Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Delhi High Court Case Commentaries

Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j)

Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j)

Date: Aug 26, 2025
Delhi High Court Affirms Privacy over Academic Records: Personal Educational Data Exempt from RTI under Section 8(1)(j) Introduction On 25 August 2025, the Delhi High Court delivered a cluster...
No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel

No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel

Date: Aug 22, 2025
No Pre‑Verification Duty and No Fiduciary Duty to the Adversary: Delhi High Court on the Limits of “Professional Misconduct” Against Opposing Counsel Introduction In Chand Mehra v. Union of India &...
Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Delhi High Court Recognizes Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later

Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Delhi High Court Recognizes Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Estate-Level Liability from Coparcenary Property: Widowed Daughter‑in‑Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Deceased Father‑in‑Law’s Estate, Even When Widowhood Occurs Later Commentary on GEETA SHARMA v....

      Delhi High Court on Internet-Based Territorial Jurisdiction and Co‑registered Marks: Aggregator Listings and Passive Websites Don’t Confer Jurisdiction; “Doctor” Held Non‑Distinctive for Disinfectants

Delhi High Court on Internet-Based Territorial Jurisdiction and Co‑registered Marks: Aggregator Listings and Passive Websites Don’t Confer Jurisdiction; “Doctor” Held Non‑Distinctive for Disinfectants

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Internet Listings Don’t Create Jurisdiction; Co‑Registration Bars Infringement: The Delhi High Court’s Roadmap for Online IP Suits and Composite Marks Introduction In Vikrant Chemico Industries Pvt...
Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses in Praveen @ Lallu v. State (2025)

Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses in Praveen @ Lallu v. State (2025)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Gang Rape Conviction Sustainable Against a Single Accused under Section 376DA IPC: Delhi High Court affirms primacy of a consistent child-victim testimony and limits of DNA lapses Introduction The...
Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise:
Delhi High Court Affirms MCD’s Exclusive Authority to Alter Land-Use Consistent with the Master Plan

Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise: Delhi High Court Affirms MCD’s Exclusive Authority to Alter Land-Use Consistent with the Master Plan

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Primacy of Statutorily-Sanctioned Layout-Plan Amendments over Private Compromise: Mohit Goel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2025 DHC 6992) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s judgment in Mohit Goel and...
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas 1. Introduction In Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. v. GAIL (India)...
Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Pre‑Bid Challenges Mandatory for PAC Tenders: Delhi High Court Clarifies Locus and Timelines for Judicial Review in Public Procurement Case: Rotoffset Corporation v. Security Printing and Minting...
“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences

“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences Introduction In ARVIND DHAM v. Directorate of...
Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases

Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases Introduction In Keshav Kumar @ Tushar v. State (GNCT) of Delhi and Anr....
Reaffirming the “Conscious-Possession” Doctrine for Inadvertent Ammunition: Commentary on Harjeet Singh Talwar v. State (2025 DHC 6790)

Reaffirming the “Conscious-Possession” Doctrine for Inadvertent Ammunition: Commentary on Harjeet Singh Talwar v. State (2025 DHC 6790)

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Reaffirming the “Conscious-Possession” Doctrine for Inadvertent Ammunition Commentary on Harjeet Singh Talwar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 2025 DHC 6790 Citation: 2025 DHC 6790, Delhi High Court...
“Regular Service in the Grade” Extends to Service in an Analogous Post: The Bhupinder Kumar Malik Precedent

“Regular Service in the Grade” Extends to Service in an Analogous Post: The Bhupinder Kumar Malik Precedent

Date: Aug 9, 2025
“Regular Service in the Grade” Extends to Service in an Analogous Post (Commentary on Delhi High Court’s decision in Bhupinder Kumar Malik v. Union of India, 2025 DHC 6630-DB) 1. Introduction This...
Section 74(2) Approval as the Jurisdictional Gatekeeper for SSFC Trials of Civil Offences; Mental Illness Alone Does Not Bar Trial: Commentary on Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI (2025 DHC 6617-DB)

Section 74(2) Approval as the Jurisdictional Gatekeeper for SSFC Trials of Civil Offences; Mental Illness Alone Does Not Bar Trial: Commentary on Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI (2025 DHC 6617-DB)

Date: Aug 9, 2025
Section 74(2) Approval as the Jurisdictional Gatekeeper for SSFC Trials of Civil Offences; Mental Illness Alone Does Not Bar Trial: Commentary on Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI (2025 DHC 6617-DB)...
Delhi High Court Declares: No Pendente-Lite Maintenance Where Applicant Has Adequate Means and Respondent Is Financially Incapacitated (Yashwani Verma v. Virender Verma, 2025)

Delhi High Court Declares: No Pendente-Lite Maintenance Where Applicant Has Adequate Means and Respondent Is Financially Incapacitated (Yashwani Verma v. Virender Verma, 2025)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Delhi High Court Declares: No Pendente-Lite Maintenance Where Applicant Has Adequate Means and Respondent Is Financially Incapacitated (An authoritative commentary on Yashwani Verma v. Virender...
“Shared-Household” Rights Do Not Defeat Co-Owners’ Right to Partition: Delhi High Court’s New Rule in Smita Jina v. Amit Kumar Jina

“Shared-Household” Rights Do Not Defeat Co-Owners’ Right to Partition: Delhi High Court’s New Rule in Smita Jina v. Amit Kumar Jina

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“Shared-Household” Rights Do Not Defeat Co-Owners’ Right to Partition Commentary on Delhi High Court decision in Smita Jina v. Amit Kumar Jina (2025 DHC 6421-DB) Introduction The Division Bench of...
“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” – A Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269)

“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” – A Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” A Detailed Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s...
“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold

“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold 1. Introduction In Vinay Sharma v. State Govt....
Delhi High Court Tightens Bail Threshold for High-Value Economic Offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita – A Commentary on Kapil Wadhawan v. CBI (2025)

Delhi High Court Tightens Bail Threshold for High-Value Economic Offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita – A Commentary on Kapil Wadhawan v. CBI (2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Delhi High Court Tightens Bail Threshold for High-Value Economic Offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita – Commentary on Kapil Wadhawan v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2025 DHC...
Pre-Summoning Evidence Before Notice: Delhi High Court Defines the New Section 223 BNSS Protocol

Pre-Summoning Evidence Before Notice: Delhi High Court Defines the New Section 223 BNSS Protocol

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Pre-Summoning Evidence Before Notice: Delhi High Court Defines the New Section 223 BNSS Protocol 1. Introduction Brand Protectors India Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner / accused) invoked the Delhi High Court’s...
“Rigorous Scrutiny, not Routine Extension” – Delhi High Court Clarifies the Standard for Prolonged Pre-Charge Detention under UAPA

“Rigorous Scrutiny, not Routine Extension” – Delhi High Court Clarifies the Standard for Prolonged Pre-Charge Detention under UAPA

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Rigorous Scrutiny, not Routine Extension” – Delhi High Court Clarifies the Standard for Prolonged Pre-Charge Detention under UAPA I. Introduction In Mohd. Rizwan Ashraf v. National Investigation...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert