Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Genus–Species Patents, “Person in the Know” and Evergreening: Commentary on Novo Nordisk A/S v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (2025 DHC 10820)

Genus–Species Patents, “Person in the Know” and Evergreening: Commentary on Novo Nordisk A/S v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (2025 DHC 10820)

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Genus–Species Patents, “Person in the Know” and Evergreening: Commentary on Novo Nordisk A/S v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (2025 DHC 10820) 1. Introduction This judgment of the Delhi High Court...
Primacy of Section 27 Tribunal and Limits on Writ Interference in Coal Mine Performance Security: Commentary on Vedanta Ltd v. Nominated Authority, Ministry of Coal

Primacy of Section 27 Tribunal and Limits on Writ Interference in Coal Mine Performance Security: Commentary on Vedanta Ltd v. Nominated Authority, Ministry of Coal

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Primacy of Section 27 Tribunal and Limits on Writ Interference in Coal Mine Performance Security: Commentary on Vedanta Limited v. Nominated Authority, Ministry of Coal & Ors., 2025 DHC 10744 I....
Recognition of Social Media Posts as “Stalking” and “Outraging Modesty” under IPC and Limits on Quashing under Section 482 CrPC

Recognition of Social Media Posts as “Stalking” and “Outraging Modesty” under IPC and Limits on Quashing under Section 482 CrPC

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Recognition of Social Media Posts as “Stalking” and “Outraging Modesty” under IPC and Limits on Quashing under Section 482 CrPC Case: Tukaram s/o Balasaheb Raskar v. State of Maharashtra through...
Quo Warranto, State Litigation Policies, and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil Samdaria v. State of Rajasthan

Quo Warranto, State Litigation Policies, and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil Samdaria v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Quo Warranto, State Litigation Policies, and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil Samdaria v. State of Rajasthan I. Introduction The Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)...
Proportionality and Innocent Purchaser Protection in Cancellation of Motor Vehicle Registration Obtained on Forged Import Documents

Proportionality and Innocent Purchaser Protection in Cancellation of Motor Vehicle Registration Obtained on Forged Import Documents

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Proportionality and Innocent Purchaser Protection in Cancellation of Motor Vehicle Registration Obtained on Forged Import Documents Case Commentary on Imran Humayun Chandiwala v. State of...
Doctrine of Abandonment of Article 226 Remedy on Withdrawal Without Liberty: Rahul Modi v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Doctrine of Abandonment of Article 226 Remedy on Withdrawal Without Liberty: Rahul Modi v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Doctrine of Abandonment of Article 226 Remedy on Withdrawal Without Liberty: A Commentary on Rahul Modi v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2025 MPHC-JBP 62634 1. Introduction The decision of the Madhya...
Correcting Patent Computational Errors in Arbitral Awards at the Section 37 Stage: Commentary on Jagdish Kaur v. Jasbir Singh Sandhu & Ors.

Correcting Patent Computational Errors in Arbitral Awards at the Section 37 Stage: Commentary on Jagdish Kaur v. Jasbir Singh Sandhu & Ors.

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Correcting Patent Computational Errors in Arbitral Awards at the Section 37 Stage: Commentary on Jagdish Kaur v. Jasbir Singh Sandhu & Ors. 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision in FAO...
Fair Investigation as a facet of Article 21: Delhi High Court’s Power to Order a Fresh CBI Probe Despite Closure Report and Alternate Remedy – Commentary on Anu Duggal v. State & Ors. (2025 DHC 10526)

Fair Investigation as a facet of Article 21: Delhi High Court’s Power to Order a Fresh CBI Probe Despite Closure Report and Alternate Remedy – Commentary on Anu Duggal v. State & Ors. (2025 DHC 10526)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Fair Investigation as a Facet of Article 21: Delhi High Court’s Power to Order a Fresh CBI Probe Despite Closure Report and Alternate Remedy Commentary on Anu Duggal v. State & Ors., 2025 DHC 10526...
Limits on Non‑Remittable Life Sentences and Standards for Circumstantial Proof of Conspiracy: Commentary on Vinesh v. State of Kerala

Limits on Non‑Remittable Life Sentences and Standards for Circumstantial Proof of Conspiracy: Commentary on Vinesh v. State of Kerala

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Limits on Non‑Remittable Life Sentences and Standards for Circumstantial Proof of Conspiracy: Commentary on Vinesh v. State of Kerala I. Introduction The decision of the Kerala High Court in Vinesh...

    Calibrating Death Penalty and Defining Harassment: Commentary on 
    The Inspector of Police v. Sathish, 2025 MHC 2712

Calibrating Death Penalty and Defining Harassment: Commentary on The Inspector of Police v. Sathish, 2025 MHC 2712

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Calibrating Death Penalty and Defining “Harassment”: Madras High Court’s Sentencing and Harassment Jurisprudence in The Inspector of Police v. Sathish, 2025 MHC 2712 1. Introduction The decision of...
Obtaining a Deceptively Similar Trademark Registration During an Injunction as Contempt: Madras High Court’s Strict Application of Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Roopa Industries

Obtaining a Deceptively Similar Trademark Registration During an Injunction as Contempt: Madras High Court’s Strict Application of Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Roopa Industries

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Obtaining a Deceptively Similar Trademark Registration During an Injunction as Contempt: Madras High Court’s Strict Application of Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC in Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Roopa...
Primacy of Statutory Appeals over Writ Jurisdiction in Drug Licence Suspension: Commentary on Rajpal Kataria v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Primacy of Statutory Appeals over Writ Jurisdiction in Drug Licence Suspension: Commentary on Rajpal Kataria v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Primacy of Statutory Appeals over Writ Jurisdiction in Drug Licence Suspension: Commentary on Rajpal Kataria v. State of Madhya Pradesh Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench Coram:...
Limits on Arbitral Power to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Award Unliquidated Damages: Commentary on M/s Sugesan Transport Pvt Ltd v M/s E.C. Bose & Co Pvt Ltd, 2025 MHC 2699

Limits on Arbitral Power to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Award Unliquidated Damages: Commentary on M/s Sugesan Transport Pvt Ltd v M/s E.C. Bose & Co Pvt Ltd, 2025 MHC 2699

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Limits on Arbitral Power to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Award Unliquidated Damages: Commentary on M/s Sugesan Transport Pvt Ltd v M/s E.C. Bose & Co Pvt Ltd, 2025 MHC 2699 (Madras High Court) I....

    Article 227 Review of Arbitral Orders on Party Substitution and the Non‑Binding
    Effect of Conciliation Settlements on Non‑Party Assignees:
    Commentary on NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD & ANR.

Article 227 Review of Arbitral Orders on Party Substitution and the Non‑Binding Effect of Conciliation Settlements on Non‑Party Assignees: Commentary on NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD & ANR.

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Article 227 Review of Arbitral Orders on Party Substitution and the Non‑Binding Effect of Conciliation Settlements on Non‑Party Assignees 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision in National...
Right of Major Partners Below Marriageable Age to Cohabit and Seek Police Protection: Commentary on Priya Suman v. State of Rajasthan

Right of Major Partners Below Marriageable Age to Cohabit and Seek Police Protection: Commentary on Priya Suman v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Right of Major Partners Below Marriageable Age to Cohabit and Seek Police Protection: A Detailed Commentary on Priya Suman v. State of Rajasthan, 2025 RJ-JP 48775 Court: High Court of Judicature for...
Retrospective Enforcement of Disability Reservation in Promotions and the Necessity of Formal Exemption under Section 33: Commentary on Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana

Retrospective Enforcement of Disability Reservation in Promotions and the Necessity of Formal Exemption under Section 33: Commentary on Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Retrospective Enforcement of Disability Reservation in Promotions and the Necessity of Formal Exemption under Section 33: Commentary on Bhim Singh v. State of Haryana 1. Introduction The judgment of...
Solitary Sexual Offence Against a Child as Sufficient Ground for Preventive Detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982

Solitary Sexual Offence Against a Child as Sufficient Ground for Preventive Detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Solitary Sexual Offence Against a Child as Sufficient Ground for Preventive Detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 1. Introduction The decision in C. Kayalvizhi v. State of Tamil Nadu, H.C.P.(MD)...
Change in Shareholding Does Not Constitute Transfer of Government-Allotted Land: Commentary on Tata Communications Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Change in Shareholding Does Not Constitute Transfer of Government-Allotted Land: Commentary on Tata Communications Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Date: Dec 2, 2025
Change in Shareholding Does Not Constitute Transfer of Government-Allotted Land: Commentary on Tata Communications Ltd v. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court, 1 December 2025) I. Introduction The...
Mandating Human Oversight in RBI Ombudsman Complaints and Protecting Cardholders from Harassment – Commentary on Sarwar Raza v. Ombudsman RBI & Anr., 2025 DHC 10520

Mandating Human Oversight in RBI Ombudsman Complaints and Protecting Cardholders from Harassment – Commentary on Sarwar Raza v. Ombudsman RBI & Anr., 2025 DHC 10520

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Mandating Human Oversight in RBI Ombudsman Complaints and Protecting Cardholders from Harassment – Commentary on Sarwar Raza v. Ombudsman Reserve Bank of India & Anr., 2025 DHC 10520 I. Introduction...

    Quashing Stale CBI Prosecutions Against Low‑Rank Police Officers:
    Media-Based Identification, Article 21 Speedy Trial and Institutional Reconciliation
    under Section 528 BNSS – A Commentary on
    S. Palanivel Rajan v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI (Madras High Court, 27.11.2025)

Quashing Stale CBI Prosecutions Against Low‑Rank Police Officers: Media-Based Identification, Article 21 Speedy Trial and Institutional Reconciliation under Section 528 BNSS – A Commentary on S. Palanivel Rajan v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI (Madras High Court, 27.11.2025)

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Quashing Stale CBI Prosecutions Against Low‑Rank Police Officers: Media-Based Identification, Article 21 Speedy Trial and Institutional Reconciliation under Section 528 BNSS I. Introduction This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert