Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Cohen: False Statements About Another’s Sex‑Offender Registration “Relate To” Sex Offenses for Sentencing Purposes

United States v. Cohen: False Statements About Another’s Sex‑Offender Registration “Relate To” Sex Offenses for Sentencing Purposes

Date: Nov 29, 2025
United States v. Cohen: False Statements About Another’s Sex‑Offender Registration “Relate To” Sex Offenses for Sentencing Purposes I. Introduction In United States v. James A. Cohen, No. 25‑1746...
Professional Judgment, Unknown Risks, and Prison Medical Care: Commentary on Sawyer v. Kottemann (7th Cir. 2025)

Professional Judgment, Unknown Risks, and Prison Medical Care: Commentary on Sawyer v. Kottemann (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 29, 2025
Professional Judgment, Unknown Risks, and Prison Medical Care: A Commentary on Sawyer v. Kottemann (7th Cir. 2025) Note: This commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and does...
Schoeps v. Sompo Holdings: No Federal Common-Law Cause of Action Under the HEAR Act and Narrow Limits on Specific Personal Jurisdiction in Nazi-Looted Art Litigation

Schoeps v. Sompo Holdings: No Federal Common-Law Cause of Action Under the HEAR Act and Narrow Limits on Specific Personal Jurisdiction in Nazi-Looted Art Litigation

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Schoeps v. Sompo Holdings: No Federal Common-Law Cause of Action Under the HEAR Act and Narrow Limits on Specific Personal Jurisdiction in Nazi-Looted Art Litigation I. Introduction This Seventh...
Bostic v. Murray: Clarifying Supervisory Liability and Deliberate Indifference for Subordinate Sexual Misconduct in the Seventh Circuit

Bostic v. Murray: Clarifying Supervisory Liability and Deliberate Indifference for Subordinate Sexual Misconduct in the Seventh Circuit

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Bostic v. Murray: Clarifying Supervisory Liability and Deliberate Indifference for Subordinate Sexual Misconduct in the Seventh Circuit I. Introduction In Lorena E. Bostic v. Clarence D. Murray & Jan...
Gang Recruitment as Generalized Crime: The Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed in Serpas‑Villalobos v. Bondi (7th Cir. 2025)

Gang Recruitment as Generalized Crime: The Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed in Serpas‑Villalobos v. Bondi (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Gang Recruitment as Generalized Crime: The Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed in Serpas‑Villalobos v. Bondi (7th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Seventh Circuit’s nonprecedential...
Reaffirming the Enforceability of Non‑Negotiable Appellate Waivers and the Deference Owed to Below‑Guidelines Sentences: Commentary on United States v. Briana White

Reaffirming the Enforceability of Non‑Negotiable Appellate Waivers and the Deference Owed to Below‑Guidelines Sentences: Commentary on United States v. Briana White

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Reaffirming the Enforceability of Non‑Negotiable Appellate Waivers and the Deference Owed to Below‑Guidelines Sentences: Commentary on United States v. Briana White I. Introduction This commentary...
United States v. Cornelius: Erlinger’s Jury-Fact-Finding Rule Does Not Apply to Advisory Sentencing Guidelines

United States v. Cornelius: Erlinger’s Jury-Fact-Finding Rule Does Not Apply to Advisory Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Nov 23, 2025
United States v. Cornelius: Erlinger’s Jury-Fact-Finding Rule Does Not Apply to Advisory Sentencing Guidelines Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Case: United States v....
No Implied Private Right of Action Under LMRDA § 481(g): Chicago Teachers Union v. Educators for Excellence

No Implied Private Right of Action Under LMRDA § 481(g): Chicago Teachers Union v. Educators for Excellence

Date: Nov 20, 2025
No Implied Private Right of Action Under LMRDA § 481(g): Commentary on Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. Educators for Excellence, Inc. I. Introduction This Seventh Circuit decision addresses a...
Flowers v. Bondi: Enforcing Jurisdictional Limits on Review of Discretionary Immigration Relief

Flowers v. Bondi: Enforcing Jurisdictional Limits on Review of Discretionary Immigration Relief

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Flowers v. Bondi: Enforcing Jurisdictional Limits on Review of Discretionary Immigration Relief I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s nonprecedential order in Jeannette Loretta Flowers v. Pamela J....
Jurisdictional Limits on Reviewing Discretionary Denials of Cancellation of Removal After Patel and Wilkinson: Commentary on Flowers v. Bondi

Jurisdictional Limits on Reviewing Discretionary Denials of Cancellation of Removal After Patel and Wilkinson: Commentary on Flowers v. Bondi

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Jurisdictional Limits on Reviewing Discretionary Denials of Cancellation of Removal After Patel and Wilkinson: Commentary on Flowers v. Bondi I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s nonprecedential...
Reaffirming that Social Security ALJs Need Not Expressly Recite the “Preponderance of the Evidence” Standard: Commentary on Bigger v. Bisignano (7th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming that Social Security ALJs Need Not Expressly Recite the “Preponderance of the Evidence” Standard: Commentary on Bigger v. Bisignano (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Reaffirming that Social Security ALJs Need Not Expressly Recite the “Preponderance of the Evidence” Standard: Commentary on Bigger v. Bisignano (7th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
Miscalculated Prison Law Library Deadlines Do Not Constitute “Cause” for Habeas Procedural Default: Commentary on Jannke v. Gierach (7th Cir. 2025)

Miscalculated Prison Law Library Deadlines Do Not Constitute “Cause” for Habeas Procedural Default: Commentary on Jannke v. Gierach (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Miscalculated Prison Law Library Deadlines Do Not Constitute “Cause” for Habeas Procedural Default: A Detailed Commentary on Terence L. Jannke v. Michael Gierach, No. 23‑2485 (7th Cir. Nov. 17, 2025)...
Refusal to Participate in Internal Investigation Is Not Protected Activity Absent a Contemporaneous, Good‑Faith Belief of Opposing Discrimination

Refusal to Participate in Internal Investigation Is Not Protected Activity Absent a Contemporaneous, Good‑Faith Belief of Opposing Discrimination

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Refusal to Participate in Internal Investigation Is Not Protected Activity Absent a Contemporaneous, Good‑Faith Belief of Opposing Discrimination Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh...
“Appearance” Requires Readiness to Proceed: Seventh Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reaffirmation on Self-Representation, Speedy Trial Exclusions, and Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Kevin Smith

“Appearance” Requires Readiness to Proceed: Seventh Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reaffirmation on Self-Representation, Speedy Trial Exclusions, and Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Kevin Smith

Date: Nov 16, 2025
“Appearance” Requires Readiness to Proceed: Seventh Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reaffirmation on Self-Representation, Speedy Trial Exclusions, and Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Kevin...
Broad “Relating To” Under § 2251(e) Survives Plain-Error Review: Applying the Enhancement to an Illinois Predicate that Also Protects Adults with Severe Intellectual Disabilities

Broad “Relating To” Under § 2251(e) Survives Plain-Error Review: Applying the Enhancement to an Illinois Predicate that Also Protects Adults with Severe Intellectual Disabilities

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Broad “Relating To” Under § 2251(e) Survives Plain-Error Review: Applying the Enhancement to an Illinois Predicate that Also Protects Adults with Severe Intellectual Disabilities Introduction In...
Seventh Circuit (Nonprecedential) Reaffirms Limits on § 1985(3) Private Conspiracies and Confirms § 1915(e)(2) Screening Applies to Fee-Paying Litigants; No FDCPA or Fraud Liability for Authorized Eviction Filing or Ordinance-Based Notice

Seventh Circuit (Nonprecedential) Reaffirms Limits on § 1985(3) Private Conspiracies and Confirms § 1915(e)(2) Screening Applies to Fee-Paying Litigants; No FDCPA or Fraud Liability for Authorized Eviction Filing or Ordinance-Based Notice

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Seventh Circuit (Nonprecedential) Reaffirms Limits on § 1985(3) Private Conspiracies and Confirms § 1915(e)(2) Screening Applies to Fee-Paying Litigants; No FDCPA or Fraud Liability for Authorized...
De Minimis Detention and the Heck Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal While Sidestepping the Summers Arrest‑Warrant Split

De Minimis Detention and the Heck Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal While Sidestepping the Summers Arrest‑Warrant Split

Date: Nov 11, 2025
De Minimis Detention and the Heck Bar: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal While Sidestepping the Summers Arrest‑Warrant Split Introduction In David E. Jackson, III and Nickole A. Jackson v. Richard...
Inadvertent BOP Release Does Not Extinguish an Undischarged Consecutive Term: Limits of the “Installment Punishment” Rule in McKinney v. Lauritsen (7th Cir. 2025)

Inadvertent BOP Release Does Not Extinguish an Undischarged Consecutive Term: Limits of the “Installment Punishment” Rule in McKinney v. Lauritsen (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Inadvertent BOP Release Does Not Extinguish an Undischarged Consecutive Term: Limits of the “Installment Punishment” Rule in McKinney v. Lauritsen (7th Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of...
Delegating Courtroom Security Decisions Is Error but Harmless Absent Prejudice; Departmental Policies Do Not Define Fourth Amendment Standards

Delegating Courtroom Security Decisions Is Error but Harmless Absent Prejudice; Departmental Policies Do Not Define Fourth Amendment Standards

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Delegating Courtroom Security Decisions Is Error but Harmless Absent Prejudice; Departmental Policies Do Not Define Fourth Amendment Standards Case: Joshua Lee Vinson, Sr. v. Jason DeBruin, et al....
Accrual Ends at the Last Denial: Seventh Circuit Confirms Wisconsin’s Split Limitations Regime and Rejects Continuing‑Violation Tolling for Lingering Pain in § 1983 Medical‑Indifference Claims

Accrual Ends at the Last Denial: Seventh Circuit Confirms Wisconsin’s Split Limitations Regime and Rejects Continuing‑Violation Tolling for Lingering Pain in § 1983 Medical‑Indifference Claims

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Accrual Ends at the Last Denial: Seventh Circuit Confirms Wisconsin’s Split Limitations Regime and Rejects Continuing‑Violation Tolling for Lingering Pain in § 1983 Medical‑Indifference Claims...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert