Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Court of Inquiry Is Not a Departmental Proceeding: J&K & Ladakh High Court on Simultaneous Criminal Trial, Internal Fact‑Finding and Suspension in the BSF

Court of Inquiry Is Not a Departmental Proceeding: J&K & Ladakh High Court on Simultaneous Criminal Trial, Internal Fact‑Finding and Suspension in the BSF

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Court of Inquiry Is Not a Departmental Proceeding: J&K & Ladakh High Court on Simultaneous Criminal Trial, Internal Fact‑Finding and Suspension in the BSF 1. Introduction In Akhand Prakash Shahi v....

        Counter-Prosecutions against Sexual Harassment Complainants:
        Delhi High Court on Section 195 CrPC, Data Entrustment and Defamation
        in Rajan Sareen v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Counter-Prosecutions against Sexual Harassment Complainants: Delhi High Court on Section 195 CrPC, Data Entrustment and Defamation in Rajan Sareen v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Counter-Prosecutions against Sexual Harassment Complainants: Delhi High Court on Section 195 CrPC, Data Entrustment and Defamation in Rajan Sareen v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors. I. Introduction The...
Acquiescence, Descriptive Use and Similar Goods under Indian Trademark Law: Commentary on Leayan Global Pvt Ltd v. Bata India Ltd

Acquiescence, Descriptive Use and Similar Goods under Indian Trademark Law: Commentary on Leayan Global Pvt Ltd v. Bata India Ltd

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Acquiescence, Descriptive Use and “Similar Goods” in Trademark Infringement: A Detailed Commentary on Leayan Global Pvt Ltd v. Bata India Ltd 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the Delhi High...
Rarest of Rare, Not Automatic Death: Gujarat High Court’s Sentencing Framework for Child Rape under Section 376AB IPC and POCSO

Rarest of Rare, Not Automatic Death: Gujarat High Court’s Sentencing Framework for Child Rape under Section 376AB IPC and POCSO

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Rarest of Rare, Not Automatic Death: Gujarat High Court’s Sentencing Framework for Child Rape under Section 376AB IPC and POCSO 1. Introduction The decision of the Gujarat High Court in State of...
Non-Speaking Appellate Acquittals Are Unsustainable: Reaffirming the Duty to Give Reasoned Criminal Judgments – Commentary on State of M.P. v. Babulal Malviya

Non-Speaking Appellate Acquittals Are Unsustainable: Reaffirming the Duty to Give Reasoned Criminal Judgments – Commentary on State of M.P. v. Babulal Malviya

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Non-Speaking Appellate Acquittals Are Unsustainable: Reaffirming the Duty to Give Reasoned Criminal Judgments – Commentary on State of Madhya Pradesh v. Babulal Malviya 1. Introduction The decision...
Interpreting Ambiguous Maintenance Orders and Mandating Payment from the Date of Application: Commentary on Manisha Amit Khajanchi v. Amit Kanakraj Khajanchi, Bombay High Court (2025)

Interpreting Ambiguous Maintenance Orders and Mandating Payment from the Date of Application: Commentary on Manisha Amit Khajanchi v. Amit Kanakraj Khajanchi, Bombay High Court (2025)

Date: Dec 16, 2025
Interpreting Ambiguous Interim Maintenance Orders and Enforcing Payment from the Date of Application: A Detailed Commentary on Manisha Amit Khajanchi v. Amit Kanakraj Khajanchi (Bombay High Court,...
Xami Dha Tirakita Kaye v. Union of India – Commentary (Analysis Limited Due to Incomplete Judgment Text)

Xami Dha Tirakita Kaye v. Union of India – Commentary (Analysis Limited Due to Incomplete Judgment Text)

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Limits of Judicial Commentary in the Absence of a Full Record: A Structured Framework for Analysing Xami Dha Tirakita Kaye v. Union of India, Through its Secretary & Anr. (Bombay High Court, Goa...

        No Stop‑Gap Temple Administrators Without Statutory Authority:
        Commentary on Bhagwat Sopan Bankar v. State of Maharashtra

No Stop‑Gap Temple Administrators Without Statutory Authority: Commentary on Bhagwat Sopan Bankar v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Dec 15, 2025
No Stop‑Gap Temple Administrators Without Statutory Authority: Commentary on Bhagwat Sopan Bankar & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors (Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, 12 December 2025) 1....
Extension of NDPS Investigation Without Producing the Accused is Void: Default Bail as an Article 21 Right under BNSS – Commentary on Jaivardhan Dhawan v. NCB

Extension of NDPS Investigation Without Producing the Accused is Void: Default Bail as an Article 21 Right under BNSS – Commentary on Jaivardhan Dhawan v. NCB

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Extension of NDPS Investigation Without Producing the Accused is Void: Default Bail as an Article 21 Right under BNSS I. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision in Jaivardhan Dhawan v. Narcotics...

        Once an Advertisement is Held Disparaging, Cosmetic Editing Cannot Cure It:
        Commentary on Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd. v. Dabur India Ltd.

Once an Advertisement is Held Disparaging, Cosmetic Editing Cannot Cure It: Commentary on Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd. v. Dabur India Ltd.

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Once a Comparative Advertisement is Found Disparaging, Deletion of Isolated Words Cannot Save It: A Commentary on Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd. v. Dabur India Limited Court: High Court at...
Darshan Mohar v. State of NCT of Delhi: POCSO Presumptions, Victim Testimony and Protocols for DNA Preservation of Product of Conception

Darshan Mohar v. State of NCT of Delhi: POCSO Presumptions, Victim Testimony and Protocols for DNA Preservation of Product of Conception

Date: Dec 13, 2025
Darshan Mohar v. State of NCT of Delhi: POCSO Presumptions, Victim Testimony and Protocols for DNA Preservation of Product of Conception 1. Introduction The judgment of the Delhi High Court in...
Seized FDRs as “Court Property” and the Limits of DRT Orders: Commentary on Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan (2025)

Seized FDRs as “Court Property” and the Limits of DRT Orders: Commentary on Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan (2025)

Date: Dec 13, 2025
Seized FDRs as “Court Property” and the Limits of DRT Orders: Commentary on Axis Bank Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, 2025 RJ‑JP 49452 1. Introduction The decision of the Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur...
Interim Moratorium under Section 96 IBC vs SARFAESI Sales: Ownership Transfers Only on Sale Certificate, Not on Sale Notice – Commentary on Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Bank of India

Interim Moratorium under Section 96 IBC vs SARFAESI Sales: Ownership Transfers Only on Sale Certificate, Not on Sale Notice – Commentary on Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Bank of India

Date: Dec 13, 2025
Interim Moratorium under Section 96 IBC vs SARFAESI Sales: Ownership Transfers Only on Sale Certificate, Not on Sale Notice Commentary on Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Union...
No Deemed Guilt for SHOs on Illicit Liquor Seizures: Commentary on Bhola Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar

No Deemed Guilt for SHOs on Illicit Liquor Seizures: Commentary on Bhola Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar

Date: Dec 13, 2025
No Deemed Guilt for SHOs Merely from Illicit Liquor Seizures in Their Jurisdiction: Commentary on Bhola Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar, Patna High Court (10.12.2025) I. Introduction The Patna High...
Judicial Recognition of Tripartite Settlements and Third‑Party Financing in Post‑Award Section 9 Proceedings: Commentary on Eros International Media Ltd v. 14 Reels Entertainment Pvt Ltd

Judicial Recognition of Tripartite Settlements and Third‑Party Financing in Post‑Award Section 9 Proceedings: Commentary on Eros International Media Ltd v. 14 Reels Entertainment Pvt Ltd

Date: Dec 13, 2025
Judicial Recognition of Tripartite Settlements and Third‑Party Financing in Post‑Award Section 9 Arbitration Proceedings: A Commentary on Eros International Media Ltd v. 14 Reels Entertainment Pvt...
Pension as a Service-Rule Benefit, Not a Constitutional Entitlement, for Employees of Government‑Funded Autonomous Schools – Commentary on Abdul Majeed Parray v. UT of J&K

Pension as a Service-Rule Benefit, Not a Constitutional Entitlement, for Employees of Government‑Funded Autonomous Schools – Commentary on Abdul Majeed Parray v. UT of J&K

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Pension as a Service-Rule Benefit, Not a Constitutional Entitlement, for Employees of Government‑Funded Autonomous Schools Commentary on Abdul Majeed Parray v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors., High...
Prioritising Grievances of Persons with Disabilities and Time-bound Decisions on Community Certificate Appeals: Commentary on C. Somasundaram v. Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board & Ors.

Prioritising Grievances of Persons with Disabilities and Time-bound Decisions on Community Certificate Appeals: Commentary on C. Somasundaram v. Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board & Ors.

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Prioritising Grievances of Persons with Disabilities and Time-bound Decisions on Community Certificate Appeals: Commentary on C. Somasundaram v. Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board & Ors. 1....
Due Process and Police Surveillance of “Rowdy Sheeters”: Commentary on Sunil Kumar @ Silent Sunil v. State of Karnataka

Due Process and Police Surveillance of “Rowdy Sheeters”: Commentary on Sunil Kumar @ Silent Sunil v. State of Karnataka

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Due Process and Police Surveillance of “Rowdy Sheeters”: Commentary on Sunil Kumar @ Silent Sunil v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction The judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Sunil Kumar @...
Cinema Multiplexes as Non‑Aeronautical Activities under the AAI Act: Commentary on PVR INOX Ltd v. Airports Authority of India

Cinema Multiplexes as Non‑Aeronautical Activities under the AAI Act: Commentary on PVR INOX Ltd v. Airports Authority of India

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Cinema Multiplexes as Non‑Aeronautical Activities under the AAI Act: Commentary on PVR INOX Ltd v. Airports Authority of India 1. Introduction The Madras High Court’s decision in PVR INOX Ltd v....
Contempt Jurisdiction, Executive Prohibitory Orders under Section 163 BNSS, and Court’s Power to Requisition Central Forces: Commentary on K.J. Praveenkumar IAS v. Rama Ravikumar

Contempt Jurisdiction, Executive Prohibitory Orders under Section 163 BNSS, and Court’s Power to Requisition Central Forces: Commentary on K.J. Praveenkumar IAS v. Rama Ravikumar

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Contempt Jurisdiction, Section 163 BNSS Orders, and Judicial Power to Call in Central Forces: A Commentary on K.J. Praveenkumar IAS v. Rama Ravikumar I. Introduction The decision in K J Praveenkumar...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert