Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Montana Case Commentaries

Montana Supreme Court Authorizes Community Justice Workers to Provide Limited Legal Services in Justice and City Courts

Montana Supreme Court Authorizes Community Justice Workers to Provide Limited Legal Services in Justice and City Courts

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Montana Supreme Court Authorizes Community Justice Workers to Provide Limited Legal Services in Justice and City Courts Introduction In administrative docket AF 11-0765, the Supreme Court of Montana...
Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss

Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss Introduction In Fahrnow v. E-5 Oilfield Services, 2025 MT 220, the Montana...
Street-Time Credit Cannot Be Denied for Restitution Nonpayment Without a DOC-Set Payment Schedule and Specific, Recorded Violations: State v. Powell (2025 MT 218)

Street-Time Credit Cannot Be Denied for Restitution Nonpayment Without a DOC-Set Payment Schedule and Specific, Recorded Violations: State v. Powell (2025 MT 218)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Street-Time Credit Cannot Be Denied for Restitution Nonpayment Without a DOC-Set Payment Schedule and Specific, Recorded Violations Commentary on State v. Powell, 2025 MT 218 (Mont. Sept. 30, 2025)...
Richeson and the Limits of Plain-Error Review: Highlighting Unrebutted Expert Evidence Is Not Burden Shifting; Record‑Silent IAC Claims Belong in Postconviction Proceedings

Richeson and the Limits of Plain-Error Review: Highlighting Unrebutted Expert Evidence Is Not Burden Shifting; Record‑Silent IAC Claims Belong in Postconviction Proceedings

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Richeson and the Limits of Plain-Error Review: Highlighting Unrebutted Expert Evidence Is Not Burden Shifting; Record‑Silent IAC Claims Belong in Postconviction Proceedings Case: State v. L....
Established Facts, Not Volume: Jackson v. State Clarifies Montana’s § 46‑21‑104(1)(c) Threshold for Ineffective-Assistance Postconviction Petitions and Expert-Witness Claims

Established Facts, Not Volume: Jackson v. State Clarifies Montana’s § 46‑21‑104(1)(c) Threshold for Ineffective-Assistance Postconviction Petitions and Expert-Witness Claims

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Established Facts, Not Volume: Jackson v. State Clarifies Montana’s § 46‑21‑104(1)(c) Threshold for Ineffective-Assistance Postconviction Petitions and Expert-Witness Claims Court: Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error

Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming Montana’s Ariegwe Speedy‑Trial Framework: Defendant‑Caused Continuances Control the Balance; Evidence‑Anchored “Guilt” Statements in Closing Are Not Plain Error Introduction This...
No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice

No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice Note: The Montana Supreme Court designated...
Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone

Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone Introduction In Apecella v....
Clarifying Brady’s “Reasonable Probability” Standard and the Use of Supervisory Control to Prevent a Second Trial Under a Mistake of Law

Clarifying Brady’s “Reasonable Probability” Standard and the Use of Supervisory Control to Prevent a Second Trial Under a Mistake of Law

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Clarifying Brady’s “Reasonable Probability” Standard and the Use of Supervisory Control to Prevent a Second Trial Under a Mistake of Law Introduction This supervisory-control proceeding arises from a...
Supervised Visitation Conditioned on Rehabilitation Programs Upheld Under Best-Interest Review in Nonprecedential Memorandum Decision

Supervised Visitation Conditioned on Rehabilitation Programs Upheld Under Best-Interest Review in Nonprecedential Memorandum Decision

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Supervised Visitation Conditioned on Rehabilitation Programs Upheld Under Best-Interest Review in Nonprecedential Memorandum Decision Case: In re the Parenting of J.E.B. & B.L.B., 2025 MT 216N (Mont....
State v. Post: Montana Supreme Court Requires On-the-Record Ability-to-Pay Findings for Criminal Fines and Surcharges; Oral Pronouncement Controls Over Written Judgment

State v. Post: Montana Supreme Court Requires On-the-Record Ability-to-Pay Findings for Criminal Fines and Surcharges; Oral Pronouncement Controls Over Written Judgment

Date: Sep 25, 2025
State v. Post: Mandatory Ability-to-Pay Findings for Fines, Fees, and Surcharges; Oral Sentence Controls Introduction In State v. Post, 2025 MT 215 (Mont. Sept. 23, 2025), the Montana Supreme Court...
Exhaust-Local-Then-Random: Montana’s New Contiguous-Pool Protocol for Assigning Substituted District Judges Under SB 41

Exhaust-Local-Then-Random: Montana’s New Contiguous-Pool Protocol for Assigning Substituted District Judges Under SB 41

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Exhaust-Local-Then-Random: Montana’s New Contiguous-Pool Protocol for Assigning Substituted District Judges Under SB 41 Introduction In AF 09-0289, the Supreme Court of Montana announced a revised...
No “Private Areas” Exception: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms That Probation Home Visits—Including Bedroom Walkthroughs—Are Not Searches

No “Private Areas” Exception: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms That Probation Home Visits—Including Bedroom Walkthroughs—Are Not Searches

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No “Private Areas” Exception: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms That Probation Home Visits—Including Bedroom Walkthroughs—Are Not Searches Case: State v. Manyhides, 2025 MT 204 (Mont. Sept. 9, 2025)...
Implied Consent Opens the Door: Montana Supreme Court Affirms Post‑Trial Amendment and Third‑Party Parental Interest Under § 40‑4‑228, MCA (Marriage of Rehbein & Paddock, 2025 MT 201)

Implied Consent Opens the Door: Montana Supreme Court Affirms Post‑Trial Amendment and Third‑Party Parental Interest Under § 40‑4‑228, MCA (Marriage of Rehbein & Paddock, 2025 MT 201)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Implied Consent Opens the Door: Montana Supreme Court Affirms Post‑Trial Amendment and Third‑Party Parental Interest Under § 40‑4‑228, MCA Case: In re the Marriage of Rehbein and Paddock (2025 MT...
No Amendment After Final Adjudication: Montana’s Strict Bar on Successive Post‑Conviction Petitions and the Narrow Actual‑Innocence Exception

No Amendment After Final Adjudication: Montana’s Strict Bar on Successive Post‑Conviction Petitions and the Narrow Actual‑Innocence Exception

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No Amendment After Final Adjudication: Montana’s Strict Bar on Successive Post‑Conviction Petitions and the Narrow Actual‑Innocence Exception Nonprecedential Note: This is a memorandum opinion under...
Ascertainability Is Not a Mandatory Prerequisite Under Montana Rule 23: Predominance and Early-Stage Deference Affirmed in Allied Waste v. LH Residential

Ascertainability Is Not a Mandatory Prerequisite Under Montana Rule 23: Predominance and Early-Stage Deference Affirmed in Allied Waste v. LH Residential

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Ascertainability Is Not a Mandatory Prerequisite Under Montana Rule 23: Predominance and Early-Stage Deference Affirmed in Allied Waste v. LH Residential Introduction In Allied Waste v. LH...
Kessler and the Due Process Floor at Sentencing: No Resentencing Absent Reliance on Materially False Information; Clerical Correction of Offense Level under § 45-6-301(7)(b)(i), MCA

Kessler and the Due Process Floor at Sentencing: No Resentencing Absent Reliance on Materially False Information; Clerical Correction of Offense Level under § 45-6-301(7)(b)(i), MCA

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Kessler and the Due Process Floor at Sentencing: No Resentencing Absent Reliance on Materially False Information; Clerical Correction of Offense Level under § 45-6-301(7)(b)(i), MCA Court: Supreme...
Supervisory Control Denied Absent a Developed Record; Pretrial Subpoenas of Child Victims to Test Waiver Are Unreasonable Under Montana’s Victim‑Advocate Privilege

Supervisory Control Denied Absent a Developed Record; Pretrial Subpoenas of Child Victims to Test Waiver Are Unreasonable Under Montana’s Victim‑Advocate Privilege

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Supervisory Control Denied Absent a Developed Record; Pretrial Subpoenas of Child Victims to Test Waiver Are Unreasonable Under Montana’s Victim‑Advocate Privilege Case: A. Burch v. Twentieth...
State v. Shewalter: Continuous Officer‑Documented Noncompliance Can Extinguish All Elapsed “Street Time”; Detention Credit Is Mandatory and Must Be Precisely Calculated

State v. Shewalter: Continuous Officer‑Documented Noncompliance Can Extinguish All Elapsed “Street Time”; Detention Credit Is Mandatory and Must Be Precisely Calculated

Date: Sep 10, 2025
State v. Shewalter: Continuous Officer‑Documented Noncompliance Can Extinguish All Elapsed “Street Time”; Detention Credit Is Mandatory and Must Be Precisely Calculated Introduction In State v....
State v. Arvidson: Montana Supreme Court Narrows Direct Appellate Review of Ineffective Assistance to “Rare Instances” and Reaffirms the Oral‑Pronouncement Rule

State v. Arvidson: Montana Supreme Court Narrows Direct Appellate Review of Ineffective Assistance to “Rare Instances” and Reaffirms the Oral‑Pronouncement Rule

Date: Sep 10, 2025
State v. Arvidson: Limiting Direct IAC Review to “Rare Instances” and Enforcing the Oral‑Pronouncement Rule Introduction In State v. Arvidson, 2025 MT 200, the Montana Supreme Court addressed two...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert