Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“Meaningful Appeals, Not Illusory Rights” – Supreme Court Re-affirms the Liberal Approach to Suspending Fixed-Term Sentences Pending Appeal (Aasif @ Pasha v. State of U.P., 2025)

“Meaningful Appeals, Not Illusory Rights” – Supreme Court Re-affirms the Liberal Approach to Suspending Fixed-Term Sentences Pending Appeal (Aasif @ Pasha v. State of U.P., 2025)

Date: Aug 8, 2025
“Meaningful Appeals, Not Illusory Rights” – Supreme Court Re-affirms the Liberal Approach to Suspending Fixed-Term Sentences Pending Appeal Aasif @ Pasha v. State of U.P. (2025 INSC 944) 1....
Sanctioned Tariff Concessions Cannot Be Withdrawn After Implementation: Supreme Court reinforces administrative fairness in power-supply incentives

Sanctioned Tariff Concessions Cannot Be Withdrawn After Implementation: Supreme Court reinforces administrative fairness in power-supply incentives

Date: Aug 8, 2025
Sanctioned Tariff Concessions Cannot Be Withdrawn After Implementation: Supreme Court reinforces administrative fairness in power-supply incentives Case Comment on Edcons (MKS) Castings Pvt. Ltd. v....
Jamnalal v. State of Rajasthan (2025): Supreme Court Tightens Standards for Suspension of Sentence under §389 CrPC in Heinous-Crime Appeals

Jamnalal v. State of Rajasthan (2025): Supreme Court Tightens Standards for Suspension of Sentence under §389 CrPC in Heinous-Crime Appeals

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Jamnalal v. State of Rajasthan (2025): Supreme Court Tightens Standards for Suspension of Sentence under §389 CrPC in Heinous-Crime Appeals 1. Introduction Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: B.V....
“Re-affirming the Panchsheel of Circumstantial Evidence” – A Supreme Court Mandate on Solitary-Witness Reliability

“Re-affirming the Panchsheel of Circumstantial Evidence” – A Supreme Court Mandate on Solitary-Witness Reliability

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“Re-affirming the Panchsheel of Circumstantial Evidence” – Supreme Court’s Clarion Call for Rigorous Scrutiny of Solitary Witness Testimony in Shail Kumari v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025) 1....
“Regulatory Asset Ceiling & Rapid-Liquidation Doctrine” – A Comment on BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. DERC (2025 INSC 937)

“Regulatory Asset Ceiling & Rapid-Liquidation Doctrine” – A Comment on BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. DERC (2025 INSC 937)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“Regulatory Asset Ceiling & Rapid-Liquidation Doctrine” Commentary on Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2025 INSC 937, decided on 06 Aug...

        Conditional Dissolution under Article 142 and Quashing of Vexatious 498-A
        Proceedings: A Commentary on Anurag Vijaykumar Goel v. State of Maharashtra
        (2025 INSC 926)

Conditional Dissolution under Article 142 and Quashing of Vexatious 498-A Proceedings: A Commentary on Anurag Vijaykumar Goel v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 926)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Conditional Dissolution under Article 142 and Quashing of Vexatious 498-A Proceedings: An Exhaustive Commentary on Anurag Vijaykumar Goel v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2025 INSC 926) 1....
Voluntary-Surrender Exception to the IBC Moratorium: Commentary on Sincere Securities Pvt. Ltd. v. Chandrakant Khemka (2025 INSC 931)

Voluntary-Surrender Exception to the IBC Moratorium: Commentary on Sincere Securities Pvt. Ltd. v. Chandrakant Khemka (2025 INSC 931)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Voluntary-Surrender Exception to the IBC Moratorium Commentary on Sincere Securities Private Limited v. Chandrakant Khemka (2025 INSC 931) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Sincere...
Constructive Trusts & Registered Societies: Supreme Court Opens the Door for Section 92 CPC Suits – A Commentary on Operation ASHA v. Shelly Batra (2025 INSC 932)

Constructive Trusts & Registered Societies: Supreme Court Opens the Door for Section 92 CPC Suits – A Commentary on Operation ASHA v. Shelly Batra (2025 INSC 932)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Constructive Trusts & Registered Societies: Supreme Court Opens the Door for Section 92 CPC Suits A Comprehensive Commentary on Operation ASHA v. Shelly Batra (2025 INSC 932) I. Introduction The...
Confessional FIRs & Evidentiary Boundaries: The Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in Narayan Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Confessional FIRs & Evidentiary Boundaries: The Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in Narayan Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Confessional FIRs & Evidentiary Boundaries: Narayan Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 927) 1. Introduction The judgment delivered on 5 August 2025 by the Supreme Court of India in Narayan...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 193 CrPC – Sessions Court’s Power to Summon Additional Accused at the Committal Stage

Clarifying the Scope of Section 193 CrPC – Sessions Court’s Power to Summon Additional Accused at the Committal Stage

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Clarifying the Scope of Section 193 CrPC – Sessions Court’s Power to Summon Additional Accused at the Committal Stage 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment in Kallu Nat alias Mayank Kumar...
Primacy of Victim’s Testimony Over Medical Corroboration in POCSO Cases – Comment on Deepak Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 929)

Primacy of Victim’s Testimony Over Medical Corroboration in POCSO Cases – Comment on Deepak Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 929)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Primacy of Victim’s Testimony Over Medical Corroboration in POCSO Cases – Deepak Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 929) 1. Introduction Deepak Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh...
“Beyond Allegations of Fraud” – The Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of a Referral-Court’s Narrow Mandate under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

“Beyond Allegations of Fraud” – The Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of a Referral-Court’s Narrow Mandate under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“Beyond Allegations of Fraud” – The Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of a Referral-Court’s Narrow Mandate under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 1. Introduction The decision...
Apeejay School v. Dhriti Duggal (2025): Re-affirming Civil Court Jurisdiction in Private School Fee Recovery Disputes

Apeejay School v. Dhriti Duggal (2025): Re-affirming Civil Court Jurisdiction in Private School Fee Recovery Disputes

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Apeejay School v. Dhriti Duggal (2025): Re-affirming Civil Court Jurisdiction in Private School Fee Recovery Disputes 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Apeejay School v. Dhriti Duggal &...
“OSFC-Vigyan Chemicals” – The Supreme Court Re-Defines (i) The Mandatory Nature of Section 80 CPC Notice, (ii) The Limited Post-Take-Over Liability of State Financial Corporations under Section 29 SFC Act, and (iii) The Prospective-Only Reach of the 1993 Delayed-Payments Act

“OSFC-Vigyan Chemicals” – The Supreme Court Re-Defines (i) The Mandatory Nature of Section 80 CPC Notice, (ii) The Limited Post-Take-Over Liability of State Financial Corporations under Section 29 SFC Act, and (iii) The Prospective-Only Reach of the 1993 Delayed-Payments Act

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“OSFC v. Vigyan Chemicals” (2025) – A Triple Marker Judgment on Section 80 CPC Notice, State Financial Corporation Liability & Prospective Operation of the 1993 Delayed-Payments Act 1. Introduction...
Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana (2025) – Supreme Court Mandates Suo Motu Acquittal of Non-Appealing Co-Accused When Evidence Fails

Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana (2025) – Supreme Court Mandates Suo Motu Acquittal of Non-Appealing Co-Accused When Evidence Fails

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana (2025 INSC 987) Supreme Court Mandates Suo Motu Acquittal of Non-Appealing Co-Accused When Evidence Fails Introduction The decision in Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana...
“Naming Welfare Schemes after Living Political Leaders is Not Per Se Illegal” – Commentary on Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam v. C. Ve. Shanmugam (2025 INSC 976)

“Naming Welfare Schemes after Living Political Leaders is Not Per Se Illegal” – Commentary on Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam v. C. Ve. Shanmugam (2025 INSC 976)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
“Naming Welfare Schemes after Living Political Leaders is Not Per Se Illegal” A Detailed Commentary on Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam v. C. Ve. Shanmugam, 2025 INSC 976 1. Introduction In Dravida Munnetra...
Dignity-Centric Mobility and Eco-Sensitive Infrastructure: Supreme Court outlaws hand‑pulled rickshaws in Matheran, mandates clay pavers and a State-run e‑rickshaw rehabilitation model

Dignity-Centric Mobility and Eco-Sensitive Infrastructure: Supreme Court outlaws hand‑pulled rickshaws in Matheran, mandates clay pavers and a State-run e‑rickshaw rehabilitation model

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Dignity-Centric Mobility and Eco-Sensitive Infrastructure: Supreme Court outlaws hand‑pulled rickshaws in Matheran, mandates clay pavers and a State-run e‑rickshaw rehabilitation model Introduction...
SEIAA Empowerment & Mandatory EIA for Large Industrial/Educational Constructions: Commentary on Vanashakti v. Union of India (2025)

SEIAA Empowerment & Mandatory EIA for Large Industrial/Educational Constructions: Commentary on Vanashakti v. Union of India (2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
SEIAA Empowerment & Mandatory EIA for Large Industrial/Educational Constructions: Supreme Court’s Clarificatory Ruling in Vanashakti v. Union of India (2025 INSC 961) 1. Introduction Vanashakti v....
No Clubbing of NDPS Quantities Absent Proven Conspiracy; Cumulative Non‑Compliance with Standing Order 1/1989 and Section 52A Can Vitiate Seizure and FSL Evidence — Commentary on Nadeem Ahamed v. State of West Bengal (2025 INSC 993)

No Clubbing of NDPS Quantities Absent Proven Conspiracy; Cumulative Non‑Compliance with Standing Order 1/1989 and Section 52A Can Vitiate Seizure and FSL Evidence — Commentary on Nadeem Ahamed v. State of West Bengal (2025 INSC 993)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
No Clubbing of NDPS Quantities Absent Proven Conspiracy; Cumulative Non‑Compliance with Standing Order 1/1989 and Section 52A Can Vitiate Seizure and FSL Evidence Case: Nadeem Ahamed v. The State of...
Restitutionary Powers of Pollution Control Boards Clarified: Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in D.P.C.C. v. Lodhi Property Co. Ltd.

Restitutionary Powers of Pollution Control Boards Clarified: Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in D.P.C.C. v. Lodhi Property Co. Ltd.

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Restitutionary Powers of Pollution Control Boards Clarified: Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in D.P.C.C. v. Lodhi Property Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 923) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in its...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert