Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Freedom to Seek Re-determination of Tariff by Renewable Generators Absent an Accelerated-Depreciation Commitment

Freedom to Seek Re-determination of Tariff by Renewable Generators Absent an Accelerated-Depreciation Commitment

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Freedom to Seek Re-determination of Tariff by Renewable Generators Absent an Accelerated-Depreciation Commitment 1. Introduction Case: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Green Infra Corporate Wind...

        “The Joseph Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Alternate Employment 
        for Colour-Blind Drivers under Binding Industrial Settlements

“The Joseph Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Alternate Employment for Colour-Blind Drivers under Binding Industrial Settlements

Date: Aug 4, 2025
“The Joseph Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Alternate Employment for Colour-Blind Drivers under Binding Industrial Settlements 1. Introduction In Ch. Joseph v. Telangana State Road Transport...

        Supreme Court Tightens Juvenility Determination: Priority to Public Records & Medical Opinion over School Certificates

Supreme Court Tightens Juvenility Determination: Priority to Public Records & Medical Opinion over School Certificates

Date: Aug 4, 2025
Supreme Court Tightens Juvenility Determination: Priority to Public Records & Medical Opinion over School Certificates Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in Suresh v. State of Uttar Pradesh...
Expanding “No-Fault” Liability: Supreme Court Questions Owner-Driver Exclusion under Section 163A

Expanding “No-Fault” Liability: Supreme Court Questions Owner-Driver Exclusion under Section 163A

Date: Aug 4, 2025
Expanding “No-Fault” Liability: Supreme Court Questions Owner-Driver Exclusion under Section 163A Introduction Case: Wakia Afrin (Minor) v. M/s National Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 919) Court:...
“Civil Dispute in Criminal Garb” Doctrine Re-affirmed: Supreme Court fortifies High Courts’ duty to quash abusive prosecutions – Comment on Urmila Devi v. Balram (2025 INSC 915)

“Civil Dispute in Criminal Garb” Doctrine Re-affirmed: Supreme Court fortifies High Courts’ duty to quash abusive prosecutions – Comment on Urmila Devi v. Balram (2025 INSC 915)

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“Civil Dispute in Criminal Garb” Doctrine Re-affirmed: Supreme Court fortifies High Courts’ duty to quash abusive prosecutions – Comment on Urmila Devi & Ors. v. Balram & Anr. (2025 INSC 915) I....
Affidavit‐Compliance under Section 156(3) CrPC Clarified as a “Mandatory-but-Curable” Requirement – Commentary on S.N. Vijayalakshmi v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 917)

Affidavit‐Compliance under Section 156(3) CrPC Clarified as a “Mandatory-but-Curable” Requirement – Commentary on S.N. Vijayalakshmi v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 917)

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Affidavit-Compliance under Section 156(3) CrPC Clarified as a “Mandatory-but-Curable” Requirement Commentary on S.N. Vijayalakshmi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr., 2025 INSC 917 I. Introduction...
“Re-affirming Bhajan Lal: Peaceful Protest, Election Code and the Limits of Criminalisation – Commentary on Manchu Mohan Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025)

“Re-affirming Bhajan Lal: Peaceful Protest, Election Code and the Limits of Criminalisation – Commentary on Manchu Mohan Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025)

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Re-affirming Bhajan Lal: Peaceful Protest, the Model Code of Conduct and the Limits of Criminalisation – A Comprehensive Commentary on Manchu Mohan Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025 INSC 916)...
Interference with Anticipatory Bail Does Not Presume Arrest: SC’s BNSS 2023 Clarification and Caution Against Merits-Based Orders

Interference with Anticipatory Bail Does Not Presume Arrest: SC’s BNSS 2023 Clarification and Caution Against Merits-Based Orders

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Interference with Anticipatory Bail Does Not Presume Arrest: SC’s BNSS 2023 Clarification and Caution Against Merits-Based Orders Introduction In The State of Andhra Pradesh v. N. Sanjay (2025 INSC...
“Right to Prefer” Means “Right to Prosecute”: Legal Heirs of Victims Can Continue Criminal Appeals under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC; Section 394 Abatement Inapplicable

“Right to Prefer” Means “Right to Prosecute”: Legal Heirs of Victims Can Continue Criminal Appeals under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC; Section 394 Abatement Inapplicable

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“Right to Prefer” Means “Right to Prosecute”: Legal Heirs of Victims Can Continue Criminal Appeals under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC; Section 394 Abatement Inapplicable Introduction In Khem Singh...
Supreme Court Outlaws Monetary-Deposit Conditions in Bail Orders – Commentary on Gajanan Dattatray Gore v. State of Maharashtra (2025)

Supreme Court Outlaws Monetary-Deposit Conditions in Bail Orders – Commentary on Gajanan Dattatray Gore v. State of Maharashtra (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“No Bail on Deposit” – The New Mandate from the Supreme Court of India Introduction The judgment in Gajanan Dattatray Gore v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2025 INSC 913) marks a watershed moment...
“From Deference to Deadlines” – The Supreme Court’s New Mandate on Timely Disposal of Defection Petitions

“From Deference to Deadlines” – The Supreme Court’s New Mandate on Timely Disposal of Defection Petitions

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“From Deference to Deadlines” The Precedent of Padi Kaushik Reddy v. State of Telangana (2025 INSC 912) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India in Padi Kaushik Reddy v. State of Telangana has...
“Unnamed but Acknowledged” – Supreme Court Clarifies that Generic Balance-Sheet Entries Can Extend Limitation under IBC & COVID-19 Suspension Orders (IL & FS v. Adhunik Meghalaya Steels, 2025)

“Unnamed but Acknowledged” – Supreme Court Clarifies that Generic Balance-Sheet Entries Can Extend Limitation under IBC & COVID-19 Suspension Orders (IL & FS v. Adhunik Meghalaya Steels, 2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Unnamed but Acknowledged” – Supreme Court Clarifies that Generic Balance-Sheet Entries Can Extend Limitation under IBC & COVID-19 Suspension Orders IL & FS Financial Services Ltd. v. Adhunik...
Informant-Cum-Investigator Not a Per Se Ground for Acquittal; Current Law Applies to Pending Appeals — State of Punjab v. Gurnam @ Gama (2025 INSC 960)

Informant-Cum-Investigator Not a Per Se Ground for Acquittal; Current Law Applies to Pending Appeals — State of Punjab v. Gurnam @ Gama (2025 INSC 960)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Informant-Cum-Investigator Not a Per Se Ground for Acquittal; Current Law Applies to Pending Appeals — State of Punjab v. Gurnam @ Gama (2025 INSC 960) Introduction In State of Punjab v. Gurnam @...
Primacy of 2014 Government Guidelines and Natural Justice in Ex‑Servicemen Pay Re‑Fixation: Commentary on Mukund K. Pai v. Punjab National Bank (2025 INSC 1033)

Primacy of 2014 Government Guidelines and Natural Justice in Ex‑Servicemen Pay Re‑Fixation: Commentary on Mukund K. Pai v. Punjab National Bank (2025 INSC 1033)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Primacy of 2014 Government Guidelines and Natural Justice in Ex‑Servicemen Pay Re‑Fixation Case: Mukund K. Pai & Ors. v. Punjab National Bank & Ors., 2025 INSC 1033 (Supreme Court of India, 30 July...
Quashing Post‑Divorce Matrimonial Prosecutions on the Strength of Lok Adalat Settlement: Supreme Court’s Article 142 Framework and Curb on Indiscriminate Prosecution of In‑Laws

Quashing Post‑Divorce Matrimonial Prosecutions on the Strength of Lok Adalat Settlement: Supreme Court’s Article 142 Framework and Curb on Indiscriminate Prosecution of In‑Laws

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Quashing Post‑Divorce Matrimonial Prosecutions on the Strength of Lok Adalat Settlement: Supreme Court’s Article 142 Framework and Curb on Indiscriminate Prosecution of In‑Laws Introduction This...
Statutory Arbitration Trumps Contractual Clause: Exclusive Jurisdiction of the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal in Works-Contract Disputes – A Commentary on Umri Pooph Pratappur (UPP) Tollways Pvt. Ltd. v. M.P. Road Development Corporation (2025 INSC 907)

Statutory Arbitration Trumps Contractual Clause: Exclusive Jurisdiction of the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal in Works-Contract Disputes – A Commentary on Umri Pooph Pratappur (UPP) Tollways Pvt. Ltd. v. M.P. Road Development Corporation (2025 INSC 907)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Statutory Arbitration Trumps Contractual Clause: Exclusive Jurisdiction of the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal in Works-Contract Disputes Commentary on Umri Pooph Pratappur (UPP) Tollways Pvt. Ltd. v. M.P....
Doctrine of Anti-Parochial Classification in Service Benefits – Commentary on Subha Prasad Nandi Majumdar v. State of West Bengal (2025)

Doctrine of Anti-Parochial Classification in Service Benefits – Commentary on Subha Prasad Nandi Majumdar v. State of West Bengal (2025)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Doctrine of Anti-Parochial Classification in Service Benefits: Supreme Court affirms nation-wide portability of teaching experience for retirement benefits 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s...
Elevating Notional Income for Student Victims & Refined Liability Apportionment – A Commentary on S. Mohammed Hakkim v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 905)

Elevating Notional Income for Student Victims & Refined Liability Apportionment – A Commentary on S. Mohammed Hakkim v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 905)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Elevating Notional Income for Student Victims & Refined Liability Apportionment Comprehensive Commentary on S. Mohammed Hakkim v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025 INSC 905) 1. Introduction The...
“Commuting-Accident Doctrine” Under the Employees’ Compensation Act: Supreme Court Integrates Section 51E Logic Into EC Act

“Commuting-Accident Doctrine” Under the Employees’ Compensation Act: Supreme Court Integrates Section 51E Logic Into EC Act

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Commuting-Accident Doctrine” Under the Employees’ Compensation Act: Supreme Court Integrates Section 51E Logic Into EC Act Introduction The decision in Daivshala & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Co....

        “Doctrine of the Highest Bona-Fide Exemplar” Reaffirmed – A Commentary on 
        Manohar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2025) 9 SCC ___

“Doctrine of the Highest Bona-Fide Exemplar” Reaffirmed – A Commentary on Manohar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., (2025) 9 SCC ___

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Doctrine of the Highest Bona-Fide Exemplar” Reaffirmed Comprehensive Commentary on Manohar & Others v. State of Maharashtra & Others (2025 INSC 900, Supreme Court of India, 28 July 2025) 1....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert