Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Special Courts Case Commentaries

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Deficiency Petitions: Hallmark Research Collective v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Deficiency Petitions: Hallmark Research Collective v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Nov 30, 2022
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Deficiency Petitions: Hallmark Research Collective v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction The case of Hallmark Research Collective v. Commissioner of Internal...
Limitations on Tax Court Jurisdiction Over Overpayments in Section 6330 Proceedings: Greene-Thapedi v. Commissioner

Limitations on Tax Court Jurisdiction Over Overpayments in Section 6330 Proceedings: Greene-Thapedi v. Commissioner

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Limitations on Tax Court Jurisdiction Over Overpayments in Section 6330 Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case Llwellyn Greene–Thapedi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 126 T.C. 1 (2006),...
Affirmation of IRS's Discretion in Levy Proceedings: Murphy v. Commissioner

Affirmation of IRS's Discretion in Levy Proceedings: Murphy v. Commissioner

Date: Dec 30, 2005
Affirmation of IRS's Discretion in Levy Proceedings: Murphy v. Commissioner Introduction Murphy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (125 T.C. 301, 2005) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Dismissal Without Prejudice for Section 6320(c) Petitions: Wagner v. Commissioner

Dismissal Without Prejudice for Section 6320(c) Petitions: Wagner v. Commissioner

Date: Apr 16, 2002
Dismissal Without Prejudice for Section 6320(c) Petitions: Wagner v. Commissioner Introduction In the case of Richard T. Wagner and Margie Wagner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (No. 7186–00L,...
Shifting Burden of Proof Under IRC Section 7491: Insights from Higbee v. Commissioner

Shifting Burden of Proof Under IRC Section 7491: Insights from Higbee v. Commissioner

Date: Jun 7, 2001
Shifting Burden of Proof Under IRC Section 7491: Insights from Higbee v. Commissioner Introduction The Tax Court case of Earl G. Higbee and Lesley A. Higbee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 116...
Burden of Proof in Tax Litigation: Insights from Higbee v. Commissioner under IRC §7491

Burden of Proof in Tax Litigation: Insights from Higbee v. Commissioner under IRC §7491

Date: Jun 7, 2001
Burden of Proof in Tax Litigation: Insights from Higbee v. Commissioner under IRC §7491 Introduction Earl G. Higbee and Lesley A. Higbee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is a pivotal case...
Enhancements to Multidistrict Litigation Procedures: Comprehensive Analysis

Enhancements to Multidistrict Litigation Procedures: Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Apr 3, 2001
Enhancements to Multidistrict Litigation Procedures: Comprehensive Analysis Introduction On April 2, 2001, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued an Order adopting substantial...
Affirmation of IRS Appeals Procedures in Davis v. Commissioner: Form 4340 Reliance, Hearing Limitations, and Section 6065 Exemption

Affirmation of IRS Appeals Procedures in Davis v. Commissioner: Form 4340 Reliance, Hearing Limitations, and Section 6065 Exemption

Date: Aug 1, 2000
Affirmation of IRS Appeals Procedures in Davis v. Commissioner: Form 4340 Reliance, Hearing Limitations, and Section 6065 Exemption Introduction In the landmark case of Ronald A. Davis v....
Tax Court Limits VEBA Contribution Deductions to Term Life Insurance Costs and Recognizes Excess as Constructive Dividends

Tax Court Limits VEBA Contribution Deductions to Term Life Insurance Costs and Recognizes Excess as Constructive Dividends

Date: Aug 1, 2000
Tax Court Limits VEBA Contribution Deductions to Term Life Insurance Costs and Recognizes Excess as Constructive Dividends Introduction The case of Neonatology Associates, P.A., et al. v....
Preclusion of Tax Liability Challenges Under IRC §6330(c)(2)(B): Sego v. Commissioner

Preclusion of Tax Liability Challenges Under IRC §6330(c)(2)(B): Sego v. Commissioner

Date: Jul 1, 2000
Preclusion of Tax Liability Challenges Under IRC §6330(c)(2)(B): Sego v. Commissioner Introduction In Steven and Davina Sego v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (114 T.C. 604, 2000), the United...
Jurisdictional Limits in Collection Due Process: Offiler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Jurisdictional Limits in Collection Due Process: Offiler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Jun 20, 2000
Jurisdictional Limits in Collection Due Process: Offiler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (114 T.C. 492) Introduction Lucielle J. Offiler, a taxpayer residing in Kissimmee, Florida, filed a...
Limitations on Contesting Underlying Tax Liability in Pre-Levy Hearings: Goza v. Commissioner of IRS

Limitations on Contesting Underlying Tax Liability in Pre-Levy Hearings: Goza v. Commissioner of IRS

Date: Mar 18, 2000
Limitations on Contesting Underlying Tax Liability in Pre-Levy Hearings: Goza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Howard Goza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 114 T.C. 176 (2000), is...
Strict Adherence to Deficiency Petition Process Under IRC Section 6330: Howard Goza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Strict Adherence to Deficiency Petition Process Under IRC Section 6330: Howard Goza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Mar 18, 2000
Strict Adherence to Deficiency Petition Process Under IRC Section 6330: Howard Goza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction The case of Howard Goza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,...
Romann v. Commissioner: Defining "Interested Party" in Declaratory Judgment Actions

Romann v. Commissioner: Defining "Interested Party" in Declaratory Judgment Actions

Date: Nov 5, 1998
Romann v. Commissioner: Defining "Interested Party" in Declaratory Judgment Actions 1. Introduction Romann v. Commissioner is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Tax Court on November 4,...
Sundstrand v. Commissioner: Payments for Cost Accounting Violations Not Covered by IRC Section 1481

Sundstrand v. Commissioner: Payments for Cost Accounting Violations Not Covered by IRC Section 1481

Date: May 5, 1992
Sundstrand v. Commissioner: Payments for Cost Accounting Violations Not Covered by IRC Section 1481 Introduction The case of Sundstrand Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of...
Repayments Under Settlement Agreements Excluded from Section 1481 Renegotiation Provisions

Repayments Under Settlement Agreements Excluded from Section 1481 Renegotiation Provisions

Date: May 5, 1992
Repayments Under Settlement Agreements Excluded from Section 1481 Renegotiation Provisions Introduction In the case of Sundstrand Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal...
Centralization of Asbestos Litigation under 28 U.S.C. § 1407: A Landmark Decision

Centralization of Asbestos Litigation under 28 U.S.C. § 1407: A Landmark Decision

Date: Jul 30, 1991
Centralization of Asbestos Litigation under 28 U.S.C. § 1407: A Landmark Decision Introduction The judicial landscape for asbestos-related litigation underwent a significant transformation with the...
Notice of Deficiency: Jurisdictional Implications in Monge v. Commissioner

Notice of Deficiency: Jurisdictional Implications in Monge v. Commissioner

Date: Jul 13, 1989
Notice of Deficiency: Jurisdictional Implications in Monge v. Commissioner Introduction Monge v. Commissioner is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Tax Court on July 12, 1989 (Docket No....
Res Judicata in Federal Tax Litigation: Florida Peach Corp. v. Commissioner

Res Judicata in Federal Tax Litigation: Florida Peach Corp. v. Commissioner

Date: Apr 13, 1988
Res Judicata in Federal Tax Litigation: Florida Peach Corp. v. Commissioner Introduction Florida Peach Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 90 T.C. 678 (1988), is a seminal case in the...
Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Multi-Entity Tax Deficiency Cases: Normac, Inc. v. Commissioner

Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Multi-Entity Tax Deficiency Cases: Normac, Inc. v. Commissioner

Date: Jan 27, 1988
Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Multi-Entity Tax Deficiency Cases: Normac, Inc. and Normac International, Limited v. Commissioner Introduction The case of Normac, Incorporated, and Normac...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert