Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Disjunctive Service on Corporations under Order XXIX Rule 2 CPC and the Non‑Extendable 120‑Day Limit for Written Statements: Commentary on MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A. & Anr. v. NTC Industries Ltd.

Disjunctive Service on Corporations under Order XXIX Rule 2 CPC and the Non‑Extendable 120‑Day Limit for Written Statements: Commentary on MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A. & Anr. v. NTC Industries Ltd.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Disjunctive Service on Corporations under Order XXIX Rule 2 CPC and the Non‑Extendable 120‑Day Limit for Written Statements: Commentary on MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A. & Anr. v. NTC Industries...
Trust Rules vs Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta High Court on Higher Pension for Employees of Exempted Establishments

Trust Rules vs Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta High Court on Higher Pension for Employees of Exempted Establishments

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Trust Rules vs Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta High Court’s Extension of Higher Pension to Employees of Exempted Establishments 1. Introduction This commentary examines the judgment dated 14...
Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): Commentary on Shroff Geeta v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs (Calcutta High Court, 2025)

Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): Commentary on Shroff Geeta v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs (Calcutta High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): A Detailed Commentary on Shroff Geeta (OA/10/2019/PT/KOL) v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs Court:...
Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC

Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC Introduction In Suhana Khatun and Others v. State of West Bengal (CRM...
Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio: Calcutta High Court in Tata Steel Ltd. v. Union of India

Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio: Calcutta High Court in Tata Steel Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio Introduction In a set of writ petitions arising out of tax disputes of the...
Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Introduction In Central Bank of India & Ors v. Jay Kumar Goyal & Ors (IA...
Zero FIR Is a Police Facilitation, Not a Jurisdictional Bridge for Magistrates: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Territorial Limits of Section 156(3) in Hate-Speech Complaints

Zero FIR Is a Police Facilitation, Not a Jurisdictional Bridge for Magistrates: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Territorial Limits of Section 156(3) in Hate-Speech Complaints

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Zero FIR Is a Police Facilitation, Not a Jurisdictional Bridge for Magistrates: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Territorial Limits of Section 156(3) in Hate-Speech Complaints Case: Anirban Bhattacharya...
As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared

As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared

Date: Sep 26, 2025
As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared Decision: Cotton Casuals India Private Limited &...
Appointing High Court Is the “Court” under Section 29A: Calcutta High Court Affirms Residual Jurisdiction to Extend or Substitute Arbitrator

Appointing High Court Is the “Court” under Section 29A: Calcutta High Court Affirms Residual Jurisdiction to Extend or Substitute Arbitrator

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Appointing High Court Is the “Court” under Section 29A: Calcutta High Court Affirms Residual Jurisdiction to Extend or Substitute Arbitrator Introduction In Best Eastern Business House Pvt Ltd v....
Rarest-of-Rare Recalibrated: Calcutta High Court commutes death penalty to “life without remission for 40 years” and overturns rape conviction for want of medical corroboration

Rarest-of-Rare Recalibrated: Calcutta High Court commutes death penalty to “life without remission for 40 years” and overturns rape conviction for want of medical corroboration

Date: Sep 19, 2025
Rarest-of-Rare Recalibrated: Calcutta High Court commutes death penalty to “life without remission for 40 years” and overturns rape conviction for want of medical corroboration Introduction In State...
NMC Teaching-Experience Requirement Prevails: Study Leave for Super-Specialty Cannot Be Counted Toward Promotion as Associate Professor

NMC Teaching-Experience Requirement Prevails: Study Leave for Super-Specialty Cannot Be Counted Toward Promotion as Associate Professor

Date: Sep 13, 2025
NMC Teaching-Experience Requirement Prevails: Study Leave for Super-Specialty Cannot Be Counted Toward Promotion as Associate Professor Introduction In The Dean in Charge, ESI-PGIMSR, ESIC Medical...
Calcutta High Court sets temporal cut‑off for counterclaims in arbitration: no counterclaim after issues are framed; exceptional allowance only until start of claimant’s evidence

Calcutta High Court sets temporal cut‑off for counterclaims in arbitration: no counterclaim after issues are framed; exceptional allowance only until start of claimant’s evidence

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Counterclaims in Arbitration: Calcutta High Court fixes an outer limit tied to “framing of issues,” with rare leeway until commencement of claimant’s evidence Introduction In Gayatri Granites & Ors...
Consent of Existing Apartment Owners Is a Condition Precedent for Additional Structures; NKDA’s Non‑Obstante Clause Cannot Eclipse the WB Apartment Ownership Act and Promoters Act — Calcutta High Court Orders Demolition of Elita Garden Vista’s 16th Tower

Consent of Existing Apartment Owners Is a Condition Precedent for Additional Structures; NKDA’s Non‑Obstante Clause Cannot Eclipse the WB Apartment Ownership Act and Promoters Act — Calcutta High Court Orders Demolition of Elita Garden Vista’s 16th Tower

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Consent of Existing Apartment Owners Is a Condition Precedent for Additional Structures; NKDA’s Non‑Obstante Clause Cannot Eclipse the WB Apartment Ownership Act and Promoters Act — Calcutta High...
Section 105 CrPC Held Inapplicable to Service of Notice in Criminal Revisions Involving Foreign Parties – A Commentary on UBS Switzerland AG v. State of West Bengal

Section 105 CrPC Held Inapplicable to Service of Notice in Criminal Revisions Involving Foreign Parties – A Commentary on UBS Switzerland AG v. State of West Bengal

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Section 105 CrPC Held Inapplicable to Service of Notice in Criminal Revisions Involving Foreign Parties Commentary on UBS Switzerland AG v. State of West Bengal & Ors., Calcutta High Court, C.R.R....
“No Locus Standi of an Accused to Appeal Against Transfer-of-Investigation Orders” – Commentary on Sahajahan Sk. & Anr. v. Supriya Mandal Gayen & Ors., Calcutta High Court (2025)

“No Locus Standi of an Accused to Appeal Against Transfer-of-Investigation Orders” – Commentary on Sahajahan Sk. & Anr. v. Supriya Mandal Gayen & Ors., Calcutta High Court (2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“No Locus Standi of an Accused to Appeal Against Transfer-of-Investigation Orders” – Commentary on Sahajahan Sk. & Anr. v. Supriya Mandal Gayen & Ors., Calcutta High Court (2025) 1. Introduction The...
“Notice-Before-Cancellation” Doctrine for Domicile Certificates: Ravi Kumar Ray v. Union of India & Ors. (2025)

“Notice-Before-Cancellation” Doctrine for Domicile Certificates: Ravi Kumar Ray v. Union of India & Ors. (2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Notice-Before-Cancellation” Doctrine for Domicile Certificates Commentary on Ravi Kumar Ray v. Union of India & Ors. (2025 CHC-AS 1466) 1. Introduction The Calcutta High Court’s decision in Ravi...
Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity: 
            Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025)

Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity: Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025 CHC-AS 1093) Introduction In Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of...
“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (Hansraj Koley v. Secretary, Labour Department & Ors., 2025)

“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (Hansraj Koley v. Secretary, Labour Department & Ors., 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1. Introduction The Calcutta High Court, in Hansraj Koley v. The Secretary,...
“Grounds-of-Arrest Bail Doctrine”: Calcutta High Court Makes Written Communication of Arrest Grounds a Pre-condition for Valid Custody under the NDPS Act

“Grounds-of-Arrest Bail Doctrine”: Calcutta High Court Makes Written Communication of Arrest Grounds a Pre-condition for Valid Custody under the NDPS Act

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“Grounds-of-Arrest Bail Doctrine”: Calcutta High Court Makes Written Communication of Arrest Grounds a Pre-condition for Valid Custody under the NDPS Act Introduction On 11 June 2025, the Calcutta...
Counting All Hands: Calcutta High Court Extends Payment of Gratuity Act Coverage to Co-operative Societies Employing Ten or More Workers (Including Daily-Rated Labour)

Counting All Hands: Calcutta High Court Extends Payment of Gratuity Act Coverage to Co-operative Societies Employing Ten or More Workers (Including Daily-Rated Labour)

Date: May 24, 2025
Counting All Hands: Calcutta High Court Extends Payment of Gratuity Act Coverage to Co-operative Societies Employing Ten or More Workers (Including Daily-Rated Labour) Introduction In Midnapur...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert