Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

People v. Jasso (2025): Refining Declarations-Against-Interest and Confrontation Rules When Witnesses Refuse to Testify

People v. Jasso (2025): Refining Declarations-Against-Interest and Confrontation Rules When Witnesses Refuse to Testify

Date: Jun 18, 2025
People v. Jasso (2025): A Supreme Court of California Blueprint for Handling Recalcitrant Witnesses, Declarations Against Penal Interest, and Post-SB 1437 Felony-Murder Issues 1. Introduction On...
Felony–Murder Rule Refined: Reckless Indifference Requirement for Non-Killer Accomplices

Felony–Murder Rule Refined: Reckless Indifference Requirement for Non-Killer Accomplices

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Felony–Murder Rule Refined: Reckless Indifference Requirement for Non-Killer Accomplices Introduction In People v. Emanuel (S280551), the Supreme Court of California re-examined the contours of the...
Clarifying Jury Qualification in Capital Cases: Witherspoon/Witt and People v. Oyler

Clarifying Jury Qualification in Capital Cases: Witherspoon/Witt and People v. Oyler

Date: May 6, 2025
Clarifying Jury Qualification in Capital Cases: Witherspoon/Witt and People v. Oyler Introduction The case of People v. Oyler (S173784) arose from a series of wildland arson fires in the Banning Pass...
Invalidation of Public Entity Exculpatory Waivers for Statutory Road-Maintenance Duties: Whitehead v. City of Oakland

Invalidation of Public Entity Exculpatory Waivers for Statutory Road-Maintenance Duties: Whitehead v. City of Oakland

Date: May 2, 2025
Invalidation of Public Entity Exculpatory Waivers for Statutory Road-Maintenance Duties Introduction In Whitehead v. City of Oakland (2025), the Supreme Court of California confronted the question...
Eligibility for Resentencing Under Section 1172.6 for Provocative Act Murder Convictions Pre-2009

Eligibility for Resentencing Under Section 1172.6 for Provocative Act Murder Convictions Pre-2009

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Eligibility for Resentencing Under Section 1172.6 for Provocative Act Murder Convictions Pre-2009 Introduction People v. Antonelli, decided April 24, 2025 by the Supreme Court of California,...
Post-SB 1437 Aider-and-Abettor Liability: Direct Intent Requirement and Harmless Error in People v. Hin

Post-SB 1437 Aider-and-Abettor Liability: Direct Intent Requirement and Harmless Error in People v. Hin

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Post-SB 1437 Aider-and-Abettor Liability: Direct Intent Requirement and Harmless Error in People v. Hin Introduction People v. Hin (S141519, San Joaquin Co. Super. Ct. No. SF090168B) is the...
Invalidity of Damage Limitations for Willful Injury Under California Civil Code §1668

Invalidity of Damage Limitations for Willful Injury Under California Civil Code §1668

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Invalidity of Damage Limitations for Willful Injury Under California Civil Code §1668 Introduction The Supreme Court of California’s decision in New England Country Foods, LLC v. VanLaw Food...
Section 1089 Juror Removal Requires Demonstrable Reality of Bias – People v. McGhee

Section 1089 Juror Removal Requires Demonstrable Reality of Bias – People v. McGhee

Date: Apr 4, 2025
Section 1089 Juror Removal Requires Demonstrable Reality of Bias – People v. McGhee Introduction People v. McGhee (2025) 13 Cal.5th xxx clarifies the limits on a trial court’s power under Penal Code...
People v. Jasso: Clarifying the Declaration-Against-Interest Exception and Sentencing Discretion under Senate Bill 620

People v. Jasso: Clarifying the Declaration-Against-Interest Exception and Sentencing Discretion under Senate Bill 620

Date: Apr 4, 2025
People v. Jasso: Clarifying the Declaration-Against-Interest Exception and Sentencing Discretion under Senate Bill 620 Introduction People v. Jasso (S179454) is a 2025 Supreme Court of California...
Section 998 Cost-Shifting Applies to Pretrial Settlements After Rejected Offers—Default Rule Unless Parties Reallocate in Settlement

Section 998 Cost-Shifting Applies to Pretrial Settlements After Rejected Offers—Default Rule Unless Parties Reallocate in Settlement

Date: Mar 21, 2025
Section 998 Cost-Shifting Applies to Pretrial Settlements After Rejected Offers—Default Rule Unless Parties Reallocate in Settlement Introduction In Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor America (Supreme Court...
Clarifying Prima Facie Requirements for Resentencing Relief Under section 1172.6: The Role of Preliminary Hearing Transcripts

Clarifying Prima Facie Requirements for Resentencing Relief Under section 1172.6: The Role of Preliminary Hearing Transcripts

Date: Mar 6, 2025
Clarifying Prima Facie Requirements for Resentencing Relief Under section 1172.6: The Role of Preliminary Hearing Transcripts Introduction In The People v. Ramon Patton, the Supreme Court of...
Defining “Compensation” in Workers’ Compensation Law: Excluding Industrial Disability Leave from the 50% Premium Calculation

Defining “Compensation” in Workers’ Compensation Law: Excluding Industrial Disability Leave from the 50% Premium Calculation

Date: Feb 25, 2025
Defining “Compensation” in Workers’ Compensation Law: Excluding Industrial Disability Leave from the 50% Premium Calculation Introduction The Judgment in Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation...
Revisiting Felony-Murder Doctrine and Gang Enhancements: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Mao Hin

Revisiting Felony-Murder Doctrine and Gang Enhancements: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Mao Hin

Date: Feb 7, 2025
Revisiting Felony-Murder Doctrine and Gang Enhancements: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Mao Hin Introduction People v. Mao Hin is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California rendered...
Clarifying Parcel Creation under the Subdivision Map Act: Cox v. City of Oakland

Clarifying Parcel Creation under the Subdivision Map Act: Cox v. City of Oakland

Date: Jan 24, 2025
Clarifying Parcel Creation under the Subdivision Map Act: Cox v. City of Oakland Introduction Cox v. City of Oakland is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of California on January 23,...
Retroactive Application of Ameliorative Legislation in Nonfinal Criminal Cases: The People v. Oscar Lopez

Retroactive Application of Ameliorative Legislation in Nonfinal Criminal Cases: The People v. Oscar Lopez

Date: Jan 24, 2025
Retroactive Application of Ameliorative Legislation in Nonfinal Criminal Cases: The People v. Oscar Lopez Introduction In The People v. Oscar Lopez, the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
Collins v. The People: Redefining Implied Malice in Parental Liability

Collins v. The People: Redefining Implied Malice in Parental Liability

Date: Jan 13, 2025
Collins v. The People: Redefining Implied Malice in Parental Liability Introduction Collins v. The People, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on January 6, 2025, represents a pivotal...
California Supreme Court Sets Precedent on EMS Fee Disclosure Requirements

California Supreme Court Sets Precedent on EMS Fee Disclosure Requirements

Date: Dec 27, 2024
California Supreme Court Sets Precedent on EMS Fee Disclosure Requirements Introduction In the landmark case of Taylor Capito v. San Jose Healthcare System, LP, the California Supreme Court addressed...
Enforceability of Cotenancy Provisions in Commercial Leases: JJD-HOV Elk Grove v. Jo-Ann Stores Establishes Valid Alternative Performance Under California Law

Enforceability of Cotenancy Provisions in Commercial Leases: JJD-HOV Elk Grove v. Jo-Ann Stores Establishes Valid Alternative Performance Under California Law

Date: Dec 23, 2024
Enforceability of Cotenancy Provisions in Commercial Leases: JJD-HOV Elk Grove v. Jo-Ann Stores Establishes Valid Alternative Performance Under California Law Introduction The case of JJD-HOV Elk...
Affirmation of Unauthorized Wobbler Reduction: PEOPLE v. SUPERIOR COURT of Ventura County

Affirmation of Unauthorized Wobbler Reduction: PEOPLE v. SUPERIOR COURT of Ventura County

Date: Dec 18, 2024
Affirmation of Unauthorized Wobbler Reduction: PEOPLE v. SUPERIOR COURT of Ventura County Introduction In PEOPLE v. SUPERIOR COURT of Ventura County, the Supreme Court of California addressed...
California Supreme Court Abrogates Two-Year Limitation on section 473(d) Motions to Vacate Default Judgments Due to Improper Service

California Supreme Court Abrogates Two-Year Limitation on section 473(d) Motions to Vacate Default Judgments Due to Improper Service

Date: Nov 21, 2024
California Supreme Court Abrogates Two-Year Limitation on section 473(d) Motions to Vacate Default Judgments Due to Improper Service Introduction In the pivotal case of California Capital Insurance...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert