Mandamus Review Under § 45-37A-51.139 Requires the Board Record or Additional Evidence; Progressive Conditions Do Not Satisfy the “Accident at a Definite Time and Place” Requirement for Extraordinary Disability

Mandamus Review Under § 45-37A-51.139 Requires the Board Record or Additional Evidence; Progressive Conditions Do Not Satisfy the “Accident at a Definite Time and Place” Requirement for Extraordinary Disability

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Mandamus Review Under § 45-37A-51.139 Requires the Board Record or Additional Evidence; Progressive Conditions Do Not Satisfy the “Accident at a Definite Time and Place” Requirement for Extraordinary...
Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails — Campus Crest v. City of Tuscaloosa

Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails — Campus Crest v. City of Tuscaloosa

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails Introduction In Campus...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert