Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583)

Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583) Court: Delhi High Court | Bench: Justice Girish...
Madras High Court Narrows Bar Council’s Section 13 Enquiry: Multiple Associations at a Court Centre Permitted; Consultation with Rival Associations Prohibited

Madras High Court Narrows Bar Council’s Section 13 Enquiry: Multiple Associations at a Court Centre Permitted; Consultation with Rival Associations Prohibited

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Madras High Court Narrows Bar Council’s Section 13 Enquiry: Multiple Associations at a Court Centre Permitted; Consultation with Rival Associations Prohibited Introduction In Women Lawyers...
Cancellation of Appointment for Forged Educational Qualifications Survives Criminal Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court’s Clarification on Eligibility, Natural Justice, and Probation

Cancellation of Appointment for Forged Educational Qualifications Survives Criminal Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court’s Clarification on Eligibility, Natural Justice, and Probation

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Cancellation of Appointment for Forged Educational Qualifications Survives Criminal Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court’s Clarification on Eligibility, Natural Justice, and Probation Case: Ashok Kumar...
Substance Over Nomenclature: J&K High Court Treats Long‑Term “Academic Arrangements” Against Sanctioned Posts as Contractual/Consolidated Appointments Eligible for Regularization under the 2010 Act

Substance Over Nomenclature: J&K High Court Treats Long‑Term “Academic Arrangements” Against Sanctioned Posts as Contractual/Consolidated Appointments Eligible for Regularization under the 2010 Act

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Substance Over Nomenclature: J&K High Court Treats Long‑Term “Academic Arrangements” Against Sanctioned Posts as Contractual/Consolidated Appointments Eligible for Regularization under the 2010 Act...
No Probation for Section 304-A IPC Fatal Road Accidents: HP High Court Reaffirms Supreme Court Line and Sets Aside Creative Probation Orders

No Probation for Section 304-A IPC Fatal Road Accidents: HP High Court Reaffirms Supreme Court Line and Sets Aside Creative Probation Orders

Date: Sep 4, 2025
No Probation for Section 304-A IPC Fatal Road Accidents: HP High Court Reaffirms Supreme Court Line and Sets Aside Creative Probation Orders Introduction In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajika Gupta...
Mandatory Panchayat Parivar Register Entry on Section 4 Notification Date as the Determinative Eligibility Criterion for R&R Oustee Benefits: Nathu Ram v. NTPC (2025 HHC 29048)

Mandatory Panchayat Parivar Register Entry on Section 4 Notification Date as the Determinative Eligibility Criterion for R&R Oustee Benefits: Nathu Ram v. NTPC (2025 HHC 29048)

Date: Sep 3, 2025
Mandatory Panchayat Parivar Register Entry on Section 4 Notification Date as the Determinative Eligibility Criterion for R&R Oustee Benefits Commentary on Nathu Ram v. National Thermal Power...
Reading Between the Lines: J&K High Court mandates holistic scrutiny of FIRs to thwart criminalization of civil disputes under Section 482 CrPC / Section 528 BNSS

Reading Between the Lines: J&K High Court mandates holistic scrutiny of FIRs to thwart criminalization of civil disputes under Section 482 CrPC / Section 528 BNSS

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Reading Between the Lines: J&K High Court mandates holistic scrutiny of FIRs to thwart criminalization of civil disputes under Section 482 CrPC / Section 528 BNSS Introduction The High Court of Jammu...
Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni

Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Regulation, Not Prohibition: AP High Court affirms the secular character of public roads and directs facilitation of the traditional Vinayaka immersion procession in Adoni Introduction In Viswa Hindu...
Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj

Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj Introduction This commentary...
Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE

Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Family Settlement First: Allahabad High Court Prioritizes Rule 109(5)(g) in Partition (Kurra) and Sets a Step-wise Hierarchy under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016

Family Settlement First: Allahabad High Court Prioritizes Rule 109(5)(g) in Partition (Kurra) and Sets a Step-wise Hierarchy under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Family Settlement First: Hierarchy within Rule 109(5) for Partition (Kurra) under the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 Case: Shahadat Ali and Another v. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow through Member...
Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede

Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede Court: Delhi High Court Bench: Justice Navin...
No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection

No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982: Appeals Held Not Maintainable; Liberty to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction with Interim Protection Court:...
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge Introduction In Yash Mishra v. State of...
Kerala High Court Sets Transparency Standard for Devaswom Outsourcing: Mandatory Multilingual Rate Display and Enforcement Against Overcharging at Sabarimala

Kerala High Court Sets Transparency Standard for Devaswom Outsourcing: Mandatory Multilingual Rate Display and Enforcement Against Overcharging at Sabarimala

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Kerala High Court Sets Transparency Standard for Devaswom Outsourcing: Mandatory Multilingual Rate Display and Enforcement Against Overcharging at Sabarimala Introduction In SUO MOTU v. State of...
Sincere Remorse Cleanses Contempt: Telangana High Court’s Restorative Approach to Scandalous Transfer Pleadings and the Bar–Bench Compact

Sincere Remorse Cleanses Contempt: Telangana High Court’s Restorative Approach to Scandalous Transfer Pleadings and the Bar–Bench Compact

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Sincere Remorse Cleanses Contempt: Telangana High Court’s Restorative Approach to Scandalous Transfer Pleadings and the Bar–Bench Compact Introduction This commentary examines the Telangana High...
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: A Detailed Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr. (2025 DHC 7371)...
Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration

Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Substance Over Form in Section 34 Challenges: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Section 14 Exclusion and Cautions Against Technical Dismissals in International Commercial Arbitration Introduction This...
Renunciation Certificate Is a Substantive Precondition—No Minor’s Exception: Kerala High Court in Union of India v. Rasheeda Bano (2025)

Renunciation Certificate Is a Substantive Precondition—No Minor’s Exception: Kerala High Court in Union of India v. Rasheeda Bano (2025)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Renunciation Certificate Is a Substantive Precondition—No Minor’s Exception Case: Union of India v. Rasheeda Bano (2025 KER 63835) Court: High Court of Kerala (Division Bench) Bench: Sushrut Arvind...
Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Non‑disclosure of a trivial, time‑stale gambling conviction is not ipso facto ground for termination: Bombay High Court’s contextual, post‑sensitive test for integrity verification Introduction In...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.