Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Disability Reservation Subject to Notified Functional Requirements: Commentary on Sajil Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Disability Reservation Subject to Notified Functional Requirements: Commentary on Sajil Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Disability Reservation Subject to Notified Functional Requirements: A Detailed Commentary on Sajil Kumar v. State of H.P. & Others, CWP No. 4525 of 2023 Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla...
Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International

Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International

Date: Nov 6, 2025
Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International Introduction In Suparshva Swabs India v....
No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure

No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure

Date: Nov 6, 2025
No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure Case: Infrastructure Watchdog v. Union of India &...
ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’

ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’

Date: Nov 6, 2025
ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’ Introduction In Directorate of Enforcement v. M/s Prakash...

      “No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty:
      Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent an Explicit Stay

“No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty: Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent an Explicit Stay

Date: Nov 6, 2025
“No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty: Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent...
Technical Contribution without Novel Hardware: Madras High Court’s Section 3(k) Framework for Computer‑Related Inventions in Ab Initio Technology LLC v. Controller of Patents

Technical Contribution without Novel Hardware: Madras High Court’s Section 3(k) Framework for Computer‑Related Inventions in Ab Initio Technology LLC v. Controller of Patents

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Technical Contribution without Novel Hardware: Madras High Court’s Section 3(k) Framework for Computer‑Related Inventions in Ab Initio Technology LLC v. Controller of Patents Citation: 2025 MHC 2579...
Mandatory Age Determination under JJ Act and the Limited Scope of Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar

Mandatory Age Determination under JJ Act and the Limited Scope of Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar

Date: Nov 4, 2025
Mandatory Age Determination under the Juvenile Justice Act and the “Possible View” Test in Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Prosecutions: A Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar, Patna...
Reservation Does Not Extend to Confirmation: Delhi High Court Mandates Reasoned Consideration of Relaxed Standards and Accommodation for PwBDs; CCPwD Recommendations Are Quasi-Binding

Reservation Does Not Extend to Confirmation: Delhi High Court Mandates Reasoned Consideration of Relaxed Standards and Accommodation for PwBDs; CCPwD Recommendations Are Quasi-Binding

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Reservation Does Not Extend to Confirmation: Reasoned Duty to Consider Relaxed Standards and Accommodation for PwBDs; CCPwD Recommendations Are Quasi-Binding Introduction In Munna Lal Yadav v....
BNSS Section 528 Quashing Reaffirmed: Mere Credit Default in Agri-Produce Sales Is Not Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust; Purchase Slips Are Not “False Documents” Absent Impersonation or Alteration

BNSS Section 528 Quashing Reaffirmed: Mere Credit Default in Agri-Produce Sales Is Not Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust; Purchase Slips Are Not “False Documents” Absent Impersonation or Alteration

Date: Oct 28, 2025
BNSS Section 528 Quashing Reaffirmed: Mere Credit Default in Agri-Produce Sales Is Not Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust; Purchase Slips Are Not “False Documents” Absent Impersonation or...
Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Quantified Settlement Notes as Accord and Satisfaction of Accrued Claims: Delhi High Court clarifies the reach of Sections 62 and 63 of the Contract Act Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement

Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Section 11 Appointments Not Barred by Pending Section 37 Appeals: Bombay High Court Orders De Novo Arbitration After Set-Aside, Confines Referral Court to Prima Facie Existence of Agreement...
Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State (Madras High Court, 10 Oct 2025)

Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State (Madras High Court, 10 Oct 2025)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Victim’s Age under POCSO Must Be Determined via JJ Act Section 94(2); Section 34 POCSO Confined to Juvenile‑Accused: Commentary on Murugesan @ Murugesh v. State Citation: 2025 MHC 2357 | Court:...
GST Returns Are Confidential: Bombay High Court Holds Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory

GST Returns Are Confidential: Bombay High Court Holds Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory

Date: Oct 16, 2025
GST Returns Are Confidential: Section 158 of the GST Act Overrides RTI Requests for Third-Party Tax Records; Section 11 Notice Mandatory Introduction In Writ Petition No. 11135 of 2025, decided on 14...
Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation for revisions

Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation for revisions

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation...
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Delhi High Court Orders Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Zero‑Tolerance Protocol for Impersonated NGO Writs: Police Probe and Personal Costs for Fraud on the Court Introduction Case: Delhi Ki Galiyan NGO v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors., W.P.(C) 10595/2024...
Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court (13 October 2025)

Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court (13 October 2025)

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Right to Safe Roads under Article 21: Immediate Public-Law Compensation for Pothole and Open Manhole Victims; District Compensation Committees and Personal Liability of Officials — Bombay High Court...
Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A

Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A...
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved Introduction In CM(M) 1961/2025 (with CM APPL. 63525/2025 & 63524/2025), the Delhi High...
Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar Re‑Execution

Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar Re‑Execution

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar...
No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

Date: Oct 13, 2025
No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition Case: Mohammed Taiyab and Others v. State of Madhya...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert