Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Guam Case Commentaries

People of Guam v. Narruhn: Direct Review Limits on Ineffective Assistance Claims and Scrutiny of DNA Evidence in Micronesian Prosecutions

People of Guam v. Narruhn: Direct Review Limits on Ineffective Assistance Claims and Scrutiny of DNA Evidence in Micronesian Prosecutions

Date: Dec 17, 2025
People of Guam v. Narruhn: Direct Review Limits on Ineffective Assistance Claims and Scrutiny of DNA Evidence in Micronesian Prosecutions Introduction The Supreme Court of Guam’s decision in People...
Jurisdictional Limits on the Office of Public Accountability in Debarment Matters: Commentary on SH Enterprises, Inc. v. Territory of Guam (2025 Guam 10)

Jurisdictional Limits on the Office of Public Accountability in Debarment Matters: Commentary on SH Enterprises, Inc. v. Territory of Guam (2025 Guam 10)

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Jurisdictional Limits on the Office of Public Accountability in Debarment Matters: Commentary on SH Enterprises, Inc. v. Territory of Guam, 2025 Guam 10 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Guam’s...
Limiting Multiple CSC Convictions for a Single Sexual Act under 9 GCA § 1.22(e): Commentary on People of Guam v. Castro, 2025 Guam 9

Limiting Multiple CSC Convictions for a Single Sexual Act under 9 GCA § 1.22(e): Commentary on People of Guam v. Castro, 2025 Guam 9

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Limiting Multiple CSC Convictions for a Single Sexual Act under 9 GCA § 1.22(e): A Comprehensive Commentary on People of Guam v. Castro, 2025 Guam 9 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Guam’s...
“Indictments Are Not Convictions”: Limits on Impeachment and Clarification of “Sexual Penetration” in People of Guam v. Reyes (2025 Guam 8)

“Indictments Are Not Convictions”: Limits on Impeachment and Clarification of “Sexual Penetration” in People of Guam v. Reyes (2025 Guam 8)

Date: Dec 5, 2025
“Indictments Are Not Convictions”: Limits on Impeachment and Clarification of “Sexual Penetration” in People of Guam v. Reyes (2025 Guam 8) I. Introduction In People of Guam v. William Robert Reyes,...
Guam Supreme Court Adopts the Ninth Circuit’s Objective Abandonment Test and Enforces Strict Preservation for Inevitable Discovery in Cell-Phone Searches

Guam Supreme Court Adopts the Ninth Circuit’s Objective Abandonment Test and Enforces Strict Preservation for Inevitable Discovery in Cell-Phone Searches

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Guam Supreme Court Adopts the Ninth Circuit’s Objective Abandonment Test and Enforces Strict Preservation for Inevitable Discovery in Cell-Phone Searches Introduction In People of Guam v. Joseph...
“Opening the Door” Does Not Bypass Rule 403: Guam Supreme Court Requires Explicit On‑the‑Record Balancing Before Admitting Pretrial‑Release or Pending‑Case Evidence

“Opening the Door” Does Not Bypass Rule 403: Guam Supreme Court Requires Explicit On‑the‑Record Balancing Before Admitting Pretrial‑Release or Pending‑Case Evidence

Date: Oct 11, 2025
“Opening the Door” Does Not Bypass Rule 403: Guam Supreme Court Requires Explicit On‑the‑Record Balancing Before Admitting Pretrial‑Release or Pending‑Case Evidence Introduction In People of Guam v....
People of Guam v. Ojeda (2025 Guam 5): Defense Counsel’s Duty to Proactively Preserve Third‑Party Digital Surveillance Evidence—Deficient Performance Without Per Se Prejudice

People of Guam v. Ojeda (2025 Guam 5): Defense Counsel’s Duty to Proactively Preserve Third‑Party Digital Surveillance Evidence—Deficient Performance Without Per Se Prejudice

Date: Sep 9, 2025
People of Guam v. Ojeda (2025 Guam 5): Defense Counsel’s Duty to Proactively Preserve Third‑Party Digital Surveillance Evidence—Deficient Performance Without Per Se Prejudice Introduction In People...
Ownership Without Certificates: Paid‑In Shares and Corporate Records Determine Stock Interests Under Guam’s Clear‑Error Review

Ownership Without Certificates: Paid‑In Shares and Corporate Records Determine Stock Interests Under Guam’s Clear‑Error Review

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Ownership Without Certificates: Paid‑In Shares and Corporate Records Determine Stock Interests Under Guam’s Clear‑Error Review Introduction In Franklin J. Gutierrez, Individually and as...
Traditional Standing vs. Contractual Entitlement: Guam Supreme Court Limits “Abandonment” and Recalibrates Summary Judgment Burdens in Cho v. Alupang Beach Club (2025 Guam 3)

Traditional Standing vs. Contractual Entitlement: Guam Supreme Court Limits “Abandonment” and Recalibrates Summary Judgment Burdens in Cho v. Alupang Beach Club (2025 Guam 3)

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Traditional Standing vs. Contractual Entitlement: Guam Supreme Court Limits “Abandonment” and Recalibrates Summary Judgment Burdens in Cho v. Alupang Beach Club (2025 Guam 3) Introduction In a...
“No Finality, No Appeal” – The Guam Supreme Court Confirms that a Dismissal Without Prejudice is Not Immediately Appealable by a Criminal Defendant

“No Finality, No Appeal” – The Guam Supreme Court Confirms that a Dismissal Without Prejudice is Not Immediately Appealable by a Criminal Defendant

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“No Finality, No Appeal” – The Guam Supreme Court Confirms that a Dismissal Without Prejudice is Not Immediately Appealable by a Criminal Defendant 1. Introduction The People of Guam v. Bruno Frankie...
“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1)

“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1) Author: AI Legal Commentary Service 1. Introduction In...
Affirmation of CPGA's Shield Against Defamation Claims: Guamanian Supreme Court Upholds Anti-SLAPP Protections

Affirmation of CPGA's Shield Against Defamation Claims: Guamanian Supreme Court Upholds Anti-SLAPP Protections

Date: Sep 12, 2008
Affirmation of CPGA's Shield Against Defamation Claims: Guamanian Supreme Court Upholds Anti-SLAPP Protections Introduction The case of GUAM GREYHOUND, INC. and JOHN BALDWIN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,...
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert