Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wyoming Case Commentaries

Refusing to Decide as Abuse of Discretion: Hale & Ringen v. City of Laramie and the Duty to Adjudicate Rule 60(b) Motions to Modify Injunctions

Refusing to Decide as Abuse of Discretion: Hale & Ringen v. City of Laramie and the Duty to Adjudicate Rule 60(b) Motions to Modify Injunctions

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Refusing to Decide as Abuse of Discretion: Hale & Ringen v. City of Laramie and the Duty to Adjudicate Rule 60(b) Motions to Modify Injunctions I. Introduction In Timothy Hale and Sonja Ringen v....
Prejudgment Interest as a Question of Law for the Court: Commentary on Russ & Debi Ropken v. YJ Construction, Inc. (2025 WY 131)

Prejudgment Interest as a Question of Law for the Court: Commentary on Russ & Debi Ropken v. YJ Construction, Inc. (2025 WY 131)

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Prejudgment Interest as a Question of Law for the Court: Commentary on Russ & Debi Ropken v. YJ Construction, Inc., 2025 WY 131 I. Introduction The Wyoming Supreme Court’s decision in Russ Ropken and...
Separate Estate, Marital Earnings, and “Property Acquired During Marriage”: The Wyoming Supreme Court’s Framework for Interpreting Postnuptial Agreements in Young v. Jones

Separate Estate, Marital Earnings, and “Property Acquired During Marriage”: The Wyoming Supreme Court’s Framework for Interpreting Postnuptial Agreements in Young v. Jones

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Separate Estate, Marital Earnings, and “Property Acquired During Marriage”: The Wyoming Supreme Court’s Framework for Interpreting Postnuptial Agreements in Young v. Jones I. Introduction In Bethany...
Mutual Waivers as Consideration and Limits on Separate‑Property Clauses in Wyoming Postnuptial Agreements: Commentary on Jones v. Young, 2025 WY 130

Mutual Waivers as Consideration and Limits on Separate‑Property Clauses in Wyoming Postnuptial Agreements: Commentary on Jones v. Young, 2025 WY 130

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Mutual Waivers as Consideration and Limits on Separate‑Property Clauses in Wyoming Postnuptial Agreements Commentary on Jeremy D. Jones v. Bethany D. Young, 2025 WY 130 (Wyo. Dec. 10, 2025) I....
Hunter v. Universal Precast: Limiting Dismissal as a Sanction After Mistrial and Reaffirming Gatekeeping in Wyoming

Hunter v. Universal Precast: Limiting Dismissal as a Sanction After Mistrial and Reaffirming Gatekeeping in Wyoming

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Hunter v. Universal Precast: Limiting Dismissal as a Sanction After Mistrial and Reaffirming Gatekeeping in Wyoming Introduction In Scott Hunter and Heather Hunter, as Next Friends and Parents of LH,...
From “Good Government” to Concrete Harm: Wyoming Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits on Declaratory and Taxpayer Standing in Williams v. Board of County Commissioners

From “Good Government” to Concrete Harm: Wyoming Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits on Declaratory and Taxpayer Standing in Williams v. Board of County Commissioners

Date: Dec 4, 2025
From “Good Government” to Concrete Harm: Wyoming Supreme Court Reaffirms Limits on Declaratory and Taxpayer Standing in Williams v. Board of County Commissioners I. Introduction In Christopher...
Best Interests, Not Equal Time: No Constitutional Right to 50/50 Parenting Between Fit Parents in Wyoming – Commentary on Peter Augustus Smith v. Justine Delores Smith, 2025 WY 128

Best Interests, Not Equal Time: No Constitutional Right to 50/50 Parenting Between Fit Parents in Wyoming – Commentary on Peter Augustus Smith v. Justine Delores Smith, 2025 WY 128

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Best Interests, Not Equal Time: No Constitutional Right to 50/50 Parenting Between Fit Parents in Wyoming I. Introduction The Wyoming Supreme Court’s decision in Peter Augustus Smith v. Justine...
Production vs. Transportation in Wyoming Oil & Gas Taxation: Commentary on Wyoming Department of Revenue v. PacifiCorp & Merit Energy Co.

Production vs. Transportation in Wyoming Oil & Gas Taxation: Commentary on Wyoming Department of Revenue v. PacifiCorp & Merit Energy Co.

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Production vs. Transportation in Wyoming Oil & Gas Taxation: Commentary on Wyoming Department of Revenue v. PacifiCorp & Merit Energy Company, LLC, 2025 WY 126 I. Introduction The Wyoming Supreme...
Jurisdictional Limits of W.R.Cr.P. 41(g) and Sovereign Immunity in Lost-Property Claims: Commentary on Scott Dearold Bressette v. State of Wyoming (2025 WY 125)

Jurisdictional Limits of W.R.Cr.P. 41(g) and Sovereign Immunity in Lost-Property Claims: Commentary on Scott Dearold Bressette v. State of Wyoming (2025 WY 125)

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Jurisdictional Limits of W.R.Cr.P. 41(g) and Sovereign Immunity in Lost-Property Claims: Commentary on Scott Dearold Bressette v. State of Wyoming, 2025 WY 125 I. Introduction In Scott Dearold...
Consecutive by Silence: Wyoming High Court Confirms That Silent Oral Sentences Are Presumed Consecutive—and Written Judgments May Explicitly Say So (Brewer v. State, 2025 WY 123)

Consecutive by Silence: Wyoming High Court Confirms That Silent Oral Sentences Are Presumed Consecutive—and Written Judgments May Explicitly Say So (Brewer v. State, 2025 WY 123)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Consecutive by Silence: Wyoming High Court Confirms That Silent Oral Sentences Are Presumed Consecutive—and Written Judgments May Explicitly Say So Commentary on Brewer v. State, 2025 WY 123 (Wyo....
No Requirement for Self‑Defense Unanimity Instructions or Special Verdict Interrogatories Under Wyoming Law

No Requirement for Self‑Defense Unanimity Instructions or Special Verdict Interrogatories Under Wyoming Law

Date: Nov 8, 2025
No Requirement for Self‑Defense Unanimity Instructions or Special Verdict Interrogatories Under Wyoming Law Introduction In James Franklin Mavigliano v. State of Wyoming, 2025 WY 122 (Wyo. Nov. 6,...
Reasonable Suspicion for 100-Foot Turn-Signal Violations: Trained Officer Distance Estimates and Ambiguous Dashcam Footage Suffice

Reasonable Suspicion for 100-Foot Turn-Signal Violations: Trained Officer Distance Estimates and Ambiguous Dashcam Footage Suffice

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Reasonable Suspicion for 100-Foot Turn-Signal Violations: Trained Officer Distance Estimates and Ambiguous Dashcam Footage Suffice Case: Mark David Davis v. The State of Wyoming (2025 WY 120) Court:...
No Prophylactic Brady Duty: Wyoming Supreme Court Declines to Require Preemptive “Brady Cop” Disclosures and Sends Ambiguous Non‑Disparagement Clause to the Fact‑Finder

No Prophylactic Brady Duty: Wyoming Supreme Court Declines to Require Preemptive “Brady Cop” Disclosures and Sends Ambiguous Non‑Disparagement Clause to the Fact‑Finder

Date: Nov 8, 2025
No Prophylactic Brady Duty: Wyoming Supreme Court Declines to Require Preemptive “Brady Cop” Disclosures and Sends Ambiguous Non‑Disparagement Clause to the Fact‑Finder Introduction This commentary...
Silence Is Not Ambiguity: Wyoming High Court Holds Written Judgment Cannot Supply a Probation Length Omitted at Sentencing

Silence Is Not Ambiguity: Wyoming High Court Holds Written Judgment Cannot Supply a Probation Length Omitted at Sentencing

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Silence Is Not Ambiguity: Wyoming High Court Holds Written Judgment Cannot Supply a Probation Length Omitted at Sentencing Introduction In James D. Van Winter v. State of Wyoming, 2025 WY 119 (Wyo....
Silence Is Conflict: Wyoming Supreme Court Requires Probation Length Be Orally Pronounced; Written Judgment Cannot Supply Missing Term

Silence Is Conflict: Wyoming Supreme Court Requires Probation Length Be Orally Pronounced; Written Judgment Cannot Supply Missing Term

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Silence Is Conflict: Wyoming Supreme Court Requires Probation Length Be Orally Pronounced; Written Judgment Cannot Supply Missing Term Introduction In James D. Van Winter v. The State of Wyoming,...
Robin v. State: Wyoming Affirms 911 Calls Made During an Ongoing Emergency Are Nontestimonial and Admissible as Excited Utterances

Robin v. State: Wyoming Affirms 911 Calls Made During an Ongoing Emergency Are Nontestimonial and Admissible as Excited Utterances

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Robin v. State: Wyoming Affirms 911 Calls Made During an Ongoing Emergency Are Nontestimonial and Admissible as Excited Utterances Introduction In Michael Isreal Robin, Sr. v. State of Wyoming, 2025...
Intent to Steal May Be Inferred from Social Media Planning and Forced Entry; Co‑Conspirator Messages Admissible with Independent Proof of Conspiracy

Intent to Steal May Be Inferred from Social Media Planning and Forced Entry; Co‑Conspirator Messages Admissible with Independent Proof of Conspiracy

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Intent to Steal May Be Inferred from Social Media Planning and Forced Entry; Co‑Conspirator Messages Admissible with Independent Proof of Conspiracy Introduction This commentary examines the Wyoming...
Uniform “Reasonable Probability” Harmless‑Error Standard Adopted; Defendant’s Absence from Suppression Hearing Deemed Harmless; Confession Upheld as Voluntary

Uniform “Reasonable Probability” Harmless‑Error Standard Adopted; Defendant’s Absence from Suppression Hearing Deemed Harmless; Confession Upheld as Voluntary

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Uniform “Reasonable Probability” Harmless‑Error Standard Adopted; Defendant’s Absence from Suppression Hearing Deemed Harmless; Confession Upheld as Voluntary Introduction In Cheri Lynn Marler v....
“Dispositive Must Mean Case-Ending”: Wyoming Supreme Court Invalidates Non‑Dispositive Conditional Plea Under W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) in Kotrc v. State

“Dispositive Must Mean Case-Ending”: Wyoming Supreme Court Invalidates Non‑Dispositive Conditional Plea Under W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) in Kotrc v. State

Date: Oct 24, 2025
“Dispositive Must Mean Case-Ending”: Wyoming Supreme Court Invalidates Non‑Dispositive Conditional Plea Under W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) in Kotrc v. State Introduction In Cody Allan Kotrc v. State of...
A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults

A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults

Date: Oct 22, 2025
A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults Introduction In Christopher Robert Hicks v. The...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert