Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

No Automatic SICA Shield: Section 22A restraint orders do not bar Section 138 NI Act prosecutions; summoning orders cannot be recalled

No Automatic SICA Shield: Section 22A restraint orders do not bar Section 138 NI Act prosecutions; summoning orders cannot be recalled

Date: Sep 7, 2025
No Automatic SICA Shield: Section 22A restraint orders do not bar Section 138 NI Act prosecutions; summoning orders cannot be recalled Introduction In SHREE NAGANI SILK MILLS PVT. LTD v. L.D....
NCLT can adjudicate fraud and void share transfers in oppression/mismanagement proceedings: Supreme Court in Shailja Krishna v. Satori Global Ltd. (2025 INSC 1065)

NCLT can adjudicate fraud and void share transfers in oppression/mismanagement proceedings: Supreme Court in Shailja Krishna v. Satori Global Ltd. (2025 INSC 1065)

Date: Sep 7, 2025
NCLT can adjudicate fraud and void share transfers in oppression/mismanagement proceedings: Supreme Court in Shailja Krishna v. Satori Global Ltd. (2025 INSC 1065) Court: Supreme Court of India |...
No-interest clauses limited: Supreme Court upholds arbitral power to grant pendente lite interest and affirms non-derogable post‑award interest under Section 31(7)(b)

No-interest clauses limited: Supreme Court upholds arbitral power to grant pendente lite interest and affirms non-derogable post‑award interest under Section 31(7)(b)

Date: Sep 7, 2025
No-interest clauses limited: Supreme Court upholds arbitral power to grant pendente lite interest and affirms non-derogable post‑award interest under Section 31(7)(b) Introduction In Oil and Natural...
Kiran v. Rajkumar Jivraj Jain: Supreme Court reaffirms near‑absolute bar on anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act; clarifies “public view” and recognizes election‑retaliation under Section 3(1)(o)

Kiran v. Rajkumar Jivraj Jain: Supreme Court reaffirms near‑absolute bar on anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act; clarifies “public view” and recognizes election‑retaliation under Section 3(1)(o)

Date: Sep 3, 2025
Kiran v. Rajkumar Jivraj Jain: Supreme Court reaffirms near‑absolute bar on anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act; clarifies “public view” and recognizes election‑retaliation under Section 3(1)(o)...
Prejudice is the Touchstone: Misjoinder and Defective Charges Do Not Vitiate Trial Absent Failure of Justice; Supreme Court Recalibrates “Reasonable Doubt” in POCSO Prosecutions

Prejudice is the Touchstone: Misjoinder and Defective Charges Do Not Vitiate Trial Absent Failure of Justice; Supreme Court Recalibrates “Reasonable Doubt” in POCSO Prosecutions

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Prejudice is the Touchstone: Misjoinder and Defective Charges Do Not Vitiate Trial Absent Failure of Justice; Supreme Court Recalibrates “Reasonable Doubt” in POCSO Prosecutions Introduction In...
Article 371D Reaffirmed: Supreme Court bars judicial expansion of “local candidate” definition; upholds Telangana’s residence-plus-study test with narrow transfer-linked exceptions

Article 371D Reaffirmed: Supreme Court bars judicial expansion of “local candidate” definition; upholds Telangana’s residence-plus-study test with narrow transfer-linked exceptions

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Article 371D Reaffirmed: Supreme Court bars judicial expansion of “local candidate” definition; upholds Telangana’s residence-plus-study test with narrow transfer-linked exceptions Introduction In...
NGT Must Follow Water Act Sampling Procedure and Audi Alteram Partem: Ad hoc Committee Reports Cannot Substitute Adjudication

NGT Must Follow Water Act Sampling Procedure and Audi Alteram Partem: Ad hoc Committee Reports Cannot Substitute Adjudication

Date: Sep 2, 2025
NGT Must Follow Water Act Sampling Procedure and Audi Alteram Partem: Ad hoc Committee Reports Cannot Substitute Adjudication Case: M/s Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd. v. State of Uttar...
SA/GPA/Will Do Not Convey Title; Will Must Be Strictly Proved; Section 53A Is a Shield Only With Possession — Ramesh Chand (D) thr. LRs v. Suresh Chand (2025 INSC 1059)

SA/GPA/Will Do Not Convey Title; Will Must Be Strictly Proved; Section 53A Is a Shield Only With Possession — Ramesh Chand (D) thr. LRs v. Suresh Chand (2025 INSC 1059)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
SA/GPA/Will Do Not Convey Title; Will Must Be Strictly Proved; Section 53A Is a Shield Only With Possession Commentary on RAMESH CHAND (D) THR. LRS. v. SURESH CHAND (2025 INSC 1059) Introduction In...
TET as a Minimum Qualification and Promotions Criterion under the RTE Act; Reference Sought on Minority Exemption in Pramati: A Comprehensive Commentary on Anjuman Ishaat‑e‑Taleem Trust v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1063)

TET as a Minimum Qualification and Promotions Criterion under the RTE Act; Reference Sought on Minority Exemption in Pramati: A Comprehensive Commentary on Anjuman Ishaat‑e‑Taleem Trust v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1063)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
TET as a Minimum Qualification and Promotions Criterion under the RTE Act; Reference Sought on Minority Exemption in Pramati A Comprehensive Commentary on Anjuman Ishaat‑e‑Taleem Trust v. State of...
No Private Tariffs: Supreme Court Affirms Mandatory State Commission Approval for PPAs and Tariff Modifications under Section 86(1)(b)

No Private Tariffs: Supreme Court Affirms Mandatory State Commission Approval for PPAs and Tariff Modifications under Section 86(1)(b)

Date: Aug 30, 2025
No Private Tariffs: Supreme Court Affirms Mandatory State Commission Approval for PPAs and Tariff Modifications under Section 86(1)(b) Case: M/s KKK Hydro Power Limited v. Himachal Pradesh State...
Dual-Limb Clarification of Punjab Police Rule 16.2(1) and the “Past-Record-for-Weight” Doctrine: Dismissal for a Single Gravest Act Needs No Prior Notice of Past Misconduct

Dual-Limb Clarification of Punjab Police Rule 16.2(1) and the “Past-Record-for-Weight” Doctrine: Dismissal for a Single Gravest Act Needs No Prior Notice of Past Misconduct

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Dual-Limb Clarification of Punjab Police Rule 16.2(1) and the “Past-Record-for-Weight” Doctrine: Dismissal for a Single Gravest Act Needs No Prior Notice of Past Misconduct Introduction This...
Mandating Specific and Proximate Proof of “Cruelty” under Section 498-A IPC and Recognising Neighbour Testimony: Commentary on Bhagwati Devi v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1051)

Mandating Specific and Proximate Proof of “Cruelty” under Section 498-A IPC and Recognising Neighbour Testimony: Commentary on Bhagwati Devi v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1051)

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Mandating Specific and Proximate Proof of “Cruelty” under Section 498-A IPC and Recognising Neighbour Testimony: Commentary on Bhagwati Devi v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1051) Introduction This...
No Road Tax Without Public-Place Nexus: Supreme Court aligns Rule 12A with Section 3 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act

No Road Tax Without Public-Place Nexus: Supreme Court aligns Rule 12A with Section 3 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act

Date: Aug 30, 2025
No Road Tax Without Public-Place Nexus: Supreme Court aligns Rule 12A with Section 3 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Case: M/s. Tarachand Logistic Solutions Limited v. State of Andhra Pradesh...
Executive Policy Cannot Supplant Statutory Recruitment Rules or Derail Ongoing Selections: The Supreme Court’s Tripura Trilogy

Executive Policy Cannot Supplant Statutory Recruitment Rules or Derail Ongoing Selections: The Supreme Court’s Tripura Trilogy

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Executive Policy Cannot Supplant Statutory Recruitment Rules or Derail Ongoing Selections: The Supreme Court’s Tripura Trilogy Case: Partha Das & Ors. v. State of Tripura & Ors. (with connected...
Article 317 Misbehaviour Is Personal, Not Collective: Supreme Court Clarifies Removal Standard for Public Service Commission Members

Article 317 Misbehaviour Is Personal, Not Collective: Supreme Court Clarifies Removal Standard for Public Service Commission Members

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Article 317 Misbehaviour Is Personal, Not Collective: Supreme Court Clarifies Removal Standard for Public Service Commission Members Case: In Re: Ms. Mepung Tadar Bage, Member, Arunachal Pradesh...
CBDT Circulars as Binding Constraints on Section 276C(1) Prosecutions; Conclusiveness of Settlement Commission Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Non‑Compliant Tax Prosecution as Abuse of Process

CBDT Circulars as Binding Constraints on Section 276C(1) Prosecutions; Conclusiveness of Settlement Commission Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Non‑Compliant Tax Prosecution as Abuse of Process

Date: Aug 30, 2025
CBDT Circulars as Binding Constraints on Section 276C(1) Prosecutions; Conclusiveness of Settlement Commission Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Non‑Compliant Tax Prosecution as Abuse of Process...
Arraign the Company, Protect Good‑Faith SARFAESI Acts: Supreme Court Bars Vicarious Criminal Defamation of Bank Officers

Arraign the Company, Protect Good‑Faith SARFAESI Acts: Supreme Court Bars Vicarious Criminal Defamation of Bank Officers

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Arraign the Company, Protect Good‑Faith SARFAESI Acts: Supreme Court Bars Vicarious Criminal Defamation of Bank Officers Citation: 2025 INSC 1069 | Case: Dr. Anil Khandelwal v. Phoenix India | Court:...
Service of an arbitral award on a non-decision-making authorised representative does not trigger Section 34 limitation: Supreme Court reiterates the “decision-maker” test for Government parties

Service of an arbitral award on a non-decision-making authorised representative does not trigger Section 34 limitation: Supreme Court reiterates the “decision-maker” test for Government parties

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Service of an arbitral award on a non-decision-making authorised representative does not trigger Section 34 limitation: Supreme Court reiterates the “decision-maker” test for Government parties Case:...
“Enabling, Not Mandatory” – Supreme Court Clarifies That Sole-Proprietors May Be Sued in Their Personal Capacity Without Impleading the Trade Name (Dogiparthi Venkata Satish v. Pilla Durga Prasad, 2025)

“Enabling, Not Mandatory” – Supreme Court Clarifies That Sole-Proprietors May Be Sued in Their Personal Capacity Without Impleading the Trade Name (Dogiparthi Venkata Satish v. Pilla Durga Prasad, 2025)

Date: Aug 27, 2025
“Enabling, Not Mandatory” – Supreme Court Clarifies That Sole-Proprietors May Be Sued in Their Personal Capacity Without Impleading the Trade Name (Dogiparthi Venkata Satish v. Pilla Durga Prasad,...
Putai v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025): Supreme Court Reinforces the “Chain-of-Custody” Rule for DNA Evidence in Circumstantial Prosecutions

Putai v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025): Supreme Court Reinforces the “Chain-of-Custody” Rule for DNA Evidence in Circumstantial Prosecutions

Date: Aug 27, 2025
Putai v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025): Supreme Court Reinforces the “Chain-of-Custody” Rule for DNA Evidence in Circumstantial Prosecutions 1. Introduction In Putai v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert