Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Montana Case Commentaries

Mere Presence Is Not Corroboration: State v. Matt and Montana’s Strict Accomplice-Testimony Rule

Mere Presence Is Not Corroboration: State v. Matt and Montana’s Strict Accomplice-Testimony Rule

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Mere Presence Is Not Corroboration: State v. Matt and Montana’s Strict Accomplice-Testimony Rule I. Introduction In State v. Matt, 2025 MT 264, the Montana Supreme Court reversed a drug-possession...
Zimmermann v. Wardle: The Consequences of Failing to Provide a Certified Transcript in Protection-Order Appeals

Zimmermann v. Wardle: The Consequences of Failing to Provide a Certified Transcript in Protection-Order Appeals

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Zimmermann v. Wardle (Mont. 2025): The Consequences of Failing to Provide a Certified Transcript in Protection-Order Appeals I. Introduction Zimmermann v. Wardle, 2025 MT 266N (DA 25-0083), is a...
No Final Disclosures, No Set-Aside: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies § 40-4-253(5), MCA Requires Perjury in a Final Declaration and Sanctions Vexatious Appeals

No Final Disclosures, No Set-Aside: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies § 40-4-253(5), MCA Requires Perjury in a Final Declaration and Sanctions Vexatious Appeals

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Final Disclosures, No Set-Aside: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies § 40-4-253(5), MCA Requires Perjury in a Final Declaration and Sanctions Vexatious Appeals Introduction In In re the Marriage of...
When Courts Permit Video Appearance, They Must Clarify Limits Upfront: Mid‑Trial Denial of Defendant’s Video Testimony Is Abuse of Discretion; Accountability Proven Across Closely‑Linked Transactions

When Courts Permit Video Appearance, They Must Clarify Limits Upfront: Mid‑Trial Denial of Defendant’s Video Testimony Is Abuse of Discretion; Accountability Proven Across Closely‑Linked Transactions

Date: Nov 15, 2025
When Courts Permit Video Appearance, They Must Clarify Limits Upfront: Mid‑Trial Denial of Defendant’s Video Testimony Is Abuse of Discretion; Accountability Proven Across Closely‑Linked Transactions...
Estate of Damjanovich: Holographic Will Valid Only to Appoint Personal Representative; No Power of Appointment Without Transfer and Identifiable Appointees under § 72‑7‑201, MCA

Estate of Damjanovich: Holographic Will Valid Only to Appoint Personal Representative; No Power of Appointment Without Transfer and Identifiable Appointees under § 72‑7‑201, MCA

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Estate of Damjanovich: Holographic Will Valid Only to Appoint Personal Representative; No Power of Appointment Without Transfer and Identifiable Appointees under § 72‑7‑201, MCA Introduction In...
Mandatory Cross-Examination at Montana Protection-Order Hearings and Appellate Remand on Inadequate Records: Commentary on Hennon v. Weber, 2025 MT 260

Mandatory Cross-Examination at Montana Protection-Order Hearings and Appellate Remand on Inadequate Records: Commentary on Hennon v. Weber, 2025 MT 260

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Mandatory Cross-Examination at Montana Protection-Order Hearings and Appellate Remand on Inadequate Records: Commentary on Hennon v. Weber, 2025 MT 260 Introduction In Hennon v. Weber, 2025 MT 260,...
Nonprecedential Affirmance: Applying Law-of-the-Case and Best-Interests Standards to Modify a Third-Party Parenting Plan in Montana

Nonprecedential Affirmance: Applying Law-of-the-Case and Best-Interests Standards to Modify a Third-Party Parenting Plan in Montana

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Nonprecedential Affirmance: Applying Law-of-the-Case and Best-Interests Standards to Modify a Third-Party Parenting Plan in Montana Introduction In Parenting of L.M.A.R. & N.R.R. (DA 25-0305), the...
Deferred Prosecution Agreements Cannot Be Incorporated into Plea Agreements under Montana Law: State v. Pein (2025 MT 258)

Deferred Prosecution Agreements Cannot Be Incorporated into Plea Agreements under Montana Law: State v. Pein (2025 MT 258)

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Deferred Prosecution Agreements Cannot Be Incorporated into Plea Agreements under Montana Law Commentary on State v. Pein, 2025 MT 258 (Mont. Nov. 12, 2025) Introduction In State v. Pein, the Supreme...
Pierce: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Conduct‑Based “Knowingly” for SIWOC and Clarifies Limits on Alcohol-Use Evidence

Pierce: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Conduct‑Based “Knowingly” for SIWOC and Clarifies Limits on Alcohol-Use Evidence

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Pierce: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Conduct‑Based “Knowingly” for SIWOC and Clarifies Limits on Alcohol-Use Evidence Introduction In State v. D. Pierce, 2025 MT 257 (Supreme Court of Montana,...
State v. Prado: Harmless-Error Review for Redacted Jail-Call Context Statements and Strict Limits on Plain-Error Claims of “Credibility-Boosting” Background Testimony

State v. Prado: Harmless-Error Review for Redacted Jail-Call Context Statements and Strict Limits on Plain-Error Claims of “Credibility-Boosting” Background Testimony

Date: Nov 15, 2025
State v. Prado: Harmless-Error Review for Redacted Jail-Call Context Statements and Strict Limits on Plain-Error Claims of “Credibility-Boosting” Background Testimony Introduction In State v. Prado,...
Right to Peremptory Substitution of District Judge in De Novo Appeals from Non-Record Justice Courts: French v. Twentieth Judicial District Court (Mont. 2025)

Right to Peremptory Substitution of District Judge in De Novo Appeals from Non-Record Justice Courts: French v. Twentieth Judicial District Court (Mont. 2025)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Right to Peremptory Substitution of District Judge in De Novo Appeals from Non-Record Justice Courts Commentary on French v. Twentieth Judicial District Court, 2025 MT 254 (OP 25-0642) Introduction...
Comparative Negligence in Jail-Custody Cases: Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County Confirms “Special Circumstances” as the Exception

Comparative Negligence in Jail-Custody Cases: Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County Confirms “Special Circumstances” as the Exception

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Comparative Negligence in Jail-Custody Cases: Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County Confirms “Special Circumstances” as the Exception Introduction In Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County, 2025 MT 252,...
“Illusion of Choice” and Strict Compliance in Montana Civil Commitments: No Waiver of the Five‑Day Hearing or Qualified Evaluation Requirements Absent Knowing, Voluntary Consent (Matter of J.L.O.)

“Illusion of Choice” and Strict Compliance in Montana Civil Commitments: No Waiver of the Five‑Day Hearing or Qualified Evaluation Requirements Absent Knowing, Voluntary Consent (Matter of J.L.O.)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
“Illusion of Choice” and Strict Compliance in Montana Civil Commitments: No Waiver of the Five‑Day Hearing or Qualified Evaluation Requirements Absent Knowing, Voluntary Consent Introduction In...
Broad Titles, Liberal Construction: “Vaccination Status” Encompasses EUA/Trial‑Vaccine Mandate Bans Under Montana’s Article V, § 11(3)

Broad Titles, Liberal Construction: “Vaccination Status” Encompasses EUA/Trial‑Vaccine Mandate Bans Under Montana’s Article V, § 11(3)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Broad Titles, Liberal Construction: “Vaccination Status” Encompasses EUA/Trial‑Vaccine Mandate Bans Under Montana’s Article V, § 11(3) Introduction In Netzer, Krautter & Brown, P.C. and Donald L....
Experts Are Not Automatically Exempt from Sequestration; Presumption of Vindictiveness Bars Increased Sentences Based on Appeal or Lack of Remorse — Commentary on State v. Grimshaw, 2025 MT 250

Experts Are Not Automatically Exempt from Sequestration; Presumption of Vindictiveness Bars Increased Sentences Based on Appeal or Lack of Remorse — Commentary on State v. Grimshaw, 2025 MT 250

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Experts Are Not Automatically Exempt from Sequestration; Presumption of Vindictiveness Bars Increased Sentences Based on Appeal or Lack of Remorse — Commentary on State v. Grimshaw, 2025 MT 250 Case:...
Resentencing Required When a District Court Exceeds the Statutory Maximum—Even with a Fully Suspended Term (State v. S. Foster, 2025 MT 255N)

Resentencing Required When a District Court Exceeds the Statutory Maximum—Even with a Fully Suspended Term (State v. S. Foster, 2025 MT 255N)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Resentencing Required When a District Court Exceeds the Statutory Maximum—Even with a Fully Suspended Term (State v. S. Foster, 2025 MT 255N) Court: Supreme Court of Montana Date: November 4, 2025...
State v. Ellis: Open-Driveway Encounters—No Search When Evidence Is Voluntarily Produced, and Miranda Not Required During Noncustodial Driveway Questioning

State v. Ellis: Open-Driveway Encounters—No Search When Evidence Is Voluntarily Produced, and Miranda Not Required During Noncustodial Driveway Questioning

Date: Nov 7, 2025
State v. Ellis: Open-Driveway Encounters—No Search When Evidence Is Voluntarily Produced, and Miranda Not Required During Noncustodial Driveway Questioning Introduction In State v. Z. Ellis, 2025 MT...
Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4

Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 Important procedural note: Although the source is labeled as an...
Initial Arraignment Is the Sole Trigger for Automatic Judicial Substitution in Montana Criminal Cases

Initial Arraignment Is the Sole Trigger for Automatic Judicial Substitution in Montana Criminal Cases

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Initial Arraignment Is the Sole Trigger for Automatic Judicial Substitution in Montana Criminal Cases Introduction In Caye v. Twentieth Judicial District Court (2025 MT 246), the Supreme Court of...
Basque (Mont. 2025): Denial of Venue Change in Parenting-Plan Enforcement Under Ends-of-Justice and Continuing Jurisdiction (Noncitable)

Basque (Mont. 2025): Denial of Venue Change in Parenting-Plan Enforcement Under Ends-of-Justice and Continuing Jurisdiction (Noncitable)

Date: Oct 31, 2025
Basque (Mont. 2025): Denial of Venue Change in Parenting-Plan Enforcement Under Ends-of-Justice and Continuing Jurisdiction (Noncitable) Introduction In In re the Marriage of Basque, 2025 MT 247N,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert