Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Foundational Facts, Child Witness Competency and the Limits of Section 29 POCSO Presumption: Commentary on Jai Krishna Yadav v. State of Bihar

Foundational Facts, Child Witness Competency and the Limits of Section 29 POCSO Presumption: Commentary on Jai Krishna Yadav v. State of Bihar

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Foundational Facts, Child Witness Competency and the Limits of Section 29 POCSO Presumption: Commentary on Jai Krishna Yadav v. State of Bihar 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the Patna High...

        Demurrer-Based Threshold for Territorial Jurisdiction in Internet Trade Mark Suits:
        Commentary on Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Artura Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd.

Demurrer-Based Threshold for Territorial Jurisdiction in Internet Trade Mark Suits: Commentary on Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Artura Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd.

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Demurrer-Based Threshold for Territorial Jurisdiction in Internet Trade Mark Suits: A Commentary on Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Artura Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd. 1. Introduction The decision...
Section 195 CrPC as a Bar at the Cognizance Stage, Not at FIR Stage: Commentary on Daljit Singh Grewal @ Bhola v. State of Punjab

Section 195 CrPC as a Bar at the Cognizance Stage, Not at FIR Stage: Commentary on Daljit Singh Grewal @ Bhola v. State of Punjab

Date: Nov 30, 2025
Section 195 CrPC as a Bar at the Cognizance Stage, Not at FIR Stage: Commentary on Daljit Singh Grewal @ Bhola v. State of Punjab and Others 1. Introduction The decision of the Punjab & Haryana High...

        Illegality of Foreclosure Charges on MSME Floating‑Rate Loans and Mandatory Release of Securities After Repayment:
        Commentary on Maa Tarini Poultries Pvt. Ltd. v. Indian Bank

Illegality of Foreclosure Charges on MSME Floating‑Rate Loans and Mandatory Release of Securities After Repayment: Commentary on Maa Tarini Poultries Pvt. Ltd. v. Indian Bank

Date: Nov 30, 2025
Illegality of Foreclosure Charges on MSME Floating‑Rate Loans and Mandatory Release of Securities After Repayment: Commentary on Maa Tarini Poultries Pvt. Ltd., Ganjam v. Indian Bank, Main Branch,...
Functus Officio of Authorised Officers under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act: Commentary on Nainesh Sanghvi & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors

Functus Officio of Authorised Officers under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act: Commentary on Nainesh Sanghvi & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors

Date: Nov 29, 2025
Functus Officio of Authorised Officers under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act: Commentary on Nainesh Sanghvi & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Ors 1. Introduction The judgment...

        Re‑Characterising Evidence from Circumstantial to Direct and Sifting Partly Hostile Testimony:
        Commentary on Ram Singar Singh v. State, 2025 DHC 10558-DB

Re‑Characterising Evidence from Circumstantial to Direct and Sifting Partly Hostile Testimony: Commentary on Ram Singar Singh v. State, 2025 DHC 10558-DB

Date: Nov 29, 2025
Re‑Characterising Evidence from Circumstantial to Direct and Sifting Partly Hostile Testimony: Commentary on Ram Singar Singh v. State, 2025 DHC 10558‑DB 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s...
Limits on Executing Foreign Letters Rogatory in India: Article 23 of the Hague Evidence Convention and Non‑Party Rights in Softgel Healthcare v. Pfizer

Limits on Executing Foreign Letters Rogatory in India: Article 23 of the Hague Evidence Convention and Non‑Party Rights in Softgel Healthcare v. Pfizer

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Limits on Executing Foreign Letters Rogatory in India: Article 23 of the Hague Evidence Convention and Non‑Party Rights in Softgel Healthcare v. Pfizer I. Introduction The decision of the Madras High...
Vague and Contradictory Allegations Cannot Sustain Conviction under Section 498-A IPC: Commentary on Ranjit Saha v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Vague and Contradictory Allegations Cannot Sustain Conviction under Section 498-A IPC: Commentary on Ranjit Saha v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Vague and Contradictory Allegations Cannot Sustain Conviction under Section 498-A IPC: Commentary on Ranjit Saha & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Anr. Case: CRA 14 of 2004 | Court: Calcutta High...
Cross-LoC Barter Trade as Intra‑State Supply under GST and Validity of Composite Section 74 Show Cause Notices – Commentary on M/s R.J.M. Brothers v. Union of India & Ors.

Cross-LoC Barter Trade as Intra‑State Supply under GST and Validity of Composite Section 74 Show Cause Notices – Commentary on M/s R.J.M. Brothers v. Union of India & Ors.

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Cross-LoC Barter Trade as Intra‑State Supply under GST and Validity of Composite Section 74 Show Cause Notices – Commentary on M/s R.J.M. Brothers v. Union of India & Ors. 1. Introduction The...
Mental Health, Proportionality and Judicial Review of Armed Forces Training Discipline: Commentary on Ex Flt Cdt Tarang Bhardwaj v. Union of India (2025 DHC 10503-DB)

Mental Health, Proportionality and Judicial Review of Armed Forces Training Discipline: Commentary on Ex Flt Cdt Tarang Bhardwaj v. Union of India (2025 DHC 10503-DB)

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Mental Health, Proportionality and Judicial Review of Armed Forces Training Discipline: Commentary on Ex Flt Cdt Tarang Bhardwaj v. Union of India & Ors., 2025 DHC 10503-DB 1. Introduction The...
Impleadment of Manufacturer and Joint Liability for Warranty-Period Defects under Consumer Law: Commentary on Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Mohammad Ashraf Khan

Impleadment of Manufacturer and Joint Liability for Warranty-Period Defects under Consumer Law: Commentary on Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Mohammad Ashraf Khan

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Impleadment of Manufacturer and Joint Liability for Warranty-Period Defects under Consumer Law: Commentary on Maruti Suzuki India Limited v. Mohammad Ashraf Khan & Ors 1. Introduction This commentary...

        Passport Renewal Despite Minor Pending Criminal Case for Overseas Resident:
        Commentary on Mohasin Sabbir Ahmed Surati v. Union of India

Passport Renewal Despite Minor Pending Criminal Case for Overseas Resident: Commentary on Mohasin Sabbir Ahmed Surati v. Union of India

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Balancing Minor Pending Criminal Proceedings with Passport Renewal for Overseas Workers: A Commentary on Mohasin Sabbir Ahmed Surati v. Union of India Court: High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad Case...
Judicial Deference to Racing Regulators and Deemed Approval of Race Conditions: Commentary on Ravinder Pal Singh Chauhan v. Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd.

Judicial Deference to Racing Regulators and Deemed Approval of Race Conditions: Commentary on Ravinder Pal Singh Chauhan v. Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Judicial Deference to Racing Regulators and Deemed Approval of Race Conditions: Commentary on Ravinder Pal Singh Chauhan v. Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. & Ors. I. Introduction This commentary examines...
Anti‑Dissection and Dominant Part Tests are Confined to the Plaintiff’s Composite Mark: Commentary on Saurabh Gupta v. Sheopals Pvt Ltd

Anti‑Dissection and Dominant Part Tests are Confined to the Plaintiff’s Composite Mark: Commentary on Saurabh Gupta v. Sheopals Pvt Ltd

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Anti‑Dissection and Dominant Part Tests are Confined to the Plaintiff’s Composite Mark: Commentary on Saurabh Gupta v. Sheopals Pvt Ltd (2025 DHC 10443‑DB) 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the...
Preventive Externment under Section 163 BNSS: Emergency, Proportionality and Natural Justice in Sri Adrushya Kadeshwara Swamiji v. Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad

Preventive Externment under Section 163 BNSS: Emergency, Proportionality and Natural Justice in Sri Adrushya Kadeshwara Swamiji v. Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Preventive Externment under Section 163 BNSS: Emergency, Proportionality and Natural Justice in Sri Adrushya Kadeshwara Swamiji v. Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad I. Introduction The decision of the...
Doctrine of Pleasure, Article 14 and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil S/o Annappa Sank v. State of Karnataka

Doctrine of Pleasure, Article 14 and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil S/o Annappa Sank v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Constraining the Doctrine of Pleasure in Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil S/o Annappa Sank v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court, 25 November 2025) I. Introduction The decision in...
Disjunctive Service on Corporations under Order XXIX Rule 2 CPC and the Non‑Extendable 120‑Day Limit for Written Statements: Commentary on MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A. & Anr. v. NTC Industries Ltd.

Disjunctive Service on Corporations under Order XXIX Rule 2 CPC and the Non‑Extendable 120‑Day Limit for Written Statements: Commentary on MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A. & Anr. v. NTC Industries Ltd.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Disjunctive Service on Corporations under Order XXIX Rule 2 CPC and the Non‑Extendable 120‑Day Limit for Written Statements: Commentary on MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A. & Anr. v. NTC Industries...
Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy and Constitutional Limits on DNA Testing: Commentary on Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P.

Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy and Constitutional Limits on DNA Testing: Commentary on Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy and Constitutional Limits on DNA Testing: Commentary on Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P. Case Title Ramraj Patel v. State of U.P. and Another Court High Court of...
Representative Sampling and Prima Facie Proof of Commercial Quantity as a Precondition for Section 37 NDPS Rigours: Commentary on Shiranjana Budha v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Representative Sampling and Prima Facie Proof of Commercial Quantity as a Precondition for Section 37 NDPS Rigours: Commentary on Shiranjana Budha v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Representative Sampling and Prima Facie Proof of Commercial Quantity as a Precondition for Section 37 NDPS Rigours: Commentary on Shiranjana Budha v. State of Himachal Pradesh I. Introduction The...
Recognition of the HERMES “Birkin” 3D Shape and Associated Marks as Well‑Known Trademarks in India – Commentary on Hermes International & Anr. v. Macky Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., 2025 DHC 10346

Recognition of the HERMES “Birkin” 3D Shape and Associated Marks as Well‑Known Trademarks in India – Commentary on Hermes International & Anr. v. Macky Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., 2025 DHC 10346

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Recognition of the HERMES “Birkin” 3D Shape and Associated Marks as Well‑Known Trademarks in India Commentary on Hermes International & Anr. v. Macky Lifestyle Private Limited & Anr., 2025 DHC 10346...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert