Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Blood Alcohol Threshold for “Intoxication” under Section 304-AA IPC: Commentary on Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Blood Alcohol Threshold for “Intoxication” under Section 304-AA IPC: Commentary on Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Blood Alcohol Threshold for “Intoxication” under Section 304-AA IPC: Commentary on Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh 1. Introduction The judgment in Dilbag Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh,...
Clarifying Deputation Tenure and Premature Repatriation under DoPT OM 17.06.2010 – Commentary on VUKKEM RAMBABU v. UNION OF INDIA

Clarifying Deputation Tenure and Premature Repatriation under DoPT OM 17.06.2010 – Commentary on VUKKEM RAMBABU v. UNION OF INDIA

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Clarifying Deputation Tenure and Premature Repatriation under DoPT OM 17.06.2010 – Commentary on VUKKEM RAMBABU v. UNION OF INDIA I. Introduction The Calcutta High Court’s judgment in VUKKEM RAMBABU...
When Section 60 Cannot Apply: Patna High Court’s Writ Power to Release Vehicles Not Used in Prohibition Offences

When Section 60 Cannot Apply: Patna High Court’s Writ Power to Release Vehicles Not Used in Prohibition Offences

Date: Nov 11, 2025
When Section 60 Cannot Apply: Patna High Court’s Writ Power to Release Vehicles Not Used in Prohibition Offences I. Introduction The decision in Karnal Kumar v. State of Bihar through the Principal...
Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant — PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (2025 DHC 9755)

Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant — PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (2025 DHC 9755)

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Interference Through Intermediaries and Judicial Influence as Tampering: Delhi High Court Cancels Pre‑Arrest Bail Despite a Valid Initial Grant Case: PJ v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr....
Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Nov 10, 2025
Initial-Interest Confusion Reaffirmed and Disclaimer-Based Interim Relief for Innocent Infringers: Delhi High Court’s Balanced Approach in Mohammad Talha v. Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Introduction This...
Doctrine of Merger, SLP Dismissal, and Scope of Review: Commentary on Zahida Shah & Anr. v. Bilal Ahmad Dar & Ors.

Doctrine of Merger, SLP Dismissal, and Scope of Review: Commentary on Zahida Shah & Anr. v. Bilal Ahmad Dar & Ors.

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Doctrine of Merger, SLP Dismissal, and Scope of High Court Review Jurisdiction A Commentary on Zahida Shah & Anr. and Dr. Sham-su-nisa & Ors. v. Bilal Ahmad Dar & Ors. (Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh...
Disability Reservation Subject to Notified Functional Requirements: Commentary on Sajil Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Disability Reservation Subject to Notified Functional Requirements: Commentary on Sajil Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Disability Reservation Subject to Notified Functional Requirements: A Detailed Commentary on Sajil Kumar v. State of H.P. & Others, CWP No. 4525 of 2023 Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla...

        Judicial Limits on Interference with Disciplinary Penalties for Bigamy in Disciplined Forces:
        Commentary on The Director General, CISF v. Kudipudi Suri Babu (AP High Court, 07.11.2025)

Judicial Limits on Interference with Disciplinary Penalties for Bigamy in Disciplined Forces: Commentary on The Director General, CISF v. Kudipudi Suri Babu (AP High Court, 07.11.2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Judicial Limits on Interference with Disciplinary Penalties for Bigamy in Disciplined Forces: Commentary on The Director General, CISF v. Kudipudi Suri Babu I. Introduction The Division Bench of the...
Ad Hoc Service and the NPS Cut-Off: Commentary on Adnan Wani & Ors. v. High Court of J&K & Ladakh

Ad Hoc Service and the NPS Cut-Off: Commentary on Adnan Wani & Ors. v. High Court of J&K & Ladakh

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Ad Hoc Service Cannot Override the NPS Cut‑Off: A Detailed Commentary on Adnan Wani & Ors. v. High Court of J&K & Ladakh 1. Introduction 1.1. Case Overview This commentary examines the judgment of...
Substantive Posts vs. Session-Based Academic Arrangements: Scope of the “Ad Hoc Cannot Replace Ad Hoc” Doctrine

Substantive Posts vs. Session-Based Academic Arrangements: Scope of the “Ad Hoc Cannot Replace Ad Hoc” Doctrine

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Substantive Posts vs. Session-Based Academic Arrangements: Scope of the “Ad Hoc Cannot Replace Ad Hoc” Doctrine I. Introduction The Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at...

    Accumulation under Section 11(2) as a Matter of Right and the Bar on Reassessment for Mere Change of Opinion:
    Commentary on Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Charity Fund v. ITO (Exemption) 2(3), Mumbai

Accumulation under Section 11(2) as a Matter of Right and the Bar on Reassessment for Mere Change of Opinion: Commentary on Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Charity Fund v. ITO (Exemption) 2(3), Mumbai

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Accumulation under Section 11(2) as a Matter of Right and the Bar on Reassessment for Mere Change of Opinion: Commentary on Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Charity Fund v. Income Tax Officer (Exemption) 2,...
Locus Standi and Bar Council Misconduct Jurisdiction over Advocates Acting as POSH ICC Members: Commentary on Ms. Jayna Kothari v. Manish Kumar

Locus Standi and Bar Council Misconduct Jurisdiction over Advocates Acting as POSH ICC Members: Commentary on Ms. Jayna Kothari v. Manish Kumar

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Locus Standi to Initiate Bar Council Disciplinary Proceedings and the Status of Advocates Serving as POSH ICC Members: A Commentary on Ms. Jayna Kothari v. Manish Kumar, Karnataka High Court (2025)...
False Implication of Insured Vehicles and the Burden on Claimants in Motor Accident Claims: Commentary on Suresh S/o Mahadev Vathar v. Siddarama & Anr. (Karnataka High Court, 06.11.2025)

False Implication of Insured Vehicles and the Burden on Claimants in Motor Accident Claims: Commentary on Suresh S/o Mahadev Vathar v. Siddarama & Anr. (Karnataka High Court, 06.11.2025)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
False Implication of Insured Vehicles and the Burden on Claimants in Motor Accident Claims: Commentary on Suresh S/o Mahadev Vathar v. Siddarama & Anr. (Karnataka High Court, 06 November 2025) 1....
Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International

Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International

Date: Nov 6, 2025
Prior-user protection across allied goods demands category-specific goodwill at the material time: Delhi High Court in Suparshva Swabs v. AGN International Introduction In Suparshva Swabs India v....
No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure

No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure

Date: Nov 6, 2025
No Cognizance Without Credible Material: Delhi High Court’s No‑Notice Threshold for PILs Challenging Bank OTS Deals and Mandatory Source Disclosure Case: Infrastructure Watchdog v. Union of India &...
ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’

ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’

Date: Nov 6, 2025
ED’s Section 5 PMLA Power Is Self-Contained; Allocation Letters Are ‘Property’, and Share-Market Gains from Fraud Are ‘Proceeds of Crime’ Introduction In Directorate of Enforcement v. M/s Prakash...

      “No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty:
      Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent an Explicit Stay

“No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty: Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent an Explicit Stay

Date: Nov 6, 2025
“No Coercive Measures” Is Contextual and Ordinarily Protects Only Personal Liberty: Delhi High Court Clarifies That Investigative Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Is Not Barred Absent...
Technical Contribution without Novel Hardware: Madras High Court’s Section 3(k) Framework for Computer‑Related Inventions in Ab Initio Technology LLC v. Controller of Patents

Technical Contribution without Novel Hardware: Madras High Court’s Section 3(k) Framework for Computer‑Related Inventions in Ab Initio Technology LLC v. Controller of Patents

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Technical Contribution without Novel Hardware: Madras High Court’s Section 3(k) Framework for Computer‑Related Inventions in Ab Initio Technology LLC v. Controller of Patents Citation: 2025 MHC 2579...
Mandatory Age Determination under JJ Act and the Limited Scope of Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar

Mandatory Age Determination under JJ Act and the Limited Scope of Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar

Date: Nov 4, 2025
Mandatory Age Determination under the Juvenile Justice Act and the “Possible View” Test in Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Prosecutions: A Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar, Patna...
Minimum Four‑Hour Threshold for Fixed Pay of Part‑Time Gujarat Government Employees: Commentary on Deputy Director, Animal Husbandry v. State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court, 03.11.2025)

Minimum Four‑Hour Threshold for Fixed Pay of Part‑Time Gujarat Government Employees: Commentary on Deputy Director, Animal Husbandry v. State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court, 03.11.2025)

Date: Nov 4, 2025
Minimum Four‑Hour Threshold for Fixed Pay of Part‑Time Gujarat Government Employees under the 16.07.2019 Circular Case: Deputy Director, Animal Husbandry & Anr. v. State of Gujarat & Anr. Court: High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert