Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“From ‘Prefer’ to ‘Prosecute’: Supreme Court Clarifies Victim-Centric Appellate Rights under Section 372 CrPC”

“From ‘Prefer’ to ‘Prosecute’: Supreme Court Clarifies Victim-Centric Appellate Rights under Section 372 CrPC”

Date: Aug 24, 2025
“From ‘Prefer’ to ‘Prosecute’: Supreme Court Clarifies Victim-Centric Appellate Rights under Section 372 CrPC” 1. Introduction In Khem Singh (Dead through LRs) v. State of Uttaranchal (now...
“Equal Pay Parity for Contractual Academics” – The New Doctrine from Shah Samir Bharatbhai v. State of Gujarat (2025)

“Equal Pay Parity for Contractual Academics” – The New Doctrine from Shah Samir Bharatbhai v. State of Gujarat (2025)

Date: Aug 24, 2025
“Equal Pay Parity for Contractual Academics” – The New Doctrine from Shah Samir Bharatbhai v. State of Gujarat (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in Shah Samir Bharatbhai & Ors. v....
Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 2(g) of the 1966 Recruitment Rules: Forest Range Officers Brought within the “State Forest Service” for Promotion to the Indian Forest Service

Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 2(g) of the 1966 Recruitment Rules: Forest Range Officers Brought within the “State Forest Service” for Promotion to the Indian Forest Service

Date: Aug 24, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 2(g) of the 1966 Recruitment Rules: Forest Range Officers Brought within the “State Forest Service” for Promotion to the Indian Forest Service Introduction In P. Maruthi...
Strengthening Safeguards Against Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions – A Commentary on Neelam Kumari v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 INSC 1013)

Strengthening Safeguards Against Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions – A Commentary on Neelam Kumari v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 INSC 1013)

Date: Aug 22, 2025
Strengthening Safeguards Against Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions – A Commentary on Neelam Kumari v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 INSC 1013) Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in...
Clarifying the Dual Barriers: Supreme Court on Section 195 Cr.P.C. and the Meaning of “Obstruction” under Section 186 I.P.C.

Clarifying the Dual Barriers: Supreme Court on Section 195 Cr.P.C. and the Meaning of “Obstruction” under Section 186 I.P.C.

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Clarifying the Dual Barriers: The Supreme Court’s Definitive Ruling on Section 195 Cr.P.C. & the Contours of “Obstruction” under Section 186 I.P.C. (Devendra Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2025 INSC...
“SBI v. Ramadhar Sao (2025): Re-affirming the Narrow Compass of Judicial Review over Departmental Punishments and Clarifying that No Elaborate Reasons Are Required When the Disciplinary Authority Concurs with the Inquiry Report”

“SBI v. Ramadhar Sao (2025): Re-affirming the Narrow Compass of Judicial Review over Departmental Punishments and Clarifying that No Elaborate Reasons Are Required When the Disciplinary Authority Concurs with the Inquiry Report”

Date: Aug 21, 2025
State Bank of India v. Ramadhar Sao (2025) – Re-affirming the Narrow Compass of Judicial Review over Departmental Punishments and Clarifying that No Elaborate Reasons Are Required When the...
Supreme Court Re-asserts Doctrine of Severability and Individualised Scrutiny in Mass-Cancellation of Appointments

Supreme Court Re-asserts Doctrine of Severability and Individualised Scrutiny in Mass-Cancellation of Appointments

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Supreme Court Re-asserts Doctrine of Severability and Individualised Scrutiny in Mass-Cancellation of Appointments 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Pawan Kumar Tiwary v. Jharkhand...
Kalpataru Power v. Vinod (2025): Supreme Court Calls for Statutory Appeal Mechanism under Telegraph-Related Compensation Proceedings

Kalpataru Power v. Vinod (2025): Supreme Court Calls for Statutory Appeal Mechanism under Telegraph-Related Compensation Proceedings

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. (Now Kalpataru Projects International Ltd.) v. Vinod & Ors. (2025 INSC 1004) “Towards an Appellate Framework for Compensation Disputes under the Indian Telegraph...
“From Agricultural to Civil: Supreme Court Clarifies That a Subsequent Section 143 UPZALR Declaration Confers Civil-Court Jurisdiction”

“From Agricultural to Civil: Supreme Court Clarifies That a Subsequent Section 143 UPZALR Declaration Confers Civil-Court Jurisdiction”

Date: Aug 20, 2025
From Agricultural to Civil: Supreme Court Clarifies That a Subsequent Section 143 UPZALR Declaration Confers Civil-Court Jurisdiction I. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Mahesh Chand...
Shifting the Onus Back: Supreme Court Re-affirms Prosecution’s Foundational Burden before Invoking Section 411 IPC

Shifting the Onus Back: Supreme Court Re-affirms Prosecution’s Foundational Burden before Invoking Section 411 IPC

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Shifting the Onus Back: Supreme Court Re-affirms Prosecution’s Foundational Burden before Invoking Section 411 IPC 1. Introduction In SD Shabuddin v. State of Telangana (2025 INSC 999) the Supreme...
Doctrine of Movability Reaffirmed: Power-Plant Assets Are Not ‘Goods’ & Press Releases Are Not “Change in Law” – A Comment on Nabha Power Ltd. v. PSPCL (2025 INSC 1002)

Doctrine of Movability Reaffirmed: Power-Plant Assets Are Not ‘Goods’ & Press Releases Are Not “Change in Law” – A Comment on Nabha Power Ltd. v. PSPCL (2025 INSC 1002)

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Doctrine of Movability Reaffirmed: Power-Plant Assets Are Not “Goods” & Press Releases Are Not “Change in Law” – Supreme Court Commentary on Nabha Power Ltd. v. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd....
Dharam Singh v. State of U.P. (2025): Judicial Review of “Financial-Constraint” Refusals and a New Constitutional Duty to Regularise Perennial Daily-Wage Workers

Dharam Singh v. State of U.P. (2025): Judicial Review of “Financial-Constraint” Refusals and a New Constitutional Duty to Regularise Perennial Daily-Wage Workers

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Dharam Singh v. State of U.P. (2025): Judicial Review of “Financial-Constraint” Refusals and a New Constitutional Duty to Regularise Perennial Daily-Wage Workers 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
“From ‘May’ to ‘Shall’” – The Supreme Court Makes the Charged-Officer’s Examination and Disclosure of CVC Advice Mandatory in Departmental Inquiries

“From ‘May’ to ‘Shall’” – The Supreme Court Makes the Charged-Officer’s Examination and Disclosure of CVC Advice Mandatory in Departmental Inquiries

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“From ‘May’ to ‘Shall’” – The Supreme Court Makes the Charged-Officer’s Examination and Disclosure of CVC Advice Mandatory in Departmental Inquiries Introduction The decision in K. Prabhakar Hegde v....
The “Proximate-Trigger” Doctrine: Supreme Court Re-calibrates Abetment to Suicide under Section 306 IPC

The “Proximate-Trigger” Doctrine: Supreme Court Re-calibrates Abetment to Suicide under Section 306 IPC

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The “Proximate-Trigger” Doctrine: Supreme Court Re-calibrates Abetment to Suicide under Section 306 IPC 1. Introduction Criminal Appeal Nos. 2177-2185 of 2024 in Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. State of...
“Once You Approbate, You Cannot Reprobate” – Supreme Court Crystallises Estoppel Against Post-Decree Challenges to Arbitrability

“Once You Approbate, You Cannot Reprobate” – Supreme Court Crystallises Estoppel Against Post-Decree Challenges to Arbitrability

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Once You Approbate, You Cannot Reprobate” – Supreme Court Crystallises Estoppel Against Post-Decree Challenges to Arbitrability Introduction In Sanjit Singh Salwan & Ors. v. Sardar Inderjit Singh...
“No Monopoly over the Generic”: Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Dissection, Dominant-Feature and Post-Sale Confusion Doctrines in Pernod Ricard v. Karanveer Singh Chhabra

“No Monopoly over the Generic”: Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Dissection, Dominant-Feature and Post-Sale Confusion Doctrines in Pernod Ricard v. Karanveer Singh Chhabra

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“No Monopoly over the Generic” Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Dissection, Dominant-Feature and Post-Sale Confusion Doctrines in Pernod Ricard India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Karanveer Singh Chhabra (2025) 1....
Mandatory 30-Day Rent-Deposit Rule under the WBPT Act Re-affirmed: Seventh Day Adventist School v. Ismat Ahmed (2025)

Mandatory 30-Day Rent-Deposit Rule under the WBPT Act Re-affirmed: Seventh Day Adventist School v. Ismat Ahmed (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Mandatory 30-Day Rent-Deposit Rule under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act Re-affirmed Commentary on Seventh Day Adventist Senior Secondary School v. Ismat Ahmed & Ors. (2025 INSC 984) 1....
“Summons ≠ Proceedings” – The Supreme Court’s Definitive Clarification of Section 6(2)(b) CGST in Armour Security

“Summons ≠ Proceedings” – The Supreme Court’s Definitive Clarification of Section 6(2)(b) CGST in Armour Security

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Summons ≠ Proceedings” – The Supreme Court’s Definitive Clarification of Section 6(2)(b) CGST M/S Armour Security (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST, Delhi East Commissionerate (2025 INSC 982) 1....
Darshan Bail Cancellation Case: Supreme Court Clarifies the Annulment-Cancellation Divide and Rejects “Celebrity Immunity”

Darshan Bail Cancellation Case: Supreme Court Clarifies the Annulment-Cancellation Divide and Rejects “Celebrity Immunity”

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Darshan Bail Cancellation Case: Supreme Court Clarifies the Annulment-Cancellation Divide and Rejects “Celebrity Immunity” 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment in State of Karnataka v. Sri...
The Right to Stray-Free Streets: Supreme Court Elevates Public Safety over Mandatory Release of Sterilised Dogs

The Right to Stray-Free Streets: Supreme Court Elevates Public Safety over Mandatory Release of Sterilised Dogs

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Right to Stray-Free Streets: Supreme Court Elevates Public Safety over Mandatory Release of Sterilised Dogs 1. Introduction “In Re: ‘City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price’ (Suo Motu W.P. (C) No....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert