Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Suicide Video Naming Alone Not Sufficient to Deny Bail in Loan-Linked Abetment Cases: MP High Court Clarifies under BNSS Sections 482/483

Suicide Video Naming Alone Not Sufficient to Deny Bail in Loan-Linked Abetment Cases: MP High Court Clarifies under BNSS Sections 482/483

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Suicide Video Naming Alone Not Sufficient to Deny Bail in Loan-Linked Abetment Cases: MP High Court Clarifies under BNSS Sections 482/483 Case Commentary on: Arvind Parmar v. The State of Madhya...
Section 52A Delay Is a Curable Irregularity and Colour Variance in Samples Is Non-Fatal at Bail Stage: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Section 37 NDPS Bar in Courier-Parcel Heroin Cases

Section 52A Delay Is a Curable Irregularity and Colour Variance in Samples Is Non-Fatal at Bail Stage: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Section 37 NDPS Bar in Courier-Parcel Heroin Cases

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Section 52A Delay Is a Curable Irregularity and Colour Variance in Samples Is Non-Fatal at Bail Stage: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Section 37 NDPS Bar in Courier-Parcel Heroin Cases Introduction...
Replication Clock Starts When Belated Written Statement Is Taken on Record: Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 5, Chapter VII, DHC (Original Side) Rules in Helsinn v. Hetero

Replication Clock Starts When Belated Written Statement Is Taken on Record: Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 5, Chapter VII, DHC (Original Side) Rules in Helsinn v. Hetero

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Replication Clock Starts When Belated Written Statement Is Taken on Record: Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 5, Chapter VII, DHC (Original Side) Rules Case: Helsinn Healthcare SA & Anr. v. Hetero...
Diatom and CDR Evidence Require Corroboration; Digital “Last Seen” Plus Section 27 Discovery Sustain Murder Conviction; Death Penalty Requires Proved Irreformability — State of HP v. Chander Sharma @ Kaku

Diatom and CDR Evidence Require Corroboration; Digital “Last Seen” Plus Section 27 Discovery Sustain Murder Conviction; Death Penalty Requires Proved Irreformability — State of HP v. Chander Sharma @ Kaku

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Diatom and CDR Evidence Require Corroboration; Digital “Last Seen” Plus Section 27 Discovery Sustain Murder Conviction; Death Penalty Requires Proved Irreformability — State of HP v. Chander Sharma @...
Unauthorized Absence Requires Proof of Willfulness: Non-consideration of Medical Defence Vitiates Disciplinary Orders

Unauthorized Absence Requires Proof of Willfulness: Non-consideration of Medical Defence Vitiates Disciplinary Orders

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Unauthorized Absence Requires Proof of Willfulness: Non-consideration of Medical Defence Vitiates Disciplinary Orders Case: Roop Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others (W.P. No. 4426/2021)...
Single Credible Testimony Can Sustain Departmental Charges; Tribunal’s Review Confined to Process, Not Evidence Reappreciation — Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar (Delhi High Court, 26 September 2025)

Single Credible Testimony Can Sustain Departmental Charges; Tribunal’s Review Confined to Process, Not Evidence Reappreciation — Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar (Delhi High Court, 26 September 2025)

Date: Sep 29, 2025
Single Credible Testimony Can Sustain Departmental Charges; Tribunal’s Review Confined to Process, Not Evidence Reappreciation — Delhi High Court in Director General v. Sanjeev Kumar Introduction The...
Initial-Interest Confusion as Sufficient Ground for Trademark Infringement and Ex‑Parte Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court’s Ruling in Hotels.com, LP v. Barath M L (2025)

Initial-Interest Confusion as Sufficient Ground for Trademark Infringement and Ex‑Parte Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court’s Ruling in Hotels.com, LP v. Barath M L (2025)

Date: Sep 29, 2025
Initial-Interest Confusion as Sufficient Ground for Trademark Infringement and Ex‑Parte Summary Judgment: Hotels.com, LP v. Barath M L (Delhi High Court, 2025) Introduction In a decisive enforcement...
Notional Interest Counts: Delhi High Court Validates Objective Income Estimation for Ex‑Gratia Relief under Bank Schemes

Notional Interest Counts: Delhi High Court Validates Objective Income Estimation for Ex‑Gratia Relief under Bank Schemes

Date: Sep 29, 2025
Notional Interest Counts: Delhi High Court Validates Objective Income Estimation for Ex‑Gratia Relief under Bank Schemes Case: OMWATI v. The Bank of Maharashtra and Anr | Citation: 2025 DHC 8676 |...
Implied Maintenance Condition Under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Delhi High Court Affirms Cancellation of Gift Deeds Absent Express Clause or Pleading

Implied Maintenance Condition Under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Delhi High Court Affirms Cancellation of Gift Deeds Absent Express Clause or Pleading

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Implied Maintenance Condition Under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Delhi High Court Affirms Cancellation of Gift Deeds Absent Express Clause or Pleading Case: Smt. Varinder Kaur v. Smt....
Gazette re-appointment not needed on Drugs Inspector’s transfer; Sessions trial requires Magistrate’s committal; Section 468 CrPC bar inapplicable where joint trial involves graver Drugs Act offences — Karnataka High Court in Vishwanath v. State of Karnataka

Gazette re-appointment not needed on Drugs Inspector’s transfer; Sessions trial requires Magistrate’s committal; Section 468 CrPC bar inapplicable where joint trial involves graver Drugs Act offences — Karnataka High Court in Vishwanath v. State of Karnataka

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Gazette re-appointment not needed on Drugs Inspector’s transfer; Sessions trial requires Magistrate’s committal; Section 468 CrPC bar inapplicable where joint trial involves graver Drugs Act offences...
Zero FIR Is a Police Facilitation, Not a Jurisdictional Bridge for Magistrates: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Territorial Limits of Section 156(3) in Hate-Speech Complaints

Zero FIR Is a Police Facilitation, Not a Jurisdictional Bridge for Magistrates: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Territorial Limits of Section 156(3) in Hate-Speech Complaints

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Zero FIR Is a Police Facilitation, Not a Jurisdictional Bridge for Magistrates: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Territorial Limits of Section 156(3) in Hate-Speech Complaints Case: Anirban Bhattacharya...
Applying the “Larger Conspiracy” Lens at the Bail Stage: Delay and Parity Not Determinative in Communal-Riot Murder Cases — Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 DHC 8605

Applying the “Larger Conspiracy” Lens at the Bail Stage: Delay and Parity Not Determinative in Communal-Riot Murder Cases — Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 DHC 8605

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Applying the “Larger Conspiracy” Lens at the Bail Stage: Delay and Parity Not Determinative in Communal-Riot Murder Cases Case: Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi) Citation: 2025 DHC 8605...
Mere restitution cannot erase criminal liability for misappropriation: Kerala High Court clarifies quash threshold under BNSS Section 528

Mere restitution cannot erase criminal liability for misappropriation: Kerala High Court clarifies quash threshold under BNSS Section 528

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Mere restitution cannot erase criminal liability for misappropriation: Kerala High Court clarifies quash threshold under BNSS Section 528 Case: P.N. Suresh Kumar v. State of Kerala (Crl.M.C. No. 3477...
RTE and RPwD Acts Held Inapplicable to Sainik Schools: Madras High Court Upholds Non‑Negotiable Medical Fitness Standards and Estoppel Against Post‑Participation Challenges

RTE and RPwD Acts Held Inapplicable to Sainik Schools: Madras High Court Upholds Non‑Negotiable Medical Fitness Standards and Estoppel Against Post‑Participation Challenges

Date: Sep 26, 2025
RTE and RPwD Acts Held Inapplicable to Sainik Schools: Madras High Court Upholds Non‑Negotiable Medical Fitness Standards and Estoppel Against Post‑Participation Challenges Case: M.R. Yajith Krishna...
Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother

Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother Introduction This commentary examines the...
Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications

Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications Introduction In Akshay Quenim v. Royce Savio...
As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared

As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared

Date: Sep 26, 2025
As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared Decision: Cotton Casuals India Private Limited &...
Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings

Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings Introduction In Chandrama Vishvakarma v....
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims

Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims Introduction In X Corp v. Union of...
RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor Infraction, Delay, and Post-Retirement Futility

RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor Infraction, Delay, and Post-Retirement Futility

Date: Sep 24, 2025
RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert