Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Accrual of Protection-Order Claims Under Pennsylvania’s Sexual Violence and Intimidation Act: Commentary on Weatherholtz v. McKelvey Commentary on Justice Dougherty’s Concurring and Dissenting...
Affirmative Public Benefit and Judicial Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Commentary on Consumer Advocate v. PUC; Appeal of Aqua Pennsylvania Wastewater, Inc. I. Introduction This...
Consumer Advocate v. PUC (East Whiteland): Reaffirming PUC Discretion and the “Affirmative Public Benefits” Test for Fair Market Value Utility Acquisitions I. Introduction This consolidated decision...
Affirmative Public Benefits and Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Consumer Advocate v. Pennsylvania PUC (Aqua / East Whiteland) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme...
Commonwealth v. Kurtz: Probable Cause and the Validity of Reverse Google Keyword Warrants in Pennsylvania I. Introduction The concurring opinion by Chief Justice Todd in Commonwealth v. Kurtz...
Probable Cause and Reverse Keyword Warrants: Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz I. Introduction This commentary examines the concurring opinion of Chief Justice Debra Todd in...
Probable Cause for Reverse Keyword Warrants Under a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test: Commentary on Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz I. Introduction The concurring opinion...
Possession as Dominion, Not Exclusivity: Duncan v. Chartiers Nature Conservancy and the Threshold for Quiet Title Actions in Pennsylvania I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s decision...
Judicial Gatekeeping of Kinship Care Participation in Pennsylvania Dependency Proceedings Commentary on the 2025 Amendments to Pa.R.J.C.P. 1241, 1242, 1501, 1514, 1601, and 1608 I. Introduction The...
Reaffirming Mandatory CLE and Administrative Suspension under Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b) I. Introduction On November 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued an order titled “Attorneys...
“Any Person” Includes High Public Officials: Justice Dougherty’s Dissent on the Waiver of Official Immunity under Pennsylvania’s Wiretap Act I. Introduction This commentary examines Justice Kevin...
Commonwealth v. Blakeney: No Public-Record Presumption in PCRA “Unknown Fact” Exception and Reasonable Diligence in Juror-Nondisclosure Claims Introduction In Commonwealth v. Blakeney (Pa. Nov. 5,...
Plain Meaning Over “Spirit”: Pennsylvania High Court Bars ARD Revocation for Pre‑Admission Conduct or Implied Conditions Introduction In Commonwealth v. Jenkins, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Home Inspection Law’s One‑Year Period Is a Statute of Repose Triggered by Report Delivery Case: Gidor v. Mangus (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District,...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Broadens MHPA Immunity to All Care During MHPA Admissions; Dissent Would Limit Immunity to Care That Facilitates Recovery from Mental Illness Introduction In Wunderly v....
No Precedent Set: Justice Wecht’s Dissent Urges Individualized Suspicion for Flight Plus Proximity to Marijuana Under Article I, Section 8 Introduction In Commonwealth v. Coles, E., Aplt., the...
No Agency-Made Privileges: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds 37 Pa. Code § 61.2 Does Not Create an Evidentiary Privilege Introduction In Toland v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Pa....
Section 9760(1) Requires Credit to the New Sentence for Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer When the Detainer Is Based on the Same Conduct as the New Charge Commentary on Commonwealth v....
Conduct-Based Time Credit Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1): Pre‑Sentence Custody on a Probation Detainer Triggered by New‑Charge Conduct Must Be Credited to the New Sentence Case: Commonwealth v. Phillips,...
Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8 Court:...