Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Himachal Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Diatom and CDR Evidence Require Corroboration; Digital “Last Seen” Plus Section 27 Discovery Sustain Murder Conviction; Death Penalty Requires Proved Irreformability — State of HP v. Chander Sharma @ Kaku

Diatom and CDR Evidence Require Corroboration; Digital “Last Seen” Plus Section 27 Discovery Sustain Murder Conviction; Death Penalty Requires Proved Irreformability — State of HP v. Chander Sharma @ Kaku

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Diatom and CDR Evidence Require Corroboration; Digital “Last Seen” Plus Section 27 Discovery Sustain Murder Conviction; Death Penalty Requires Proved Irreformability — State of HP v. Chander Sharma @...
Absence of THC Percentage Is Not Fatal; Joint Section 50 Intimation to Multiple Accused Vitiates Personal Search under the NDPS Act — A Commentary on State of HP v. Soni, 2025 HHC 33178

Absence of THC Percentage Is Not Fatal; Joint Section 50 Intimation to Multiple Accused Vitiates Personal Search under the NDPS Act — A Commentary on State of HP v. Soni, 2025 HHC 33178

Date: Sep 24, 2025
State of HP v. Soni (2025 HHC 33178), clarifying that THC percentage in FSL reports is not mandatory to prove 'charas', while holding that joint Section 50 consent for multiple accused vitiates...
Non‑joinder of a Later‑Formed Partnership Is Not Fatal to Eviction Under the H.P. Public Premises Act: Burden on Occupants to Prove Firm Tenancy

Non‑joinder of a Later‑Formed Partnership Is Not Fatal to Eviction Under the H.P. Public Premises Act: Burden on Occupants to Prove Firm Tenancy

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Non‑joinder of a Later‑Formed Partnership Is Not Fatal to Eviction Under the H.P. Public Premises Act: Burden on Occupants to Prove Firm Tenancy Introduction In Sudershan Devi and Others v....
Impleaded Sub-tenant is an “Aggrieved Person” Entitled to Revision, but Eviction Stands Absent Perversity: HP High Court on Subletting, Pleading Sufficiency, and Revisional Limits under Section 24(5) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987

Impleaded Sub-tenant is an “Aggrieved Person” Entitled to Revision, but Eviction Stands Absent Perversity: HP High Court on Subletting, Pleading Sufficiency, and Revisional Limits under Section 24(5) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987

Date: Sep 18, 2025
Impleaded Sub-tenant is an “Aggrieved Person” Entitled to Revision, but Eviction Stands Absent Perversity: HP High Court on Subletting, Pleading Sufficiency, and Revisional Limits under Section 24(5)...
Sole-Testimony Convictions in Rape Cases Require “Sterling Quality” Evidence; Appellate Deference to Acquittals Reaffirmed, with Post-Judgment Bonds Directed under BNSS Section 481 — Commentary on State of HP v. Sunil Khan (2025 HHC 31354-DB)

Sole-Testimony Convictions in Rape Cases Require “Sterling Quality” Evidence; Appellate Deference to Acquittals Reaffirmed, with Post-Judgment Bonds Directed under BNSS Section 481 — Commentary on State of HP v. Sunil Khan (2025 HHC 31354-DB)

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Sole-Testimony Convictions in Rape Cases Require “Sterling Quality” Evidence; Appellate Deference to Acquittals Reaffirmed, with Post-Judgment Bonds Directed under BNSS Section 481 Case: State of...
Bail for Foreign Nationals in NDPS Prosecutions: Co‑accused Confession Insufficient; Article 21 and Frank Vitus–compliant Safeguards Prevail — Commentary on Tidj Mamane @ Tidy Mamane v. State of HP (2025 HHC 30402)

Bail for Foreign Nationals in NDPS Prosecutions: Co‑accused Confession Insufficient; Article 21 and Frank Vitus–compliant Safeguards Prevail — Commentary on Tidj Mamane @ Tidy Mamane v. State of HP (2025 HHC 30402)

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Bail for Foreign Nationals in NDPS Prosecutions: Co‑accused Confession Insufficient; Article 21 and Frank Vitus–compliant Safeguards Prevail Case: Tidj Mamane alias Tidy Mamane v. State of Himachal...
Married Daughters Must Be Counted in Family Size; Policy‑Induced Delay Not Fatal: HP High Court on Compassionate Appointment

Married Daughters Must Be Counted in Family Size; Policy‑Induced Delay Not Fatal: HP High Court on Compassionate Appointment

Date: Sep 6, 2025
Married Daughters Must Be Counted in Family Size; Policy‑Induced Delay Not Fatal: HP High Court on Compassionate Appointment Case: Savita v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others Citation: 2025 HHC...
No Probation for Section 304-A IPC Fatal Road Accidents: HP High Court Reaffirms Supreme Court Line and Sets Aside Creative Probation Orders

No Probation for Section 304-A IPC Fatal Road Accidents: HP High Court Reaffirms Supreme Court Line and Sets Aside Creative Probation Orders

Date: Sep 4, 2025
No Probation for Section 304-A IPC Fatal Road Accidents: HP High Court Reaffirms Supreme Court Line and Sets Aside Creative Probation Orders Introduction In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajika Gupta...
Mandatory Panchayat Parivar Register Entry on Section 4 Notification Date as the Determinative Eligibility Criterion for R&R Oustee Benefits: Nathu Ram v. NTPC (2025 HHC 29048)

Mandatory Panchayat Parivar Register Entry on Section 4 Notification Date as the Determinative Eligibility Criterion for R&R Oustee Benefits: Nathu Ram v. NTPC (2025 HHC 29048)

Date: Sep 3, 2025
Mandatory Panchayat Parivar Register Entry on Section 4 Notification Date as the Determinative Eligibility Criterion for R&R Oustee Benefits Commentary on Nathu Ram v. National Thermal Power...
Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj

Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Only-Possible-View Threshold Reaffirmed; Specificity and Public-View Requirement for Caste-Insult Offences under the SC/ST Act: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Mam Raj Introduction This commentary...
Voluntary Adoption of a Foreign Pay-Pattern Does Not Create an Enforceable Right to Parity – Comment on Sudhir Dhiman & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 28289)

Voluntary Adoption of a Foreign Pay-Pattern Does Not Create an Enforceable Right to Parity – Comment on Sudhir Dhiman & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 28289)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Voluntary Adoption of a Foreign Pay-Pattern Does Not Create an Enforceable Right to Parity Commentary on Sudhir Dhiman & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (2025 HHC 28289, decided 21 Aug 2025)...
No “Change in Circumstances” Needed to Approach High Court After Sessions Court Rejects Bail: Himachal Pradesh High Court in Gufran v. State of HP

No “Change in Circumstances” Needed to Approach High Court After Sessions Court Rejects Bail: Himachal Pradesh High Court in Gufran v. State of HP

Date: Aug 28, 2025
No “Change in Circumstances” Needed to Approach High Court After Sessions Court Rejects Bail: Himachal Pradesh High Court in Gufran v. State of HP Introduction In Gufran v. State of Himachal Pradesh...
Sub-10-Bigha Encroachments and Mens Rea: The New Limits on Criminal Prosecution – State of H.P. v. Ghambo Devi (2025 HHC 28247)

Sub-10-Bigha Encroachments and Mens Rea: The New Limits on Criminal Prosecution – State of H.P. v. Ghambo Devi (2025 HHC 28247)

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Sub-10-Bigha Encroachments and Mens Rea: The New Limits on Criminal Prosecution – State of H.P. v. Ghambo Devi (2025 HHC 28247) 1. Introduction In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ghambo Devi, the...
“Substance over Procedure” in Public Employment:  Balbir Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025) and the Compulsory Regularisation of Long-Serving Daily Wagers

“Substance over Procedure” in Public Employment: Balbir Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025) and the Compulsory Regularisation of Long-Serving Daily Wagers

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Substance over Procedure” in Public Employment: Balbir Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025) and the Compulsory Regularisation of Long-Serving Daily Wagers 1. Introduction CWP No. 3189 of 2025...
Suleman v. State of H.P. — The “Intent-and-Incitement” Threshold for Section 152 BNS (Sedition-type) Offences

Suleman v. State of H.P. — The “Intent-and-Incitement” Threshold for Section 152 BNS (Sedition-type) Offences

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Suleman v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 27866) Commentary: The High Court Re-defines the Reach of Section 152, Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 Introduction The Himachal Pradesh High Court,...
Execution Against a Deceased Judgment‑Debtor: No Abatement, But Impleading Legal Representatives Is Mandatory—Ex Parte Status Irrelevant

Execution Against a Deceased Judgment‑Debtor: No Abatement, But Impleading Legal Representatives Is Mandatory—Ex Parte Status Irrelevant

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Execution Against a Deceased Judgment‑Debtor: No Abatement, But Impleading Legal Representatives Is Mandatory—Ex Parte Status Irrelevant Case: Ganga Jogta v. Nand Lal (deceased) through LRs, CMPMO...
Case-to-Case Cannot Mean Arbitrary: Uniform Consideration for Extension up to 68 and No Superannuation During Pending Writs — Dr. Susheela Rana v. State of HP (2025)

Case-to-Case Cannot Mean Arbitrary: Uniform Consideration for Extension up to 68 and No Superannuation During Pending Writs — Dr. Susheela Rana v. State of HP (2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Case-to-Case Cannot Mean Arbitrary: Uniform Consideration for Extension up to 68 and No Superannuation During Pending Writs — Dr. Susheela Rana v. State of HP (2025) Court: High Court of Himachal...
The “Incitement-Threshold” Bail Doctrine under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita – A Commentary on Farooq Ahmad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025)

The “Incitement-Threshold” Bail Doctrine under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita – A Commentary on Farooq Ahmad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
The “Incitement-Threshold” Bail Doctrine under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita A Comprehensive Commentary on Farooq Ahmad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, 2025 HHC 23619 1. Introduction On 22 July 2025 the...
Volunteer Status Bars Compassionate Appointment: Commentary on Mano Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 23412)

Volunteer Status Bars Compassionate Appointment: Commentary on Mano Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 23412)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Volunteer Status Bars Compassionate Appointment: A Comprehensive Commentary on Mano Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 23412) 1. Introduction Background. The petitioners, Jogindra and Mano...
“No-Deduction Rule” for Retired High Court Judges Heading State Administrative Tribunals

“No-Deduction Rule” for Retired High Court Judges Heading State Administrative Tribunals

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“No-Deduction Rule” for Retired High Court Judges Heading State Administrative Tribunals 1. Introduction On 23 July 2025, the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Justice (Retd.) V.K. Sharma v. State of...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert