Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing

Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: The Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing Introduction In People of...
Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner

Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner Case: People of Michigan v. Keith Devon Turner,...
OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges

OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges

Date: Oct 9, 2025
OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges Introduction In People...
Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review

Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review Introduction In Prudential Properties v....
Parental Facilitation of Sexual Abuse Constitutes “Aggravated Circumstances”: A Commentary on In re Barber/Espinoza (Mich. 2025)

Parental Facilitation of Sexual Abuse Constitutes “Aggravated Circumstances”: A Commentary on In re Barber/Espinoza (Mich. 2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Parental Facilitation of Sexual Abuse Constitutes “Aggravated Circumstances”: A Commentary on In re Barber/Espinoza, Supreme Court of Michigan (2025) 1. Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court’s...
From General Warrants to Digital Precision: People v Carson and Michigan’s New Particularity Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants

From General Warrants to Digital Precision: People v Carson and Michigan’s New Particularity Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants

Date: Aug 5, 2025
From General Warrants to Digital Precision: People v Carson and Michigan’s New Particularity Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants 1. Introduction People of Michigan v. Michael Georgie Carson...
Rayford v American House (2025): Michigan Supreme Court Revives “Reasonableness” Review and Adhesion-Contract Scrutiny for Contractual Limitation Periods in Employment Agreements

Rayford v American House (2025): Michigan Supreme Court Revives “Reasonableness” Review and Adhesion-Contract Scrutiny for Contractual Limitation Periods in Employment Agreements

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Rayford v American House Roseville I, LLC (Mich, 2025) A New Era of “Reasonableness” & Adhesion Scrutiny in Michigan Employment Contracts 1. Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in...
“Speculation Is Not Probable Cause” – The Michigan Supreme Court’s Implicit Re-affirmation of Robust Gatekeeping at the Preliminary Examination in People v. Amaree Darvell Terry

“Speculation Is Not Probable Cause” – The Michigan Supreme Court’s Implicit Re-affirmation of Robust Gatekeeping at the Preliminary Examination in People v. Amaree Darvell Terry

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Speculation Is Not Probable Cause” – The Michigan Supreme Court’s Implicit Re-affirmation of Robust Gatekeeping at the Preliminary Examination in People v. Amaree Darvell Terry 1. Introduction On 25...
“Futility over Formality” – The Michigan Supreme Court Curtails Remand after Vacated Summary-Contempt Convictions

“Futility over Formality” – The Michigan Supreme Court Curtails Remand after Vacated Summary-Contempt Convictions

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Futility over Formality” – The Michigan Supreme Court Curtails Remand after Vacated Summary-Contempt Convictions Introduction In In re Contempt of Kathy H. Murphy, the Michigan Supreme Court...
“Clarifying Public-Policy Retaliatory Discharge & Employer Status under Michigan’s WPA” – A Commentary on Janetsky v County of Saginaw (Mich. 2025)

“Clarifying Public-Policy Retaliatory Discharge & Employer Status under Michigan’s WPA” – A Commentary on Janetsky v County of Saginaw (Mich. 2025)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Clarifying Public-Policy Retaliatory Discharge & Employer Status under Michigan’s WPA – A Structured Commentary on Janetsky v. County of Saginaw, 508 Mich ___ (2025) 1. Introduction The Michigan...
No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover

No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover

Date: Jul 26, 2025
No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover Introduction In People of Michigan v. Damaree Darvell...
From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes

From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes

Date: Jul 23, 2025
From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes Introduction In Jacqueline Davis v. BetMGM LLC, the Michigan Supreme...
From Silence to Scienter: Michigan Supreme Court Requires Mens Rea for Prisoner-in-Possession Offences Under MCL 8.9

From Silence to Scienter: Michigan Supreme Court Requires Mens Rea for Prisoner-in-Possession Offences Under MCL 8.9

Date: Jul 22, 2025
From Silence to Scienter: Michigan Supreme Court Requires Mens Rea for Prisoner-in-Possession Offences Under MCL 8.9 1. Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Christopher Lehman...
The Jackson Rule: Equity in Tax-Foreclosed Property Remains Protected When Government Uses Right-of-First-Refusal

The Jackson Rule: Equity in Tax-Foreclosed Property Remains Protected When Government Uses Right-of-First-Refusal

Date: Jul 22, 2025
The Jackson Rule: Equity in Tax-Foreclosed Property Remains Protected When Government Uses the Right-of-First-Refusal Introduction In Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization...
The “Zero-Surplus, Zero-Taking” Doctrine:  Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in Yono v. County of Ingham (2025)

The “Zero-Surplus, Zero-Taking” Doctrine: Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in Yono v. County of Ingham (2025)

Date: Jul 22, 2025
The “Zero-Surplus, Zero-Taking” Doctrine: Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in Yono v. County of Ingham (2025) Introduction On 16 July 2025, the Supreme Court of Michigan delivered a unanimous...
Major Political Parties Have Standing to Enforce Election-Inspector Parity Under MCL 168.674(2)

Major Political Parties Have Standing to Enforce Election-Inspector Parity Under MCL 168.674(2)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Major Political Parties Have Standing to Enforce Election-Inspector Parity Under MCL 168.674(2) Case: Michigan Republican Party and Republican National Committee v. Donahue, Kim, and Kaake (Genesee...
“Partisan-Parity Standing” – Michigan Supreme Court Confers Standing on Major Political Parties to Enforce Election-Inspector Equality

“Partisan-Parity Standing” – Michigan Supreme Court Confers Standing on Major Political Parties to Enforce Election-Inspector Equality

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Partisan-Parity Standing” – Michigan Supreme Court Confers Standing on Major Political Parties to Enforce Election-Inspector Equality Introduction The case of Michigan Republican Party & Republican...
When PHC Felonies Eclipse MRTMA Misdemeanors: The Practical Effect of the Supreme Court’s Denial of Leave in People v. Julia Kathleen Soto

When PHC Felonies Eclipse MRTMA Misdemeanors: The Practical Effect of the Supreme Court’s Denial of Leave in People v. Julia Kathleen Soto

Date: Jul 12, 2025
When PHC Felonies Eclipse MRTMA Misdemeanors: The Practical Effect of the Supreme Court’s Denial of Leave in People v. Julia Kathleen Soto 1. Introduction Case name: People of the State of Michigan...
MRTMA’s Exclusive-Penalty Clause vs. PHC Felonies: Michigan Supreme Court Denies Review, Leaving a Court of Appeals Split to Govern Charging Choices in Marijuana Cases

MRTMA’s Exclusive-Penalty Clause vs. PHC Felonies: Michigan Supreme Court Denies Review, Leaving a Court of Appeals Split to Govern Charging Choices in Marijuana Cases

Date: Jul 12, 2025
MRTMA’s Exclusive-Penalty Clause vs. PHC Felonies: Michigan Supreme Court Denies Review, Leaving a Court of Appeals Split to Govern Charging Choices in Marijuana Cases Case: People of the State of...
Presumed Patient Reliance in Emergency-Room Care:  Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital (Mich. 2025)

Presumed Patient Reliance in Emergency-Room Care: Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital (Mich. 2025)

Date: Jul 11, 2025
Presumed Patient Reliance in Emergency-Room Care: Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital (Michigan Supreme Court, 2025) Introduction Markel v. William Beaumont Hospital, decided by the Michigan Supreme...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert