Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Karnataka High Court on Coercive GST Recovery During Search: Limits of Section 74(5) and Right to Refund of Involuntary DRC‑03 Payments

Karnataka High Court on Coercive GST Recovery During Search: Limits of Section 74(5) and Right to Refund of Involuntary DRC‑03 Payments

Date: Oct 14, 2025
Karnataka High Court on Coercive GST Recovery During Search: Limits of Section 74(5) and Right to Refund of Involuntary DRC‑03 Payments 1. Introduction The judgment in Sri J Ramesh Chand v. Union of...
Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A

Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Accidental Falls Culminating in Run-Over Remain “Untoward Incidents”: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Strict Liability and Evidentiary Primacy of Police Records over DRM Inquiries under Section 124A...
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Six-Year Delay in Written Statement: Counsel’s Lapse Not a Shield; Limited Cross‑Examination Right Preserved Introduction In CM(M) 1961/2025 (with CM APPL. 63525/2025 & 63524/2025), the Delhi High...
Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar Re‑Execution

Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar Re‑Execution

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Dropping an Execution for Want of Particulars Is Impermissible Without First Allowing Rectification: Orissa High Court Reaffirms Order 21 Rule 17 CPC and Clarifies that Technical Disposals Do Not Bar...
No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition

Date: Oct 13, 2025
No Fundamental Right to a Particular Place of Worship: MP High Court Denies Devotee Locus for Mosque Reconstruction After Lawful Acquisition Case: Mohammed Taiyab and Others v. State of Madhya...
Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR

Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR

Date: Oct 13, 2025
Directory, Not Mandatory: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Material-Compliance Standard for Co‑operative Housing Redevelopment Under the 2019 GR Introduction This commentary examines the Bombay High...
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Non est Charge-Sheets under Rule 14(3) CCS(CCA): Delhi High Court Reaffirms B.V. Gopinath, Rejects Res Judicata and Prospective-Only Arguments Case: Union of India through Secretary & Ors. v. Shri S...
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Seizure of Digital Devices by Another Agency Negates Need for Custodial Interrogation in Cyber-Obscenity Cases: Delhi High Court’s Anticipatory Bail Ruling in Ajaz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) Case:...
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Anti‑Profiteering, Not Price Control: Delhi High Court delineates DoE’s limited fee‑regulation power over unaided recognised schools under Sections 17, 18 and 24 of the Delhi School Education Act,...
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Willful Disobedience Threshold in Tax Stay Matters: Briefly Reasoned Reliance on CBDT’s 20% Pre-Deposit Policy Is Not Contempt Introduction In “Court on its own motion v. Anuradha Misra,” 2025 DHC...
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Good‑Faith Shareholder Alerts to Lenders Are Protected; Internal Receipt by Corporate Employees Is Not “Publication” for Defamation: Delhi High Court’s Ritesh Bawri v. State (NCT of Delhi)...
MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture

MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture

Date: Oct 10, 2025
MP High Court clarifies: No automatic forfeiture of gratuity for dismissed bank officers; Payment of Gratuity Act overrides service regulations; conviction required for ‘moral turpitude’ forfeiture...
No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit

No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Equity in Illegality: Bombay High Court Cancels Ineligible ANM/GNM Admissions, Orders Refunds, Rs.1 Lakh Compensation, and Five-Year Compliance Audit Court: Bombay High Court (Civil Appellate...
Strict Application of NDPS Section 37 and Limited Role of Procedural & Delay Grounds in Bail: A Commentary on Man Bahadur Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Strict Application of NDPS Section 37 and Limited Role of Procedural & Delay Grounds in Bail: A Commentary on Man Bahadur Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Strict Application of NDPS Section 37 and the Limited Role of Arrest & Delay Challenges in Bail: Commentary on Man Bahadur Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, 2025 HHC 34145 1. Introduction This...
Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund

Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Rebuttable Notice from Registration and Mixed-Question Limitation: AP High Court Restricts Pre‑Registration Rejection under Order VII Rule 11 and Directs Court‑Fee Refund Introduction In A.S. No. 409...
Earliest Medical Certification Fixes the “Date of Diagnosis” Under Cancer Cover Waiting Periods: LIC of India v. Haripreetha T

Earliest Medical Certification Fixes the “Date of Diagnosis” Under Cancer Cover Waiting Periods: LIC of India v. Haripreetha T

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Earliest Medical Certification Fixes the “Date of Diagnosis” Under Cancer Cover Waiting Periods: LIC of India v. Haripreetha T Court: High Court of Kerala, Division Bench (Ernakulam) Citation: 2025...
Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs

Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Anti-Circumvention of Locus Standi in Unauthorized Construction Writs: Bare Ownership Claims Without Civil Action Do Not Confer Standing; Abuse of Article 226 Invites Exemplary Costs Case: Shri...
Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid Statute/Ordinance; 2007 draft Ordinance held withdrawn

Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid Statute/Ordinance; 2007 draft Ordinance held withdrawn

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Teachers versus “Other Academic Staff” under the IGNOU Act: Division Bench clarifies that 65-year superannuation and teacher-CAS are confined to “teachers” duly created or redesignated by valid...
Ill‑treatment of Step‑Children and Suicide Attempts Constitute Matrimonial Cruelty under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act: Kerala High Court Reaffirms a Uniform Cruelty Standard Across Personal Laws and Recalibrates Maintenance by Husband’s Means

Ill‑treatment of Step‑Children and Suicide Attempts Constitute Matrimonial Cruelty under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act: Kerala High Court Reaffirms a Uniform Cruelty Standard Across Personal Laws and Recalibrates Maintenance by Husband’s Means

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Ill‑treatment of Step‑Children and Suicide Attempts Constitute Matrimonial Cruelty under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act: Kerala High Court Reaffirms a Uniform Cruelty Standard Across Personal...
IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Section 138 NI Act Prosecution of Directors Even When Insolvency Predates Cheque Dishonour

IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Section 138 NI Act Prosecution of Directors Even When Insolvency Predates Cheque Dishonour

Date: Oct 8, 2025
IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Section 138 NI Act Prosecution of Directors Even When Insolvency Predates Cheque Dishonour Introduction This commentary examines the oral judgment delivered by the Bombay...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert