Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

“Compensation Mandate for State Take-Over of Private Educational Institutions’ Assets” – Commentary on SANATAN DHARAM PRATINIDHI SABHA v. STATE (2025 HHC 19366)

“Compensation Mandate for State Take-Over of Private Educational Institutions’ Assets” – Commentary on SANATAN DHARAM PRATINIDHI SABHA v. STATE (2025 HHC 19366)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Compensation Mandate for State Take-Over of Private Educational Institutions’ Assets” Comprehensive Commentary on SANATAN DHARAM PRATINIDHI SABHA v. STATE (2025 HHC 19366) 1. Introduction The...
Post-FIR Addition of SC/ST Act Charges and the Scope of Anticipatory Bail under the BNSS: Commentary on Sahil Sharma v. State of H.P. (2025 HHC 19540)

Post-FIR Addition of SC/ST Act Charges and the Scope of Anticipatory Bail under the BNSS: Commentary on Sahil Sharma v. State of H.P. (2025 HHC 19540)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Post-FIR Addition of SC/ST Act Charges Does Not Bar Anticipatory Bail when Prima-Facie Ingredients Are Absent – A Detailed Commentary on Sahil Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 19540) 1....
Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed – Comment on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari (MPHC, 2025)

Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed – Comment on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari (MPHC, 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed (Commentary on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari, MP High Court, 16-06-2025) 1. Introduction Court : High Court of Madhya Pradesh,...
“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards

“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards 1. Introduction The judgment of Chagla J. in Board of Control...
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths Commentary on Prema Haththel v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 CGHC 23811-DB) 1. Introduction The Chhattisgarh High Court’s division bench decision in...
“When a Rule Disappears, So Do Pending Proceedings” – Gujarat High Court Holds Omission of Rule 96(10) CGST Rules Applies to All Matters Still Alive

“When a Rule Disappears, So Do Pending Proceedings” – Gujarat High Court Holds Omission of Rule 96(10) CGST Rules Applies to All Matters Still Alive

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“When a Rule Disappears, So Do Pending Proceedings” – Gujarat High Court Holds Omission of Rule 96(10) CGST Rules Applies to All Matters Still Alive 1. Introduction The consolidated decision in...
Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh — The “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine Re-affirmed in Departmental Enquiries

Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh — The “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine Re-affirmed in Departmental Enquiries

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Chhattarpal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025) — Re-affirmation of the “Substantial-Compliance / No-Prejudice” Doctrine in Departmental Enquiries 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the...
Commentary on Jitesh Kumar v. State of Jharkhand (2025) – Elevating Maintenance Standards for Spouses Caring for Children with Autism

Commentary on Jitesh Kumar v. State of Jharkhand (2025) – Elevating Maintenance Standards for Spouses Caring for Children with Autism

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Beyond Subsistence” – The Jharkhand High Court Mandates Progressive, Indexed Maintenance where a Child with Autism is Involved 1. Introduction In Susmita Prasad v. Raju Prasad (F.A. No. 141 of 2023,...
Finality of DVO Valuation and the Boundaries of Section 263 Revision – Commentary on The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ayyappa Roller Flour Mills Ltd. (2025 KER 43849)

Finality of DVO Valuation and the Boundaries of Section 263 Revision – Commentary on The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ayyappa Roller Flour Mills Ltd. (2025 KER 43849)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Finality of DVO Valuation and the Boundaries of Section 263 Revision – Commentary on Principal CIT v. Ayyappa Roller Flour Mills Ltd. (2025 KER 43849) 1. Introduction The Kerala High Court’s judgment...
No Monopoly over Unused Goods within Same Trademark Class – A Commentary on RSPL Health Pvt. Ltd. v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. (2025 DHC 4961-DB)

No Monopoly over Unused Goods within Same Trademark Class – A Commentary on RSPL Health Pvt. Ltd. v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. (2025 DHC 4961-DB)

Date: Jun 17, 2025
No Monopoly over Unused Goods within Same Trademark Class – A Commentary on RSPL Health Pvt. Ltd. v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. (2025 DHC 4961-DB) 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the Delhi...
“Watali Plus” – Delhi High Court Re-affirms the Elevated Bail Threshold post-Charge under UAPA and Rejects House-Arrest as a Surrogate Remedy

“Watali Plus” – Delhi High Court Re-affirms the Elevated Bail Threshold post-Charge under UAPA and Rejects House-Arrest as a Surrogate Remedy

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“Watali Plus” – Delhi High Court Re-affirms the Elevated Bail Threshold post-Charge under UAPA and Rejects House-Arrest as a Surrogate Remedy 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the Delhi High...
“Grounds-of-Arrest Bail Doctrine”: Calcutta High Court Makes Written Communication of Arrest Grounds a Pre-condition for Valid Custody under the NDPS Act

“Grounds-of-Arrest Bail Doctrine”: Calcutta High Court Makes Written Communication of Arrest Grounds a Pre-condition for Valid Custody under the NDPS Act

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“Grounds-of-Arrest Bail Doctrine”: Calcutta High Court Makes Written Communication of Arrest Grounds a Pre-condition for Valid Custody under the NDPS Act Introduction On 11 June 2025, the Calcutta...

        Vikram Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 DHC 4946 — 
        “The Reasoned-Review Mandate”: Delhi High Court re-shapes Sentence Review Board procedure for premature release

Vikram Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 DHC 4946 — “The Reasoned-Review Mandate”: Delhi High Court re-shapes Sentence Review Board procedure for premature release

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“The Reasoned-Review Mandate” – Commentary on Vikram Yadav v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), 2025 DHC 4946 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s judgment dated 11 June 2025 in Vikram Yadav v. State...
“No Caste – No Religion” Certificates: Madras High Court Affirms the Fundamental Right to a Casteless & Religion-Free Identity

“No Caste – No Religion” Certificates: Madras High Court Affirms the Fundamental Right to a Casteless & Religion-Free Identity

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“No Caste – No Religion” Certificates: Madras High Court Affirms the Fundamental Right to a Casteless & Religion-Free Identity 1. Introduction On 10 June 2025, a Division Bench of the Madras High...
“Informed-Consent Clauses & Pre-Society Development Rights” – Commentary on Krishna Constructions v. Subhash Dalvi (Bombay HC, 2025)

“Informed-Consent Clauses & Pre-Society Development Rights” – Commentary on Krishna Constructions v. Subhash Dalvi (Bombay HC, 2025)

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“Informed-Consent Clauses & Pre-Society Development Rights” – Commentary on M/s Krishna Constructions & Ors. v. Subhash Uttam Dalvi & Ors. (Bombay High Court, Appeal From Order No. 744 of 2024,...
Sikkim High Court Recognises Refund of Unutilised ITC on Business Closure – A New Precedent under the CGST Act

Sikkim High Court Recognises Refund of Unutilised ITC on Business Closure – A New Precedent under the CGST Act

Date: Jun 17, 2025
Sikkim High Court Recognises Refund of Unutilised Input Tax Credit upon Business Closure Introduction In SICPA India Private Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (WP(C) No. 54 of 2023, decided on...
“Partnership Estoppel” in Trademark Law: Delhi High Court bars Ex-Partner from Rebranding with Acknowledged Mark – Comment on Newgen IT v. Newgen Software (2025)

“Partnership Estoppel” in Trademark Law: Delhi High Court bars Ex-Partner from Rebranding with Acknowledged Mark – Comment on Newgen IT v. Newgen Software (2025)

Date: Jun 16, 2025
“Partnership Estoppel” in Trademark Law: Delhi High Court bars Ex-Partner from Rebranding with Acknowledged Mark Commentary on NEWGEN IT Technologies Ltd. v. NEWGEN Software Technologies Ltd. (2025...

        “Belated Recovery Demands after Superannuation Are Void unless Pre-adjudicated” 
        – A Commentary on State of Madhya Pradesh v. K.M. Shukla & Anr., 2025 DHC 4958-DB

“Belated Recovery Demands after Superannuation Are Void unless Pre-adjudicated” – A Commentary on State of Madhya Pradesh v. K.M. Shukla & Anr., 2025 DHC 4958-DB

Date: Jun 16, 2025
Belated Recovery Demands after Superannuation Are Void unless Pre-adjudicated – Delhi High Court clarifies Rule 19-C AIS Rules & State Recovery Powers Introduction In State of Madhya Pradesh v. K.M....
Madras High Court Re-affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction over Contractual Unconscionability Claims Despite Competition Act Bar

Madras High Court Re-affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction over Contractual Unconscionability Claims Despite Competition Act Bar

Date: Jun 16, 2025
“In Personam vs. In Rem” – Madras High Court Carves Out a Jurisdictional Safe-Harbour for Contract-Based Challenges to Google Play Billing Terms 1. Introduction On 11 June 2025, the Madras High Court...
Commissioning-Centric “Delivery”: Delhi High Court Redefines the Rejection Clock under Clause 2102 – Comment on Hindustan Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2025 DHC 4927)

Commissioning-Centric “Delivery”: Delhi High Court Redefines the Rejection Clock under Clause 2102 – Comment on Hindustan Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2025 DHC 4927)

Date: Jun 16, 2025
Commissioning-Centric “Delivery”: Delhi High Court Redefines the Rejection Clock under Clause 2102 Commentary on Hindustan Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2025 DHC 4927) 1. Introduction This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert