Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Anticipatory Bail under BNSS, Non-Arrest for Sub-Seven-Year Offences, and Journalistic Activity: Commentary on Rafiq Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Anticipatory Bail under BNSS, Non-Arrest for Sub-Seven-Year Offences, and Journalistic Activity: Commentary on Rafiq Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Anticipatory Bail under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Non-Arrest for Sub-Seven-Year Offences, and Journalistic Activity: A Commentary on Rafiq Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh I....
Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040-DB)

Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040-DB)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040‑DB) I....
Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): Commentary on Shroff Geeta v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs (Calcutta High Court, 2025)

Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): Commentary on Shroff Geeta v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs (Calcutta High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): A Detailed Commentary on Shroff Geeta (OA/10/2019/PT/KOL) v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs Court:...

        National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition:
        Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court (13.11.2025)

National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition: Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court (13.11.2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition: Detailed Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court, 13...
Tushar @ Nandi @ Anand v. State of M.P.: Strict Scrutiny of Externment under the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 and Unimpaired Writ Jurisdiction

Tushar @ Nandi @ Anand v. State of M.P.: Strict Scrutiny of Externment under the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 and Unimpaired Writ Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Tushar @ Nandi @ Anand v. State of Madhya Pradesh: Strict Scrutiny of Externment under the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 and Unimpaired Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 1. Introduction The...

        Contradictions in Prosecution Testimony Not a "Change in Circumstances" for Successive Bail 
        in Wildlife Offence Cases under Section 483 BNSS, 2023:
        Commentary on Devisingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Contradictions in Prosecution Testimony Not a "Change in Circumstances" for Successive Bail in Wildlife Offence Cases under Section 483 BNSS, 2023: Commentary on Devisingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Contradictions in Prosecution Testimony Not a "Change in Circumstances" for Successive Bail in Wildlife Offence Cases under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 A Detailed Commentary on Devisingh v. State of...
Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India

Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India, Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench, 14 November 2025) 1. Introduction...
Execution Courts, Arbitral Interest and Partial Deposits: Commentary on Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Mega Electricals (Meghalaya High Court, 14.11.2025)

Execution Courts, Arbitral Interest and Partial Deposits: Commentary on Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Mega Electricals (Meghalaya High Court, 14.11.2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Execution Courts, Arbitral Interest and Partial Deposits: A Commentary on Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. M/s Mega Electricals (Meghalaya High Court, 14 November 2025) 1. Introduction This...
Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC

Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC Introduction In Suhana Khatun and Others v. State of West Bengal (CRM...
SEBI Consent Orders Do Not Bar CBI Prosecutions for IPO Rigging: Economic Offences Affecting Retail Investors Are Public Wrongs Not Fit for Quashing

SEBI Consent Orders Do Not Bar CBI Prosecutions for IPO Rigging: Economic Offences Affecting Retail Investors Are Public Wrongs Not Fit for Quashing

Date: Nov 17, 2025
SEBI Consent Orders Do Not Bar CBI Prosecutions for IPO Rigging: Economic Offences Affecting Retail Investors Are Public Wrongs Not Fit for Quashing Introduction In Manojdev Gokulchand Seksaria v....
Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio: Calcutta High Court in Tata Steel Ltd. v. Union of India

Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio: Calcutta High Court in Tata Steel Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio Introduction In a set of writ petitions arising out of tax disputes of the...
No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Rajasthan High Court refers conversion of NBWs to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences to a Larger Bench

No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Rajasthan High Court refers conversion of NBWs to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences to a Larger Bench

Date: Nov 17, 2025
No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Larger Bench reference on converting arrest warrants to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences Introduction In Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/o Ram Swroop Sharma...
Preventive detention cannot substitute bail cancellation: Detaining Authority must evaluate efficacy of bail conditions before invoking MPDA

Preventive detention cannot substitute bail cancellation: Detaining Authority must evaluate efficacy of bail conditions before invoking MPDA

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Preventive detention cannot substitute bail cancellation: Detaining Authority must evaluate efficacy of bail conditions before invoking MPDA Case Snapshot Court: Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at...
No-Objection Certificate for Passport cannot be denied solely due to pending departmental or criminal proceedings: Orissa High Court in Dr. Ashok Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha

No-Objection Certificate for Passport cannot be denied solely due to pending departmental or criminal proceedings: Orissa High Court in Dr. Ashok Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha

Date: Nov 17, 2025
No-Objection Certificate for Passport cannot be denied solely due to pending departmental or criminal proceedings: Orissa High Court in Dr. Ashok Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha Court: Orissa High...
Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A

Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A Case:...
Attempt to Murder under BNS §109(1): Injury Severity Not Determinative at the Charge-Framing Stage; “Grave Suspicion” Test under BNSS §250 Reaffirmed — Commentary on Vivek @ Vicky v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 MPHC-IND 32712)

Attempt to Murder under BNS §109(1): Injury Severity Not Determinative at the Charge-Framing Stage; “Grave Suspicion” Test under BNSS §250 Reaffirmed — Commentary on Vivek @ Vicky v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 MPHC-IND 32712)

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Attempt to Murder under BNS §109(1): Injury Severity Not Determinative at the Charge-Framing Stage; “Grave Suspicion” Test under BNSS §250 Reaffirmed Introduction In Vivek @ Vicky v. The State of...
Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Introduction In Central Bank of India & Ors v. Jay Kumar Goyal & Ors (IA...
Blood Alcohol Threshold for “Intoxication” under Section 304-AA IPC: Commentary on Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Blood Alcohol Threshold for “Intoxication” under Section 304-AA IPC: Commentary on Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Blood Alcohol Threshold for “Intoxication” under Section 304-AA IPC: Commentary on Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh 1. Introduction The judgment in Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh,...
Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant — PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (2025 DHC 9755)

Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant — PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (2025 DHC 9755)

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant Case: PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr....
Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Introduction This...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert