Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims

Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims Introduction In a precedential...
No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO

No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability

Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability Introduction In Jose Miguel German Santos v....
Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville

Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville Note: This Third Circuit disposition is designated not...
Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates

Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates Introduction In Robert Sofaly v. Portfolio...
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515

"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515

Date: Sep 24, 2025
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (not...
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions

"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions

Date: Sep 24, 2025
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Not...
Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey

Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey Introduction In a precedential opinion...
Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb

Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: The Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb Introduction In a precedential opinion, the...
No Qualified Immunity for Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence: Third Circuit’s Evans v. City of Newark

No Qualified Immunity for Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence: Third Circuit’s Evans v. City of Newark

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Qualified Immunity for Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence Evans v. City of Newark (3d Cir. Sept. 12, 2025) Introduction In a precedential decision, the United States Court of...
Section 666 in the Territories: Third Circuit Affirms that Commissioners of Statutorily “Independent” Agencies Are Government Agents and Federal Block Grants Are “Benefits”

Section 666 in the Territories: Third Circuit Affirms that Commissioners of Statutorily “Independent” Agencies Are Government Agents and Federal Block Grants Are “Benefits”

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Section 666 in the Territories: Third Circuit Affirms that Commissioners of Statutorily “Independent” Agencies Are Government Agents and Federal Block Grants Are “Benefits” Case: United States v....
No Duty to Exhaustively Vet Citizen-Witness Backgrounds; Probable Cause Sustained by Partial Corroboration and Reconstructed Affidavit — United States v. Larnerd (3d Cir. 2025)

No Duty to Exhaustively Vet Citizen-Witness Backgrounds; Probable Cause Sustained by Partial Corroboration and Reconstructed Affidavit — United States v. Larnerd (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Duty to Exhaustively Vet Citizen-Witness Backgrounds; Probable Cause Sustained by Partial Corroboration and Reconstructed Affidavit — United States v. Larnerd (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction In United...
Qualified Immunity Does Not Shield Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence: Third Circuit’s Evans v. Newark

Qualified Immunity Does Not Shield Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence: Third Circuit’s Evans v. Newark

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Qualified Immunity Does Not Shield Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence Commentary on Lee Evans v. Newark City, Nos. 23-1723 & 23-1724 (3d Cir. Sept. 12, 2025) Introduction This...
Unapproved Class Settlements Don’t Moot Previously Granted Injunctive Relief: Third Circuit Affirms Permanent Injunction Despite Delay and Minor Drafting Errors

Unapproved Class Settlements Don’t Moot Previously Granted Injunctive Relief: Third Circuit Affirms Permanent Injunction Despite Delay and Minor Drafting Errors

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Unapproved Class Settlements Don’t Moot Previously Granted Injunctive Relief: Third Circuit Affirms Permanent Injunction Despite Delay and Minor Drafting Errors Case: Vaudral Luxama v. Ironbound...
Images and Mentions Are Not Enough: Third Circuit Clarifies “Of and Concerning” and Reaffirms Opinion/Substantial-Truth Shields for Political Commentary

Images and Mentions Are Not Enough: Third Circuit Clarifies “Of and Concerning” and Reaffirms Opinion/Substantial-Truth Shields for Political Commentary

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Images and Mentions Are Not Enough: Third Circuit Clarifies “Of and Concerning” and Reaffirms Opinion/Substantial-Truth Shields for Political Commentary Case: Nina Jankowicz v. Fox News Network LLC...
Pre-enforcement Excessive Fines Challenges to IRA §5000D Excise Tax Are Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts; Voluntariness of Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Reaffirmed

Pre-enforcement Excessive Fines Challenges to IRA §5000D Excise Tax Are Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts; Voluntariness of Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Pre-enforcement Excessive Fines Challenges to IRA §5000D Excise Tax Are Barred by the Anti-Injunction and Declaratory Judgment Acts; Voluntariness of Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Reaffirmed...
No Country-Conditions Hardship When Children Remain in the U.S.: The Third Circuit’s Post‑Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Cancellation of Removal and Enforcing Exhaustion

No Country-Conditions Hardship When Children Remain in the U.S.: The Third Circuit’s Post‑Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Cancellation of Removal and Enforcing Exhaustion

Date: Sep 12, 2025
No Country-Conditions Hardship When Children Remain in the U.S.: The Third Circuit’s Post‑Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Cancellation of Removal and Enforcing Exhaustion Introduction In Edin Samuel...
Principles, Not Twins: The Third Circuit’s Sensitive-Places Framework After Bruen and Rahimi — Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Principles, Not Twins: The Third Circuit’s Sensitive-Places Framework After Bruen and Rahimi — Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Principles, Not Twins: The Third Circuit’s Sensitive-Places Framework After Bruen and Rahimi Commentary on Koons v. Attorney General New Jersey (3d Cir. Sept. 10, 2025) Introduction In Koons v....
Internal Affairs, Not Foreign Receivers, Controls Bankruptcy Authority; Product‑Line Successor Claims Are Property of the Estate — A Comprehensive Commentary on In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Internal Affairs, Not Foreign Receivers, Controls Bankruptcy Authority; Product‑Line Successor Claims Are Property of the Estate — A Comprehensive Commentary on In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Internal Affairs, Not Foreign Receivers, Controls Bankruptcy Authority; Product‑Line Successor Claims Are Property of the Estate A comprehensive commentary on In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc.,...
Compatibility and Proximity Control: Third Circuit Reaffirms LCM Capability Under § 2K2.1(a)(3), Applies Perez’s Close‑Proximity Presumption, and Rejects Probationer’s Second Amendment Challenge

Compatibility and Proximity Control: Third Circuit Reaffirms LCM Capability Under § 2K2.1(a)(3), Applies Perez’s Close‑Proximity Presumption, and Rejects Probationer’s Second Amendment Challenge

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Compatibility and Proximity Control: Third Circuit Reaffirms LCM Capability Under § 2K2.1(a)(3), Applies Perez’s Close‑Proximity Presumption, and Rejects Probationer’s Second Amendment Challenge...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.