Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries


      Supreme Court settles that EIA “General Conditions” do not apply to Building and Township Projects; SEIAA remains the appraising authority; exemption for industrial/educational buildings struck down

Supreme Court settles that EIA “General Conditions” do not apply to Building and Township Projects; SEIAA remains the appraising authority; exemption for industrial/educational buildings struck down

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Supreme Court settles that EIA “General Conditions” do not apply to Building and Township Projects; SEIAA remains the appraising authority; exemption for industrial/educational buildings struck down...
From Criminalisation to Constitutional Care: Supreme Court Mandates National Standards for Beggars’ Homes under Article 21

From Criminalisation to Constitutional Care: Supreme Court Mandates National Standards for Beggars’ Homes under Article 21

Date: Sep 13, 2025
From Criminalisation to Constitutional Care: Supreme Court Mandates National Standards for Beggars’ Homes under Article 21 Case: M.S. Patter v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others Citation: 2025 INSC...
Tenant Estoppel, Optional Probate, and the Ownership Threshold in Eviction Suits: Supreme Court Clarifies in Jyoti Sharma v. Vishnu Goyal (2025)

Tenant Estoppel, Optional Probate, and the Ownership Threshold in Eviction Suits: Supreme Court Clarifies in Jyoti Sharma v. Vishnu Goyal (2025)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Tenant Estoppel, Optional Probate, and the Ownership Threshold in Eviction Suits: Supreme Court Clarifies in Jyoti Sharma v. Vishnu Goyal (2025) Introduction In Jyoti Sharma v. Vishnu Goyal & Anr.,...
MLC Intimation Triggers Mandatory FIR and SP’s Duty under Section 154(3) CrPC: Supreme Court Orders SIT and Disciplinary Action for Police Inaction in Communal Riot Context

MLC Intimation Triggers Mandatory FIR and SP’s Duty under Section 154(3) CrPC: Supreme Court Orders SIT and Disciplinary Action for Police Inaction in Communal Riot Context

Date: Sep 12, 2025
MLC Intimation Triggers Mandatory FIR and SP’s Duty under Section 154(3) CrPC: Supreme Court Orders SIT and Disciplinary Action for Police Inaction in Communal Riot Context Introduction In Mohammad...
No eviction of cultivating tenants without cogent proof of “destructive or injurious” acts under Section 3(2)(b), Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955

No eviction of cultivating tenants without cogent proof of “destructive or injurious” acts under Section 3(2)(b), Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955

Date: Sep 11, 2025
No eviction of cultivating tenants without cogent proof of “destructive or injurious” acts under Section 3(2)(b), Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 Case: Govindappa Gounder @...
Mandatory FIR and the Non‑Conclusive Status of Preliminary Enquiries: “Those Who Investigate Must Also Be Investigated”

Mandatory FIR and the Non‑Conclusive Status of Preliminary Enquiries: “Those Who Investigate Must Also Be Investigated”

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Mandatory FIR and the Non‑Conclusive Status of Preliminary Enquiries: “Those Who Investigate Must Also Be Investigated” Case: Vinod Kumar Pandey & Anr. v. Seesh Ram Saini & Ors.; Vinod Kumar Pandey &...
No Cheating Without Material Inducement: SC quashes 420 IPC where alleged forged Fire NOC was legally irrelevant; ‘maker’ requirement for forgery reaffirmed

No Cheating Without Material Inducement: SC quashes 420 IPC where alleged forged Fire NOC was legally irrelevant; ‘maker’ requirement for forgery reaffirmed

Date: Sep 11, 2025
No Cheating Without Material Inducement: Supreme Court quashes Section 420 IPC where an alleged forged Fire NOC was legally irrelevant; ‘maker’ requirement for forgery reaffirmed Introduction In...
“DNA Cannot Cure a Broken Chain”: Supreme Court tightens standards on circumstantial proof, last-seen evidence, and death sentencing in Akhtar Ali v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1097)

“DNA Cannot Cure a Broken Chain”: Supreme Court tightens standards on circumstantial proof, last-seen evidence, and death sentencing in Akhtar Ali v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1097)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
“DNA Cannot Cure a Broken Chain”: Supreme Court tightens standards on circumstantial proof, last-seen evidence, and death sentencing in Akhtar Ali v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1097)...
No Section 306 IPC for Ordinary Neighbourhood Quarrels: Supreme Court Reiterates Mens Rea and Clear Instigation Are Essential

No Section 306 IPC for Ordinary Neighbourhood Quarrels: Supreme Court Reiterates Mens Rea and Clear Instigation Are Essential

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No Section 306 IPC for Ordinary Neighbourhood Quarrels: Supreme Court Reiterates Mens Rea and Clear Instigation Are Essential Case: GEETA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, 2025 INSC 1089 (Supreme Court of...
Reserved-to-Unreserved Migration Clarified: Express Embargo in Recruitment Rules Prevails; Physical-Standards Variations Are Not “Relaxed Standards” Under DoPT OMs

Reserved-to-Unreserved Migration Clarified: Express Embargo in Recruitment Rules Prevails; Physical-Standards Variations Are Not “Relaxed Standards” Under DoPT OMs

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Reserved-to-Unreserved Migration Clarified: Express Embargo in Recruitment Rules Prevails; Physical-Standards Variations Are Not “Relaxed Standards” Under DoPT OMs Introduction In Railway Protection...
The Conditional Migration Rule: Reserved Candidates Who Avail Relaxation Cannot Claim Unreserved Seats Where Recruitment Rules Impose an Embargo — Commentary on Union of India v. Sajib Roy (2025 INSC 1084)

The Conditional Migration Rule: Reserved Candidates Who Avail Relaxation Cannot Claim Unreserved Seats Where Recruitment Rules Impose an Embargo — Commentary on Union of India v. Sajib Roy (2025 INSC 1084)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
The Conditional Migration Rule: Reserved Candidates Who Avail Relaxation Cannot Claim Unreserved Seats Where Recruitment Rules Impose an Embargo Commentary on Union of India v. Sajib Roy, 2025 INSC...
"Banker’s Eye", “Some Evidence”, and the Outer Limits of Section 11‑A Review: Supreme Court restores compulsory retirement in Canara Bank v. Ganganarasimhaiah

"Banker’s Eye", “Some Evidence”, and the Outer Limits of Section 11‑A Review: Supreme Court restores compulsory retirement in Canara Bank v. Ganganarasimhaiah

Date: Sep 10, 2025
"Banker’s Eye", “Some Evidence”, and the Outer Limits of Section 11‑A Review: Supreme Court restores compulsory retirement in Canara Bank v. Ganganarasimhaiah Introduction In The General Manager (P),...
No-Implied-Document Rule in Public Tenders and Limits on Judicial Supplementation: Maha Mineral Mining & Benefication Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 1085)

No-Implied-Document Rule in Public Tenders and Limits on Judicial Supplementation: Maha Mineral Mining & Benefication Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 1085)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
No-Implied-Document Rule in Public Tenders and Limits on Judicial Supplementation Case: Maha Mineral Mining & Benefication Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Co. Ltd. & Anr. Citation: 2025...
Verified and Published Homebuyer Claims Must Be Honoured with Possession under Resolution Plans: Supreme Court in Amit Nehra v. Pawan Kumar Garg (2025 INSC 1086)

Verified and Published Homebuyer Claims Must Be Honoured with Possession under Resolution Plans: Supreme Court in Amit Nehra v. Pawan Kumar Garg (2025 INSC 1086)

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Verified and Published Homebuyer Claims Must Be Honoured with Possession under Resolution Plans: Supreme Court in Amit Nehra v. Pawan Kumar Garg (2025 INSC 1086) Introduction In Amit Nehra & Anr. v....
Consumer Fora Cannot Recast Medical Negligence Claims Beyond the Pleadings: Supreme Court Reaffirms Deference to Expert Medical Boards

Consumer Fora Cannot Recast Medical Negligence Claims Beyond the Pleadings: Supreme Court Reaffirms Deference to Expert Medical Boards

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Consumer Fora Cannot Recast Medical Negligence Claims Beyond the Pleadings: Supreme Court Reaffirms Deference to Expert Medical Boards Case Metadata Case: Deep Nursing Home and another v. Manmeet...
Review Is Not an Appeal: Supreme Court Reasserts Narrow Limits of Review under Order 47 CPC and Restores CRP Recognising Daughter’s Coparcenary Claim

Review Is Not an Appeal: Supreme Court Reasserts Narrow Limits of Review under Order 47 CPC and Restores CRP Recognising Daughter’s Coparcenary Claim

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Review Is Not an Appeal: Supreme Court Reasserts Narrow Limits of Review under Order 47 CPC and Restores CRP Recognising Daughter’s Coparcenary Claim Introduction In Malleeswari v. K. Suguna (2025...
Plant‑Level Pro‑Rata Allocation of Linkage and Alternate Coal Across All PPAs; Section 125 Appeals Strictly Confined to Substantial Questions of Law — Commentary on HPPC v. GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. (2025 INSC 1079)

Plant‑Level Pro‑Rata Allocation of Linkage and Alternate Coal Across All PPAs; Section 125 Appeals Strictly Confined to Substantial Questions of Law — Commentary on HPPC v. GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. (2025 INSC 1079)

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Plant‑Level Pro‑Rata Allocation of Linkage and Alternate Coal Across All PPAs; Section 125 Appeals Strictly Confined to Substantial Questions of Law Commentary on Haryana Power Purchase Centre (HPPC)...
Witness Protection Scheme Is Not an Alternative to Bail Cancellation: Supreme Court Reasserts Preventive–Curative Divide in Bail Jurisprudence

Witness Protection Scheme Is Not an Alternative to Bail Cancellation: Supreme Court Reasserts Preventive–Curative Divide in Bail Jurisprudence

Date: Sep 7, 2025
Witness Protection Scheme Is Not an Alternative to Bail Cancellation: Supreme Court Reasserts the Preventive–Curative Divide in Bail Jurisprudence Case: PHIRERAM v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.,...
Functional Disability, Not Medical Disability, Governs Motor Accident Compensation; Pre‑Accident Tax Returns Accepted and Future Prospects Not Automatic in Injury Claims — Commentary on Anoop Maheshwari v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 1076)

Functional Disability, Not Medical Disability, Governs Motor Accident Compensation; Pre‑Accident Tax Returns Accepted and Future Prospects Not Automatic in Injury Claims — Commentary on Anoop Maheshwari v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 1076)

Date: Sep 7, 2025
Functional Disability, Not Medical Disability, Governs Motor Accident Compensation; Pre‑Accident Tax Returns Accepted and Future Prospects Not Automatic in Injury Claims Commentary on: Anoop...
Second Appeals Cannot Birth a New Case: Strict Limits on Invoking Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act via Section 100(5) CPC — Commentary on C.P. Francis v. C.P. Joseph (2025 INSC 1071)

Second Appeals Cannot Birth a New Case: Strict Limits on Invoking Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act via Section 100(5) CPC — Commentary on C.P. Francis v. C.P. Joseph (2025 INSC 1071)

Date: Sep 7, 2025
Second Appeals Cannot Birth a New Case: Strict Limits on Invoking Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act via Section 100(5) CPC Commentary on Supreme Court of India decision: C. P. Francis v. C.P....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert