Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Gatekeeping the Three‑Judge Panel: Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Threshold Showing that a Redistricting Suit Is an “Apportionment” Challenge Before § 751.035 Is Triggered Introduction In a...
Gatekeeping Before Appointing Three‑Judge Redistricting Panels: Wisconsin Supreme Court to Decide What Counts as an “Apportionment” Challenge Under Wis. Stat. § 801.50(4m) Introduction In Wisconsin...
Burkert: Two-Year Suspension and Full Restitution as a Condition to File for Reinstatement in Law‑Firm Fee Diversion Cases Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew V. Burkert, 2025 WI...
Complete Restitution as a Precondition to Reinstatement and a Two-Year Benchmark for Law‑Firm Fee Diversion Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew V. Burkert, 2025 WI 44 (Wisconsin Supreme Court,...
Default, Progressive Discipline, and Revocation: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. Kovac and the Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s Latest Guidance on Attorney Misconduct 1. Introduction In Office of...
From Forgery to 30-Month Suspension: The Wisconsin Rule on Repeated Will-Witness Fraud Absent Broader Misconduct Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John P. Buran, 2025 WI 40, the...
The Kovac Default Doctrine: Serial Misconduct + Procedural Default = Mandatory Revocation in Wisconsin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. Kovac, 2025 WI 41 is the latest and most...
“Beyond the Six-Month Benchmark” – The Malloy Standard for Progressive Escalation of Attorney Discipline in Wisconsin 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy, 2025 WI 39, is...
Forged Witness Signatures and the Threshold for Revocation: A Commentary on Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John P. Buran, 2025 WI 40 1. Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John P. Buran,...
“Consult First, Act Later” – Wisconsin Affirms the Attorney’s Duty to Communicate Directly with Adjudged-Incompetent Clients (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas L. Frenn, 2025 WI ___) Introduction...
Evers v. Marklein: Wisconsin Adopts the Chadha Standard— Legislative Vetoes of Administrative Rules Declared Unconstitutional 1. Introduction In Evers v. Marklein, 2025 WI 36, the Supreme Court of...
Evers v. Marklein (2025 WI 36): Wisconsin Supreme Court Abolishes the Legislative Veto over Administrative Rules 1 Introduction Case name: Tony Evers v. Howard Marklein Court: Supreme Court of...
State v. Stetzer (2025 WI 34): Continuous Applicability of the Coercion Defence and Admissibility of Personal-History Evidence in Assessing Reasonableness Introduction In State v. Joan L. Stetzer,...
From Suspension to Automatic Revocation: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s New Standard for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel P. Steffen, 2025 WI 31 1. Introduction...
“One Incident – One Sentence, Many Verdicts”: State v. McAdory and the Revival Power of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c) I. Introduction State v. Carl Lee McAdory, 2025 WI 30, is the Wisconsin Supreme...
“Continuous Coercion” & the Role of Personal History: State v. Joan L. Stetzer, 2025 WI 34 – New Parameters for Wisconsin’s Coercion Defense 1. Introduction On 3 July 2025 the Wisconsin Supreme Court...
Wisconsin DOC v. Hayes: Supreme Court Clarifies “Good-Cause” Threshold for Hearsay at Probation-Revocation Hearings Introduction In State ex rel. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Division of...
Implied-Repeal-by-Substitution: Wisconsin Supreme Court Dispenses with the 1849 Abortion Ban in Josh Kaul v. Urmanski (2025 WI 32) 1. Introduction The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in Josh Kaul...
Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct: A Commentary on Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel P. Steffen, 2025 WI 31 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel...