Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Twin-Blockades and Conclusive Legitimacy: Supreme Court Restricts Court-Ordered DNA Profiling in Criminal Investigations Absent Non-Access and Direct Nexus to the Offence

Twin-Blockades and Conclusive Legitimacy: Supreme Court Restricts Court-Ordered DNA Profiling in Criminal Investigations Absent Non-Access and Direct Nexus to the Offence

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Twin-Blockades and Conclusive Legitimacy: Supreme Court Restricts Court-Ordered DNA Profiling in Criminal Investigations Absent Non-Access and Direct Nexus to the Offence Introduction In R. Rajendran...
When an Impulsive Stab on a Vital Part Leading to Septicemia Attracts Section 304 Part I, Not Section 302

When an Impulsive Stab on a Vital Part Leading to Septicemia Attracts Section 304 Part I, Not Section 302

Date: Nov 11, 2025
When an Impulsive Stab on a Vital Part Leading to Septicemia Attracts Section 304 Part I, Not Section 302 Introduction The Supreme Court of India in Nandkumar @ Nandu Manilal Mudaliar v. State of...
Unilateral Termination of Non‑Determinable Agreements to Sell: No Declaratory Relief Needed; Constructive Notice Defeats the Bona Fide Purchaser Defence

Unilateral Termination of Non‑Determinable Agreements to Sell: No Declaratory Relief Needed; Constructive Notice Defeats the Bona Fide Purchaser Defence

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Unilateral Termination of Non‑Determinable Agreements to Sell: No Declaratory Relief Needed; Constructive Notice Defeats the Bona Fide Purchaser Defence Introduction In K. S. Manjunath v....
Departmental Exoneration and Jurisdictional Validity of Sanction under Section 19 of the PC Act: Commentary on T. Manjunath v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 1356)

Departmental Exoneration and Jurisdictional Validity of Sanction under Section 19 of the PC Act: Commentary on T. Manjunath v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 1356)

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Departmental Exoneration and Jurisdictional Validity of Sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act: Commentary on T. Manjunath v. State of Karnataka, 2025 INSC 1356 1. Introduction...
Excisability Precedes Valuation: Bought‑out, Site‑Delivered Components Not Includible When the Contract Yields an Immovable Steam‑Generating Plant

Excisability Precedes Valuation: Bought‑out, Site‑Delivered Components Not Includible When the Contract Yields an Immovable Steam‑Generating Plant

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Excisability Precedes Valuation: Bought‑out, Site‑Delivered Components Not Includible When the Contract Yields an Immovable Steam‑Generating Plant Introduction In Lipi Boilers Ltd. v. Commissioner of...
“Issued” Means “Issued and Served”: Supreme Court Reasserts Judicial Discipline and Strict Vesting Preconditions under the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act

“Issued” Means “Issued and Served”: Supreme Court Reasserts Judicial Discipline and Strict Vesting Preconditions under the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Rohan Vijay Nahar v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1296), clarifying that a notice ‘issued’ under Section 35(3) IFA must be served, only ‘live’ pipeline notices can trigger vesting under MPFA,...
Committee‑Led Revival of Stalled Cooperative Housing Projects: Supreme Court Enables Partial Lease Restoration, Pro‑Rata Dues, and Verification Framework in Ravi Prakash Srivastava v. State of U.P. (2025 INSC 1291)

Committee‑Led Revival of Stalled Cooperative Housing Projects: Supreme Court Enables Partial Lease Restoration, Pro‑Rata Dues, and Verification Framework in Ravi Prakash Srivastava v. State of U.P. (2025 INSC 1291)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Committee‑Led Revival of Stalled Cooperative Housing Projects: Supreme Court Enables Partial Lease Restoration, Pro‑Rata Dues, and Verification Framework in Ravi Prakash Srivastava v. State of U.P....
Arbitrators Cannot Override Binding Government Policy: Supreme Court Clarifies Patent Illegality and Contractual Hierarchy in IRCTC v. Brandavan Food Products

Arbitrators Cannot Override Binding Government Policy: Supreme Court Clarifies Patent Illegality and Contractual Hierarchy in IRCTC v. Brandavan Food Products

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Arbitrators Cannot Override Binding Government Policy: Supreme Court Clarifies Patent Illegality and Contractual Hierarchy in IRCTC v. Brandavan Food Products Introduction The Supreme Court of India...
No Mutation Certificate as a Precondition for Registration: Supreme Court invalidates Bihar Rule 19(xvii)-(xviii) and charts a path toward conclusive titling

No Mutation Certificate as a Precondition for Registration: Supreme Court invalidates Bihar Rule 19(xvii)-(xviii) and charts a path toward conclusive titling

Date: Nov 8, 2025
No Mutation Certificate as a Precondition for Registration: Supreme Court invalidates Bihar Rule 19(xvii)-(xviii) and charts a path toward conclusive titling Case: Samiullah v. The State of Bihar &...
“Previous Financial Year” in Tender Compliance Means the Latest Year with a Return Due as on Bid Date: Supreme Court Aligns Tender Interpretation with Income-Tax Timelines and Public Trust in Natural Resource Auctions

“Previous Financial Year” in Tender Compliance Means the Latest Year with a Return Due as on Bid Date: Supreme Court Aligns Tender Interpretation with Income-Tax Timelines and Public Trust in Natural Resource Auctions

Date: Nov 8, 2025
“Previous Financial Year” in Tender Compliance Means the Latest Year with a Return Due as on Bid Date: Supreme Court Aligns Tender Interpretation with Income-Tax Timelines and Public Trust in Natural...
No Split Multiplier Under the MV Act: Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Age-Based Multiplier and Triennial Enhancement of Conventional Heads

No Split Multiplier Under the MV Act: Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Age-Based Multiplier and Triennial Enhancement of Conventional Heads

Date: Nov 8, 2025
No Split Multiplier Under the MV Act: Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Age-Based Multiplier and Triennial Enhancement of Conventional Heads Introduction In Preetha Krishnan & Ors. v. The United India...
No Mini-Trial at the Quashing Stage: Omission of Specific Incidents in Pre-FIR Complaints Cannot Ground Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC

No Mini-Trial at the Quashing Stage: Omission of Specific Incidents in Pre-FIR Complaints Cannot Ground Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No Mini-Trial at the Quashing Stage: Omission of Specific Incidents in Pre-FIR Complaints Cannot Ground Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC Case: Muskan v. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and Others Citation:...
The Two-Hour Rule and Written Grounds of Arrest: Supreme Court’s Pan-Statutory Framework under Article 22(1)

The Two-Hour Rule and Written Grounds of Arrest: Supreme Court’s Pan-Statutory Framework under Article 22(1)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
The Two-Hour Rule and Written Grounds of Arrest: A Pan-Statutory Framework under Article 22(1) Introduction In a landmark judgment in Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Another (2025 INSC...
Who Can Appeal an Acquittal in a CBI Case? Supreme Court Reaffirms Central Government’s Exclusive Locus Under Section 378(2) CrPC and Sets a Liberal Standard for Condoning CBI Delays; Victim’s Appeal Held Prospective

Who Can Appeal an Acquittal in a CBI Case? Supreme Court Reaffirms Central Government’s Exclusive Locus Under Section 378(2) CrPC and Sets a Liberal Standard for Condoning CBI Delays; Victim’s Appeal Held Prospective

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Who Can Appeal an Acquittal in a CBI Case? Supreme Court Reaffirms Central Government’s Exclusive Locus Under Section 378(2) CrPC and Sets a Liberal Standard for Condoning CBI Delays; Victim’s Appeal...
“Arbitration” in Name Is Not Arbitration in Law: Supreme Court holds internal, non‑final processes do not meet Section 7; post‑notice correspondence cannot cure the absence of an arbitration agreement

“Arbitration” in Name Is Not Arbitration in Law: Supreme Court holds internal, non‑final processes do not meet Section 7; post‑notice correspondence cannot cure the absence of an arbitration agreement

Date: Nov 7, 2025
“Arbitration” in Name Is Not Arbitration in Law: Supreme Court holds internal, non‑final processes do not meet Section 7; post‑notice correspondence cannot cure the absence of an arbitration...
Non‑Disclosure of Criminal Conviction in Nomination Affidavit Is Presumptively Fatal; Subsequent Acquittal Irrelevant — Poonam v. Dule Singh (2025 INSC 1284)

Non‑Disclosure of Criminal Conviction in Nomination Affidavit Is Presumptively Fatal; Subsequent Acquittal Irrelevant — Poonam v. Dule Singh (2025 INSC 1284)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Non‑Disclosure of Criminal Conviction in Nomination Affidavit Is Presumptively Fatal; Subsequent Acquittal Irrelevant — Poonam v. Dule Singh (2025 INSC 1284) Introduction In Poonam v. Dule Singh &...
Nullity of Appellate Decrees Passed After Death of All Appellants: Trial Decree Remains Executable Despite “Merger” — Vikram Bhalchandra Ghongade v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1283)

Nullity of Appellate Decrees Passed After Death of All Appellants: Trial Decree Remains Executable Despite “Merger” — Vikram Bhalchandra Ghongade v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 1283)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Nullity of Appellate Decrees Passed After Death of All Appellants: Trial Decree Remains Executable Despite “Merger” Case: Vikram Bhalchandra Ghongade v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2025 INSC...
Registered Release Self‑Operative; Unregistered Palupatti Admissible for Collateral Proof of Severance; Pre‑2004 Disruption Freezes Coparcenary Claims — Commentary on P. Anjanappa (D) by LRs v. A.P. Nanjundappa, 2025 INSC 1286

Registered Release Self‑Operative; Unregistered Palupatti Admissible for Collateral Proof of Severance; Pre‑2004 Disruption Freezes Coparcenary Claims — Commentary on P. Anjanappa (D) by LRs v. A.P. Nanjundappa, 2025 INSC 1286

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Registered Release Self‑Operative; Unregistered Palupatti Admissible for Collateral Proof of Severance; Pre‑2004 Disruption Freezes Coparcenary Claims — Supreme Court in P. Anjanappa (D) by LRs v....
Mixed-Use Is Enabling, Not Mandatory: Supreme Court affirms right to reconstruct purely residential houses on notified mixed-use streets under MPD‑2021

Mixed-Use Is Enabling, Not Mandatory: Supreme Court affirms right to reconstruct purely residential houses on notified mixed-use streets under MPD‑2021

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Mixed-Use Is Enabling, Not Mandatory: Supreme Court affirms right to reconstruct purely residential houses on notified mixed-use streets under MPD‑2021 Case: South Delhi Municipal Corporation through...
Substance Over Semantics in Section 156(3) CrPC: Supreme Court Restores FIR and Limits Premature Quashing under Section 482 — Commentary on Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 1282)

Substance Over Semantics in Section 156(3) CrPC: Supreme Court Restores FIR and Limits Premature Quashing under Section 482 — Commentary on Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 1282)

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Substance Over Semantics in Section 156(3) CrPC: Supreme Court Restores FIR and Limits Premature Quashing under Section 482 — Commentary on Sadiq B. Hanchinmani v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 1282)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert