Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Refining the Distinction between “Setting-Aside” and “Cancellation” of Bail – A Commentary on Ashok Dhankad v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2025 INSC 974)

Refining the Distinction between “Setting-Aside” and “Cancellation” of Bail – A Commentary on Ashok Dhankad v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2025 INSC 974)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Refining the Distinction between “Setting-Aside” and “Cancellation” of Bail – A Commentary on Ashok Dhankad v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2025 INSC 974) Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Ashok...
Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Autonomy & Confidentiality: Non-Signatories Have No Right of Audience After Section 11 Appointment

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Autonomy & Confidentiality: Non-Signatories Have No Right of Audience After Section 11 Appointment

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Autonomy & Confidentiality: Non-Signatories Have No Right of Audience After Section 11 Appointment 1. Introduction In Kamal Gupta v. M/s L.R. Builders Pvt. Ltd....
“Best-Interest Regularisation” – Supreme Court Affirms Power under Article 142 to Restore Custody to Adoptive Parents despite Procedural Irregularities (Dasari Anil Kumar v. CWP Director, 2025)

“Best-Interest Regularisation” – Supreme Court Affirms Power under Article 142 to Restore Custody to Adoptive Parents despite Procedural Irregularities (Dasari Anil Kumar v. CWP Director, 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Best-Interest Regularisation” – Supreme Court Affirms Power under Article 142 to Restore Custody to Adoptive Parents despite Procedural Irregularities (Dasari Anil Kumar v. The Child Welfare Project...
The “Substantiality Test” for Form 26 Omissions: Supreme Court holds that non-disclosure of Income Tax Return particulars, absent concealment of assets, does not vitiate elections

The “Substantiality Test” for Form 26 Omissions: Supreme Court holds that non-disclosure of Income Tax Return particulars, absent concealment of assets, does not vitiate elections

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The “Substantiality Test” for Form 26 Omissions: Supreme Court holds that non-disclosure of Income Tax Return particulars, absent concealment of assets, does not vitiate elections Introduction This...
Automatic Release After Expiry of a Fixed-Term Life Sentence – Commentary on Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 969

Automatic Release After Expiry of a Fixed-Term Life Sentence – Commentary on Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 969

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Automatic Release After Expiry of a Fixed-Term Life Sentence Commentary on Supreme Court Judgment in Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2025 INSC 969) I. Introduction The Supreme...
Pre-Independence Documentary Evidence Trumps Affinity Test:  A Detailed Commentary on Yogesh Madhav Makalwad v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 964)

Pre-Independence Documentary Evidence Trumps Affinity Test: A Detailed Commentary on Yogesh Madhav Makalwad v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 964)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Pre-Independence Documentary Evidence Trumps Affinity Test Comprehensive Commentary on Yogesh Madhav Makalwad v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 964) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in...
“Automatic Vacation of Ex-Parte Injunctions for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC” – A Commentary on Time City Infrastructure & Housing Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2025) INSC 966

“Automatic Vacation of Ex-Parte Injunctions for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC” – A Commentary on Time City Infrastructure & Housing Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2025) INSC 966

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Automatic Vacation of Ex-Parte Injunctions for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC A Detailed Commentary on Time City Infrastructure & Housing Ltd. v. State of U.P. (2025 INSC 966) 1....
“No Certified Copy, No Appeal” – The Supreme Court’s Strict View on Limitation in IBC Appeals (Ashdan v. DSK, 2025)

“No Certified Copy, No Appeal” – The Supreme Court’s Strict View on Limitation in IBC Appeals (Ashdan v. DSK, 2025)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
“No Certified Copy, No Appeal” – The Supreme Court’s Strict View on Limitation in IBC Appeals Ashdan Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. DSK Global Education & Research Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (2025 INSC 959) 1....
“Constitution-Bench Compulsion for Article 233(2) Questions” – Commentary on Rejanish K.V v. K. Deepa (2025 INSC 965)

“Constitution-Bench Compulsion for Article 233(2) Questions” – Commentary on Rejanish K.V v. K. Deepa (2025 INSC 965)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Constitution-Bench Compulsion for Article 233(2) Questions: A Detailed Commentary on Rejanish K.V v. K. Deepa (2025 INSC 965) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Rejanish K.V v. K. Deepa...
Mere Acceptance Is Not Enough – The “Karunanithi Principle” on Demand, Acceptance & Abetment under the P.C. Act

Mere Acceptance Is Not Enough – The “Karunanithi Principle” on Demand, Acceptance & Abetment under the P.C. Act

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Mere Acceptance Is Not Enough – The “Karunanithi Principle” on Demand, Acceptance & Abetment under the P.C. Act 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in A. Karunanithi v. State represented by...
Port Tariff Disputes, Expert Determination and the Supreme Court’s Call for a Specialised Appellate Tribunal – A Commentary on Paradip Port Authority v. Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. (2025 INSC 971)

Port Tariff Disputes, Expert Determination and the Supreme Court’s Call for a Specialised Appellate Tribunal – A Commentary on Paradip Port Authority v. Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. (2025 INSC 971)

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Port Tariff Disputes, Expert Determination and the Supreme Court’s Call for a Specialised Appellate Tribunal – Commentary on Paradip Port Authority v. Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. (2025 INSC 971) Court:...
Custodial Conspiracy without Overt Act – Supreme Court Tightens Accountability of Jail Officials: A Commentary on Gurdeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2025 INSC 957)

Custodial Conspiracy without Overt Act – Supreme Court Tightens Accountability of Jail Officials: A Commentary on Gurdeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2025 INSC 957)

Date: Aug 12, 2025
Custodial Conspiracy without Overt Act – Supreme Court Tightens Accountability of Jail Officials A Detailed Commentary on Gurdeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2025 INSC 957) 1. Introduction The Supreme...
“No Pleadings, No Possession” – Supreme Court Re-affirms that Adverse Possession Must Be Specifically Pleaded before it can be Adjudicated

“No Pleadings, No Possession” – Supreme Court Re-affirms that Adverse Possession Must Be Specifically Pleaded before it can be Adjudicated

Date: Aug 12, 2025
“No Pleadings, No Possession” – Supreme Court Re-affirms that Adverse Possession Must Be Specifically Pleaded before it can be Adjudicated 1. Introduction Kishundeo Rout v. Govind Rao (2025 INSC 956)...
The “Arshnoor Doctrine”: Supreme Court of India Mandates Merit-Based, Gender-Neutral Intake in the Army JAG Branch

The “Arshnoor Doctrine”: Supreme Court of India Mandates Merit-Based, Gender-Neutral Intake in the Army JAG Branch

Date: Aug 12, 2025
The “Arshnoor Doctrine”: Supreme Court of India Mandates Merit-Based, Gender-Neutral Intake in the Army JAG Branch 1. Introduction In Arshnoor Kaur v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 954, the Supreme Court...
“Paramount Duty to the Court”: The N. Peddi Raju Contempt Ruling and the New Protocol for Apologising to High-Court Judges

“Paramount Duty to the Court”: The N. Peddi Raju Contempt Ruling and the New Protocol for Apologising to High-Court Judges

Date: Aug 12, 2025
“Paramount Duty to the Court”: The N. Peddi Raju Contempt Ruling and the New Protocol for Apologising to High-Court Judges 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in In Re: N. Peddi Raju (2025...
Extending “Future Prospects” to Self-Employed Foreign Nationals – Commentary on Kulwinder Kaur v. Parshant Sharma (2025 INSC 950)

Extending “Future Prospects” to Self-Employed Foreign Nationals – Commentary on Kulwinder Kaur v. Parshant Sharma (2025 INSC 950)

Date: Aug 9, 2025
Extending “Future Prospects” to Self-Employed Foreign Nationals A Detailed Commentary on Kulwinder Kaur & Ors. v. Parshant Sharma & Anr. (2025 INSC 950) Court: Supreme Court of India | Date of...
Supreme Court Re-affirms Insurer’s Liability when Vehicle Possession Alone is Transferred: Brij Bihari Gupta v. Manmet (2025)

Supreme Court Re-affirms Insurer’s Liability when Vehicle Possession Alone is Transferred: Brij Bihari Gupta v. Manmet (2025)

Date: Aug 9, 2025
Insurer’s Indemnity Prevails Despite Unregistered Transfer of Possession – Clarifying Section 147 MV Act 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Brij Bihari Gupta v. Manmet & Ors., 2025 INSC...
Refining the “Pay-and-Recover” Doctrine: The Principle of Irretrievable Partial Disbursement –  A Commentary on National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunita Devi (2025)

Refining the “Pay-and-Recover” Doctrine: The Principle of Irretrievable Partial Disbursement – A Commentary on National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunita Devi (2025)

Date: Aug 9, 2025
Refining the “Pay-and-Recover” Doctrine: The Principle of Irretrievable Partial Disbursement – Commentary on National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunita Devi & Ors. (2025 INSC 951) 1. Introduction The...
Clarifying the Clock: Supreme Court Defines the Relationship between Section 144C & Section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Clarifying the Clock: Supreme Court Defines the Relationship between Section 144C & Section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Clarifying the Clock: Supreme Court Defines the Relationship between Section 144C & Section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Introduction In Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Intl. Taxation) &...
XXX v. Union of India (2025): Supreme Court Confirms Legal Sanction of the “In-House” Judicial Discipline Procedure and the Chief Justice of India’s Reporting Power

XXX v. Union of India (2025): Supreme Court Confirms Legal Sanction of the “In-House” Judicial Discipline Procedure and the Chief Justice of India’s Reporting Power

Date: Aug 8, 2025
XXX v. Union of India (2025): Supreme Court Confirms Legal Sanction of the “In-House” Judicial Discipline Procedure and the Chief Justice of India’s Reporting Power 1. Introduction On 7 August 2025...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert