Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Delhi High Court Case Commentaries

Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040-DB)

Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040-DB)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040‑DB) I....
Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A

Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A Case:...
Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant — PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (2025 DHC 9755)

Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant — PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (2025 DHC 9755)

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant Case: PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr....
Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Introduction This...
Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International

Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International

Date: Nov 6, 2025
Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International Introduction In Suparshva Swabs India v....
No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure

No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure

Date: Nov 6, 2025
No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure Case: Infrastructure Watchdog v. Union of India &...
ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’

ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’

Date: Nov 6, 2025
ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’ Introduction In Directorate of Enforcement v. M/s Prakash...

      “No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty:
      Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent an Explicit Stay

“No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty: Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent an Explicit Stay

Date: Nov 6, 2025
“No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty: Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent...
Reservation Does Not Extend to Confirmation: Delhi High Court Mandates Reasoned Consideration of Relaxed Standards and Accommodation for PwBDs; CCPwD Recommendations Are Quasi-Binding

Reservation Does Not Extend to Confirmation: Delhi High Court Mandates Reasoned Consideration of Relaxed Standards and Accommodation for PwBDs; CCPwD Recommendations Are Quasi-Binding

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Reservation Does Not Extend to Confirmation: Reasoned Duty to Consider Relaxed Standards and Accommodation for PwBDs; CCPwD Recommendations Are Quasi-Binding Introduction In Munna Lal Yadav v....
Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court Introduction Case: Delhi Ki Galiyan NGO v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors., W.P.(C) 10595/2024...
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved Introduction In CM(M) 1961/2025 (with CM APPL. 63525/2025 & 63524/2025), the Delhi High...
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments Case: Union of India through Secretary & Ors. v. Shri S...
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Delhi High Court’s Anticipatory Bail Ruling in Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) Case:...
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act,...
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt Introduction In “Court on its own motion v. Anuradha Misra,” 2025 DHC...
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)...
Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs

Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs Case: Shri...
Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid Statute/Ordinance; 2007 draft Ordinance held withdrawn

Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid Statute/Ordinance; 2007 draft Ordinance held withdrawn

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid...
Reaffirmation that Medical Sales Representatives Are Not “Workmen” under Section 2(s) ID Act and the Limited Scope of Writ Review over Labour Court Findings

Reaffirmation that Medical Sales Representatives Are Not “Workmen” under Section 2(s) ID Act and the Limited Scope of Writ Review over Labour Court Findings

Date: Oct 7, 2025
Reaffirmation that Medical Sales Representatives Are Not “Workmen” under Section 2(s) ID Act and the Limited Scope of Writ Review over Labour Court Findings Introduction In SH. Samarendra Das v. M/s...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert