Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Interpreting Ambiguous Maintenance Orders and Mandating Payment from the Date of Application: Commentary on Manisha Amit Khajanchi v. Amit Kanakraj Khajanchi, Bombay High Court (2025)

Interpreting Ambiguous Maintenance Orders and Mandating Payment from the Date of Application: Commentary on Manisha Amit Khajanchi v. Amit Kanakraj Khajanchi, Bombay High Court (2025)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Interpreting Ambiguous Interim Maintenance Orders and Enforcing Payment from the Date of Application: A Detailed Commentary on Manisha Amit Khajanchi v. Amit Kanakraj Khajanchi (Bombay High Court,...
Xami Dha Tirakita Kaye v. Union of India – Commentary (Analysis Limited Due to Incomplete Judgment Text)

Xami Dha Tirakita Kaye v. Union of India – Commentary (Analysis Limited Due to Incomplete Judgment Text)

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Limits of Judicial Commentary in the Absence of a Full Record: A Structured Framework for Analysing Xami Dha Tirakita Kaye v. Union of India, Through its Secretary & Anr. (Bombay High Court, Goa...

        No Stop‑Gap Temple Administrators Without Statutory Authority:
        Commentary on Bhagwat Sopan Bankar v. State of Maharashtra

No Stop‑Gap Temple Administrators Without Statutory Authority: Commentary on Bhagwat Sopan Bankar v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Dec 15, 2025
No Stop‑Gap Temple Administrators Without Statutory Authority: Commentary on Bhagwat Sopan Bankar & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors (Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, 12 December 2025) 1....
Interim Moratorium under Section 96 IBC vs SARFAESI Sales: Ownership Transfers Only on Sale Certificate, Not on Sale Notice – Commentary on Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Bank of India

Interim Moratorium under Section 96 IBC vs SARFAESI Sales: Ownership Transfers Only on Sale Certificate, Not on Sale Notice – Commentary on Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Bank of India

Date: Dec 13, 2025
Interim Moratorium under Section 96 IBC vs SARFAESI Sales: Ownership Transfers Only on Sale Certificate, Not on Sale Notice Commentary on Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Union...

        Narrowing the Window for Quashing After Chargesheet: 
        Commentary on Akhil Anil Chitre v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Bombay High Court, 9 December 2025)

Narrowing the Window for Quashing After Chargesheet: Commentary on Akhil Anil Chitre v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Bombay High Court, 9 December 2025)

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Narrowing the Window for Quashing After Chargesheet: Commentary on Akhil Anil Chitre v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Bombay High Court, 9 December 2025) I. Introduction The judgment in Akhil Anil...
Substance Over Labels: Mandatory Charity Commissioner Consent for Suits Against (Ex)‑Trustees under Sections 50–51 MPTA – Commentary on Niket Mehta v. Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust

Substance Over Labels: Mandatory Charity Commissioner Consent for Suits Against (Ex)‑Trustees under Sections 50–51 MPTA – Commentary on Niket Mehta v. Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Substance Over Labels: Mandatory Charity Commissioner Consent for Suits Against (Ex)‑Trustees under Sections 50–51 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act I. Introduction The decision of the Bombay High...
Eviction Under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: 
    Bombay High Court Clarifies that Eviction Cannot Be Granted Without a Claim for Maintenance

Eviction Under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Eviction Cannot Be Granted Without a Claim for Maintenance

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Eviction as an Incident of Maintenance, Not a Stand-Alone Remedy: A Commentary on Jitendra Gorakh Megh v. Additional Collector & Anr., Bombay High Court, 8 December 2025 I. Introduction The Division...

        Sexual Assault under POCSO and Overlap with IPC: 
        Hand‑Holding with Sexual Proposition to a Child as “Sexual Assault” 
        and Application of Section 42 POCSO – Commentary on 
        Sheikh Rafique Sk. Gulab v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 04.12.2025)

Sexual Assault under POCSO and Overlap with IPC: Hand‑Holding with Sexual Proposition to a Child as “Sexual Assault” and Application of Section 42 POCSO – Commentary on Sheikh Rafique Sk. Gulab v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 04.12.2025)

Date: Dec 8, 2025
Hand‑Holding with Sexual Proposition to a Child as “Sexual Assault” under POCSO and Preference for POCSO Punishment over IPC via Section 42: Commentary on Sheikh Rafique Sk. Gulab v. State of...
Pending Re‑Quantification Keeps Tax Dues in “Litigation” Category under SVLDRS: Commentary on Unique Enterprises v. Union of India

Pending Re‑Quantification Keeps Tax Dues in “Litigation” Category under SVLDRS: Commentary on Unique Enterprises v. Union of India

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Pending Re‑Quantification Keeps Tax Dues in “Litigation” Category under SVLDRS, 2019: Commentary on Unique Enterprises v. Union of India, Bombay High Court (2 December 2025) 1. Introduction The...
Recognition of Social Media Posts as “Stalking” and “Outraging Modesty” under IPC and Limits on Quashing under Section 482 CrPC

Recognition of Social Media Posts as “Stalking” and “Outraging Modesty” under IPC and Limits on Quashing under Section 482 CrPC

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Recognition of Social Media Posts as “Stalking” and “Outraging Modesty” under IPC and Limits on Quashing under Section 482 CrPC Case: Tukaram s/o Balasaheb Raskar v. State of Maharashtra through...
Proportionality and Innocent Purchaser Protection in Cancellation of Motor Vehicle Registration Obtained on Forged Import Documents

Proportionality and Innocent Purchaser Protection in Cancellation of Motor Vehicle Registration Obtained on Forged Import Documents

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Proportionality and Innocent Purchaser Protection in Cancellation of Motor Vehicle Registration Obtained on Forged Import Documents Case Commentary on Imran Humayun Chandiwala v. State of...
Change in Shareholding Does Not Constitute Transfer of Government-Allotted Land: Commentary on Tata Communications Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Change in Shareholding Does Not Constitute Transfer of Government-Allotted Land: Commentary on Tata Communications Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Change in Shareholding Does Not Constitute Transfer of Government-Allotted Land: Commentary on Tata Communications Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 1 December 2025) I. Introduction The...
Functus Officio of Authorised Officers under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act: Commentary on Nainesh Sanghvi & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors

Functus Officio of Authorised Officers under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act: Commentary on Nainesh Sanghvi & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors

Date: Nov 29, 2025
Functus Officio of Authorised Officers under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act: Commentary on Nainesh Sanghvi & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors 1. Introduction The judgment...
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC Is Not a “Debt” Provable in Insolvency: Commentary on Mehul Jagdish Trivedi v. Manisha Mehul Trivedi

Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC Is Not a “Debt” Provable in Insolvency: Commentary on Mehul Jagdish Trivedi v. Manisha Mehul Trivedi

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC Is Not a “Debt” Provable in Insolvency and Cannot Ground a Debtor’s Own Insolvency Petition 1. Introduction The decision of the Bombay High Court in Insolvency...
Best-Efforts Clauses, Business Plans and Damages: Commentary on Regus South Mumbai Business Centre Pvt Ltd v. Marie Gold Realtors Pvt Ltd (Bombay High Court, 25 Nov 2025)

Best-Efforts Clauses, Business Plans and Damages: Commentary on Regus South Mumbai Business Centre Pvt Ltd v. Marie Gold Realtors Pvt Ltd (Bombay High Court, 25 Nov 2025)

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Enforceability of “Shall Endeavour” Clauses and Lost-Revenue Damages in Management Agreements: Commentary on Regus South Mumbai Business Centre Pvt Ltd v. Marie Gold Realtors Pvt Ltd, Bombay High...

        Natural Justice, Anti‑Mala Fides and Personal Liability in Municipal Stop‑Work Orders:
        Commentary on M/s Atria Constructions & Pooja B. Jain v. Pune Municipal Commissioner & Ors

Natural Justice, Anti‑Mala Fides and Personal Liability in Municipal Stop‑Work Orders: Commentary on M/s Atria Constructions & Pooja B. Jain v. Pune Municipal Commissioner & Ors

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Natural Justice, Anti‑Mala Fides and Personal Liability in Municipal Stop‑Work Orders: Commentary on M/s Atria Constructions & Pooja B. Jain v. Pune Municipal Commissioner & Ors 1. Introduction This...
Situs of Trademarks and Export Sales under the CST Act: Commentary on Duphar Interfran Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

Situs of Trademarks and Export Sales under the CST Act: Commentary on Duphar Interfran Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Situs of Trademarks and Export Sales under the CST Act: Commentary on Duphar Interfran Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra 1. Introduction The Bombay High Court’s decision in M/s. Duphar Interfran Ltd. v....

        Circumstantial Evidence and Non‑Reporting to Station Master in Railway Accident Claims:
        Commentary on Dhondu Sakharam Tambe v. Union of India

Circumstantial Evidence and Non‑Reporting to Station Master in Railway Accident Claims: Commentary on Dhondu Sakharam Tambe v. Union of India

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Proving “Untoward Incidents” under the Railways Act through Circumstantial Evidence: A Commentary on Shri Dhondu Sakharam Tambe & Anr. v. Union of India Bombay High Court, First Appeal No. 1668 of...
Importer’s Right to Refund of Customs Duty When Goods Are Never Received: Ajay Industrial v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Importer’s Right to Refund of Customs Duty When Goods Are Never Received: Ajay Industrial v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Importer’s Right to Refund of Customs Duty When Goods Are Never Received, Irrespective of Inter‑Departmental Disputes or Bill of Entry Closure Case: M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd v. Assistant...
Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India

Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India, Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench, 14 November 2025) 1. Introduction...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert