Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Generic Hospitality Terms and Composite Marks: Delhi High Court Declines Monopoly over “HAVELI” in Class 43

Generic Hospitality Terms and Composite Marks: Delhi High Court Declines Monopoly over “HAVELI” in Class 43

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Generic Hospitality Terms and Composite Marks: Delhi High Court Declines Monopoly over “HAVELI” in Class 43 I. Introduction The decision of the Delhi High Court in Haveli Restaurant and Resorts...
Interactive E‑Commerce as Purposeful Availment: Territorial Jurisdiction and Prior User Protection in “GAAY CHHAP / COW BRAND” – Commentary on Sunil Niranjan Shah v. Vijay Bahadur (2025 DHC 10364)

Interactive E‑Commerce as Purposeful Availment: Territorial Jurisdiction and Prior User Protection in “GAAY CHHAP / COW BRAND” – Commentary on Sunil Niranjan Shah v. Vijay Bahadur (2025 DHC 10364)

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Interactive E‑Commerce as Purposeful Availment: Territorial Jurisdiction and Prior User Protection in “GAAY CHHAP / COW BRAND” Commentary on Sunil Niranjan Shah v. Vijay Bahadur, 2025 DHC 10364...

        Section 3(i) and Drug Composition Claims: Commentary on
        Medilabo RFP Inc v Controller of Patents (2025 DHC 10362)

Section 3(i) and Drug Composition Claims: Commentary on Medilabo RFP Inc v Controller of Patents (2025 DHC 10362)

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Clarifying Section 3(i) for Drug Composition Claims and the Duty to Consider Amended Claims: Commentary on Medilabo RFP Inc v. Controller of Patents, 2025 DHC 10362 1. Introduction The Delhi High...
No Writ to Consolidate DRT Proceedings or Stay Personal Guarantor Insolvency under IBC: Commentary on Sanjeev Krishan Sharma v. Punjab National Bank & Anr.

No Writ to Consolidate DRT Proceedings or Stay Personal Guarantor Insolvency under IBC: Commentary on Sanjeev Krishan Sharma v. Punjab National Bank & Anr.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
No Writ to Consolidate DRT Proceedings or Stay Personal Guarantor Insolvency under IBC: Commentary on Sanjeev Krishan Sharma v. Punjab National Bank & Anr. 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s...
Strict Consequences for Non‑Payment of Conditional Costs in Commercial Suits: Commentary on Om Fire Safety Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Umakant

Strict Consequences for Non‑Payment of Conditional Costs in Commercial Suits: Commentary on Om Fire Safety Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Umakant

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Strict Consequences for Non‑Payment of Conditional Costs in Commercial Suits: Commentary on Om Fire Safety Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Umakant Case: M/s Om Fire Safety Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Umakant Citation:...
Bail under BNSS 2023 for Alleged Facilitators in Cyber‑Fraud: Role, Recovery and Parity as Key Determinants

Bail under BNSS 2023 for Alleged Facilitators in Cyber‑Fraud: Role, Recovery and Parity as Key Determinants

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Bail under BNSS 2023 for Alleged Facilitators in Cyber‑Fraud: Role, Recovery and Parity as Key Determinants Commentary on Shaik Noushad Ahammed v. State of Punjab, Punjab & Haryana High Court, 21...
Abuse of Media Platforms, Cognizable Offences and Limited Power to Quash FIRs under Section 528 BNSS: Commentary on Ashish Dave v. State of Rajasthan

Abuse of Media Platforms, Cognizable Offences and Limited Power to Quash FIRs under Section 528 BNSS: Commentary on Ashish Dave v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Abuse of Media Platforms, Cognizable Offences and Limited Power to Quash FIRs under Section 528 BNSS: Commentary on Ashish Dave v. State of Rajasthan 1. Introduction The decision of the Rajasthan...
Mandatory Victim Compensation & Forensic Blood Grouping: Commentary on Bhimappa v. State of Karnataka

Mandatory Victim Compensation & Forensic Blood Grouping: Commentary on Bhimappa v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Mandatory Victim Compensation and Scientific Blood Grouping in Criminal Trials: A Commentary on Bhimappa v. State of Karnataka, Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench), 26 November 2025 1. Introduction...

        Procedural Fairness and Natural Justice in Arunachal Pradesh Customary Courts:
        Commentary on Rippe Mayi v. Tumli Nyorak / Mayi & Anr, 2025 GAU-AP 1326

Procedural Fairness and Natural Justice in Arunachal Pradesh Customary Courts: Commentary on Rippe Mayi v. Tumli Nyorak / Mayi & Anr, 2025 GAU-AP 1326

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Procedural Fairness and Natural Justice in Arunachal Pradesh Customary Courts: A Commentary on Rippe Mayi v. Tumli Nyorak / Mayi & Anr, 2025 GAU-AP 1326 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
Loss of Matrimonial Prospects and Empathetic Assessment of Non‑Pecuniary Damages in Motor Accident Claims: Commentary on Jigishaben Maheshbhai Patel v. Sipai Mohammadkhan Rasulkhan

Loss of Matrimonial Prospects and Empathetic Assessment of Non‑Pecuniary Damages in Motor Accident Claims: Commentary on Jigishaben Maheshbhai Patel v. Sipai Mohammadkhan Rasulkhan

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Loss of Matrimonial Prospects and Empathetic Assessment of Non‑Pecuniary Damages in Motor Accident Claims: A Commentary on Jigishaben Maheshbhai Patel v. Sipai Mohammadkhan Rasulkhan & Ors. 1....
Non‑Cognizable Charge‑Sheets as “Complaints” and the Right to Pre‑Summoning Hearing under BNSS – Commentary on Prempal v. State of U.P.

Non‑Cognizable Charge‑Sheets as “Complaints” and the Right to Pre‑Summoning Hearing under BNSS – Commentary on Prempal v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Non‑Cognizable Charge‑Sheets as “Complaints” and the Right to Pre‑Summoning Hearing under BNSS – Commentary on Prempal v. State of U.P. 1. Introduction The judgment in Prempal and 3 Others v. State...
“Bail is the Rule” in Economic Offences under BNSS: Multiple FIRs and Criminal Antecedents Not a Bar Once Investigation is Complete – Commentary on Nagraj V. v. UT of J&K

“Bail is the Rule” in Economic Offences under BNSS: Multiple FIRs and Criminal Antecedents Not a Bar Once Investigation is Complete – Commentary on Nagraj V. v. UT of J&K

Date: Nov 27, 2025
“Bail is the Rule” in Economic Offences under BNSS: Multiple FIRs and Criminal Antecedents Not a Bar Once Investigation is Complete 1. Introduction The judgment in Nagraj V v. Union Territory of...

        Artificial Breaks in Ad-hoc Service to be Ignored for Pension under Unamended Rule 15-A of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 – Commentary on Dr. Arun Prakash Bukharia v. State of M.P.

Artificial Breaks in Ad-hoc Service to be Ignored for Pension under Unamended Rule 15-A of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 – Commentary on Dr. Arun Prakash Bukharia v. State of M.P.

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Artificial Breaks in Ad-hoc Service Deemed Continuous for Pension under Unamended Rule 15-A of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976: A Detailed Commentary on Dr. Arun Prakash Bukharia v....
Suggestive Slogans as Inherently Distinctive Trade Marks and the Scope of Section 19 TM Act: Commentary on Ashim Kumar Ghosh v. Registrar of Trade Marks

Suggestive Slogans as Inherently Distinctive Trade Marks and the Scope of Section 19 TM Act: Commentary on Ashim Kumar Ghosh v. Registrar of Trade Marks

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Suggestive Slogans as Inherently Distinctive Trade Marks and the Scope of Section 19 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999: A Commentary on Ashim Kumar Ghosh v. Registrar of Trade Marks, 2025 DHC 10350 1....

        Secondary Meaning of “GOLD” in Cigarette Trade Marks and Initial-Interest Confusion:
        Commentary on ITC Limited v. Pelican Tobacco Co. Ltd. & Ors., 2025 DHC 10358

Secondary Meaning of “GOLD” in Cigarette Trade Marks and Initial-Interest Confusion: Commentary on ITC Limited v. Pelican Tobacco Co. Ltd. & Ors., 2025 DHC 10358

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Secondary Meaning and Dominant Feature Protection for “GOLD” in Cigarette Trade Marks: A Detailed Commentary on ITC Limited v. Pelican Tobacco Co Ltd & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 24 November 2025) 1....
Reaffirming the Broad‑Feature Comparison Test for Cancelling Label Copyrights under Section 50 – Commentary on Rajani Products v. Madhukar Varandani

Reaffirming the Broad‑Feature Comparison Test for Cancelling Label Copyrights under Section 50 – Commentary on Rajani Products v. Madhukar Varandani

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Reaffirming the Broad‑Feature Comparison Test for Cancelling Label Copyrights under Section 50 – Commentary on Rajani Products v. Madhukar Varandani 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...

    Expansive Concept of “Proceeds of Crime” and Validity of Single‑Member Adjudicating Authority under PMLA:
    Commentary on Naresh Bansal & Ors v. Adjudicating Authority & Anr (2025 DHC 10341-DB)

Expansive Concept of “Proceeds of Crime” and Validity of Single‑Member Adjudicating Authority under PMLA: Commentary on Naresh Bansal & Ors v. Adjudicating Authority & Anr (2025 DHC 10341-DB)

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Expansive Concept of “Proceeds of Crime” and Validity of Single‑Member Adjudicating Authority under PMLA: Commentary on Naresh Bansal & Ors v. Adjudicating Authority & Anr, 2025 DHC 10341‑DB 1....
Uniform Superannuation in the Indian Coast Guard and the Limits of Article 33: Commentary on Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India (2025 DHC 10356-DB)

Uniform Superannuation in the Indian Coast Guard and the Limits of Article 33: Commentary on Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India (2025 DHC 10356-DB)

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Uniform Superannuation in the Indian Coast Guard and the Limits of Article 33 Commentary on Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India & Ors., 2025 DHC 10356-DB (Delhi High Court, 24 November 2025) 1....
Ensuring Remedies in Customs Seizure Cases: Belated Appeals Allowed Where Pre‑Printed Waiver of Show Cause Notice Is Invalid

Ensuring Remedies in Customs Seizure Cases: Belated Appeals Allowed Where Pre‑Printed Waiver of Show Cause Notice Is Invalid

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Ensuring Remedies in Customs Seizure Cases: Belated Appeals Allowed Where Pre‑Printed Waiver of Show Cause Notice Is Invalid Case Commentary on Tarun Arora v. Commissioner of Customs (2025 DHC...

        Concurrent Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers under Section 148:
        Delhi High Court’s Reaffirmation of TKS Builders in Inder Dev Gupta v. ACIT

Concurrent Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers under Section 148: Delhi High Court’s Reaffirmation of TKS Builders in Inder Dev Gupta v. ACIT

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Concurrent Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers under Section 148: A Detailed Commentary on Inder Dev Gupta v. ACIT, Central Circle‑2, Delhi 1. Introduction This commentary...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert