Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Specific Teaching, Not Assumptions: Inventive Step, Overlapping Ranges and Structural Features in Trident Limited v. Controller of Patents

Specific Teaching, Not Assumptions: Inventive Step, Overlapping Ranges and Structural Features in Trident Limited v. Controller of Patents

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Specific Teaching, Not Assumptions: Inventive Step, Overlapping Ranges and Structural Features in Trident Limited v. Controller of Patents 1. Introduction The decision of the Delhi High Court in...
Approvers’ Bail, Section 306(4) CrPC and Foreign Nationals’ Right to Speedy Trial: Commentary on Nurul Islam v. State of Rajasthan

Approvers’ Bail, Section 306(4) CrPC and Foreign Nationals’ Right to Speedy Trial: Commentary on Nurul Islam v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Approvers’ Bail, Section 306(4) CrPC and Foreign Nationals’ Right to Speedy Trial: Commentary on Nurul Islam v. State of Rajasthan 1. Introduction The decision of the Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur...
Marriage of a Son as No Bar to Family Pension under Rule 47(6) of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976: Commentary on Neeraj Kewat v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Marriage of a Son as No Bar to Family Pension under Rule 47(6) of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976: Commentary on Neeraj Kewat v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Marriage of a Son as No Bar to Family Pension under Rule 47(6) of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976: A Detailed Commentary on Neeraj Kewat v. The State of Madhya Pradesh I. Introduction...
End‑Use Cannot Curtail Customs Exemptions for Crude Edible‑Grade Oils: Commentary on VVF India Ltd v. Union of India (Gujarat High Court, 21 Nov 2025)

End‑Use Cannot Curtail Customs Exemptions for Crude Edible‑Grade Oils: Commentary on VVF India Ltd v. Union of India (Gujarat High Court, 21 Nov 2025)

Date: Nov 24, 2025
End‑Use Cannot Curtail Customs Exemptions for Crude Edible‑Grade Oils: Commentary on VVF India Ltd v. Union of India, Gujarat High Court (21 November 2025) 1. Introduction The decision of the Gujarat...
Waiver of Statutory Right of Pre‑emption by Conduct: Commentary on Iqbal Singh v. Durga Devi (J&K High Court, 2025)

Waiver of Statutory Right of Pre‑emption by Conduct: Commentary on Iqbal Singh v. Durga Devi (J&K High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Waiver of Statutory Right of Pre‑emption by Conduct: Commentary on Iqbal Singh v. Durga Devi & Ors. (J&K High Court, 21 November 2025) I. Introduction The judgment in CFA No. 19/2001, Iqbal Singh v....
Shared Parenting Not a Default in High-Conflict Custody Disputes: Commentary on Rajanand Choudhary v. Jyoti

Shared Parenting Not a Default in High-Conflict Custody Disputes: Commentary on Rajanand Choudhary v. Jyoti

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Shared Parenting Not a Default in High-Conflict Custody Disputes: Commentary on Rajanand Choudhary v. Jyoti I. Introduction The judgment of the Jharkhand High Court in F.A. No. 06 of 2023 and F.A....

        Circumstantial Evidence and Non‑Reporting to Station Master in Railway Accident Claims:
        Commentary on Dhondu Sakharam Tambe v. Union of India

Circumstantial Evidence and Non‑Reporting to Station Master in Railway Accident Claims: Commentary on Dhondu Sakharam Tambe v. Union of India

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Proving “Untoward Incidents” under the Railways Act through Circumstantial Evidence: A Commentary on Shri Dhondu Sakharam Tambe & Anr. v. Union of India Bombay High Court, First Appeal No. 1668 of...
PIL Maintainable but Judicial Deference to Executive Discretion in Extension of Chief Secretary Under Pending Corruption Prosecution – Commentary on Atul Sharma v. Union Of India (2025 HHC 39293)

PIL Maintainable but Judicial Deference to Executive Discretion in Extension of Chief Secretary Under Pending Corruption Prosecution – Commentary on Atul Sharma v. Union Of India (2025 HHC 39293)

Date: Nov 22, 2025
PIL Maintainable but Judicial Deference to Executive Discretion in Extension of Chief Secretary Under Pending Corruption Prosecution 1. Introduction The judgment in Atul Sharma v. Union Of India &...
Trust Rules vs Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta High Court on Higher Pension for Employees of Exempted Establishments

Trust Rules vs Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta High Court on Higher Pension for Employees of Exempted Establishments

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Trust Rules vs Statutory Pension Rights: Calcutta High Court’s Extension of Higher Pension to Employees of Exempted Establishments 1. Introduction This commentary examines the judgment dated 14...
EM-II Filing Held Directory and Limitation in MSME Arbitrations Tied to First Clear Denial of Payment: Commentary on Controller of Stores, Northern Railway v. CBM Industries Pvt. Ltd.

EM-II Filing Held Directory and Limitation in MSME Arbitrations Tied to First Clear Denial of Payment: Commentary on Controller of Stores, Northern Railway v. CBM Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Nov 21, 2025
EM-II Filing Held Directory and Limitation in MSME Arbitrations Tied to First Clear Denial of Payment: Commentary on Controller of Stores, Northern Railway v. M/s CBM Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. 1....
Judicial Power to Correct Bona Fide Clerical Errors in NEET‑PG Applications: Commentary on
         Ronil Umeshkumar Modi v. State of Gujarat

Judicial Power to Correct Bona Fide Clerical Errors in NEET‑PG Applications: Commentary on Ronil Umeshkumar Modi v. State of Gujarat

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Judicial Power to Correct Bona Fide Clerical Errors in NEET‑PG Applications under Article 226: Commentary on Ronil Umeshkumar Modi v. State of Gujarat 1. Introduction The decision in Ronil Umeshkumar...
Implementing Mayoral Reservation Without Framed Rules: Commentary on Bharat Cheda v. State of Arunachal Pradesh

Implementing Mayoral Reservation Without Framed Rules: Commentary on Bharat Cheda v. State of Arunachal Pradesh

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Implementing Mayoral Reservation Without Framed Rules: Commentary on Bharat Cheda v. State of Arunachal Pradesh 1. Introduction The decision of the Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Permanent Bench) in...
Retrospective Parity in Additional Salary for Vigilance Police Personnel: Commentary on The State of Bihar v. Satya Narayan Ram (Patna High Court, 19 November 2025)

Retrospective Parity in Additional Salary for Vigilance Police Personnel: Commentary on The State of Bihar v. Satya Narayan Ram (Patna High Court, 19 November 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Retrospective Parity in Additional Salary for Vigilance Police Personnel Commentary on The State of Bihar v. Satya Narayan Ram, Patna High Court, LPA No. 485 of 2022 (Judgment dated 19 November 2025)...
Quashing of FIRs in BNS Offences Relating to Online Religious Speech: Commentary on Buddha Prakash Bouddha v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Quashing of FIRs in BNS Offences Relating to Online Religious Speech: Commentary on Buddha Prakash Bouddha v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Quashing of FIRs in BNS Offences Relating to Online Religious Speech: Commentary on Buddha Prakash Bouddha v. State of Madhya Pradesh 1. Introduction 1.1. Case Overview The decision in Buddha Prakash...
Importer’s Right to Refund of Customs Duty When Goods Are Never Received: Ajay Industrial v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Importer’s Right to Refund of Customs Duty When Goods Are Never Received: Ajay Industrial v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Bombay High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Importer’s Right to Refund of Customs Duty When Goods Are Never Received, Irrespective of Inter‑Departmental Disputes or Bill of Entry Closure Case: M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd v. Assistant...
Presumption Under Section 113A Evidence Act Contingent on Proved Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC – Commentary on State of Gujarat v. Rajeshbhai Pitamberbhai Parmar

Presumption Under Section 113A Evidence Act Contingent on Proved Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC – Commentary on State of Gujarat v. Rajeshbhai Pitamberbhai Parmar

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Presumption Under Section 113A Evidence Act Contingent on Proved Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC – Commentary on State of Gujarat v. Rajeshbhai Pitamberbhai Parmar 1. Introduction The Gujarat High...
Autonomous Government-Created Bodies and Pension under KCSRs: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Non-Automatic Pension Entitlement

Autonomous Government-Created Bodies and Pension under KCSRs: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Non-Automatic Pension Entitlement

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Autonomous Government-Created Bodies and Pension under KCSRs: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Non-Automatic Pension Entitlement 1. Introduction The Karnataka High Court’s Division Bench, comprising...
Anticipatory Bail under BNSS, Non-Arrest for Sub-Seven-Year Offences, and Journalistic Activity: Commentary on Rafiq Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Anticipatory Bail under BNSS, Non-Arrest for Sub-Seven-Year Offences, and Journalistic Activity: Commentary on Rafiq Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Anticipatory Bail under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Non-Arrest for Sub-Seven-Year Offences, and Journalistic Activity: A Commentary on Rafiq Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh I....
Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040-DB)

Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040-DB)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Pre‑Charge‑Sheet Provisional Attachment and the Independent Operation of the Second Proviso to Section 5(1) PMLA – Commentary on Gautam Khaitan & Anr v. Union of India & Anr (2025 DHC 10040‑DB) I....
Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): Commentary on Shroff Geeta v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs (Calcutta High Court, 2025)

Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): Commentary on Shroff Geeta v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs (Calcutta High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Destructive Use of Human Embryos as Non‑Patentable Subject Matter under Section 3(b): A Detailed Commentary on Shroff Geeta (OA/10/2019/PT/KOL) v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs Court:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert