Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading

Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Anonymous Tips Are Not Enough: Seventh Circuit Tightens Qualified Immunity Where Officers Fail to Corroborate Animal-Neglect Allegations and Clarifies Federal Malicious Prosecution Pleading...
Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity (Jackson v. Anastacio)

Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity (Jackson v. Anastacio)

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Short Terms, Harsh Conditions: Seventh Circuit Holds That Three Months of Solitary in “Disgusting” Conditions Implicates a Liberty Interest, Yet Affirms on Qualified Immunity Introduction This...
Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims

Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Ortiz and McDonnell Douglas Reconciled: Comparator Pay Proof Is Essential in Title VII Pay-Disparity Claims Introduction In Frankie Nelson v. County of Cook (No. 24-2123), the Seventh Circuit...
Persistent Cyber-Security Threats as “Emergencies” under 49 U.S.C. §114(l)(2): A Commentary on Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA

Persistent Cyber-Security Threats as “Emergencies” under 49 U.S.C. §114(l)(2): A Commentary on Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Persistent Cyber-Security Threats as “Emergencies” under 49 U.S.C. §114(l)(2): Commentary on Grand Trunk Corporation & Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. TSA, 7th Cir. (2025) 1. Introduction The...
“Perpetual Emergencies” and Agency Power: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA and the Recognition of Continuous Cyber-Threats as Statutory Emergencies

“Perpetual Emergencies” and Agency Power: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA and the Recognition of Continuous Cyber-Threats as Statutory Emergencies

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Perpetual Emergencies” and Agency Power: Grand Trunk Corporation v. Transportation Security Administration Introduction Grand Trunk Corporation and its subsidiary, Illinois Central Railroad Company...
“Ever-Present Emergencies”: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA Confirms that Continuous Cyber-Threats Qualify as Emergencies under 49 U.S.C. § 114(l)(2)

“Ever-Present Emergencies”: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA Confirms that Continuous Cyber-Threats Qualify as Emergencies under 49 U.S.C. § 114(l)(2)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Ever-Present Emergencies”: Grand Trunk Corp. v. TSA Confirms that Continuous Cyber-Threats Qualify as Emergencies under 49 U.S.C. § 114(l)(2) 1 · Introduction Grand Trunk Corporation and its...
Off-Duty, Personal-Social-Media Threats Can Violate 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B): Commentary on United States v. Damon Taylor (7th Cir. 2025)

Off-Duty, Personal-Social-Media Threats Can Violate 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B): Commentary on United States v. Damon Taylor (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Off-Duty, Personal-Social-Media Threats Can Violate 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B) Commentary on United States v. Damon Taylor, 89 F.4th ___ (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Damon Taylor,...
Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms “Spoofing = Fraud” — United States v. Gregg Smith et al. (2025)

Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms “Spoofing = Fraud” — United States v. Gregg Smith et al. (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms “Spoofing = Fraud” United States v. Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak & Christopher Jordan (2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Gregg Smith, Nos. 23-2840, 23-2846 & 23-2849,...
“Spoofing” as a Stand-Alone Scheme to Defraud: A Commentary on United States v. Gregg Smith et al., 7th Cir. 2025

“Spoofing” as a Stand-Alone Scheme to Defraud: A Commentary on United States v. Gregg Smith et al., 7th Cir. 2025

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Spoofing” as a Stand-Alone Scheme to Defraud: United States v. Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak & Christopher Jordan, Seventh Circuit 2025 Introduction United States v. Gregg Smith consolidates three...
“Spoofing Equals Fraud” – The Seventh Circuit’s Definitive Pronouncement in United States v. Smith (2025)

“Spoofing Equals Fraud” – The Seventh Circuit’s Definitive Pronouncement in United States v. Smith (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Spoofing Equals Fraud” – The Seventh Circuit’s Definitive Pronouncement in United States v. Gregg Smith (2025) Introduction In United States v. Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak & Christopher Jordan, Nos....

        Seventh Circuit Clarifies that § 2260A Applies Even When the “Minor” Is an Undercover Agent:
        Christopher v. United States (2025)

Seventh Circuit Clarifies that § 2260A Applies Even When the “Minor” Is an Undercover Agent: Christopher v. United States (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Involving a Minor” Encompasses Fictitious Minors Under § 2260A: A Comprehensive Commentary on Charles W. Christopher v. United States, 23-2976 (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Charles W. Christopher,...
Harley-Davidson Warranty Litigation: Seventh Circuit Narrows Magnuson-Moss Anti-Tying Reach and Reinforces Rigorous Market-Definition Standards

Harley-Davidson Warranty Litigation: Seventh Circuit Narrows Magnuson-Moss Anti-Tying Reach and Reinforces Rigorous Market-Definition Standards

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Harley-Davidson Warranty Litigation: Seventh Circuit Narrows Magnuson-Moss Anti-Tying Reach and Reinforces Rigorous Market-Definition Standards 1. Introduction On 15 August 2025 the United States...
“The Recency Rule” in Asylum Adjudication: A Commentary on Martinez-Martinez v. Bondi

“The Recency Rule” in Asylum Adjudication: A Commentary on Martinez-Martinez v. Bondi

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“The Recency Rule” in Asylum Adjudication: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Government-Protection and Internal-Relocation Standards Introduction In Dania Martinez-Martinez v. Pamela J. Bondi, No. 24-3281...
From Tinker to Kuhlmeier: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Student Club Flyers on School Walls Are School-Sponsored Speech — A Commentary on E.D. v. Noblesville School District (2025)

From Tinker to Kuhlmeier: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Student Club Flyers on School Walls Are School-Sponsored Speech — A Commentary on E.D. v. Noblesville School District (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
From Tinker to Hazelwood: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Student Club Flyers on School Walls Are School-Sponsored Speech — A Commentary on E.D. v. Noblesville School District (2025) 1. Introduction...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Findings – Comment on Fidel Santos Mendoza v. Bondi

Seventh Circuit Clarifies Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Findings – Comment on Fidel Santos Mendoza v. Bondi

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Between Substantial-Evidence and Clear-Error” – The Seventh Circuit’s Post-Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Hardship Determinations Introduction Fidel Santos Mendoza, a long-time resident of Indiana...
Refining the Economic-Realities Test: When Hospitals Are Not “Employers” of Contract Physicians – A Commentary on Veerasikku Bommiasamy v. NES Oklahoma, Inc.

Refining the Economic-Realities Test: When Hospitals Are Not “Employers” of Contract Physicians – A Commentary on Veerasikku Bommiasamy v. NES Oklahoma, Inc.

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Refining the Economic-Realities Test: When Hospitals Are Not “Employers” of Contract Physicians Commentary on Veerasikku Bommiasamy v. NES Oklahoma, Inc. (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Seventh...
“Minor Policy Deviations Are Insufficient to Establish Pretext” – The New Threshold Clarified in Wendy Lohmeier v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital

“Minor Policy Deviations Are Insufficient to Establish Pretext” – The New Threshold Clarified in Wendy Lohmeier v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Minor Policy Deviations Are Insufficient to Establish Pretext” – Commentary on the Seventh Circuit’s Decision in Wendy Lohmeier v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief

Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief 1. Introduction Jeffrey Alan Weisheit,...
“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago

“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh

Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh Introduction On 13 August 2025 the Seventh Circuit delivered a significant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert