Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Constitutional Safeguards in Reverse-Burden Terrorism Trials and the Limits of Section 436‑A CrPC: Commentary on CBI v. Dayamoy Mahato

Constitutional Safeguards in Reverse-Burden Terrorism Trials and the Limits of Section 436‑A CrPC: Commentary on CBI v. Dayamoy Mahato

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Constitutional Safeguards in Reverse-Burden Terrorism Trials and the Limits of Section 436‑A CrPC: Commentary on CBI v. Dayamoy Mahato 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Central...
Requisitioning of Private Doctors Under COVID-19 Emergency Regulations as Sufficient for PMGKY Insurance Coverage – Commentary on Pradeep Arora v. Director, Health Department

Requisitioning of Private Doctors Under COVID-19 Emergency Regulations as Sufficient for PMGKY Insurance Coverage – Commentary on Pradeep Arora v. Director, Health Department

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Requisitioning of Private Doctors Under COVID-19 Emergency Regulations as Sufficient for PMGKY Insurance Coverage 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Pradeep Arora & Ors. v....
Inter‑Departmental Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committees under the POSH Act: Commentary on Dr. Sohail Malik v. Union of India (2025 INSC 1415)

Inter‑Departmental Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committees under the POSH Act: Commentary on Dr. Sohail Malik v. Union of India (2025 INSC 1415)

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Inter‑Departmental Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committees under the POSH Act: Commentary on Dr. Sohail Malik v. Union of India (2025 INSC 1415) I. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s...
Ring‑fencing Section 36(1)(viii): Strict “Derived From” Test for Long‑Term Finance Deductions in NCDC v. ACIT

Ring‑fencing Section 36(1)(viii): Strict “Derived From” Test for Long‑Term Finance Deductions in NCDC v. ACIT

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Ring‑fencing Section 36(1)(viii): Strict “Derived From” Test for Long‑Term Finance Deductions in National Cooperative Development Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax I. Introduction...
Co-existence of Section 102 CrPC Seizure Powers with Section 18A PC Act Attachment: Commentary on State of West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Dey (2025 INSC 1413)

Co-existence of Section 102 CrPC Seizure Powers with Section 18A PC Act Attachment: Commentary on State of West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Dey (2025 INSC 1413)

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Co-existence of Section 102 CrPC Seizure Powers with Section 18A PC Act Attachment: Commentary on State of West Bengal v. Anil Kumar Dey (2025 INSC 1413) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s...
Remand Observations Do Not Freeze the Law; No Cross-Appeal Bars Challenge to Operative Relief; Compounding on Carrying Cost Turns on Facts

Remand Observations Do Not Freeze the Law; No Cross-Appeal Bars Challenge to Operative Relief; Compounding on Carrying Cost Turns on Facts

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Remand Observations Do Not Freeze the Law; No Cross-Appeal Bars Challenge to Operative Relief; Compounding on Carrying Cost Turns on Facts 1. Introduction RattanIndia Power Limited (“RPL”,...
Judicial Forfeiture Clauses in IBC Liquidation Sales: Commentary on M/s Shri Karshni Alloys Pvt Ltd v. Ramakrishnan Sadasivan

Judicial Forfeiture Clauses in IBC Liquidation Sales: Commentary on M/s Shri Karshni Alloys Pvt Ltd v. Ramakrishnan Sadasivan

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Judicially-Imposed Forfeiture in IBC Liquidation Sales Is Not a Contractual Penalty: A Commentary on M/s Shri Karshni Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. Ramakrishnan Sadasivan, 2025 INSC 1411 1. Introduction The...
Expiry of Arbitral Mandate and Mandatory Substitution under Section 29A(6): Commentary on Mohan Lal Fatehpuria v. M/s Bharat Textiles

Expiry of Arbitral Mandate and Mandatory Substitution under Section 29A(6): Commentary on Mohan Lal Fatehpuria v. M/s Bharat Textiles

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Expiry of Arbitral Mandate and Mandatory Substitution under Section 29A(6): Commentary on Mohan Lal Fatehpuria v. M/s Bharat Textiles & Ors., 2025 INSC 1409 I. Introduction The Supreme Court’s...
Mercy, Apology and the Proper Use of Contempt Power: Commentary on Vineeta Srinandan v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay (2025 INSC 1408)

Mercy, Apology and the Proper Use of Contempt Power: Commentary on Vineeta Srinandan v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay (2025 INSC 1408)

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Mercy, Apology and the Proper Use of Contempt Power: A Detailed Commentary on Vineeta Srinandan v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay on its Own Motion (2025 INSC 1408) I. Introduction 1. The case in...

        Pre‑Existing Disputes Under IBC Section 9: Supreme Court Elevates Ledger Confirmations 
        and Post‑Demand Payments Over “Moonshine” Defences

Pre‑Existing Disputes Under IBC Section 9: Supreme Court Elevates Ledger Confirmations and Post‑Demand Payments Over “Moonshine” Defences

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Pre‑Existing Disputes Under IBC Section 9: Supreme Court Elevates Ledger Confirmations and Post‑Demand Payments Over “Moonshine” Defences I. Introduction The Supreme Court of India in M/s. Saraswati...
Finality of Revenue Map Adjudications and the Limited Scope of Section 30, U.P. Revenue Code: Commentary on Suvej Singh v. Ram Naresh, 2025 INSC 1405

Finality of Revenue Map Adjudications and the Limited Scope of Section 30, U.P. Revenue Code: Commentary on Suvej Singh v. Ram Naresh, 2025 INSC 1405

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Finality of Revenue Map Adjudications and the Limited Scope of Section 30, U.P. Revenue Code: Commentary on Suvej Singh v. Ram Naresh, 2025 INSC 1405 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India in...
Resignation, Forfeiture of Pension and Statutory Right to Gratuity: Commentary on Ashok Kumar Dabas v. Delhi Transport Corporation (2025 INSC 1404)

Resignation, Forfeiture of Pension and Statutory Right to Gratuity: Commentary on Ashok Kumar Dabas v. Delhi Transport Corporation (2025 INSC 1404)

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Resignation, Forfeiture of Pension and Statutory Right to Gratuity: Commentary on Ashok Kumar Dabas (Dead through LRs) v. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2025 INSC 1404 1. Introduction The Supreme Court...

    Veritable Party Test and Non‑Signatory Assignees: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 11 Scrutiny in 
    Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. BCL Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd.

Veritable Party Test and Non‑Signatory Assignees: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 11 Scrutiny in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. BCL Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Veritable Party Threshold and Anti‑Assignment Clauses: Supreme Court Limits Non‑Signatory Assignees from Invoking Arbitration Agreements under Section 11 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision...
Omission of Accused’s Name in FIR as a Fatal Defect in Identification Evidence: Commentary on Govind Mandavi v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 1399)

Omission of Accused’s Name in FIR as a Fatal Defect in Identification Evidence: Commentary on Govind Mandavi v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 1399)

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Omission of Accused’s Name in FIR as a Fatal Defect in Identification Evidence: A Commentary on Govind Mandavi v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 1399) Court: Supreme Court of India, Criminal...
Section 32 as the Exclusive Source of Termination Power under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Commentary on Harshbir Singh Pannu v. Jaswinder Singh (2025 INSC 1400)

Section 32 as the Exclusive Source of Termination Power under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Commentary on Harshbir Singh Pannu v. Jaswinder Singh (2025 INSC 1400)

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Section 32 as the Exclusive Source of Termination Power under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: A Detailed Commentary on Harshbir Singh Pannu v. Jaswinder Singh, 2025 INSC 1400 1....
Judicial Restraint in Reviewing Municipal Tax Policy and Limits of PIL in Fiscal Matters: Commentary on Akola Municipal Corporation v. Zishan Hussain (2025 INSC 1398)

Judicial Restraint in Reviewing Municipal Tax Policy and Limits of PIL in Fiscal Matters: Commentary on Akola Municipal Corporation v. Zishan Hussain (2025 INSC 1398)

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Judicial Restraint in Reviewing Municipal Tax Policy and Limits of PIL in Fiscal Matters Commentary on Akola Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Zishan Hussain Azhar Hussain & Anr., 2025 INSC 1398...
Clarifying Prohibitory Claim Clauses and the Limited Precedential Value of Bharat Drilling in Arbitration: Commentary on State of Jharkhand v. The Indian Builders Jamshedpur (2025 INSC 1388)

Clarifying Prohibitory Claim Clauses and the Limited Precedential Value of Bharat Drilling in Arbitration: Commentary on State of Jharkhand v. The Indian Builders Jamshedpur (2025 INSC 1388)

Date: Dec 6, 2025
Clarifying Prohibitory Claim Clauses and the Limited Precedential Value of Bharat Drilling in Arbitration: Commentary on State of Jharkhand v. The Indian Builders Jamshedpur (2025 INSC 1388) I....
"Simplicity in Public Transactions" as a Ground of Illegality in Administrative Action – Commentary on Adarsh Sahkari Grih Nirman Swawlambi Society Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand (2025 INSC 1389)

"Simplicity in Public Transactions" as a Ground of Illegality in Administrative Action – Commentary on Adarsh Sahkari Grih Nirman Swawlambi Society Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand (2025 INSC 1389)

Date: Dec 6, 2025
“Simplicity in Public Transactions” and Superfluous Administrative Conditions as Illegality: A Commentary on Adarsh Sahkari Grih Nirman Swawlambi Society Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand, 2025 INSC 1389 1....
BPL Ltd v Morgan Securities: Cavendish Test, Party Autonomy and High Contractual Interest under Section 31(7)(a)

BPL Ltd v Morgan Securities: Cavendish Test, Party Autonomy and High Contractual Interest under Section 31(7)(a)

Date: Dec 5, 2025
BPL Ltd v Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt Ltd (2025 INSC 1380): Adoption of Cavendish Penalty Doctrine and Reinforcement of Party Autonomy in Contractual Interest under Section 31(7)(a) 1....

    Hostel Leasing as “Residential Dwelling” and Activity‑Specific GST Exemption:
    Purposive Interpretation of Entry 13, Notification 9/2017 (IGST)

Hostel Leasing as “Residential Dwelling” and Activity‑Specific GST Exemption: Purposive Interpretation of Entry 13, Notification 9/2017 (IGST)

Date: Dec 5, 2025
Hostel Leasing as “Residential Dwelling” and Activity‑Specific GST Exemption: Purposive Interpretation of Entry 13, Notification 9/2017 (IGST) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India in The State...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert