Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Rajasthan High Court refers conversion of NBWs to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences to a Larger Bench

No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Rajasthan High Court refers conversion of NBWs to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences to a Larger Bench

Date: Nov 17, 2025
No “Bail-by-Warrant” as of Right: Larger Bench reference on converting arrest warrants to bailable warrants in economic and heinous offences Introduction In Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/o Ram Swroop Sharma...
Preventive detention cannot substitute bail cancellation: Detaining Authority must evaluate efficacy of bail conditions before invoking MPDA

Preventive detention cannot substitute bail cancellation: Detaining Authority must evaluate efficacy of bail conditions before invoking MPDA

Date: Nov 17, 2025
Preventive detention cannot substitute bail cancellation: Detaining Authority must evaluate efficacy of bail conditions before invoking MPDA Case Snapshot Court: Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at...
No-Objection Certificate for Passport cannot be denied solely due to pending departmental or criminal proceedings: Orissa High Court in Dr. Ashok Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha

No-Objection Certificate for Passport cannot be denied solely due to pending departmental or criminal proceedings: Orissa High Court in Dr. Ashok Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha

Date: Nov 17, 2025
No-Objection Certificate for Passport cannot be denied solely due to pending departmental or criminal proceedings: Orissa High Court in Dr. Ashok Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha Court: Orissa High...
Absence of Driving Licence Not Per se Contributory Negligence: Commentary on Madhu Joshi v. Rajesh Kumar @ Sonu (Himachal Pradesh High Court, 2025)

Absence of Driving Licence Not Per se Contributory Negligence: Commentary on Madhu Joshi v. Rajesh Kumar @ Sonu (Himachal Pradesh High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Absence of Driving Licence Not Per se Contributory Negligence: Commentary on Madhu Joshi v. Rajesh Kumar @ Sonu, FAO (MVA) No. 341 of 2015, Himachal Pradesh High Court (14 November 2025) 1....
"Wages Follow the Post, Not the Person": Commentary on Umer Mukhtar Mir v. UT of J&K & Ors.

"Wages Follow the Post, Not the Person": Commentary on Umer Mukhtar Mir v. UT of J&K & Ors.

Date: Nov 15, 2025
"Wages Follow the Post, Not the Person": Commentary on Umer Mukhtar Mir v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors. (Forest Department) 1. Introduction The judgment of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and...
Simultaneous Criminal and Departmental Proceedings in Sexual Misconduct Cases within Uniformed Forces: Commentary on Akhand Prakash Shahi v. Union of India & Anr.

Simultaneous Criminal and Departmental Proceedings in Sexual Misconduct Cases within Uniformed Forces: Commentary on Akhand Prakash Shahi v. Union of India & Anr.

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Simultaneous Criminal and Departmental Proceedings in Sexual Misconduct Cases within Uniformed Forces: Commentary on Akhand Prakash Shahi v. Union of India & Anr., J&K High Court (2025) 1....
Judicial Restraint in Administrative Nomenclature: Limits of Article 226 in Renaming Government Departments

Judicial Restraint in Administrative Nomenclature: Limits of Article 226 in Renaming Government Departments

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Judicial Restraint in Administrative Nomenclature: Limits of Article 226 in Renaming Government Departments 1. Introduction In Muthu Subramaniam v. State Government of Tamil Nadu, W.P. No. 43202 of...
Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Treated as Cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA: Commentary on Smt. Parvati Suryavanshi v. Omprakash Suryavanshi

Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Treated as Cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA: Commentary on Smt. Parvati Suryavanshi v. Omprakash Suryavanshi

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Treated as Cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA: A Commentary on Smt. Parvati Suryavanshi v. Omprakash Suryavanshi, 2025 MPHC-JBP 58433 1. Introduction The decision...
Equal Treatment in Regularization and Seniority of Daily-Rated Employees: Commentary on Shyama Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Equal Treatment in Regularization and Seniority of Daily-Rated Employees: Commentary on Shyama Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Equal Treatment in Regularization and Seniority of Daily-Rated Employees: Commentary on Shyama Verma v. The State of Madhya Pradesh 1. Introduction The decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in...
Zero-Rated Exports vs Deemed Exports under GST: Scope of ITC Refunds and Circular 172/2022 – Commentary on Shah Paperplast Industries Ltd. v. Union of India (Gujarat High Court, 13 November 2025)

Zero-Rated Exports vs Deemed Exports under GST: Scope of ITC Refunds and Circular 172/2022 – Commentary on Shah Paperplast Industries Ltd. v. Union of India (Gujarat High Court, 13 November 2025)

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Zero-Rated Exports vs Deemed Exports under GST: Scope of ITC Refunds and Circular 172/2022 – Commentary on Shah Paperplast Industries Ltd. v. Union of India (Gujarat High Court, 13 November 2025) I....
No “Source of Source” Requirement for Genuine Unsecured Loans Prior to Finance Act 2022 – Commentary on PCIT‑4 Delhi v. KRBL Infrastructure Ltd (2025 DHC 9908‑DB)

No “Source of Source” Requirement for Genuine Unsecured Loans Prior to Finance Act 2022 – Commentary on PCIT‑4 Delhi v. KRBL Infrastructure Ltd (2025 DHC 9908‑DB)

Date: Nov 14, 2025
No “Source of Source” Requirement for Genuine Unsecured Loans Prior to Finance Act 2022 – Commentary on PCIT‑4 Delhi v. KRBL Infrastructure Ltd (2025 DHC 9908‑DB) 1. Introduction The Delhi High...
Second Bail After Supreme Court Cancellation in Dowry Death Cases: Hostile Witness Testimony as Fresh Ground – Commentary on Mukhtar Ahmad v. State of U.P.

Second Bail After Supreme Court Cancellation in Dowry Death Cases: Hostile Witness Testimony as Fresh Ground – Commentary on Mukhtar Ahmad v. State of U.P.

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Second Bail After Supreme Court Cancellation in Dowry Death Cases: Hostile Witness Testimony as Fresh Ground Case: Mukhtar Ahmad v. State of U.P. through Addl. Chief Secretary (Home), Lucknow Court:...
Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A

Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Home Confinement as an Exceptional Interim Substitute to Parole for Incapacitated Elderly Convicts: Delhi High Court charts a humanitarian route pending premature release under Rule 1246A Case:...
Attempt to Murder under BNS §109(1): Injury Severity Not Determinative at the Charge-Framing Stage; “Grave Suspicion” Test under BNSS §250 Reaffirmed — Commentary on Vivek @ Vicky v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 MPHC-IND 32712)

Attempt to Murder under BNS §109(1): Injury Severity Not Determinative at the Charge-Framing Stage; “Grave Suspicion” Test under BNSS §250 Reaffirmed — Commentary on Vivek @ Vicky v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 MPHC-IND 32712)

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Attempt to Murder under BNS §109(1): Injury Severity Not Determinative at the Charge-Framing Stage; “Grave Suspicion” Test under BNSS §250 Reaffirmed Introduction In Vivek @ Vicky v. The State of...
Locus Standi of RTI Activists to Seek Third‑Party Examination Answer Scripts: Commentary on Intak Raju N v. Karnataka Information Commission

Locus Standi of RTI Activists to Seek Third‑Party Examination Answer Scripts: Commentary on Intak Raju N v. Karnataka Information Commission

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Locus Standi of RTI Activists to Seek Third‑Party Examination Answer Scripts: Commentary on Intak Raju N v. Karnataka Information Commission Court: High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru Case: Writ...
Civil Court Jurisdiction in SARFAESI Disputes Involving Third‑Party Purchasers: Commentary on UCO Bank & Anr v. Manjana Verma Sahni

Civil Court Jurisdiction in SARFAESI Disputes Involving Third‑Party Purchasers: Commentary on UCO Bank & Anr v. Manjana Verma Sahni

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Civil Court Jurisdiction in SARFAESI Disputes Involving Third‑Party Purchasers: Commentary on UCO Bank & Anr v. Manjana Verma Sahni & Anr 1. Introduction The judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High...
Relaxed Electronic Evidence Requirements in Matrimonial Cases: Section 14 Family Courts Act vs. Section 65-B Evidence Act in Lumeshwari @ Pinky v. Rajesh Dubey

Relaxed Electronic Evidence Requirements in Matrimonial Cases: Section 14 Family Courts Act vs. Section 65-B Evidence Act in Lumeshwari @ Pinky v. Rajesh Dubey

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Relaxed Electronic Evidence Requirements in Matrimonial Cases: Section 14 Family Courts Act vs. Section 65-B Evidence Act in Lumeshwari @ Pinky v. Rajesh Dubey 1. Introduction The decision of the...
Secondary Evidence Is Not a Tool for Delay: Himachal Pradesh High Court on Strict Compliance with Section 65 of the Evidence Act

Secondary Evidence Is Not a Tool for Delay: Himachal Pradesh High Court on Strict Compliance with Section 65 of the Evidence Act

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Secondary Evidence Is Not a Tool for Delay: Himachal Pradesh High Court on Strict Compliance with Section 65 of the Evidence Act I. Introduction The decision in Vinod Kalia v. Bhagwati Public...

        Revival of Ownership After De‑notification and Personal Succession to Tenancy:
        Commentary on Jwala Devi v. Prabha Bhagra (2025 HHC 37873)

Revival of Ownership After De‑notification and Personal Succession to Tenancy: Commentary on Jwala Devi v. Prabha Bhagra (2025 HHC 37873)

Date: Nov 12, 2025
Revival of Ownership After De‑notification and Personal Succession to Tenancy: Commentary on Smt. Jwala Devi & Ors. v. Smt. Prabha Bhagra & Ors., 2025 HHC 37873 (HP High Court) 1. Introduction 1.1....
Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Pragmatic Condonation Within the 120‑Day Cap: Calcutta High Court Clarifies Discretion and Costs under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Introduction In Central Bank of India & Ors v. Jay Kumar Goyal & Ors (IA...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert