Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” – A Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269)

“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” – A Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Proportionality & Judicial Discretion over Peremptory Cost-Orders” A Detailed Commentary on VI-John Healthcare India LLP v. Dabur India Ltd. (2025 DHC 6269) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s...
“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold

“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“The Marginal-Excess Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Softens the Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act for Quantities Only Slightly Above the Commercial Threshold 1. Introduction In Vinay Sharma v. State Govt....
Doctrine of “Conditional Deference” – Gujarat High Court’s New Framework for Judicial Review of Allowance-Related Policy (Rathod Nareshbhai Mansukhbhai v. State of Gujarat, 2025)

Doctrine of “Conditional Deference” – Gujarat High Court’s New Framework for Judicial Review of Allowance-Related Policy (Rathod Nareshbhai Mansukhbhai v. State of Gujarat, 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Doctrine of “Conditional Deference” – Gujarat High Court’s New Framework for Judicial Review of Allowance-Related Policy Commentary on Rathod Nareshbhai Mansukhbhai & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors....
Delhi High Court Tightens Bail Threshold for High-Value Economic Offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita – A Commentary on Kapil Wadhawan v. CBI (2025)

Delhi High Court Tightens Bail Threshold for High-Value Economic Offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita – A Commentary on Kapil Wadhawan v. CBI (2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Delhi High Court Tightens Bail Threshold for High-Value Economic Offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita – Commentary on Kapil Wadhawan v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2025 DHC...
“Equality Above the Bar” – Patna High Court Validates Trial Courts’ Powers to Cancel Bail and Impose Regulatory Conditions on Advocate-Accused to Secure a Speedy Trial

“Equality Above the Bar” – Patna High Court Validates Trial Courts’ Powers to Cancel Bail and Impose Regulatory Conditions on Advocate-Accused to Secure a Speedy Trial

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Equality Above the Bar” – Patna High Court Validates Trial Courts’ Powers to Cancel Bail and Impose Regulatory Conditions on Advocate-Accused to Secure a Speedy Trial 1. Introduction Case: Amber...
Case-to-Case Cannot Mean Arbitrary: Uniform Consideration for Extension up to 68 and No Superannuation During Pending Writs — Dr. Susheela Rana v. State of HP (2025)

Case-to-Case Cannot Mean Arbitrary: Uniform Consideration for Extension up to 68 and No Superannuation During Pending Writs — Dr. Susheela Rana v. State of HP (2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Case-to-Case Cannot Mean Arbitrary: Uniform Consideration for Extension up to 68 and No Superannuation During Pending Writs — Dr. Susheela Rana v. State of HP (2025) Court: High Court of Himachal...
“Notice-Before-Cancellation” Doctrine for Domicile Certificates: Ravi Kumar Ray v. Union of India & Ors. (2025)

“Notice-Before-Cancellation” Doctrine for Domicile Certificates: Ravi Kumar Ray v. Union of India & Ors. (2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Notice-Before-Cancellation” Doctrine for Domicile Certificates Commentary on Ravi Kumar Ray v. Union of India & Ors. (2025 CHC-AS 1466) 1. Introduction The Calcutta High Court’s decision in Ravi...
Written Complaint as a Jurisdictional Prerequisite, Sexual Nexus for “Hostile Work Environment,” and Natural Justice in PoSH Inquiries: Kerala High Court in XXXXXX v. Abraham Mathai (2025 KER 57427)

Written Complaint as a Jurisdictional Prerequisite, Sexual Nexus for “Hostile Work Environment,” and Natural Justice in PoSH Inquiries: Kerala High Court in XXXXXX v. Abraham Mathai (2025 KER 57427)

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Written Complaint as a Jurisdictional Prerequisite, Sexual Nexus for “Hostile Work Environment,” and Natural Justice in PoSH Inquiries: Kerala High Court in XXXXXX v. Abraham Mathai (2025 KER 57427)...
Candidacy Begins on Nomination: Karnataka High Court Reaffirms that Only Post‑Nomination Acts Can Constitute “Corrupt Practices” under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act

Candidacy Begins on Nomination: Karnataka High Court Reaffirms that Only Post‑Nomination Acts Can Constitute “Corrupt Practices” under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act

Date: Aug 1, 2025
Candidacy Begins on Nomination: Karnataka High Court Reaffirms that Only Post‑Nomination Acts Can Constitute “Corrupt Practices” under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act Introduction...
“Setback Violations are Non-Compoundable” – A Commentary on Mohammad Rafiq Sheikh & Ors. v. Deputy Director Enforcement, SDA & Ors.

“Setback Violations are Non-Compoundable” – A Commentary on Mohammad Rafiq Sheikh & Ors. v. Deputy Director Enforcement, SDA & Ors.

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Setback Violations are Non-Compoundable” Commentary on the Division Bench Judgment of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh in Mohammad Rafiq Sheikh & Ors. v. Deputy Director Enforcement, SDA...
Primacy of Expert Psychological Evaluation in Section 15 Preliminary Assessments – Commentary on Juvenile X v. State of U.P. (2025)

Primacy of Expert Psychological Evaluation in Section 15 Preliminary Assessments – Commentary on Juvenile X v. State of U.P. (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Primacy of Expert Psychological Evaluation in Section 15 Preliminary Assessments – Allahabad High Court’s Landmark Ruling in Juvenile X v. State of U.P. and Others (2025 AHC 121427) 1. Introduction...
Medical-Board Reports Are Not Conclusive: Magistrate’s Power to Proceed in Alleged Criminal Negligence Cases – Commentary on Dr. Ashok Kumar Rai v. State of U.P. (2025)

Medical-Board Reports Are Not Conclusive: Magistrate’s Power to Proceed in Alleged Criminal Negligence Cases – Commentary on Dr. Ashok Kumar Rai v. State of U.P. (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Medical-Board Reports Are Not Conclusive: Magistrate’s Power to Proceed in Alleged Criminal Negligence Cases – Commentary on Dr. Ashok Kumar Rai v. State of U.P. & Anr. (2025 AHC 121211) 1....
Pre-Summoning Evidence Before Notice: Delhi High Court Defines the New Section 223 BNSS Protocol

Pre-Summoning Evidence Before Notice: Delhi High Court Defines the New Section 223 BNSS Protocol

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Pre-Summoning Evidence Before Notice: Delhi High Court Defines the New Section 223 BNSS Protocol 1. Introduction Brand Protectors India Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner / accused) invoked the Delhi High Court’s...
The “Temporal Sanctity” Doctrine: Madras High Court Fixes Outer-Limit for Exhumation Requests

The “Temporal Sanctity” Doctrine: Madras High Court Fixes Outer-Limit for Exhumation Requests

Date: Jul 31, 2025
The “Temporal Sanctity” Doctrine: Madras High Court Fixes Outer-Limit for Exhumation Requests 1. Introduction In The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation v. S. Jaya (W.A. No. 3243 of 2024,...
“The Purvala Doctrine” – Gujarat High Court Affirms Zero-Tolerance for Unauthorized Constructions within 300 m of Protected Monuments

“The Purvala Doctrine” – Gujarat High Court Affirms Zero-Tolerance for Unauthorized Constructions within 300 m of Protected Monuments

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“The Purvala Doctrine” – Gujarat High Court Affirms Zero-Tolerance for Unauthorized Constructions within 300 m of Protected Monuments 1. Introduction Mohmmad Sarifvisad Purvala & Ors. v. Ahmedabad...
“Rigorous Scrutiny, not Routine Extension” – Delhi High Court Clarifies the Standard for Prolonged Pre-Charge Detention under UAPA

“Rigorous Scrutiny, not Routine Extension” – Delhi High Court Clarifies the Standard for Prolonged Pre-Charge Detention under UAPA

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Rigorous Scrutiny, not Routine Extension” – Delhi High Court Clarifies the Standard for Prolonged Pre-Charge Detention under UAPA I. Introduction In Mohd. Rizwan Ashraf v. National Investigation...
Clarifying “Demand-and-Acceptance”: Karnataka High Court narrows Section 7 P.C. Act liability for unwitting intermediaries

Clarifying “Demand-and-Acceptance”: Karnataka High Court narrows Section 7 P.C. Act liability for unwitting intermediaries

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Clarifying “Demand-and-Acceptance”: Karnataka High Court narrows Section 7 P.C. Act liability for unwitting intermediaries 1. Introduction In Murali Krishna R v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka High...
Reversion Without Notice Held an Illegal Major Penalty – Commentary on Birendra Singh Nabiyal v. State of Uttarakhand (2025)

Reversion Without Notice Held an Illegal Major Penalty – Commentary on Birendra Singh Nabiyal v. State of Uttarakhand (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Reversion Without Notice Held an Illegal Major Penalty – Commentary on Birendra Singh Nabiyal v. State of Uttarakhand (2025) 1. Introduction In Birendra Singh Nabiyal and Others v. State of...
“Three Calendar Months” Rule under Section 73(2) of the CGST Act – A Commentary on Tata Play Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer (2025 DHC 6172-DB)

“Three Calendar Months” Rule under Section 73(2) of the CGST Act – A Commentary on Tata Play Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer (2025 DHC 6172-DB)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Three Calendar Months” Rule under Section 73(2) of the CGST Act – A Commentary on Tata Play Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer (2025 DHC 6172-DB) 1. Introduction Tata Play Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer (2025 DHC...
“No Waiver Beyond the Code” — Bombay High Court Declares Notices under S.-280 MZPPS Act & S.-180 MVPA Non-Dispensable

“No Waiver Beyond the Code” — Bombay High Court Declares Notices under S.-280 MZPPS Act & S.-180 MVPA Non-Dispensable

Date: Jul 29, 2025
“No Waiver Beyond the Code” — Bombay High Court Declares Notices under Section 280 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads & Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 and Section 180 of the Maharashtra Village...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert