Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Delhi High Court holds that suspension cannot be extended on the ground of “pending disciplinary proceedings” unless a charge-sheet has been issued; extensions based on wrong reasons extinguish the suspension

Delhi High Court holds that suspension cannot be extended on the ground of “pending disciplinary proceedings” unless a charge-sheet has been issued; extensions based on wrong reasons extinguish the suspension

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Suspension cannot be extended on the ground of “pending disciplinary proceedings” unless a charge-sheet has been issued; extensions based on wrong reasons extinguish the suspension Introduction In...
Madras High Court narrows Special Court’s suo motu powers under the SC/ST Act: Administrative enquiry is sine qua non for Section 4; Externment under Section 10 demands a complaint/police report, area verification, and concrete likelihood of atrocity

Madras High Court narrows Special Court’s suo motu powers under the SC/ST Act: Administrative enquiry is sine qua non for Section 4; Externment under Section 10 demands a complaint/police report, area verification, and concrete likelihood of atrocity

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Madras High Court narrows Special Court’s suo motu powers under the SC/ST Act: Administrative enquiry is sine qua non for Section 4; Externment under Section 10 demands a complaint/police report,...
Targeted deterrence against false POCSO accusations: MP High Court quashes FIR, directs prosecution of informant and mandates preliminary enquiry before coercive action in habitual-complainant scenario

Targeted deterrence against false POCSO accusations: MP High Court quashes FIR, directs prosecution of informant and mandates preliminary enquiry before coercive action in habitual-complainant scenario

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Targeted deterrence against false POCSO accusations: MP High Court quashes FIR, directs prosecution of informant and mandates preliminary enquiry before coercive action in habitual-complainant...
Post-Checkmate, CPC can disallow belated employees’ PF/ESI under Section 143(1)(a); Section 10 GCA saves deposits due on national holiday — Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Delhi High Court, 08.09.2025)

Post-Checkmate, CPC can disallow belated employees’ PF/ESI under Section 143(1)(a); Section 10 GCA saves deposits due on national holiday — Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Delhi High Court, 08.09.2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Post-Checkmate, CPC can disallow belated employees’ PF/ESI under Section 143(1)(a); Section 10 GCA saves deposits due on national holiday Woodland (Aero Club) Private Limited v. Assistant...
Affidavit-Based Chief Examination Impermissible in Sessions Trials; Magistrate-Supervised Sampling Mandatory under Section 52A NDPS Act: Kerala High Court Acquittal in ASKAF v. Sub Inspector of Police, Sulthan Bathery

Affidavit-Based Chief Examination Impermissible in Sessions Trials; Magistrate-Supervised Sampling Mandatory under Section 52A NDPS Act: Kerala High Court Acquittal in ASKAF v. Sub Inspector of Police, Sulthan Bathery

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Affidavit-Based Chief Examination Impermissible in Sessions Trials; Magistrate-Supervised Sampling Mandatory under Section 52A NDPS Act: Kerala High Court Acquittal in ASKAF v. Sub Inspector of...
Natural Parent’s Primacy Reaffirmed: Habeas Corpus Maintainable to Recover Minor from Grandparent Despite Pending Guardianship Proceedings

Natural Parent’s Primacy Reaffirmed: Habeas Corpus Maintainable to Recover Minor from Grandparent Despite Pending Guardianship Proceedings

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Natural Parent’s Primacy Reaffirmed: Habeas Corpus Maintainable to Recover Minor from Grandparent Despite Pending Guardianship Proceedings Introduction This commentary analyses the Bombay High...
Calcutta High Court sets temporal cut‑off for counterclaims in arbitration: no counterclaim after issues are framed; exceptional allowance only until start of claimant’s evidence

Calcutta High Court sets temporal cut‑off for counterclaims in arbitration: no counterclaim after issues are framed; exceptional allowance only until start of claimant’s evidence

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Counterclaims in Arbitration: Calcutta High Court fixes an outer limit tied to “framing of issues,” with rare leeway until commencement of claimant’s evidence Introduction In Gayatri Granites & Ors...
No “45‑Day Wait” Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limitation, Upholds Concurrent Civil–Criminal Remedies, and Bars Mini‑Trials under Section 528 BNSS

No “45‑Day Wait” Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limitation, Upholds Concurrent Civil–Criminal Remedies, and Bars Mini‑Trials under Section 528 BNSS

Date: Sep 7, 2025
No “45‑Day Wait” Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limitation, Upholds Concurrent Civil–Criminal Remedies, and Bars Mini‑Trials under Section 528 BNSS Introduction In Smt. Rama...
Chetan v. State (2025 DHC 7684): Minor Delay in Furlough Surrender to Be Viewed with a Reformative Tilt; Non‑Speaking Rejection Orders Unsustainable

Chetan v. State (2025 DHC 7684): Minor Delay in Furlough Surrender to Be Viewed with a Reformative Tilt; Non‑Speaking Rejection Orders Unsustainable

Date: Sep 7, 2025
Chetan v. State (2025 DHC 7684): Minor Delay in Furlough Surrender to Be Viewed with a Reformative Tilt; Non‑Speaking Rejection Orders Unsustainable Introduction In Chetan v. State GNCT of Delhi...
Bail for Foreign Nationals in NDPS Prosecutions: Co‑accused Confession Insufficient; Article 21 and Frank Vitus–compliant Safeguards Prevail — Commentary on Tidj Mamane @ Tidy Mamane v. State of HP (2025 HHC 30402)

Bail for Foreign Nationals in NDPS Prosecutions: Co‑accused Confession Insufficient; Article 21 and Frank Vitus–compliant Safeguards Prevail — Commentary on Tidj Mamane @ Tidy Mamane v. State of HP (2025 HHC 30402)

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Bail for Foreign Nationals in NDPS Prosecutions: Co‑accused Confession Insufficient; Article 21 and Frank Vitus–compliant Safeguards Prevail Case: Tidj Mamane alias Tidy Mamane v. State of Himachal...
Married Daughters Must Be Counted in Family Size; Policy‑Induced Delay Not Fatal: HP High Court on Compassionate Appointment

Married Daughters Must Be Counted in Family Size; Policy‑Induced Delay Not Fatal: HP High Court on Compassionate Appointment

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Married Daughters Must Be Counted in Family Size; Policy‑Induced Delay Not Fatal: HP High Court on Compassionate Appointment Case: Savita v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others Citation: 2025 HHC...
Consent of Existing Apartment Owners Is a Condition Precedent for Additional Structures; NKDA’s Non‑Obstante Clause Cannot Eclipse the WB Apartment Ownership Act and Promoters Act — Calcutta High Court Orders Demolition of Elita Garden Vista’s 16th Tower

Consent of Existing Apartment Owners Is a Condition Precedent for Additional Structures; NKDA’s Non‑Obstante Clause Cannot Eclipse the WB Apartment Ownership Act and Promoters Act — Calcutta High Court Orders Demolition of Elita Garden Vista’s 16th Tower

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Consent of Existing Apartment Owners Is a Condition Precedent for Additional Structures; NKDA’s Non‑Obstante Clause Cannot Eclipse the WB Apartment Ownership Act and Promoters Act — Calcutta High...
Mere Residence Is Not an “Integral Part” of Cause of Action under Article 226 in Anti-Defection Writs: MP High Court (Indore) Applies Forum Conveniens

Mere Residence Is Not an “Integral Part” of Cause of Action under Article 226 in Anti-Defection Writs: MP High Court (Indore) Applies Forum Conveniens

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Mere Residence Is Not an “Integral Part” of Cause of Action under Article 226 in Anti-Defection Writs: MP High Court (Indore) Applies Forum Conveniens Case: Umang Singhar v. The State of Madhya...
Militancy Threat Alone Is Not a Defence to Prolonged Unauthorized Absence by Police Personnel; Limited-Remand Hearing Suffices: J&K High Court affirms removal in Mehraj‑ud‑Din Khan v. UT of J&K (04.09.2025)

Militancy Threat Alone Is Not a Defence to Prolonged Unauthorized Absence by Police Personnel; Limited-Remand Hearing Suffices: J&K High Court affirms removal in Mehraj‑ud‑Din Khan v. UT of J&K (04.09.2025)

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Militancy Threat Alone Is Not a Defence to Prolonged Unauthorized Absence by Police Personnel; Limited-Remand Hearing Suffices Commentary on Mehraj‑ud‑Din Khan v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors., WP(C)...
Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020

Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020 Introduction In a consolidated judgment...
Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)

Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)...
Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year (Nanakchand Agrawal v. ITO, 2025)

Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year (Nanakchand Agrawal v. ITO, 2025)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Section 69A Applies in the Year of Ownership, Not Deposit: Closing Cash-in-Hand of a Preceding Year Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained in the Succeeding Year Case: Nanakchand Agrawal v. The Income Tax...
Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups/MSMEs: Delhi High Court’s Direction to CBIC and 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty

Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups/MSMEs: Delhi High Court’s Direction to CBIC and 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups and MSMEs: Delhi High Court Orders 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty and Calls CBIC to Frame MSME‑Friendly SOPs Case: Mitraj Business Private...
Karnataka High Court shuts the door on successive Section 482/BNSS 528 petitions without a change in circumstances; quashing post-charge-sheet remains an exception

Karnataka High Court shuts the door on successive Section 482/BNSS 528 petitions without a change in circumstances; quashing post-charge-sheet remains an exception

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Karnataka High Court clarifies: No successive Section 482/BNSS 528 petitions on grounds available earlier; post-charge-sheet quashing is exceptional Introduction In Sri G. Satyanarayana Varma v....
Comparable-Net-Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses: Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh (2025 DHC 7596)

Comparable-Net-Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses: Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh (2025 DHC 7596)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Comparable‑Net‑Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh, 2025 DHC 7596 (Delhi High Court, 1...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.