Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

“Any Amount Means Any Amount”: Wyoming Supreme Court Rejects a De Minimis Defense for Methamphetamine Possession under § 35‑7‑1031

“Any Amount Means Any Amount”: Wyoming Supreme Court Rejects a De Minimis Defense for Methamphetamine Possession under § 35‑7‑1031

Date: Sep 2, 2025
“Any Amount Means Any Amount”: Wyoming Supreme Court Rejects a De Minimis Defense for Methamphetamine Possession under § 35‑7‑1031 Case: David Wayne Gober v. The State of Wyoming, 2025 WY 96 (Wyo....
No Oral Hearing Required Under FRAP 46(b)(3) in Reciprocal Discipline; Baseless Judicial-Corruption Accusations Are Unprotected: Commentary on In re Jordan (2d Cir. 2025)

No Oral Hearing Required Under FRAP 46(b)(3) in Reciprocal Discipline; Baseless Judicial-Corruption Accusations Are Unprotected: Commentary on In re Jordan (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No Oral Hearing Required Under FRAP 46(b)(3) in Reciprocal Discipline; Baseless Judicial-Corruption Accusations Are Unprotected: Commentary on In re Jordan (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction This commentary...
No “Front‑End” Sentence Increases to Offset First Step Act Credits or RDAP: The Second Circuit’s Sentencing Blueprint in United States v. James

No “Front‑End” Sentence Increases to Offset First Step Act Credits or RDAP: The Second Circuit’s Sentencing Blueprint in United States v. James

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No “Front‑End” Sentence Increases to Offset First Step Act Credits or RDAP: The Second Circuit’s Sentencing Blueprint in United States v. James Introduction United States v. James is a consequential...
No FDIC, No Federal Forum: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counterclaims Cannot Support Removal and FIRREA’s 90-Day Window Runs Only for the FDIC

No FDIC, No Federal Forum: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counterclaims Cannot Support Removal and FIRREA’s 90-Day Window Runs Only for the FDIC

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No FDIC, No Federal Forum: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Counterclaims Cannot Support Removal and FIRREA’s 90-Day Window Runs Only for the FDIC Introduction In Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v....
No Reset of the Reopening Clock After Withdrawal: IJ’s Decision Is the Final Administrative Order for the 90‑Day Motion-to-Reopen Deadline under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.4

No Reset of the Reopening Clock After Withdrawal: IJ’s Decision Is the Final Administrative Order for the 90‑Day Motion-to-Reopen Deadline under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.4

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No Reset of the Reopening Clock After Withdrawal: IJ’s Decision Is the Final Administrative Order for the 90‑Day Motion-to-Reopen Deadline under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.4 Case: Julio Connor-Molina v. U.S....
Reaffirming Subjective Recklessness and Pleading Specificity in Prisoner Suits: Beaubrun v. Dodge State Prison

Reaffirming Subjective Recklessness and Pleading Specificity in Prisoner Suits: Beaubrun v. Dodge State Prison

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Reaffirming Subjective Recklessness and Pleading Specificity in Prisoner Suits: Beaubrun v. Dodge State Prison Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Non-Argument Calendar,...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds 125% Upward Variance for Illegal Reentry Where Guidelines Understate Recidivism and Public Danger

Eleventh Circuit Upholds 125% Upward Variance for Illegal Reentry Where Guidelines Understate Recidivism and Public Danger

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Upholds 125% Upward Variance for Illegal Reentry Where Guidelines Understate Recidivism and Public Danger Introduction In United States v. Arael Martinez Perez, the U.S. Court of...
No Duty to Disclose Early‑Stage Government Investigations as “Reasonably Possible” Liabilities: Third Circuit Aligns §10(b) with ASC 450 and the Supreme Court’s Half‑Truth Doctrine

No Duty to Disclose Early‑Stage Government Investigations as “Reasonably Possible” Liabilities: Third Circuit Aligns §10(b) with ASC 450 and the Supreme Court’s Half‑Truth Doctrine

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No Duty to Disclose Early‑Stage Government Investigations as “Reasonably Possible” Liabilities: Third Circuit Aligns §10(b) with ASC 450 and the Supreme Court’s Half‑Truth Doctrine Introduction The...
R&R Is Not Final: Fifth Circuit Declares It Plain Error to Curtail Discovery or Grant Summary Judgment Based on a Magistrate’s Report; Pro Se Dismissals Require “Without Prejudice” Absent Leave to Amend — Commentary on James v. Smith (5th Cir. 2025)

R&R Is Not Final: Fifth Circuit Declares It Plain Error to Curtail Discovery or Grant Summary Judgment Based on a Magistrate’s Report; Pro Se Dismissals Require “Without Prejudice” Absent Leave to Amend — Commentary on James v. Smith (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
R&R Is Not Final: Fifth Circuit Declares It Plain Error to Curtail Discovery or Grant Summary Judgment Based on a Magistrate’s Report; Pro Se Dismissals Require “Without Prejudice” Absent Leave to...
Jones v. City of Dallas (5th Cir. 2025): Forfeiture of Appellate Issues, Specific EEOC-Facts Requirement for ADA Retaliation, and the “Nearly Identical” Comparator Rule in Title VII Pay Claims

Jones v. City of Dallas (5th Cir. 2025): Forfeiture of Appellate Issues, Specific EEOC-Facts Requirement for ADA Retaliation, and the “Nearly Identical” Comparator Rule in Title VII Pay Claims

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Jones v. City of Dallas (5th Cir. 2025): Forfeiture of Appellate Issues, Specific EEOC-Facts Requirement for ADA Retaliation, and the “Nearly Identical” Comparator Rule in Title VII Pay Claims Court:...
Delegated Vessel Inspectors Are “Acting Under” the Coast Guard: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Federal Officer Removal for Recognized Organizations

Delegated Vessel Inspectors Are “Acting Under” the Coast Guard: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Federal Officer Removal for Recognized Organizations

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Delegated Vessel Inspectors Are “Acting Under” the Coast Guard: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Federal Officer Removal for Recognized Organizations Introduction In Krell v. American Bureau of Shipping (5th...
“A person of the voter’s choice” is not absolute: Fifth Circuit narrows VRA § 208 preemption and tightens pre‑enforcement standing in challenges to Texas S.B. 1

“A person of the voter’s choice” is not absolute: Fifth Circuit narrows VRA § 208 preemption and tightens pre‑enforcement standing in challenges to Texas S.B. 1

Date: Sep 2, 2025
“A person of the voter’s choice” is not absolute: Fifth Circuit narrows VRA § 208 preemption and tightens pre‑enforcement standing in challenges to Texas S.B. 1 Introduction In La Union del Pueblo...
Burbano Adoption Equals Exhaustion, and Internal Relocation to Family Can Defeat Well‑Founded Fear: Commentary on Perez‑Ordonez v. Bondi (5th Cir. 2025)

Burbano Adoption Equals Exhaustion, and Internal Relocation to Family Can Defeat Well‑Founded Fear: Commentary on Perez‑Ordonez v. Bondi (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Burbano Adoption Equals Exhaustion, and Internal Relocation to Family Can Defeat Well‑Founded Fear: Perez‑Ordonez v. Bondi (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction This commentary examines the Fifth Circuit’s...
No Guesswork Under Rule 1006 and “Why” Matters in Concealment Laundering: The Fifth Circuit’s Multifaceted Ruling in United States v. McGuire

No Guesswork Under Rule 1006 and “Why” Matters in Concealment Laundering: The Fifth Circuit’s Multifaceted Ruling in United States v. McGuire

Date: Sep 2, 2025
No Guesswork Under Rule 1006 and “Why” Matters in Concealment Laundering: The Fifth Circuit’s Multifaceted Ruling in United States v. McGuire Introduction In United States v. McGuire (consolidated...
Rule 1006 Cannot Be Used To “Backfill” Missing Drug Quantities With Averages: Fifth Circuit Polices Summary Charts, Narrows Concealment Laundering, and Applies Harmless Error to CCE Indictments

Rule 1006 Cannot Be Used To “Backfill” Missing Drug Quantities With Averages: Fifth Circuit Polices Summary Charts, Narrows Concealment Laundering, and Applies Harmless Error to CCE Indictments

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Rule 1006 Cannot Be Used To “Backfill” Missing Drug Quantities With Averages: Fifth Circuit Polices Summary Charts, Narrows Concealment Laundering, and Applies Harmless Error to CCE Indictments...
Designation Is for the Judge, Not the Jury, and Combatant Immunity Stops at War Crimes: Commentary on United States v. Wadi (5th Cir. 2025)

Designation Is for the Judge, Not the Jury, and Combatant Immunity Stops at War Crimes: Commentary on United States v. Wadi (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Designation Is for the Judge, Not the Jury, and Combatant Immunity Stops at War Crimes: Commentary on United States v. Wadi (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Wadi, the Fifth Circuit...
“Assumption Is Not Evidence”: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Nexus Requirement for Residential Search Warrants and Limits Good‑Faith Reliance for Portable Firearms Evidence

“Assumption Is Not Evidence”: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Nexus Requirement for Residential Search Warrants and Limits Good‑Faith Reliance for Portable Firearms Evidence

Date: Sep 2, 2025
“Assumption Is Not Evidence”: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Nexus Requirement for Residential Search Warrants and Limits Good‑Faith Reliance for Portable Firearms Evidence Commentary on United States v....
Tenth Circuit Adopts Two‑Step “Genuinely Responsive to Safety” Test and Holds Delay Can Defeat Irreparable Harm in FAAAA/ADA Preemption Disputes

Tenth Circuit Adopts Two‑Step “Genuinely Responsive to Safety” Test and Holds Delay Can Defeat Irreparable Harm in FAAAA/ADA Preemption Disputes

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Tenth Circuit Adopts Two‑Step “Genuinely Responsive to Safety” Test and Holds Delay Can Defeat Irreparable Harm in FAAAA/ADA Preemption Disputes Introduction In Colorado Motor Carriers Association v....
“Groupthink Is Not Actual Malice”: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Threshold for Public-Figure Defamation in Dershowitz v. CNN

“Groupthink Is Not Actual Malice”: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Threshold for Public-Figure Defamation in Dershowitz v. CNN

Date: Sep 2, 2025
“Groupthink Is Not Actual Malice”: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Threshold for Public-Figure Defamation in Dershowitz v. CNN Introduction In Alan M. Dershowitz v. Cable News Network,...
Seventh Circuit Signals Recognition of ADEA Hostile Work Environment Claims, but Affirms for Lack of Age-Based Evidence

Seventh Circuit Signals Recognition of ADEA Hostile Work Environment Claims, but Affirms for Lack of Age-Based Evidence

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Seventh Circuit Signals Recognition of ADEA Hostile Work Environment Claims, but Affirms for Lack of Age-Based Evidence Introduction In Tanya Blumenshine v. Bloomington School District No. 87, the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert