Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule

State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule

Date: Jun 18, 2025
State v. Molde (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Declares Statistical False-Report Evidence Does Not Breach the Haseltine Anti-Vouching Rule Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Jobert L. Molde In 2025...
“Speak Up or Waive It” – The Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Due-Process Protection for Confidential Attorney–Client Consultation in Remote Hearings

“Speak Up or Waive It” – The Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Due-Process Protection for Confidential Attorney–Client Consultation in Remote Hearings

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Speak Up or Waive It” – The New Wisconsin Rule on Confidential Attorney–Client Communications During Remote Proceedings Introduction In State v. Kordell L. Grady, 2025 WI 22, the Wisconsin Supreme...
Discretionary Best‐Interests Standard in TPR Dispositions: No Burden of Proof Imposed

Discretionary Best‐Interests Standard in TPR Dispositions: No Burden of Proof Imposed

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Discretionary Best‐Interests Standard in TPR Dispositions: No Burden of Proof Imposed Introduction State of Wisconsin v. H.C. is a 2025 decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court addressing whether, in...
Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness

Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness

Date: May 29, 2025
Consent-Based License Revocation Under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Attorney Fitness Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie M. Smith, 2025 WI 19, represents a watershed in...
License Revocation by Consent under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Lawyer Fitness

License Revocation by Consent under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Lawyer Fitness

Date: May 29, 2025
License Revocation by Consent under SCR 22.19 for Criminal Acts Reflecting on Lawyer Fitness Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leslie M. Smith, 2025 WI 19, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, 2025 WI 18, is a Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17)

Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17)

Date: May 28, 2025
Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17) Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision in...
Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, 2025 WI 18...
Reinforcing Stipulation-Based Reinstatement Under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Reinforcing Stipulation-Based Reinstatement Under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Reinforcing Stipulation-Based Reinstatement Under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin Introduction In Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, 2025 WI 18 (Wis. May...
Judicial Composure and Impartiality: Suspension for Willful Violations of the Judicial Code of Ethics

Judicial Composure and Impartiality: Suspension for Willful Violations of the Judicial Code of Ethics

Date: May 28, 2025
Judicial Composure and Impartiality: Suspension for Willful Violations of the Judicial Code of Ethics Introduction Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Ellen K. Berz (2025 WI 17) is a per curiam...
Reinstatement by Joint Stipulation Under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Reinstatement by Joint Stipulation Under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Reinstatement by Joint Stipulation Under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, decided May 27, 2025 by the Supreme Court of...
Expanding the Scope of “Physician Who Treats” under Wisconsin’s Informed Consent Statute

Expanding the Scope of “Physician Who Treats” under Wisconsin’s Informed Consent Statute

Date: May 24, 2025
Expanding the Scope of “Physician Who Treats” under Wisconsin’s Informed Consent Statute Introduction This commentary examines the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in Melissa A. Hubbard v. Carol J....
Imposition of Pro Se Filing Restrictions to Prevent Abusive Litigation Practices

Imposition of Pro Se Filing Restrictions to Prevent Abusive Litigation Practices

Date: May 22, 2025
Imposition of Pro Se Filing Restrictions to Prevent Abusive Litigation Practices Introduction In the case of Stickney v. The Hon. Daniel G. Wood, No. 2025AP873-OA, decided May 21, 2025 by the Supreme...
Inherent Authority to Impose Filing Restrictions on Abusive Pro Se Litigants

Inherent Authority to Impose Filing Restrictions on Abusive Pro Se Litigants

Date: May 22, 2025
Inherent Authority to Impose Filing Restrictions on Abusive Pro Se Litigants Introduction In In re Tyler C. Frick, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin addressed a recurring pattern of abusive filings by...
Court’s Authority to Impose Filing Restrictions on Abusive Pro Se Litigants

Court’s Authority to Impose Filing Restrictions on Abusive Pro Se Litigants

Date: May 22, 2025
Court’s Authority to Impose Filing Restrictions on Abusive Pro Se Litigants Introduction In the Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s order dated May 21, 2025, the Court dismissed an original action petition...
Procedural Safeguards for Original Actions under Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Procedural Safeguards for Original Actions under Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules

Date: May 16, 2025
Procedural Safeguards for Original Actions under Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Introduction In Kate Felton v. Wisconsin Elections Commission (No. 2025AP999-OA), the Wisconsin Supreme Court considered...
Reinforcement of Procedural Rigors for Original Actions and Non-Party Amicus Briefs under Wisconsin Supreme Court Practice

Reinforcement of Procedural Rigors for Original Actions and Non-Party Amicus Briefs under Wisconsin Supreme Court Practice

Date: May 16, 2025
Reinforcement of Procedural Rigors for Original Actions and Non-Party Amicus Briefs under Wisconsin Supreme Court Practice Introduction In Elizabeth Bothfeld et al. v. Wisconsin Elections Commission...
Automatic Reversal for Denial of Counsel in Probation Revocation Proceedings

Automatic Reversal for Denial of Counsel in Probation Revocation Proceedings

Date: May 1, 2025
Automatic Reversal for Denial of Counsel in Probation Revocation Proceedings Introduction In Matthew C. Skamfer v. Phillip A. Grassmann, 2025 WI 45, file no. 2025AP000952 (Apr. 30, 2025), the Supreme...
In re Scholz: Burden-Shift and Restitution Policy in Attorney Discipline

In re Scholz: Burden-Shift and Restitution Policy in Attorney Discipline

Date: Apr 19, 2025
In re Scholz: Burden-Shift and Restitution Policy in Attorney Discipline Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl Robert Scholz, 2025 WI 13, presents a watershed moment in Wisconsin...
Defining the Bounds of the Wisconsin Governor’s Partial Veto: Striking Digits to Alter Fiscal Duration Permissible Under Article V § 10

Defining the Bounds of the Wisconsin Governor’s Partial Veto: Striking Digits to Alter Fiscal Duration Permissible Under Article V § 10

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Defining the Bounds of the Wisconsin Governor’s Partial Veto: Striking Digits to Alter Fiscal Duration Permissible Under Article V § 10 Introduction In Jeffery A. LeMieux, et al. v. Tony Evers, et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert