Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c) Introduction State v. Carl Lee McAdory, 2025 WI 30, presented the Supreme Court...

Statutory History as an Intrinsic Aid: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Ends
Mandatory Collective Bargaining for the UW Hospitals & Clinics Authority

Statutory History as an Intrinsic Aid: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Ends Mandatory Collective Bargaining for the UW Hospitals & Clinics Authority

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Statutory History as an Intrinsic Aid: Service Employees International Union Healthcare Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (2025 WI 29) Introduction In Service Employees...
State v. Ramirez (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Abolishes the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence

State v. Ramirez (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Abolishes the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Luis A. Ramirez (2025 WI 28): Wisconsin Supreme Court Abolishes the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard and Re-Aligns Speedy-Trial Analysis with Barker Citation: 2025 WI 28, Supreme Court of...
Abrogation of the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Wisconsin’s Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence – A Commentary on State v. Luis A. Ramirez, 2025 WI 28

Abrogation of the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Wisconsin’s Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence – A Commentary on State v. Luis A. Ramirez, 2025 WI 28

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Abrogation of the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Wisconsin’s Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Luis A. Ramirez, 2025 WI 28 1. Introduction State v. Ramirez presented...
The Reinforced “Four-Corners” Doctrine: Wisconsin Supreme Court Re-limits the Governor’s Partial-Veto Power (Wisconsin State Legislature v. DPI, 2025 WI 27)

The Reinforced “Four-Corners” Doctrine: Wisconsin Supreme Court Re-limits the Governor’s Partial-Veto Power (Wisconsin State Legislature v. DPI, 2025 WI 27)

Date: Jun 26, 2025
The Reinforced “Four-Corners” Doctrine: Wisconsin Supreme Court Re-limits the Governor’s Partial-Veto Power Commentary on Wisconsin State Legislature v. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction,...
“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained:  A Commentary on Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ, 2025 WI 25

“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained: A Commentary on Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ, 2025 WI 25

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Continuing Debate in Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice, 2025 WI 25 1. Introduction The...
Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals:  Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ

Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals: Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals: Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice Introduction In Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice, 2025 WI 25, the Wisconsin...
“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24

“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision in Nicole...
Guidance ≠ Rule: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies that DNR May Enforce the Spills Law Without Substance-Specific Rulemaking

Guidance ≠ Rule: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies that DNR May Enforce the Spills Law Without Substance-Specific Rulemaking

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Guidance ≠ Rule: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies that DNR May Enforce the Spills Law Without Substance-Specific Rulemaking 1. Introduction In Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Inc. v....
“The Kaul Doctrine” – Exclusive Executive Authority to Settle Civil-Enforcement and Agency-Directed Litigation

“The Kaul Doctrine” – Exclusive Executive Authority to Settle Civil-Enforcement and Agency-Directed Litigation

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“The Kaul Doctrine” – Exclusive Executive Authority to Settle Civil-Enforcement and Agency-Directed Litigation 1. Introduction On 17 June 2025 the Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a unanimous...
“From Vouching to Variables” –  State v. Molde Recognizes Purely Statistical Evidence on False Reporting as Permissible Expert Testimony

“From Vouching to Variables” – State v. Molde Recognizes Purely Statistical Evidence on False Reporting as Permissible Expert Testimony

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“From Vouching to Variables” – State v. Molde Recognizes Purely Statistical Evidence on False Reporting as Permissible Expert Testimony 1. Introduction State v. Jobert L. Molde, 2025 WI 21, presented...
No Presumed Confidentiality in Remote Hearings – State v. Grady (2025 WI 22)

No Presumed Confidentiality in Remote Hearings – State v. Grady (2025 WI 22)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
No Presumed Confidentiality in Remote Hearings: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Ruling in State v. Kordell L. Grady (2025 WI 22) Key Holding: During remote or hybrid court proceedings, a circuit court...
State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule

State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule

Date: Jun 18, 2025
State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Jobert L. Molde In 2025...
“Speak Up or Waive It” – The Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Due-Process Protection for Confidential Attorney–Client Consultation in Remote Hearings

“Speak Up or Waive It” – The Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Due-Process Protection for Confidential Attorney–Client Consultation in Remote Hearings

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Speak Up or Waive It” – The New Wisconsin Rule on Confidential Attorney–Client Communications During Remote Proceedings Introduction In State v. Kordell L. Grady, 2025 WI 22, the Wisconsin Supreme...
Discretionary Best‐Interests Standard in TPR Dispositions: No Burden of Proof Imposed

Discretionary Best‐Interests Standard in TPR Dispositions: No Burden of Proof Imposed

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Discretionary Best‐Interests Standard in TPR Dispositions: No Burden of Proof Imposed Introduction State of Wisconsin v. H.C. is a 2025 decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court addressing whether, in...
Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness

Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness

Date: May 29, 2025
Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie M. Smith, 2025 WI 19, represents a watershed in...
License Revocation by Consent under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Lawyer Fitness

License Revocation by Consent under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Lawyer Fitness

Date: May 29, 2025
License Revocation by Consent under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Lawyer Fitness Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie M. Smith, 2025 WI 19, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, 2025 WI 18, is a Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17)

Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17)

Date: May 28, 2025
Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17) Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision in...
Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, 2025 WI 18...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert