Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Delhi High Court Case Commentaries

Only Active Shopkeepers “Doing Business” Qualify for Alternative Shops under GNCTD’s MRTS Rehabilitation Policy: Delhi High Court’s Clarification in Surender Kumar v. GNCTD (2025 DHC 8227)

Only Active Shopkeepers “Doing Business” Qualify for Alternative Shops under GNCTD’s MRTS Rehabilitation Policy: Delhi High Court’s Clarification in Surender Kumar v. GNCTD (2025 DHC 8227)

Date: Sep 18, 2025
Only Active Shopkeepers “Doing Business” Qualify for Alternative Shops under GNCTD’s MRTS Rehabilitation Policy: Delhi High Court’s Clarification in Surender Kumar v. GNCTD (2025 DHC 8227)...
Glorification of Vigilantism, Cannibalistic Gore, and Communal Denigration Justifies Outright Refusal of Film Certification: Delhi High Court on CBFC’s Powers and Post-FCAT Appeals

Glorification of Vigilantism, Cannibalistic Gore, and Communal Denigration Justifies Outright Refusal of Film Certification: Delhi High Court on CBFC’s Powers and Post-FCAT Appeals

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Glorification of Vigilantism, Cannibalistic Gore, and Communal Denigration Justifies Outright Refusal of Film Certification: Delhi High Court on CBFC’s Powers and Post-FCAT Appeals Introduction In...
Delhi High Court holds that suspension cannot be extended on the ground of “pending disciplinary proceedings” unless a charge-sheet has been issued; extensions based on wrong reasons extinguish the suspension

Delhi High Court holds that suspension cannot be extended on the ground of “pending disciplinary proceedings” unless a charge-sheet has been issued; extensions based on wrong reasons extinguish the suspension

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Suspension cannot be extended on the ground of “pending disciplinary proceedings” unless a charge-sheet has been issued; extensions based on wrong reasons extinguish the suspension Introduction In...
Post-Checkmate, CPC can disallow belated employees’ PF/ESI under Section 143(1)(a); Section 10 GCA saves deposits due on national holiday — Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Delhi High Court, 08.09.2025)

Post-Checkmate, CPC can disallow belated employees’ PF/ESI under Section 143(1)(a); Section 10 GCA saves deposits due on national holiday — Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Delhi High Court, 08.09.2025)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Post-Checkmate, CPC can disallow belated employees’ PF/ESI under Section 143(1)(a); Section 10 GCA saves deposits due on national holiday Woodland (Aero Club) Private Limited v. Assistant...
No “45‑Day Wait” Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limitation, Upholds Concurrent Civil–Criminal Remedies, and Bars Mini‑Trials under Section 528 BNSS

No “45‑Day Wait” Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limitation, Upholds Concurrent Civil–Criminal Remedies, and Bars Mini‑Trials under Section 528 BNSS

Date: Sep 7, 2025
No “45‑Day Wait” Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limitation, Upholds Concurrent Civil–Criminal Remedies, and Bars Mini‑Trials under Section 528 BNSS Introduction In Smt. Rama...
Chetan v. State (2025 DHC 7684): Minor Delay in Furlough Surrender to Be Viewed with a Reformative Tilt; Non‑Speaking Rejection Orders Unsustainable

Chetan v. State (2025 DHC 7684): Minor Delay in Furlough Surrender to Be Viewed with a Reformative Tilt; Non‑Speaking Rejection Orders Unsustainable

Date: Sep 7, 2025
Chetan v. State (2025 DHC 7684): Minor Delay in Furlough Surrender to Be Viewed with a Reformative Tilt; Non‑Speaking Rejection Orders Unsustainable Introduction In Chetan v. State GNCT of Delhi...
Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020

Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Parity is Role-Specific, Physical Absence Does Not Dilute Conspiracy, and “Surface Analysis” Governs UAPA Bail: Delhi High Court’s Framework in FIR 59/2020 Introduction In a consolidated judgment...
Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)

Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Delay attributable to the accused is no ground for bail under UAPA; original interim bail must first be moved before the Special Court — Commentary on Tasleem Ahmed v. State (2025 DHC 7659-DB)...
Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups/MSMEs: Delhi High Court’s Direction to CBIC and 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty

Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups/MSMEs: Delhi High Court’s Direction to CBIC and 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Preferential, Time‑Bound Customs Release for Start‑ups and MSMEs: Delhi High Court Orders 24‑Hour Release on Differential Duty and Calls CBIC to Frame MSME‑Friendly SOPs Case: Mitraj Business Private...
Comparable-Net-Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses: Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh (2025 DHC 7596)

Comparable-Net-Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses: Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh (2025 DHC 7596)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Comparable‑Net‑Income Test under Section 127 CrPC and Affirmation of CGHS Entitlement for Estranged Spouses Commentary on Smt. Krishna Kumari v. Sh. Surender Singh, 2025 DHC 7596 (Delhi High Court, 1...
Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583)

Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583)

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Prospective Addition of Life-Imprisonment Charges Can Defeat Half-Term Bail: Delhi High Court’s Guidance in Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State (2025 DHC 7583) Court: Delhi High Court | Bench: Justice Girish...
Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE

Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Institutional Rules Prevail Over Party Preference: Delhi High Court mandates nomination only from SAROD’s panel even by non‑members, distinguishing CORE Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede

Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Sealed Cover Procedure Impermissible Absent Charge Memo or Criminal Chargesheet: Delhi High Court reaffirms Jankiraman in UOI v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede Court: Delhi High Court Bench: Justice Navin...
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Further Investigation under BNSS §193(9) is Court-Regulated and Distinct from Default Bail under §187(3): Delhi High Court Declines Constitutional Challenge Introduction In Yash Mishra v. State of...
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr., 2025 DHC 7371

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Section 29 POCSO Presumption Sustains Conviction Despite Hostile Child Witness When DNA and MLC Establish Foundational Facts: A Detailed Commentary on X v. State (NCTD) and Anr. (2025 DHC 7371)...
Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. NIA (2025 DHC 7313-DB)

Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. NIA (2025 DHC 7313-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Prospective Application of the “Written-Grounds” Requirement in UAPA Arrests – Commentary on Lakhveer Singh v. National Investigation Agency 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s division bench in...
Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights – Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (2025 DHC 7098-DB)

Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights – Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (2025 DHC 7098-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Doctrine of Post-Divorce Extinguishment of “Shared Household” Rights (Comprehensive Commentary on Kuldeep Kaur v. Swaran Kaur (Deceased) through LRs., 2025 DHC 7098-DB) Introduction The Division...
Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes

Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Delhi HC Reinforces “Family-of-Marks” Protection: Exclusive Rights Over the Suffix “KIND” in Pharmaceutical & Allied Classes 1. Introduction Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Ram Kumar (M/s Dr. Kumars...
Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd.

Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd.

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Generic Words, Disclaimers and Domain Names: Delhi HC bars monopoly over “Yatra” in Yatra Online Ltd. v. Mach Conferences & Events Ltd. 1. Introduction On 22 August 2025, the Delhi High Court...
“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners as Criminal Contempt” – A Commentary on Court on its Own Motion v. Obsession Naaz & Ors. (2025 DHC 7206-DB)

“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners as Criminal Contempt” – A Commentary on Court on its Own Motion v. Obsession Naaz & Ors. (2025 DHC 7206-DB)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
“Wilful Obstruction of Court-Appointed Commissioners Constitutes Criminal Contempt”: Delhi High Court crystallises the ‘Knowledge-Plus-Obstruction’ Test 1. Introduction In Court on its Own Motion v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert