Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

West Virginia Case Commentaries

Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time

Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time Case: In re R.L., No....
Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications

Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications Introduction In re L.H.-1, B.H., L.H.-2,...
Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance

Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance Introduction In In re I.R. and E.B., No. 24-496 (W. Va....
Reasonable Efforts May Be Satisfied by Prior and Ongoing Services; Trial Court Credibility Findings Govern Post‑Termination Visitation (In re D.G. and L.G.)

Reasonable Efforts May Be Satisfied by Prior and Ongoing Services; Trial Court Credibility Findings Govern Post‑Termination Visitation (In re D.G. and L.G.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reasonable Efforts May Be Satisfied by Prior and Ongoing Services; Trial Court Credibility Findings Govern Post‑Termination Visitation Commentary on In re D.G. and L.G., No. 24-595 (W. Va. Sept. 30,...
Consent to Legal Guardianship Does Not Limit Court’s Authority to Terminate Parental Rights When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Consent to Legal Guardianship Does Not Limit Court’s Authority to Terminate Parental Rights When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Consent to Legal Guardianship Does Not Limit Court’s Authority to Terminate Parental Rights When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists Introduction In a memorandum decision issued on...
Reaffirmation: Parent’s Nonappearance and Noncompliance Defeat Improvement Period; Termination Proper Absent Reasonable Likelihood of Correction

Reaffirmation: Parent’s Nonappearance and Noncompliance Defeat Improvement Period; Termination Proper Absent Reasonable Likelihood of Correction

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirmation: Parent’s Nonappearance and Noncompliance Defeat Improvement Period; Termination Proper Absent Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Introduction In In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K., No....
Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases

Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases Introduction In re D.G. and L.G., No. 24-620 (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025),...
In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance”

In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance”

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance” Introduction In this memorandum decision,...
In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents

In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Introduction The...
Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025)

Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025) Introduction This...
Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J.

Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J.

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J. Introduction This...
Prior Success Does Not Guarantee Another Chance: Rapid Recurrence and Non-Acknowledgment Justify Denial of a New Improvement Period and Termination

Prior Success Does Not Guarantee Another Chance: Rapid Recurrence and Non-Acknowledgment Justify Denial of a New Improvement Period and Termination

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Prior Success Does Not Guarantee Another Chance: Rapid Recurrence and Non-Acknowledgment Justify Denial of a New Improvement Period and Termination Case: In re R.D., P.D., and L.M., No. 24-593...
No Maranda T. Enhanced-Efforts Duty Where Parent Is Cognitively Competent; Noncompliance with an Improvement Period and Exposure to Sex Offenders Support Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives

No Maranda T. Enhanced-Efforts Duty Where Parent Is Cognitively Competent; Noncompliance with an Improvement Period and Exposure to Sex Offenders Support Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Maranda T. Enhanced-Efforts Duty Where Parent Is Cognitively Competent; Noncompliance with an Improvement Period and Exposure to Sex Offenders Support Termination Without Less Restrictive...
Actual Notice Cures Rule 10 Witness-List Omission Absent Prejudice: Commentary on In re T.F., F.F., and C.F.

Actual Notice Cures Rule 10 Witness-List Omission Absent Prejudice: Commentary on In re T.F., F.F., and C.F.

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Actual Notice Cures Rule 10 Witness-List Omission Absent Prejudice: In re T.F., F.F., and C.F. Introduction In a memorandum decision, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the...
Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction In a...
Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation Introduction This...
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re...
Credibility of Oral Modified‑Duty Offers Controls TTD Termination: West Virginia’s High Court Reaffirms Deference to the Board of Review Under § 23‑4‑7a(e)

Credibility of Oral Modified‑Duty Offers Controls TTD Termination: West Virginia’s High Court Reaffirms Deference to the Board of Review Under § 23‑4‑7a(e)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Credibility of Oral Modified‑Duty Offers Controls TTD Termination: West Virginia’s High Court Reaffirms Deference to the Board of Review Under § 23‑4‑7a(e) Introduction In Dainel Nicole Smith v. West...
Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards

Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards Introduction In Cindy Linger-Long...
Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review

Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review Court: Supreme Court of Appeals of...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert