Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries


        National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition:
        Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court (13.11.2025)

National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition: Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court (13.11.2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
National-Level Sports Participation Cannot Be Invalidated by Lapse of State Association Recognition: Detailed Commentary on Krishnamsetty Praneetha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. High Court, 13...
Tushar @ Nandi @ Anand v. State of M.P.: Strict Scrutiny of Externment under the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 and Unimpaired Writ Jurisdiction

Tushar @ Nandi @ Anand v. State of M.P.: Strict Scrutiny of Externment under the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 and Unimpaired Writ Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Tushar @ Nandi @ Anand v. State of Madhya Pradesh: Strict Scrutiny of Externment under the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 and Unimpaired Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 1. Introduction The...

        Contradictions in Prosecution Testimony Not a "Change in Circumstances" for Successive Bail 
        in Wildlife Offence Cases under Section 483 BNSS, 2023:
        Commentary on Devisingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Contradictions in Prosecution Testimony Not a "Change in Circumstances" for Successive Bail in Wildlife Offence Cases under Section 483 BNSS, 2023: Commentary on Devisingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Contradictions in Prosecution Testimony Not a "Change in Circumstances" for Successive Bail in Wildlife Offence Cases under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 A Detailed Commentary on Devisingh v. State of...
Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India

Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Restricting Rectification under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994: Commentary on M/s Suman Construction v. Union of India, Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench, 14 November 2025) 1. Introduction...
Execution Courts, Arbitral Interest and Partial Deposits: Commentary on Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Mega Electricals (Meghalaya High Court, 14.11.2025)

Execution Courts, Arbitral Interest and Partial Deposits: Commentary on Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Mega Electricals (Meghalaya High Court, 14.11.2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Execution Courts, Arbitral Interest and Partial Deposits: A Commentary on Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. M/s Mega Electricals (Meghalaya High Court, 14 November 2025) 1. Introduction This...
No Vested Right to Succession or Transfer of Fair Price Shop Authorizations under Rule 13 of the Karnataka PDS Control Order

No Vested Right to Succession or Transfer of Fair Price Shop Authorizations under Rule 13 of the Karnataka PDS Control Order

Date: Nov 19, 2025
No Vested Right to Succession or Transfer of Fair Price Shop Authorizations under Rule 13 of the Karnataka PDS Control Order 1. Introduction The decision in Lakshmamma v. State of Karnataka, WP No....
Disabled Child’s Right to Caregiver Presence in Armed Forces Posting Decisions – Commentary on Major Niklesh Kumar Lohani v. Union of India

Disabled Child’s Right to Caregiver Presence in Armed Forces Posting Decisions – Commentary on Major Niklesh Kumar Lohani v. Union of India

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Disabled Child’s Right to Caregiver Presence in Armed Forces Posting Decisions Commentary on Major Niklesh Kumar Lohani v. Union of India, 2025 GAU-AS 15605 (Gauhati High Court) 1. Introduction The...
Reaffirming the Bar on Suo Motu Caste Investigations by the Civil Rights Enforcement Cell: Commentary on Sri T.H. Hosamani v. State of Karnataka

Reaffirming the Bar on Suo Motu Caste Investigations by the Civil Rights Enforcement Cell: Commentary on Sri T.H. Hosamani v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Reaffirming the Bar on Suo Motu Caste Investigations by the Civil Rights Enforcement Cell: Commentary on Sri T.H. Hosamani v. State of Karnataka I. Introduction The decision of the Karnataka High...

        Extension in Service Is Continuation of Service, Not Re‑employment:
        Entitlement to Increment, Primacy of the Personnel Handbook and Article 229 Autonomy
        – Commentary on Prem Chand Verma v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025)

Extension in Service Is Continuation of Service, Not Re‑employment: Entitlement to Increment, Primacy of the Personnel Handbook and Article 229 Autonomy – Commentary on Prem Chand Verma v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Extension in Service Is Continuation of Service, Not Re‑employment: Entitlement to Increment, Primacy of the Personnel Handbook and Article 229 Autonomy A Commentary on Prem Chand Verma v. State of...
Retrospective CAS Promotion after Superannuation: Financial Entitlement without Extended Service or Pension – Commentary on Dr. Satyajit Paul v. State of Assam

Retrospective CAS Promotion after Superannuation: Financial Entitlement without Extended Service or Pension – Commentary on Dr. Satyajit Paul v. State of Assam

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Retrospective CAS Promotion after Superannuation: Financial Entitlement without Extended Service or Pension – Commentary on Dr. Satyajit Paul v. State of Assam I. Introduction The decision of the...
Speculative Apprehension and Multiple FIRs Cannot Defeat Statutory Presumption of Bail for Juveniles: Commentary on Banti Kumar @ Aryan Raj @ Hunter Yadav v. State of Bihar

Speculative Apprehension and Multiple FIRs Cannot Defeat Statutory Presumption of Bail for Juveniles: Commentary on Banti Kumar @ Aryan Raj @ Hunter Yadav v. State of Bihar

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Speculative Apprehension and Multiple FIRs Cannot Defeat Statutory Presumption of Bail for Juveniles under Section 12 JJ Act, 2015 – Commentary on Banti Kumar @ Aryan Raj @ Hunter Yadav v. State of...

    Transferee Liability for Provident Fund Dues in SARFAESI Transfers and Procedural Safeguards in EPF Garnishee Proceedings:
    Commentary on B.T. Kadlag Constructions Pvt Ltd v. EPFO

Transferee Liability for Provident Fund Dues in SARFAESI Transfers and Procedural Safeguards in EPF Garnishee Proceedings: Commentary on B.T. Kadlag Constructions Pvt Ltd v. EPFO

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Transferee Liability for Provident Fund Dues in SARFAESI Transfers and Procedural Safeguards in EPF Garnishee Proceedings: Commentary on B.T. Kadlag Constructions Pvt Ltd v. The Employees Provident...

        Primacy of MSME Facilitation Council Arbitration over GeM Contract Clauses and Limits of Writ Jurisdiction:
        Commentary on LGBRIMH v. Green Alliance (Gauhati High Court, 18 Nov 2025)

Primacy of MSME Facilitation Council Arbitration over GeM Contract Clauses and Limits of Writ Jurisdiction: Commentary on LGBRIMH v. Green Alliance (Gauhati High Court, 18 Nov 2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
MSMED Act Arbitration Overrides GeM Arbitration Clauses and Writ Jurisdiction is Not a Substitute: A Commentary on LGBRIMH v. Green Alliance Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. 1. Introduction 1.1. The...
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in GST Escalation Claims under Public Works Contracts – Commentary on Ojas Construction v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in GST Escalation Claims under Public Works Contracts – Commentary on Ojas Construction v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Limits of Writ Jurisdiction in GST Escalation Claims under Public Works Contracts: A Commentary on Ojas Construction Through Its Partner Rachna Pathak v. State of Madhya Pradesh (MP High Court, 17...
Expansive Powers of Maintenance Tribunals to Protect Abandoned Senior Citizens and Their Property: Commentary on The Bandra Holy Family Hospital Society v. State of Maharashtra

Expansive Powers of Maintenance Tribunals to Protect Abandoned Senior Citizens and Their Property: Commentary on The Bandra Holy Family Hospital Society v. State of Maharashtra

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Expansive Powers of Maintenance Tribunals to Protect Abandoned Senior Citizens and Their Property: Commentary on The Bandra Holy Family Hospital Society and Anr v. State of Maharashtra and Ors I....
No Double Pre‑Deposit for the Same GST Demand: Commentary on Vaneeta Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

No Double Pre‑Deposit for the Same GST Demand: Commentary on Vaneeta Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: Nov 18, 2025
No Double Pre‑Deposit for the Same GST Demand: Commentary on Vaneeta Impex Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors. I. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision in Vaneeta Impex Private Limited v....
Judicial Independence and Transparent Selection for Special Courts: Commentary on Devanand Puttappa Nayak v. State of Karnataka

Judicial Independence and Transparent Selection for Special Courts: Commentary on Devanand Puttappa Nayak v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 18, 2025
Judicial Independence and Transparent Selection for Special Courts: Commentary on Devanand Puttappa Nayak v. State of Karnataka I. Introduction 1. The Case in Context The decision in Devanand...
Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC

Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Anticipatory Bail Is Maintainable for Juveniles: Calcutta High Court (Larger Bench) Harmonizes JJ Act, 2015 with Section 438 CrPC Introduction In Suhana Khatun and Others v. State of West Bengal (CRM...
SEBI Consent Orders Do Not Bar CBI Prosecutions for IPO Rigging: Economic Offences Affecting Retail Investors Are Public Wrongs Not Fit for Quashing

SEBI Consent Orders Do Not Bar CBI Prosecutions for IPO Rigging: Economic Offences Affecting Retail Investors Are Public Wrongs Not Fit for Quashing

Date: Nov 17, 2025
SEBI Consent Orders Do Not Bar CBI Prosecutions for IPO Rigging: Economic Offences Affecting Retail Investors Are Public Wrongs Not Fit for Quashing Introduction In Manojdev Gokulchand Seksaria v....
Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio: Calcutta High Court in Tata Steel Ltd. v. Union of India

Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio: Calcutta High Court in Tata Steel Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Reversal-under-Protest Is Not a Pre-Deposit; IBC Approval Abates CESTAT Appeals and Leaves Tribunal Functus Officio Introduction In a set of writ petitions arising out of tax disputes of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert