Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

In re Corbett (T.N. Godavarman): Supreme Court mandates ESZs and Silence Zones for all Tiger Reserves; bans Tiger Safaris in core habitats and confines them to non‑forest/degraded buffer areas with co‑located rescue centres; imposes enforceable TCP and governance deadlines

In re Corbett (T.N. Godavarman): Supreme Court mandates ESZs and Silence Zones for all Tiger Reserves; bans Tiger Safaris in core habitats and confines them to non‑forest/degraded buffer areas with co‑located rescue centres; imposes enforceable TCP and governance deadlines

Date: Nov 18, 2025
In re Corbett (T.N. Godavarman): Supreme Court mandates ESZs and Silence Zones for all Tiger Reserves; bans Tiger Safaris in core habitats and confines them to non‑forest/degraded buffer areas with...
Advocates’ Duty to Court Reaffirmed: Scurrilous Pleadings Against Judges Attract Contempt; Supreme Court Endorses a “First Apologize to the Aggrieved Judge” Approach — In Re: N. Peddi Raju (2025 INSC 1321)

Advocates’ Duty to Court Reaffirmed: Scurrilous Pleadings Against Judges Attract Contempt; Supreme Court Endorses a “First Apologize to the Aggrieved Judge” Approach — In Re: N. Peddi Raju (2025 INSC 1321)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Advocates’ Duty to Court Reaffirmed: Scurrilous Pleadings Against Judges Attract Contempt; Supreme Court Endorses a “First Apologize to the Aggrieved Judge” Approach — In Re: N. Peddi Raju (2025 INSC...
Mere Recovery and FSL Correlation Are Insufficient to Sustain Conviction: Section 27 “Distinctly” Requirement and Chain-of-Custody Standards Reaffirmed — Commentary on Govind v. State of Haryana (2025 INSC 1318)

Mere Recovery and FSL Correlation Are Insufficient to Sustain Conviction: Section 27 “Distinctly” Requirement and Chain-of-Custody Standards Reaffirmed — Commentary on Govind v. State of Haryana (2025 INSC 1318)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Mere Recovery and FSL Correlation Are Insufficient to Sustain Conviction: Section 27 “Distinctly” Requirement and Chain-of-Custody Standards Reaffirmed Case: Govind v. State of Haryana | Citation:...
Corporate self‑use of enterprise software is a “commercial purpose”: Supreme Court’s profit‑nexus test and the narrow scope of the self‑employment exception — Poly Medicure Ltd. v. Brillio Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 1314)

Corporate self‑use of enterprise software is a “commercial purpose”: Supreme Court’s profit‑nexus test and the narrow scope of the self‑employment exception — Poly Medicure Ltd. v. Brillio Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 1314)

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Corporate self‑use of enterprise software is a “commercial purpose”: Supreme Court’s profit‑nexus test and the narrow scope of the self‑employment exception — Poly Medicure Ltd. v. Brillio...
Saranda Mandamus: Supreme Court makes Section 26A duty enforceable; declares that Wildlife Sanctuary notification does not curtail FRA rights, and calibrates boundaries using sustainable mining plan

Saranda Mandamus: Supreme Court makes Section 26A duty enforceable; declares that Wildlife Sanctuary notification does not curtail FRA rights, and calibrates boundaries using sustainable mining plan

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Saranda Mandamus: Supreme Court makes Section 26A duty enforceable; declares that Wildlife Sanctuary notification does not curtail FRA rights, and calibrates boundaries using sustainable mining plan...
Explosion Exception and Statutory Fitness: Supreme Court Restricts Insurers’ Reliance on BPP Exclusion Clause 5

Explosion Exception and Statutory Fitness: Supreme Court Restricts Insurers’ Reliance on BPP Exclusion Clause 5

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Explosion Exception and Statutory Fitness: Supreme Court Restricts Insurers’ Reliance on BPP Exclusion Clause 5 Case: Kopargaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd (now known as Karmaveer Shankarrao Kale...
State Autonomy in Use of Allocated Inter‑State River Waters and Primacy of Expert Cauvery Institutions – Commentary on The State of Karnataka v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 1343)

State Autonomy in Use of Allocated Inter‑State River Waters and Primacy of Expert Cauvery Institutions – Commentary on The State of Karnataka v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 1343)

Date: Nov 14, 2025
State Autonomy in Use of Allocated Inter‑State River Waters and Primacy of Expert Cauvery Institutions – Commentary on The State of Karnataka v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 1343) I. Introduction...
Counter-claims Cannot Be Directed Against Co-defendants; Impleadment Does Not Expand Counter-claim Scope, and No Liberty to File Time-barred Suits: Supreme Court

Counter-claims Cannot Be Directed Against Co-defendants; Impleadment Does Not Expand Counter-claim Scope, and No Liberty to File Time-barred Suits: Supreme Court

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Counter-claims Cannot Be Directed Against Co-defendants; Impleadment Does Not Expand Counter-claim Scope, and No Liberty to File Time-barred Suits: Supreme Court Case Commentary on: Sanjay Tiwari v....

        Bypassing the High Court’s Own Statutory Jurisdiction Through Writ Petitions:
        Commentary on Rikhab Chand Jain v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 1337

Bypassing the High Court’s Own Statutory Jurisdiction Through Writ Petitions: Commentary on Rikhab Chand Jain v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 1337

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Bypassing the High Court’s Own Statutory Jurisdiction via Writ Petitions: A Commentary on Rikhab Chand Jain v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 1337 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Rikhab...
Curative Power as a Constitutional Duty to Resolve Irreconcilable Final Outcomes on Identical Evidence: Commentary on Surendra Koli v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 1308)

Curative Power as a Constitutional Duty to Resolve Irreconcilable Final Outcomes on Identical Evidence: Commentary on Surendra Koli v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 1308)

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Curative Power as a Constitutional Duty to Resolve Irreconcilable Final Outcomes on Identical Evidence: Commentary on Surendra Koli v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 1308) Introduction In a...
Appeal Without Stay Is No Shield: Supreme Court Clarifies Wilful Default and Notice under Section 10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act

Appeal Without Stay Is No Shield: Supreme Court Clarifies Wilful Default and Notice under Section 10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Appeal Without Stay Is No Shield: Supreme Court Clarifies Wilful Default and Notice under Section 10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act Introduction In K. Subramaniam (Died) through LRs v. M/s...
Proof, Not Presumption: Executing Historic Compromise Decrees Requires Demonstrable Breach and Possession — Kapadam Sangalappa v. Kamatam Sangalappa (2025 INSC 1307)

Proof, Not Presumption: Executing Historic Compromise Decrees Requires Demonstrable Breach and Possession — Kapadam Sangalappa v. Kamatam Sangalappa (2025 INSC 1307)

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Proof, Not Presumption: Executing Historic Compromise Decrees Requires Demonstrable Breach and Possession — Kapadam Sangalappa v. Kamatam Sangalappa (2025 INSC 1307) Introduction This judgment of the...

        Judicial Comity and Exclusive Supreme Court Control over Sanction Orders in Court‑Monitored Investigations:
        Commentary on Rahul v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1344)

Judicial Comity and Exclusive Supreme Court Control over Sanction Orders in Court‑Monitored Investigations: Commentary on Rahul v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1344)

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Judicial Comity and Exclusive Supreme Court Control over Sanction Orders in Court‑Monitored Investigations: Commentary on Rahul v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1344) 1. Introduction The judgment...
Statutory Single-Window Governance for the Delhi Ridge (including the Morphological Ridge) under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Statutory Single-Window Governance for the Delhi Ridge (including the Morphological Ridge) under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Statutory Single-Window Governance for the Delhi Ridge (including the Morphological Ridge) under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Introduction In 2025 INSC 1306, the Supreme Court of India...
Profit-Spread Land Aggregation Is Not a “Real Estate Agent” Service: Supreme Court Clarifies Agency Test and Limits Extended Limitation under Section 73(1) Proviso

Profit-Spread Land Aggregation Is Not a “Real Estate Agent” Service: Supreme Court Clarifies Agency Test and Limits Extended Limitation under Section 73(1) Proviso

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Profit-Spread Land Aggregation Is Not a “Real Estate Agent” Service: Supreme Court Clarifies Agency Test and Limits Extended Limitation under Section 73(1) Proviso Introduction This commentary...
Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 is a Decree: Appeals Maintainable under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act; Proviso Limits Only Interlocutory Orders — Commentary on MITC Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Renuka Realtors (2025 INSC 1300)

Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 is a Decree: Appeals Maintainable under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act; Proviso Limits Only Interlocutory Orders — Commentary on MITC Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Renuka Realtors (2025 INSC 1300)

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 is a Decree: Appeals Maintainable under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act; Proviso Limits Only Interlocutory Orders Case: MITC Rolling Mills...
Twin-Blockades and Conclusive Legitimacy: Supreme Court Restricts Court-Ordered DNA Profiling in Criminal Investigations Absent Non-Access and Direct Nexus to the Offence

Twin-Blockades and Conclusive Legitimacy: Supreme Court Restricts Court-Ordered DNA Profiling in Criminal Investigations Absent Non-Access and Direct Nexus to the Offence

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Twin-Blockades and Conclusive Legitimacy: Supreme Court Restricts Court-Ordered DNA Profiling in Criminal Investigations Absent Non-Access and Direct Nexus to the Offence Introduction In R. Rajendran...
When an Impulsive Stab on a Vital Part Leading to Septicemia Attracts Section 304 Part I, Not Section 302

When an Impulsive Stab on a Vital Part Leading to Septicemia Attracts Section 304 Part I, Not Section 302

Date: Nov 11, 2025
When an Impulsive Stab on a Vital Part Leading to Septicemia Attracts Section 304 Part I, Not Section 302 Introduction The Supreme Court of India in Nandkumar @ Nandu Manilal Mudaliar v. State of...
Unilateral Termination of Non‑Determinable Agreements to Sell: No Declaratory Relief Needed; Constructive Notice Defeats the Bona Fide Purchaser Defence

Unilateral Termination of Non‑Determinable Agreements to Sell: No Declaratory Relief Needed; Constructive Notice Defeats the Bona Fide Purchaser Defence

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Unilateral Termination of Non‑Determinable Agreements to Sell: No Declaratory Relief Needed; Constructive Notice Defeats the Bona Fide Purchaser Defence Introduction In K. S. Manjunath v....
Excisability Precedes Valuation: Bought‑out, Site‑Delivered Components Not Includible When the Contract Yields an Immovable Steam‑Generating Plant

Excisability Precedes Valuation: Bought‑out, Site‑Delivered Components Not Includible When the Contract Yields an Immovable Steam‑Generating Plant

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Excisability Precedes Valuation: Bought‑out, Site‑Delivered Components Not Includible When the Contract Yields an Immovable Steam‑Generating Plant Introduction In Lipi Boilers Ltd. v. Commissioner of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert