Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Idaho Case Commentaries

Probation Waivers vs. Co‑Occupant Objection: State v. Horn and the Limits of Georgia v. Randolph in Idaho

Probation Waivers vs. Co‑Occupant Objection: State v. Horn and the Limits of Georgia v. Randolph in Idaho

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Probation Waivers vs. Co‑Occupant Objection: State v. Horn and the Limits of Georgia v. Randolph in Idaho I. Introduction In State v. Horn, the Idaho Supreme Court confronted two recurring and...
State v. Knight: Idaho’s Reaffirmation of the Binary Choice Between Counsel and Self‑Representation and the Limits of “Shadow Counsel”

State v. Knight: Idaho’s Reaffirmation of the Binary Choice Between Counsel and Self‑Representation and the Limits of “Shadow Counsel”

Date: Nov 29, 2025
State v. Knight: Idaho’s Reaffirmation of the Binary Choice Between Counsel and Self‑Representation and the Limits of “Shadow Counsel” I. Introduction In State v. Knight, Docket No. 52929 (Idaho Nov....
State v. Robertson and the Constitutional Limits of Treatment-Court Waivers in Probation Revocation

State v. Robertson and the Constitutional Limits of Treatment-Court Waivers in Probation Revocation

Date: Nov 29, 2025
State v. Robertson and the Constitutional Limits of Treatment-Court Waivers in Probation Revocation I. Introduction In State v. Robertson, 52794 (Idaho Nov. 24, 2025), the Idaho Supreme Court...
Coronado v. City of Boise: Exclusive Employee Control Over Applications for Hearings on Workers’ Compensation Benefits

Coronado v. City of Boise: Exclusive Employee Control Over Applications for Hearings on Workers’ Compensation Benefits

Date: Nov 29, 2025
Coronado v. City of Boise: Exclusive Employee Control Over Applications for Hearings on Workers’ Compensation Benefits I. Introduction In Coronado v. City of Boise, the Idaho Supreme Court issued a...
Acorn Investments, LLC v. Elsaesser: Clarifying the Narrow Commercial-Transaction Exception to the Non‑Assignability of Legal Malpractice Claims in Idaho

Acorn Investments, LLC v. Elsaesser: Clarifying the Narrow Commercial-Transaction Exception to the Non‑Assignability of Legal Malpractice Claims in Idaho

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Acorn Investments, LLC v. Elsaesser: Clarifying the Narrow Commercial-Transaction Exception to the Non‑Assignability of Legal Malpractice Claims in Idaho I. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s...
Primacy of Idaho’s “Just and Reasonable” Mandate Over Multi‑State Allocation Protocols: Commentary on PacifiCorp v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Primacy of Idaho’s “Just and Reasonable” Mandate Over Multi‑State Allocation Protocols: Commentary on PacifiCorp v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Primacy of Idaho’s “Just and Reasonable” Mandate Over Multi‑State Allocation Protocols: Commentary on PacifiCorp v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission I. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s...
Forward-Looking Loss-of-Support as the Governing Standard for Apportioning Wrongful Death Settlements Between Parents in Idaho

Forward-Looking Loss-of-Support as the Governing Standard for Apportioning Wrongful Death Settlements Between Parents in Idaho

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Forward-Looking Loss-of-Support as the Governing Standard for Apportioning Wrongful Death Settlements Between Parents in Idaho Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s decision in Rossman Law Group,...
State v. Loranger: Clarifying the Invited Error Doctrine in Sentencing Appeals

State v. Loranger: Clarifying the Invited Error Doctrine in Sentencing Appeals

Date: Nov 20, 2025
State v. Loranger: Clarifying the Invited Error Doctrine in Sentencing Appeals I. Introduction In State v. Loranger, Docket No. 53281 (Idaho Nov. 19, 2025), the Idaho Supreme Court addressed two...
"Null and Void" Plea Clauses and the Mandatory Right to Withdraw: Commentary on State v. McGarvey (Idaho 2025)

"Null and Void" Plea Clauses and the Mandatory Right to Withdraw: Commentary on State v. McGarvey (Idaho 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
"Null and Void" Plea Clauses and the Mandatory Right to Withdraw: Commentary on State v. McGarvey, Idaho Supreme Court (2025) I. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s decision in State v. McGarvey,...
Only Claimants May Initiate Hearings on Compensation and Income Benefits under Idaho Code § 72-706: Employers Cannot File “Complaints” to Litigate an Employee’s Entitlement

Only Claimants May Initiate Hearings on Compensation and Income Benefits under Idaho Code § 72-706: Employers Cannot File “Complaints” to Litigate an Employee’s Entitlement

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Only Claimants May Initiate Hearings on Compensation and Income Benefits under Idaho Code § 72-706: Employers Cannot File “Complaints” to Litigate an Employee’s Entitlement Introduction In Coronado...
No “Balance-Tipping” Presumption in Occupational Disease Claims: Clarified Burdens of Proof in Weeks v. Oneida County (Idaho 2025)

No “Balance-Tipping” Presumption in Occupational Disease Claims: Clarified Burdens of Proof in Weeks v. Oneida County (Idaho 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No “Balance-Tipping” Presumption in Occupational Disease Claims: Clarified Burdens of Proof in Weeks v. Oneida County (Idaho 2025) Introduction In Weeks v. Oneida County, the Idaho Supreme Court...
No Six-Month Presumption Under Idaho Constitution; COVID-19 Backlog Can Establish “Good Cause” Under Idaho’s Speedy Trial Statute

No Six-Month Presumption Under Idaho Constitution; COVID-19 Backlog Can Establish “Good Cause” Under Idaho’s Speedy Trial Statute

Date: Nov 15, 2025
No Six-Month Presumption Under Idaho Constitution; COVID-19 Backlog Can Establish “Good Cause” Under Idaho’s Speedy Trial Statute Introduction In State v. Fierro-Garcia, the Idaho Supreme Court...
Edwards v. Lane: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Trustee Removal and Strict Appellate Briefing Requirements (with Fee-Shifting for Frivolous Appeals)

Edwards v. Lane: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Trustee Removal and Strict Appellate Briefing Requirements (with Fee-Shifting for Frivolous Appeals)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Edwards v. Lane: Abuse-of-Discretion Review Governs Trustee Removal; Appellate Waiver for Inadequate Briefing Triggers Fees Court: Idaho Supreme Court | Date: October 23, 2025 | Docket No.: 51237...
Premium-Based Injury Confers Standing, But Enforcement Is the Remedy: Idaho Supreme Court Limits Claims Arising from Illusory UIM Coverage

Premium-Based Injury Confers Standing, But Enforcement Is the Remedy: Idaho Supreme Court Limits Claims Arising from Illusory UIM Coverage

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Premium-Based Injury Confers Standing, But Enforcement Is the Remedy: Idaho Supreme Court Limits Claims Arising from Illusory UIM Coverage Case: Gilbert v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.,...
Bypassing Batson Step One in Idaho: State v. Buck Clarifies Hernandez Mootness and Affirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion

Bypassing Batson Step One in Idaho: State v. Buck Clarifies Hernandez Mootness and Affirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Bypassing Batson Step One in Idaho: State v. Buck Clarifies Hernandez Mootness and Affirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion Introduction In State v. Buck, the Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the conviction...
Master Plans Are Not Self-Executing: Idaho Supreme Court Holds Deed-Referenced Master Plans Are Relevant but Do Not Create Restrictive Covenants or Public Dedications Without Clear, Express Language

Master Plans Are Not Self-Executing: Idaho Supreme Court Holds Deed-Referenced Master Plans Are Relevant but Do Not Create Restrictive Covenants or Public Dedications Without Clear, Express Language

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Master Plans Are Not Self-Executing: Idaho Supreme Court Holds Deed-Referenced Master Plans Are Relevant but Do Not Create Restrictive Covenants or Public Dedications Without Clear, Express Language...
No-Modification Means No-Modification: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Grandfathered Lake Encroachments, Procedures, and Abatement Enforcement

No-Modification Means No-Modification: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Grandfathered Lake Encroachments, Procedures, and Abatement Enforcement

Date: Sep 6, 2025
No-Modification Means No-Modification: Temporary Post‑1974 Changes Defeat Grandfathered Lake Encroachment Permits; § 58‑1306 Procedures Inapplicable; Administrative Abatement Requires Judicial...
Limiting Anderson’s First‑Filed Rule: District Courts Need Not Defer to the Industrial Commission on Idaho Code § 72‑209(3) “Willful or Unprovoked Physical Aggression” — Dominguez Partially Overruled

Limiting Anderson’s First‑Filed Rule: District Courts Need Not Defer to the Industrial Commission on Idaho Code § 72‑209(3) “Willful or Unprovoked Physical Aggression” — Dominguez Partially Overruled

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Limiting Anderson’s First‑Filed Rule: District Courts Need Not Defer to the Industrial Commission on Idaho Code § 72‑209(3) “Willful or Unprovoked Physical Aggression” — Dominguez Partially Overruled...
Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel

Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Row v. State: Shinn Is Not a Trigger for Successive State Post‑Conviction Relief and Rule 44.2 Does Not Create a Right to Effective Post‑Conviction Counsel Introduction In Row v. State, the Idaho...
Fraud Scienter Clarified and Disclosure Act Accrual Fixed at Closing: The Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Holdings in VanRenselaar v. Batres

Fraud Scienter Clarified and Disclosure Act Accrual Fixed at Closing: The Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Holdings in VanRenselaar v. Batres

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Fraud Scienter Clarified and Disclosure Act Accrual Fixed at Closing: The Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Holdings in VanRenselaar v. Batres Introduction In VanRenselaar v. Batres, the Idaho Supreme Court...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert