Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Federal Agency Status and Westfall Immunity for National Commissions: Commentary on Giordano v. Hohns

Federal Agency Status and Westfall Immunity for National Commissions: Commentary on Giordano v. Hohns

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Defining “Federal Agencies” Under the FTCA and Westfall Act: The Third Circuit’s Four‑Factor Control Test in Giordano v. Hohns I. Introduction The Third Circuit’s precedential decision in Frank...
Reaffirming Claim Preclusion and Judicial Immunity in Repetitive § 1983 Prisoner Litigation: Commentary on Lynn A. Padgett v. Petti et al. (3d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Claim Preclusion and Judicial Immunity in Repetitive § 1983 Prisoner Litigation: Commentary on Lynn A. Padgett v. Petti et al. (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Reaffirming Claim Preclusion and Judicial Immunity in Repetitive § 1983 Prisoner Litigation: Commentary on Lynn A. Padgett v. Petti et al. (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Third Circuit’s...
Applying the “Supportability” and “Consistency” Factors to Treating Nurse Practitioner Opinions: Commentary on Melody Olinger v. Commissioner of Social Security

Applying the “Supportability” and “Consistency” Factors to Treating Nurse Practitioner Opinions: Commentary on Melody Olinger v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Applying the “Supportability” and “Consistency” Factors to Treating Nurse Practitioner Opinions: Commentary on Melody Olinger v. Commissioner of Social Security I. Introduction This commentary...
Decisionmaker Knowledge and the Limits of “Protected Activity” in Retaliation Claims: Commentary on Nashyrah Day v. New Jersey Department of Corrections

Decisionmaker Knowledge and the Limits of “Protected Activity” in Retaliation Claims: Commentary on Nashyrah Day v. New Jersey Department of Corrections

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Decisionmaker Knowledge and the Limits of “Protected Activity” in Retaliation Claims: Commentary on Nashyrah Day v. New Jersey Department of Corrections I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Assent to Two‑Page Employment Arbitration Agreements and the Narrow Scope of Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards: Commentary on McMasters v. Restaurant Brands International, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Assent to Two‑Page Employment Arbitration Agreements and the Narrow Scope of Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards: Commentary on McMasters v. Restaurant Brands International, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Assent to Two‑Page Employment Arbitration Agreements and the Narrow Scope of Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards: Commentary on McMasters v. Restaurant Brands International, Inc. (3d Cir. 2025) I....
Assent to Two‑Page Arbitration Agreements and the High Bar for Vacating Employment Arbitration Awards: Commentary on McMasters v. Restaurant Brands International Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Assent to Two‑Page Arbitration Agreements and the High Bar for Vacating Employment Arbitration Awards: Commentary on McMasters v. Restaurant Brands International Inc. (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Assent to Two‑Page Arbitration Agreements and the High Bar for Vacating Employment Arbitration Awards: Commentary on McMasters v. Restaurant Brands International Inc. (3d Cir. 2025) Note: The...
Under New Jersey Law, Grace-Period Notices Need Not State the Amount Due; Customer-Service Assurances Do Not Estop Policy Lapse Absent Misrepresentation and Reasonable Reliance

Under New Jersey Law, Grace-Period Notices Need Not State the Amount Due; Customer-Service Assurances Do Not Estop Policy Lapse Absent Misrepresentation and Reasonable Reliance

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Under New Jersey Law, Grace-Period Notices Need Not State the Amount Due; Customer-Service Assurances Do Not Estop Policy Lapse Absent Misrepresentation and Reasonable Reliance Introduction In...
No CIPA “Interception” When the Browser Sends a Separate, Direct Transmission to a Tracker; CMIA Liability Requires Substantive Medical Content — Cole v. Quest Diagnostics (3d Cir. 2025)

No CIPA “Interception” When the Browser Sends a Separate, Direct Transmission to a Tracker; CMIA Liability Requires Substantive Medical Content — Cole v. Quest Diagnostics (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No CIPA “Interception” When the Browser Sends a Separate, Direct Transmission to a Tracker; CMIA Liability Requires Substantive Medical Content Commentary on Angela Cole v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.,...
Medical Safety–Based Denials of MAT Do Not Constitute ADA “Intentional Discrimination” or Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: The Third Circuit’s Nonprecedential Guidance in Rokita v. Klinefelter

Medical Safety–Based Denials of MAT Do Not Constitute ADA “Intentional Discrimination” or Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: The Third Circuit’s Nonprecedential Guidance in Rokita v. Klinefelter

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Medical Safety–Based Denials of MAT Do Not Constitute ADA “Intentional Discrimination” or Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: The Third Circuit’s Nonprecedential Guidance in Rokita v....
Mistaken Refusal to Deal Is Privileged; NJCFA Does Not Reach Negotiated TV Ad Buys: Unimed International Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC (3d Cir. 2025)

Mistaken Refusal to Deal Is Privileged; NJCFA Does Not Reach Negotiated TV Ad Buys: Unimed International Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Mistaken Refusal to Deal Is Privileged; NJCFA Does Not Reach Negotiated TV Ad Buys Case: Unimed International Inc. v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 24-2987 (3d Cir. Nov. 13, 2025) Court: United States...
No Default Without Proper Service: Third Circuit Reaffirms Nonparty-Service Requirement and Disfavors Defaults in Pro Se § 1983 Litigation

No Default Without Proper Service: Third Circuit Reaffirms Nonparty-Service Requirement and Disfavors Defaults in Pro Se § 1983 Litigation

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Default Without Proper Service: Third Circuit Reaffirms Nonparty-Service Requirement and Disfavors Defaults in Pro Se § 1983 Litigation Introduction In John M. Gera v. Borough of Frackville, the...
Waiver-by-Amendment: Third Circuit Finds Plaintiff Forfeits Challenge to Removal by Non-Defendant After Adding Remover as a Party; Case-Management Memoranda Count as “Other Paper” for § 1446(b)(3)

Waiver-by-Amendment: Third Circuit Finds Plaintiff Forfeits Challenge to Removal by Non-Defendant After Adding Remover as a Party; Case-Management Memoranda Count as “Other Paper” for § 1446(b)(3)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Waiver-by-Amendment: Third Circuit Finds Plaintiff Forfeits Challenge to Removal by Non-Defendant After Adding Remover as a Party; Case-Management Memoranda Count as “Other Paper” for § 1446(b)(3)...
Post-Esteras boundaries on “seriousness” at supervised-release revocation: Third Circuit affirms upward variance in United States v. Hardeman

Post-Esteras boundaries on “seriousness” at supervised-release revocation: Third Circuit affirms upward variance in United States v. Hardeman

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Post-Esteras boundaries on “seriousness” at supervised-release revocation: Third Circuit affirms upward variance in United States v. Hardeman Introduction In United States v. Taire Hardeman, the...
Post‑Esteras Boundaries in Revocation Sentencing: Third Circuit Affirms Upward Variance Grounded in Breach of Trust and Violation Conduct in United States v. Taire Hardeman

Post‑Esteras Boundaries in Revocation Sentencing: Third Circuit Affirms Upward Variance Grounded in Breach of Trust and Violation Conduct in United States v. Taire Hardeman

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Post‑Esteras Boundaries in Revocation Sentencing: Third Circuit Affirms Upward Variance Grounded in Breach of Trust and Violation Conduct United States v. Taire Hardeman, No. 24‑2832 & 24‑3230 (3d...
Substance Matters: Third Circuit Affirms that the Totality of an Employer’s Contract Proposals Can Evidence Bad-Faith Bargaining; Impasse Barred and Remedy Challenges Forfeited Absent §10(e) Preservation

Substance Matters: Third Circuit Affirms that the Totality of an Employer’s Contract Proposals Can Evidence Bad-Faith Bargaining; Impasse Barred and Remedy Challenges Forfeited Absent §10(e) Preservation

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Substance Matters: Third Circuit Affirms that the Totality of an Employer’s Contract Proposals Can Evidence Bad-Faith Bargaining; Impasse Barred and Remedy Challenges Forfeited Absent §10(e)...
Preserve It or Lose It: Third Circuit Requires Section 10(e) Preservation to Challenge Thryv Make‑Whole Remedies and Affirms Bad‑Faith Bargaining Based on the Substance of Employer Proposals

Preserve It or Lose It: Third Circuit Requires Section 10(e) Preservation to Challenge Thryv Make‑Whole Remedies and Affirms Bad‑Faith Bargaining Based on the Substance of Employer Proposals

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Preserve It or Lose It: Third Circuit Requires Section 10(e) Preservation to Challenge Thryv Make‑Whole Remedies and Affirms Bad‑Faith Bargaining Based on the Substance of Employer Proposals...
Clarifying the “Clearly Established” Right in Emergency License Suspensions: Third Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity Where Officials Verify Public-Safety Violations

Clarifying the “Clearly Established” Right in Emergency License Suspensions: Third Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity Where Officials Verify Public-Safety Violations

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Clarifying the “Clearly Established” Right in Emergency License Suspensions: Third Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity Where Officials Verify Public-Safety Violations Introduction In International...

      Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons

Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Ordinary-Meaning Rule Defines “Trade or Craft” as Manual/Artistic Skill and Limits ERISA Deference to the Administrator’s Stated Reasons Introduction In Clyde Rombach, III v. Plumbers Local Union No....
Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims

Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Contemporaneous Falsity and Strategic-Review Disclosures Defeat Omission-Based Securities Claims Introduction In a non-precedential but instructive decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third...
United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and intelligent” appeal carveouts construed to encompass voluntariness

United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and intelligent” appeal carveouts construed to encompass voluntariness

Date: Nov 8, 2025
United States v. Marc Anthony: Third Circuit clarifies that mental impairment and low Miranda-comprehension testing do not, without police coercion, invalidate a Miranda waiver; “knowing and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert