Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

“Delay-and-Age Leniency Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Clarifies ‘Special Reasons’ for Reducing Minimum Sentence under the Prevention of Corruption Act

“Delay-and-Age Leniency Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Clarifies ‘Special Reasons’ for Reducing Minimum Sentence under the Prevention of Corruption Act

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Delay-and-Age Leniency Doctrine” – Delhi High Court Clarifies ‘Special Reasons’ for Reducing Minimum Sentence under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1. Introduction Case: Surendra Kumar v. CBI, 2025...
“Dynamic Statutory Reference” Doctrine: Bombay High Court Clarifies that IPC Offences in PMLA Schedule Automatically Map to Corresponding BNS Provisions

“Dynamic Statutory Reference” Doctrine: Bombay High Court Clarifies that IPC Offences in PMLA Schedule Automatically Map to Corresponding BNS Provisions

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Dynamic Statutory Reference” Doctrine: Bombay High Court Clarifies that IPC Offences in PMLA Schedule Automatically Map to Corresponding BNS Provisions 1. Introduction On 8 July 2025, the Bombay...

“Breach of Undertaking by Advocate-Tenants: Madras High Court Lays Down a
Dual-Sanction Rule (Contempt + Bar-Council Action)” – Commentary on
P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandoss (2025)

“Breach of Undertaking by Advocate-Tenants: Madras High Court Lays Down a Dual-Sanction Rule (Contempt + Bar-Council Action)” – Commentary on P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandoss (2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Breach of Undertaking by Advocate-Tenants: Madras High Court Lays Down a Dual-Sanction Rule (Contempt + Bar-Council Action)” – Commentary on P. Vikash Kumar v. A. Mohandoss (Cont.P.Nos.985 &...
State-wide Enforcement Mandate Against Unauthorized Statue Installation on Public Property – Commentary on Rajesh Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

State-wide Enforcement Mandate Against Unauthorized Statue Installation on Public Property – Commentary on Rajesh Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
State-wide Enforcement Mandate Against Unauthorized Statue Installation on Public Property – Commentary on Rajesh Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 MPHC-IND 16939) 1. Introduction Rajesh Kumar...
Uniform Sentencing Guidelines for Cheque-Dishonour Offences: Karnataka High Court’s Pronouncement in M/s Banavathy & Co. v. Mahaeer Electro Mech (P) Ltd.

Uniform Sentencing Guidelines for Cheque-Dishonour Offences: Karnataka High Court’s Pronouncement in M/s Banavathy & Co. v. Mahaeer Electro Mech (P) Ltd.

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Uniform Sentencing Guidelines for Cheque-Dishonour Offences: Karnataka High Court’s Pronouncement in M/s Banavathy & Company v. Mahaeer Electro Mech (P) Ltd 1. Introduction The Karnataka High Court,...

        The “Specificity & Corporate Distinction” Doctrine:  
        Karnataka High Court on Pleading Requirements and Proper Party
        Identification in Online Defamation Suits – Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. Nayana Krishna

The “Specificity & Corporate Distinction” Doctrine: Karnataka High Court on Pleading Requirements and Proper Party Identification in Online Defamation Suits – Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. Nayana Krishna

Date: Jul 10, 2025
The “Specificity & Corporate Distinction” Doctrine Karnataka High Court on Pleading Requirements and Proper Party Identification in Online Defamation Suits Introduction In Google India Private...
Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Date: Jul 9, 2025
Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of Uttar Pradesh & 3 Ors. (2025 AHC 106762) 1. Introduction...
From Special-Leave to Statutory Right: High Court Affirms that NI-Act Complainants May Appeal Acquittals Directly Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

From Special-Leave to Statutory Right: High Court Affirms that NI-Act Complainants May Appeal Acquittals Directly Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

Date: Jul 8, 2025
From Special-Leave to Statutory Right: High Court Affirms that NI-Act Complainants May Appeal Acquittals Directly Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC 1. Introduction Case: Raj Kumar v. Rajender,...
Commentary – Posthumous Registration of Wills Held Valid & Limits on Inquiry at Interlocutory Stage

Commentary – Posthumous Registration of Wills Held Valid & Limits on Inquiry at Interlocutory Stage

Date: Jul 8, 2025
“Fence but Do Not Pre-Judge” – Karnataka High Court Validates Posthumous Registration of Wills and Restricts Merit Analysis at the Interim-Injunction Stage 1. Introduction In Smt. M.D. Devamma (by...
Beyond the Register: Recognising Pre-Scheme Service and Alternative Proof for Advocate-Clerks’ Welfare Claims – Commentary on A. Chandran v. State of Kerala (2025)

Beyond the Register: Recognising Pre-Scheme Service and Alternative Proof for Advocate-Clerks’ Welfare Claims – Commentary on A. Chandran v. State of Kerala (2025)

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Beyond the Register: Recognising Pre-Scheme Service and Alternative Proof for Advocate-Clerks’ Welfare Claims Comprehensive Commentary on A. Chandran v. State of Kerala (2025 KER 49749) 1....
Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the M.P. Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 – A Commentary on M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P. (2025)

Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the M.P. Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 – A Commentary on M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P. (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the Madhya Pradesh Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 Introduction In M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries...
Expanding Bodily Autonomy: Delhi High Court Allows Termination Beyond 24-Weeks for Minor Rape Victims Despite Medical-Board Dissent

Expanding Bodily Autonomy: Delhi High Court Allows Termination Beyond 24-Weeks for Minor Rape Victims Despite Medical-Board Dissent

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Expanding Bodily Autonomy: Delhi High Court Allows Termination Beyond 24-Weeks for Minor Rape Victims Despite Medical-Board Dissent 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision in Minor A (Through...
“Doctrine of Candour & Locus Standi” Reinforced – Commentary on Gulshan Babbar Advocate v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2025 DHC 5184)

“Doctrine of Candour & Locus Standi” Reinforced – Commentary on Gulshan Babbar Advocate v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2025 DHC 5184)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Doctrine of Candour & Locus Standi” Reinforced – Commentary on Gulshan Babbar Advocate v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2025 DHC 5184) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision dated 2 July...
“Matching Ammunition” and Fair-Trial Estoppel in Defence Tenders: Delhi High Court’s Framework for Rifle Trials and Judicial Restraint

“Matching Ammunition” and Fair-Trial Estoppel in Defence Tenders: Delhi High Court’s Framework for Rifle Trials and Judicial Restraint

Date: Jul 2, 2025
“Matching Ammunition” and Fair-Trial Estoppel in Defence Tenders: A Structured Commentary on Stumpp Schuele Lewis Machine Tools Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors. (2025 DHC 5134) Court: Delhi High...
Capri Global Housing Finance v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) – Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI

Capri Global Housing Finance v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) – Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Capri Global Housing Finance Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (MP High Court, 1 July 2025) Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI 1. Introduction The...
BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases

BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases

Date: Jul 1, 2025
BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases Decision: DR. RANGANATHAN v. DR. LAKSHMANAN, Crl.O.P. No. 17181 of 2025...
Chancellor’s Wide Discretion in Interim Vice-Chancellor “Arrangements” under §10(19) of the Kerala University Act – Age & Qualification Caps Held Inapplicable

Chancellor’s Wide Discretion in Interim Vice-Chancellor “Arrangements” under §10(19) of the Kerala University Act – Age & Qualification Caps Held Inapplicable

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Chancellor’s Wide Discretion in Interim Vice-Chancellor “Arrangements” under §10(19) of the Kerala University Act – Age & Qualification Caps Held Inapplicable 1. Introduction The Kerala High Court’s...
“No Compulsion in Custom” – Karnataka High Court Affirms the Right to Abstain from Traditional Tasks during Communal Festivities

“No Compulsion in Custom” – Karnataka High Court Affirms the Right to Abstain from Traditional Tasks during Communal Festivities

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“No Compulsion in Custom” – Karnataka High Court Affirms the Right to Abstain from Traditional Tasks during Communal Festivities Madiga Dandora v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 201685 of 2025,...
Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity: 
            Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025)

Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity: Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025 CHC-AS 1093) Introduction In Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of...
“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (Hansraj Koley v. Secretary, Labour Department & Ors., 2025)

“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (Hansraj Koley v. Secretary, Labour Department & Ors., 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1. Introduction The Calcutta High Court, in Hansraj Koley v. The Secretary,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert