Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Section 9760(1) Requires Credit to the New Sentence for Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer When the Detainer Is Based on the Same Conduct as the New Charge: Commonwealth v. Phillips (Pa. 2025)

Section 9760(1) Requires Credit to the New Sentence for Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer When the Detainer Is Based on the Same Conduct as the New Charge: Commonwealth v. Phillips (Pa. 2025)

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Section 9760(1) Requires Credit to the New Sentence for Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer When the Detainer Is Based on the Same Conduct as the New Charge Commentary on Commonwealth v....
Conduct-Based Time Credit Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1): Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer Triggered by New‑Charge Conduct Must Be Credited to the New Sentence

Conduct-Based Time Credit Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1): Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer Triggered by New‑Charge Conduct Must Be Credited to the New Sentence

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Conduct-Based Time Credit Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1): Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer Triggered by New‑Charge Conduct Must Be Credited to the New Sentence Case: Commonwealth v. Phillips,...
Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8

Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8 Court:...
Post-Strunk Application of §6318: Verbal Pre‑Assault Commands as “Communication” — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2025)

Post-Strunk Application of §6318: Verbal Pre‑Assault Commands as “Communication” — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2025)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Post-Strunk Application of §6318: Verbal Pre‑Assault Commands as “Communication” — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2025) Introduction This commentary examines...
Post-Strunk Application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318: Verbal Commands as “Communication” for Unlawful Contact with a Minor — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith

Post-Strunk Application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318: Verbal Commands as “Communication” for Unlawful Contact with a Minor — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Post-Strunk Application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318: Verbal Commands as “Communication” for Unlawful Contact with a Minor — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith Introduction In...
Context Over Text: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds DOH’s Two‑Lab Testing Rule Under the Medical Marijuana Act (Wecht, J., dissenting)

Context Over Text: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds DOH’s Two‑Lab Testing Rule Under the Medical Marijuana Act (Wecht, J., dissenting)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Context Over Text: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds DOH’s Two‑Lab Testing Rule Under the Medical Marijuana Act (Wecht, J., dissenting) Introduction In Green Analytics North, LLC v. Department of...
Limiting “Other Person Under the Tenant’s Control” to the Initial Invitation Onto the Premises: Justice Wecht’s Dissent in Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh v. Nash

Limiting “Other Person Under the Tenant’s Control” to the Initial Invitation Onto the Premises: Justice Wecht’s Dissent in Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh v. Nash

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Limiting “Other Person Under the Tenant’s Control” to the Initial Invitation Onto the Premises: Justice Wecht’s Dissent in Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh v. Nash Introduction This...
On‑Bill Billing and the Limits of Section 1502: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Non‑Electric Add‑Ons Fall Outside “Service”; Scope of “All Electric Services” Reserved

On‑Bill Billing and the Limits of Section 1502: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Non‑Electric Add‑Ons Fall Outside “Service”; Scope of “All Electric Services” Reserved

Date: Sep 27, 2025
On‑Bill Billing and the Limits of Section 1502: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Non‑Electric Add‑Ons Fall Outside “Service”; Scope of “All Electric Services” Reserved Introduction In Interstate Gas...
Uniformity in Effect, Not Form: Denial of Local Tax Credits to Nonresidents Renders Pittsburgh’s Facility Fee Unconstitutional under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause

Uniformity in Effect, Not Form: Denial of Local Tax Credits to Nonresidents Renders Pittsburgh’s Facility Fee Unconstitutional under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Uniformity in Effect, Not Form: Denial of Local Tax Credits to Nonresidents Renders Pittsburgh’s Facility Fee Unconstitutional under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause Introduction In National Hockey...
Tranter v. Z&D Tour: Pennsylvania High Court Rejects “Key Witness” Requirement and Articulates a 100‑Mile Benchmark in Forum Non Conveniens Analysis

Tranter v. Z&D Tour: Pennsylvania High Court Rejects “Key Witness” Requirement and Articulates a 100‑Mile Benchmark in Forum Non Conveniens Analysis

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Tranter v. Z&D Tour: Pennsylvania High Court Rejects “Key Witness” Requirement and Articulates a 100‑Mile Benchmark in Forum Non Conveniens Analysis Introduction In a set of consolidated appeals...
SURE-Based Email Notifications and Accurate Coding as Pennsylvania’s Minimum Statewide Process for Defective Mail‑In Ballots

SURE-Based Email Notifications and Accurate Coding as Pennsylvania’s Minimum Statewide Process for Defective Mail‑In Ballots

Date: Sep 27, 2025
SURE-Based Email Notifications and Accurate Coding as Pennsylvania’s Minimum Statewide Process for Defective Mail‑In Ballots Introduction In Center for Coalfield Justice v. Washington County Board of...
Human Oversight and Secured-Only Systems: Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Interim Framework for Judicial Use of Generative AI

Human Oversight and Secured-Only Systems: Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Interim Framework for Judicial Use of Generative AI

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Human Oversight and Secured-Only Systems: Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Interim Framework for Judicial Use of Generative AI Introduction On September 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued...
“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail:  Commonwealth v. Rondon (Pa. 2025)

“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail: Commonwealth v. Rondon (Pa. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail Commonwealth v. Rondon, 294 A.3d ___ (Pa. 2025) 1. Introduction Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Middle District) — Decided 19 Aug 2025 Majority: McCaffery,...
Commonwealth v. Walker (2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles in Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Walker (2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles in Pennsylvania

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Commonwealth v. Walker (Pa. 2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles Introduction In Commonwealth v. Walker, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania—Western...
“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy

“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy 1. Introduction Grant v. Grant (Pa. 2025) tackles a...
Defining Agency Records in the Social-Media Age: The “Penncrest Factors” under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law

Defining Agency Records in the Social-Media Age: The “Penncrest Factors” under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Defining Agency Records in the Social-Media Age: The “Penncrest Factors” under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law 1. Introduction Penncrest School District v. Cagle is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s...
Supreme Court Clarifies Due-Process Safeguards in Administrative Attorney Suspensions Under Pa.R.D.E. 219

Supreme Court Clarifies Due-Process Safeguards in Administrative Attorney Suspensions Under Pa.R.D.E. 219

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies Due-Process Safeguards in Administrative Attorney Suspensions Under Pa.R.D.E. 219 1. Introduction On 13 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued an order entitled...
Registration Alone Does Not Defeat Privacy – A Commentary on Commonwealth v. Anderson (Pa. 2025)

Registration Alone Does Not Defeat Privacy – A Commentary on Commonwealth v. Anderson (Pa. 2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Registration Alone Does Not Defeat Privacy The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies the Commonwealth’s Initial Burden in Vehicle-Search Suppression Hearings Introduction In Commonwealth v. Anderson,...
“ARD Counts, Conviction Doesn’t”: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Use of ARD as a “Prior Offense” for Civil License Suspensions

“ARD Counts, Conviction Doesn’t”: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Use of ARD as a “Prior Offense” for Civil License Suspensions

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“ARD Counts, Conviction Doesn’t” – Commentary on Ferguson v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver Licensing (Pa. 2025) 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s decision in...
Automatic Administrative Suspension for CLE Non-Compliance – A New Phase in Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b) Enforcement

Automatic Administrative Suspension for CLE Non-Compliance – A New Phase in Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b) Enforcement

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Automatic Administrative Suspension for CLE Non-Compliance: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s July 2025 Order under Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b) 1. Introduction On 16 July 2025 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert