Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Suicide Video Naming Alone Not Sufficient to Deny Bail in Loan-Linked Abetment Cases: MP High Court Clarifies under BNSS Sections 482/483 Case Commentary on: Arvind Parmar v. The State of Madhya...
Section 52A Delay Is a Curable Irregularity and Colour Variance in Samples Is Non-Fatal at Bail Stage: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Section 37 NDPS Bar in Courier-Parcel Heroin Cases Introduction...
Replication Clock Starts When Belated Written Statement Is Taken on Record: Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 5, Chapter VII, DHC (Original Side) Rules Case: Helsinn Healthcare SA & Anr. v. Hetero...
Diatom and CDR Evidence Require Corroboration; Digital “Last Seen” Plus Section 27 Discovery Sustain Murder Conviction; Death Penalty Requires Proved Irreformability — State of HP v. Chander Sharma @...
Unauthorized Absence Requires Proof of Willfulness: Non-consideration of Medical Defence Vitiates Disciplinary Orders Case: Roop Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others (W.P. No. 4426/2021)...
Single Credible Testimony Can Sustain Departmental Charges; Tribunal’s Review Confined to Process, Not Evidence Reappreciation — Delhi High Court in Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar Introduction The...
Initial-Interest Confusion as Sufficient Ground for Trademark Infringement and Ex‑Parte Summary Judgment: Hotels.com, LP v. Barath M L (Delhi High Court, 2025) Introduction In a decisive enforcement...
Notional Interest Counts: Delhi High Court Validates Objective Income Estimation for Ex‑Gratia Relief under Bank Schemes Case: OMWATI v. The Bank of Maharashtra and Anr | Citation: 2025 DHC 8676 |...
Implied Maintenance Condition Under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Delhi High Court Affirms Cancellation of Gift Deeds Absent Express Clause or Pleading Case: Smt. Varinder Kaur v. Smt....
Zero FIR Is a Police Facilitation, Not a Jurisdictional Bridge for Magistrates: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Territorial Limits of Section 156(3) in Hate-Speech Complaints Case: Anirban Bhattacharya...
Applying the “Larger Conspiracy” Lens at the Bail Stage: Delay and Parity Not Determinative in Communal-Riot Murder Cases Case: Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi) Citation: 2025 DHC 8605...
Mere restitution cannot erase criminal liability for misappropriation: Kerala High Court clarifies quash threshold under BNSS Section 528 Case: P.N. Suresh Kumar v. State of Kerala (Crl.M.C. No. 3477...
RTE and RPwD Acts Held Inapplicable to Sainik Schools: Madras High Court Upholds Non‑Negotiable Medical Fitness Standards and Estoppel Against Post‑Participation Challenges Case: M.R. Yajith Krishna...
Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother Introduction This commentary examines the...
As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared Decision: Cotton Casuals India Private Limited &...
Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings Introduction In Chandrama Vishvakarma v....
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims Introduction In X Corp v. Union of...