Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation

Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation Introduction This commentary examines the Mississippi Supreme Court’s administrative order in In...
Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45

Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45 Introduction In a rulemaking order titled “In re: The Rules...
Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance

Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance Introduction In...
No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances

No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances

Date: Oct 8, 2025
No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Amendments that Materially Change Interest Terms Are New, Time‑Barred Claims Under Mississippi Probate Law (§ 91-7-151)

Amendments that Materially Change Interest Terms Are New, Time‑Barred Claims Under Mississippi Probate Law (§ 91-7-151)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Amendments that Materially Change Interest Terms Are New, Time‑Barred Claims Under Mississippi Probate Law (§ 91-7-151) Case: In Re The Estate of Herbert Bernard Ivison, Jr.: Malouf & Malouf, PLLC v....
Wrongful‑Death Beneficiaries Stand in the Shoes of Government Employees: Mississippi Supreme Court Extends MTCA § 11-46-9(1)(l) Immunity to Bar Claims Against Any Governmental Entity and Upholds Statute’s Constitutionality

Wrongful‑Death Beneficiaries Stand in the Shoes of Government Employees: Mississippi Supreme Court Extends MTCA § 11-46-9(1)(l) Immunity to Bar Claims Against Any Governmental Entity and Upholds Statute’s Constitutionality

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Wrongful‑Death Beneficiaries Stand in the Shoes of Government Employees: Mississippi Supreme Court Extends MTCA § 11-46-9(1)(l) Immunity to Bar Claims Against Any Governmental Entity and Upholds...
Issue Preservation in Mississippi Tax Appeals: Chancery Court’s De Novo Review under § 27-77-7 Is Limited to Properly Appealed Questions; No Advisory Opinions

Issue Preservation in Mississippi Tax Appeals: Chancery Court’s De Novo Review under § 27-77-7 Is Limited to Properly Appealed Questions; No Advisory Opinions

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Issue Preservation in Mississippi Tax Appeals: Chancery Court’s De Novo Review under § 27-77-7 Is Limited to Properly Appealed Questions; No Advisory Opinions Case: Watkins Construction, Inc. v....
Forecasting Complications Is Expert Testimony: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies the Lay–Expert Boundary for Treating Physicians

Forecasting Complications Is Expert Testimony: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies the Lay–Expert Boundary for Treating Physicians

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Forecasting Complications Is Expert Testimony: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies the Lay–Expert Boundary for Treating Physicians Introduction In Sapireya (a/k/a Saperiya) Smith v. State of...
Clarifying the MPLA’s Reach: Mississippi Supreme Court Limits Products Liability Act to Defective-Product Claims and Preserves Contract and Commercial Implied-Warranty Actions

Clarifying the MPLA’s Reach: Mississippi Supreme Court Limits Products Liability Act to Defective-Product Claims and Preserves Contract and Commercial Implied-Warranty Actions

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Clarifying the MPLA’s Reach: Mississippi Supreme Court Limits Products Liability Act to Defective-Product Claims and Preserves Contract and Commercial Implied-Warranty Actions Introduction In...
No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization

No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No City Permits for State Billboards: Mississippi Supreme Court Reaffirms that Municipal Sign and Zoning Ordinances Do Not Reach State-Owned Property Absent Express Legislative Authorization Case:...
Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State

Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Ambiguous Lawyer Questions and Non‑Promissory Leniency: Mississippi Supreme Court Clarifies Voluntariness and Miranda in Reyes v. State Introduction In Antonio Sauceda Reyes a/k/a Antonio Reyes v....
Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule

Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule Introduction In The Mississippi State Port Authority at Gulfport v. Yilport Holding A.S., No....
“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment

“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment 1. Introduction K.S. v. M.D. and M.F.D. is the Mississippi Supreme Court’s most...
Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases: Commentary on Martez Abram v. State of Mississippi (2025)

Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases: Commentary on Martez Abram v. State of Mississippi (2025)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Reaffirming the One-Continuous-Transaction Doctrine and the M’Naghten Insanity Standard in Capital Cases Comprehensive Commentary on Martez Abram a/k/a Martez Tarrell Abram v. State of Mississippi,...
Harrelson v. State: Refining Plain-Error Review of Improper Comments on “Equally Accessible” Witnesses

Harrelson v. State: Refining Plain-Error Review of Improper Comments on “Equally Accessible” Witnesses

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Harrelson v. State: Refining Plain-Error Review of Improper Comments on “Equally Accessible” Witnesses 1. Introduction Jonathan Harrelson, a forty-four-year-old Mississippi resident, was convicted of...
Clarifying the Filing Requirements for Discovery Materials & Embracing E-Service: An Analysis of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Amendment to Rule 5

Clarifying the Filing Requirements for Discovery Materials & Embracing E-Service: An Analysis of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Amendment to Rule 5

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Clarifying the Filing Requirements for Discovery Materials & Embracing E-Service: An Analysis of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s 2025 Amendment to Rule 5 Introduction On 24 July 2025 the Supreme...
Mandatory Attorney’s-Fee Awards in Certificate-of-Need Litigation Confined to Chancery-Court Appeals: Commentary on Mississippi Methodist Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr. v. MSDH (Miss. 2025)

Mandatory Attorney’s-Fee Awards in Certificate-of-Need Litigation Confined to Chancery-Court Appeals: Commentary on Mississippi Methodist Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr. v. MSDH (Miss. 2025)

Date: Jul 9, 2025
Mandatory Attorney’s-Fee Awards in Certificate-of-Need Litigation Confined to Chancery-Court Appeals A Comprehensive Commentary on Mississippi Methodist Hospital & Rehabilitation Center Inc. v. MSDH...

        “No Fee Without Privity” – Mississippi Supreme Court Forecloses
        Third-Party-Beneficiary, Quantum-Meruit and Common-Fund Claims by
        Associated Counsel against the State

“No Fee Without Privity” – Mississippi Supreme Court Forecloses Third-Party-Beneficiary, Quantum-Meruit and Common-Fund Claims by Associated Counsel against the State

Date: Jul 9, 2025
“No Fee Without Privity” – Mississippi Supreme Court Forecloses Third-Party-Beneficiary, Quantum-Meruit and Common-Fund Claims by Associated Counsel against the State Introduction In Roedel Parsons...
Cole v. State: Clarifying the Tender-Years Hearsay Exception and the Trustworthiness Threshold for 911 CAD Business Records

Cole v. State: Clarifying the Tender-Years Hearsay Exception and the Trustworthiness Threshold for 911 CAD Business Records

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Cole v. State: Clarifying the Tender-Years Hearsay Exception and the Trustworthiness Threshold for 911 CAD Business Records 1. Introduction On 26 June 2025, the Supreme Court of Mississippi released...
“Margin-of-Illegality” Clarified: Houston v. Smith and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s Modern Test for Ordering Special Elections

“Margin-of-Illegality” Clarified: Houston v. Smith and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s Modern Test for Ordering Special Elections

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Margin-of-Illegality” Clarified: Houston v. Smith and the Mississippi Supreme Court’s Modern Test for Ordering Special Elections Introduction In In re: Republican Primary Runoff for Pearl River...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert